![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"rick etter" wrote in message
thlink.net... "Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message ... "Happy Thoughts" wrote in message ink.net... LizH228 wrote: 1. We would have to clear billions of acres of land, rainforests, national parks, etc., to make room to grow crops. Hmmmm...you'd think that the cattle and other animals currently being raised for their flesh would consume much more of such crops! And that once the land being used to support those animals becomes available for crops, there'd even be a surplus. ===================== Hey fool, there already is a surplus. Plus, cattle need to be fed absolutely no mass produced crops. So there is no need for feedlots, hay crops, feed corn crops? ============================ No, there is no absolute need for cattle to be fed any crops. Is that too hard for your feeble brain? I bow to your expertise in cow food matters, etter. =============== You should, loser. Certainly there is no need for cattle to be fed any crops. ================ Exactly. None at all. There just won't be enough cattle to keep all the Mickey D's going around the world. ====================== Why? You do realize that here they all start out on pasture, don't you? They are all fed grass at the beginning, meaning that there is already the pasture there for them. Beef will become a rare and very expensive delicacy like caviar. ================= Nope. Actually, the grass fed beef I eat is even cheaper than I could buy regular in stores. Too bad your brainwashing precludes you from the truth, eh killer? snippage.... |
|
|||
|
"rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net...
"rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net... "Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message ... "Happy Thoughts" wrote in message ink.net... LizH228 wrote: 1. We would have to clear billions of acres of land, rainforests, national parks, etc., to make room to grow crops. Hmmmm...you'd think that the cattle and other animals currently being raised for their flesh would consume much more of such crops! And that once the land being used to support those animals becomes available for crops, there'd even be a surplus. ===================== Hey fool, there already is a surplus. Plus, cattle need to be fed absolutely no mass produced crops. So there is no need for feedlots, hay crops, feed corn crops? ============================ No, there is no absolute need for cattle to be fed any crops. Is that too hard for your feeble brain? I bow to your expertise in cow food matters, etter. =============== You should, loser. Certainly there is no need for cattle to be fed any crops. ================ Exactly. None at all. There just won't be enough cattle to keep all the Mickey D's going around the world. ====================== Why? You do realize that here they all start out on pasture, don't you? They are all fed grass at the beginning, meaning that there is already the pasture there for them. Beef will become a rare and very expensive delicacy like caviar. ================= Nope. Actually, the grass fed beef I eat is even cheaper than I could buy regular in stores. Too bad your brainwashing precludes you from the truth, eh killer? snippage.... You are one deluded fool, petter. .. |
|
|||
|
"Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net... "rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net... "Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message ... "Happy Thoughts" wrote in message ink.net... LizH228 wrote: 1. We would have to clear billions of acres of land, rainforests, national parks, etc., to make room to grow crops. Hmmmm...you'd think that the cattle and other animals currently being raised for their flesh would consume much more of such crops! And that once the land being used to support those animals becomes available for crops, there'd even be a surplus. ===================== Hey fool, there already is a surplus. Plus, cattle need to be fed absolutely no mass produced crops. So there is no need for feedlots, hay crops, feed corn crops? ============================ No, there is no absolute need for cattle to be fed any crops. Is that too hard for your feeble brain? I bow to your expertise in cow food matters, etter. =============== You should, loser. Certainly there is no need for cattle to be fed any crops. ================ Exactly. None at all. There just won't be enough cattle to keep all the Mickey D's going around the world. ====================== Why? You do realize that here they all start out on pasture, don't you? They are all fed grass at the beginning, meaning that there is already the pasture there for them. Beef will become a rare and very expensive delicacy like caviar. ================= Nope. Actually, the grass fed beef I eat is even cheaper than I could buy regular in stores. Too bad your brainwashing precludes you from the truth, eh killer? snippage.... You are one deluded fool, petter. =================== Complete dodge of the post noted, killer. Why is it you cannot defend veganism, or refute what I say? Too stupid? Too ignorant? Too brainwashed? . |
|
|||
|
*
rick etter wrote: Complete dodge of the post noted, killer.* Why is it you cannot defend veganism, or refute what I say?* Too stupid?* Too ignorant?* Too brainwashed? Language that reflects the intellectual integrity of Mr Etter! "...killer, Too stupid?* Too ignorant?..." Very predictable this guy is! |
|
|||
|
"Field Mouse" wrote in message ... rick etter wrote: Complete dodge of the post noted, killer. Why is it you cannot defend veganism, or refute what I say? Too stupid? Too ignorant? Too brainwashed? Language that reflects the intellectual integrity of Mr Etter! "...killer, Too stupid? Too ignorant?..." Very predictable this guy is! ----------------------- Yes, you are. You have nothing, and never will. |
|
|||
|
*
rick etter wrote: "Field Mouse" wrote in message ... rick etter wrote: Complete dodge of the post noted, killer.* Why is it you cannot defend veganism, or refute what I say?* Too stupid?* Too ignorant?* Too brainwashed? Language that reflects the intellectual integrity of Mr Etter! "...killer, Too stupid?* Too ignorant?..." Very predictable this guy is! ----------------------- Yes, you are.* You have nothing, and never will. I have you by the balls and because I am not a rabbit petter, you are defenseless. Your persistence is mine! * |
|
|||
|
"rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net...
"Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net... "rick etter" wrote in message thlink.net... "Ron" wrote in message om... "rick etter" wrote in message ... "Happy Thoughts" wrote in message ink.net... LizH228 wrote: 1. We would have to clear billions of acres of land, rainforests, national parks, etc., to make room to grow crops. Hmmmm...you'd think that the cattle and other animals currently being raised for their flesh would consume much more of such crops! And that once the land being used to support those animals becomes available for crops, there'd even be a surplus. ===================== Hey fool, there already is a surplus. Plus, cattle need to be fed absolutely no mass produced crops. So there is no need for feedlots, hay crops, feed corn crops? ============================ No, there is no absolute need for cattle to be fed any crops. Is that too hard for your feeble brain? I bow to your expertise in cow food matters, etter. =============== You should, loser. Certainly there is no need for cattle to be fed any crops. ================ Exactly. None at all. There just won't be enough cattle to keep all the Mickey D's going around the world. ====================== Why? You do realize that here they all start out on pasture, don't you? They are all fed grass at the beginning, meaning that there is already the pasture there for them. Beef will become a rare and very expensive delicacy like caviar. ================= Nope. Actually, the grass fed beef I eat is even cheaper than I could buy regular in stores. Too bad your brainwashing precludes you from the truth, eh killer? So,...Mr. cow food expert....exactly how many acres of grassland does it take to raise your grassfed burgers from the time they are born until you slaughter them? Give us the acreage for ONE beef animal that you claim is raised only on grass. snippage.... You are one deluded fool, petter. =================== Complete dodge of the post noted, killer. Why is it you cannot defend veganism, or refute what I say? Too stupid? Too ignorant? Too brainwashed? . |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Karen Winter, the Rush Limbaugh of t.p.a./a.a.e.v. | Bill | Vegan | 133 | 18-11-2003 09:10 PM |