A non-cross post from news:alt.humor.puns

Nemo


"Tim Bruening" wrote in message
...


nemo wrote:

"Tim Bruening" wrote in message
...
2 x 27 days to Christmas.

On the first day of Christmas my true love gave to me -
Ten million pounds . .

So I scarpered!

47 days to Christmas.

Hooray!

Here's an old idea I resurrected last Christmas - a Christmas Pie.

I made a pastry case with a layer of Christmas pudding mix in the bottom - a
simple one - breadcrumbs, veg oil, rye flour, syrup, chopped nuts, vine
fruits, cinnamon and nutmeg - then a layer of marzipan on top of that, then
a layer of cake mix, then after it'd had about 20 minutes in the Microwave a
final layer of marzipan and nice sharp-tasting icing made with lemon juice.

Not much use if you're trying to lose weight, but at Christmas, who is?

So you can add that to the following list!

Jingle bells, jingle bells -
There's the savory.
Nice big bag of Brussels Sprouts
All frozen just for me.

Roasted spuds, parsnips too,
Boy, they'll taste real good.
Mustard, wine and Whiskey too
All followed by the pud.


See it disappear -
See me wolf it down.
Lovely roasted spuds
Nice and golden brown.

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

"nemo" wrote in message
. ..
A non-cross post from news:alt.humor.puns

Nemo


"Tim Bruening" wrote in message
...


nemo wrote:

"Tim Bruening" wrote in
message
...
2 x 27 days to Christmas.

On the first day of Christmas my true love gave to me -
Ten million pounds . .

So I scarpered!

47 days to Christmas.

Hooray!

Here's an old idea I resurrected last Christmas - a Christmas
Pie.

I made a pastry case with a layer of Christmas pudding mix in
the bottom - a
simple one - breadcrumbs, veg oil, rye flour, syrup, chopped
nuts, vine
fruits, cinnamon and nutmeg - then a layer of marzipan on top
of that, then
a layer of cake mix, then after it'd had about 20 minutes in
the Microwave a
final layer of marzipan and nice sharp-tasting icing made with
lemon juice.

Not much use if you're trying to lose weight, but at Christmas,
who is?

So you can add that to the following list!

Jingle bells, jingle bells -
There's the savory.
Nice big bag of Brussels Sprouts
All frozen just for me.

Roasted spuds, parsnips too,
Boy, they'll taste real good.
Mustard, wine and Whiskey too
All followed by the pud.
======================
I wouldn't have thought that pud was vegan, homo. But then,
maybe you're not a gobbler, eh?





See it disappear -
See me wolf it down.
Lovely roasted spuds
Nice and golden brown.

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!
=========================
Still pushing this ly, eh killer?

nemo wrote:
...
Roasted spuds, parsnips too,
Boy, they'll taste real good.
Mustard, wine and Whiskey too
All followed by the pud.

That's way too much information. We don't care to know that your mates
take advantage of you after you get drunk.

...
Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a result of
the farming, transportation, and storage practices associated with
grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e., pesticides). Others
aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during irrigation, burning fields,
predation when croplands are harvested, slicing and dicing during
planting and harvest, etc.).

"Phil Odox" wrote in message
...
usual suspect wrote:
nemo wrote:

cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.
=======================
No, it is not, fool. Animals die by the millions in the
production of veggies. Too bad you're just too stupid and/or
willfully ignorant to know the truth, eh killer?





Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a
result of the farming, transportation, and storage practices
associated with grains. Many of the deaths are intentional
(i.e., pesticides). Others aren't intentional (e.g., flooding
during irrigation, burning fields, predation when croplands
are harvested, slicing and dicing during planting and harvest,
etc.).

That maybe so, but the it doesn't take anything away from
nemo's correct statement; nothing *has* to die to provide
vegetarians with food.
=====================
Yes, they do. That you're too stupid to understnad is obvious,
killer.

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.

No, it's patently false.

Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a result
of the farming, transportation, and storage practices associated with
grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e., pesticides). Others
aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during irrigation, burning fields,
predation when croplands are harvested, slicing and dicing during
planting and harvest, etc.).

That maybe so,

It *is* so, and it's why "nemo" was wrong.

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.

No, it's patently false.

I've grown plenty of vegetables

How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you imbecile?

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!



That is a correct statement.



No, it's patently false.

I've grown plenty of vegetables



How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you imbecile?

How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees,

One more time. How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you ****?

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:14:47 +0000, Phil Odox wrote:

usual suspect wrote:
nemo wrote:

cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.


Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a result of
the farming, transportation, and storage practices associated with
grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e., pesticides). Others
aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during irrigation, burning fields,
predation when croplands are harvested, slicing and dicing during
planting and harvest, etc.).

That maybe so, but the it doesn't take anything away from
nemo's correct statement; nothing *has* to die to provide
vegetarians with food.

well, you mean nothing with a face has to die.

rick and usual suspect are best ignored as whackos. I think
it's mostly a matter of doing relatively less harm, than you would
if you weren't vegan.

I tried to grow some zuchhini over the summer, and the plants all got
killed by bugs, before I got around to buying something to fend them
off. If it's me or them, naturally I will pick me. When you do the
growing yourself, it puts things in a slightly different perspective.

tracy

PS I think cutting out all dairy really is helping me already. wow.

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.

No, it's patently false.

I've grown plenty of vegetables

How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you imbecile?

How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees,

One more time.

How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees

Stop trying to change the subject. It's a very simple question. Answer
it this time. Have you ever grown *wheat* and *rye*, and in sufficient
quantity to make breadcrumbs?

How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*,"

What about them?

Have you grown them commercially or even for your own use?

wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.


Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a result of
the farming, transportation, and storage practices associated with
grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e., pesticides). Others
aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during irrigation, burning fields,
predation when croplands are harvested, slicing and dicing during
planting and harvest, etc.).

That maybe so, but the it doesn't take anything away from
nemo's correct statement; nothing *has* to die to provide
vegetarians with food.

well, you mean nothing with a face has to die.

"Has to die" is meaningless sophistry when you know damn well that
animals DO die in the normal course of commercial-scale agriculture.

rick and usual suspect are best ignored as whackos.

You'd do well to admit that your rhetoric about saving animals doesn't
match reality. You're only giving meaningless platitudes, not making a
difference. Animals DO die for your consumption -- from common
agricultural practices -- even if you don't eat them. There is no
qualitative difference between you and someone who eats meat and wears
leather and fur.

And you could at least learn to spell "wacko."

I think
it's mostly a matter of doing relatively less harm, than you would
if you weren't vegan.

Prove it, Tracy. How many animals die in the course of producing your
meatless diet? It's going to be greater than one unless you grow
everything yourself. How many meals would you get from one dead steer?
Hundreds. You object to a fraction of one rather than to many, and then
you pat yourself gloriously on the back as though you've done something
special. Does a rat's life counts as much as that steer's? How is
killing an entire rat colony "relatively less harm" compared to
slaughtering just one steer?

I tried to grow some zuchhini over the summer, and the plants all got
killed by bugs, before I got around to buying something to fend them
off. If it's me or them, naturally I will pick me. When you do the
growing yourself, it puts things in a slightly different perspective.

IOW, it shows you something about the real world as opposed to the
Utopian delusion so prevalent among vegans.

PS I think cutting out all dairy really is helping me already. wow.

Helping what?

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!

That is a correct statement.

No, it's patently false.

I've grown plenty of vegetables

How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you imbecile?

How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees,

One more time.

How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees

Stop trying to change the subject.

The subject is vegetable production

No, ****, it's WHEAT and RYE. You haven't grown it, and you stubbornly
refuse to admit that commmercially-grown crops are not death-free --
because that prove you're a liar. But that's okay. We know you are.

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!



That is a correct statement.


Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a
result of the farming, transportation, and storage practices
associated with grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e.,
pesticides). Others aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during
irrigation, burning fields, predation when croplands are harvested,
slicing and dicing during planting and harvest, etc.).



That maybe so, but the it doesn't take anything away from
nemo's correct statement; nothing *has* to die to provide
vegetarians with food.



well, you mean nothing with a face has to die.



"Has to die" is meaningless sophistry when you know damn well that
animals DO die in the normal course of commercial-scale agriculture.

They might,

They do die in the NORMAL course of commercial-scale agriculture. Your
sophistry, as noble as you may think it is to prate incessantly about
not harming animals, is specious and meaningless since it's
fantasy-based rather than reality-based. The reality of farming doesn't
match your fantastical notions of what it could be like. Never has been,
never will be. ****.

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!



That is a correct statement.



No, it's patently false.

I've grown plenty of vegetables



How about "Breadcrumbs *wheat* and *rye*," you imbecile?



How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees,



One more time.



How about potatoes, swedes and fruit grown on trees



Stop trying to change the subject.



The subject is vegetable production



No,


Yes,

No, ****, it's WHEAT and RYE. You haven't grown it, and you stubbornly
refuse to admit that commmercially-grown crops are not death-free --
because that prove you're a liar. But that's okay. We know you are.

it's about vegetable production and the simple fact
that vegetarians can eat without having to kill animals.

You have a problem: animals *do* die in the normal course of
commercial-scale agriculture. Your sophistry, as noble as you may think
it is to prate incessantly about not harming animals, is specious and
meaningless since it's fantasy-based rather than reality-based. The
reality of farming doesn't match your fantastical notions of what it
could be like. Never has been, never will be. ****.

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:53:37 +0000, Phil Odox wrote:



, fool.

Your inability to converse in a civil manner is noted,
and you've barely finished your first sentence.



Really Rick, sing a different tune for once. Your severe overuse of
Fool and Killer makes entering a dialogue with you insignificant.

Maybe I don't agree with alot of what Usual S comments about, but his
posts at the very least usually has 'stocky' substance. As for his
attitude I find it darkly entertaining more than offensive much like
the villainous role played of 'Bill the Butcher' in 'Gangs of New
York'.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Phil Odox wrote:
cut

Savory made from nuts
Breadcrumbs wheat and rye.
Tastes as good, nutritious too
And nothing has to die!





That is a correct statement.


Guess again, you prancing poof. Plenty of animals DO die as a
result of the farming, transportation, and storage practices
associated with grains. Many of the deaths are intentional (i.e.,
pesticides). Others aren't intentional (e.g., flooding during
irrigation, burning fields, predation when croplands are
harvested, slicing and dicing during planting and harvest, etc.).





That maybe so, but the it doesn't take anything away from
nemo's correct statement; nothing *has* to die to provide
vegetarians with food.





well, you mean nothing with a face has to die.





"Has to die" is meaningless sophistry when you know damn well that
animals DO die in the normal course of commercial-scale agriculture.

They might,



They do die in the NORMAL course of commercial-scale agriculture.

That may be so,

It is so.

occasionally,

Wrong. NORMALLY. ROUTINELY.

Yoursophistry, as noble as you may think it is to prate incessantly about
not harming animals, is specious and meaningless since it's
fantasy-based rather than reality-based.

I've grown tons of the stuff

Liar, and yet again you've failed to address the fact that
commercially-grown wheat and rye causes harm to animals -- from combines
(squashing, slicing, dicing, etc.), irrigation (drowning), clearing
fields at harvest (predation), burning (farmers often burn fields
following harvest), pesticides (fields, storage facilities), pollution
from equipment (diesel exhaust is toxic), etc. But you have your Utopian
fantasies about "what could be" rather than "what is." Keep avoiding
reality, putz. It wouldn't suit you.