![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Cannibals for Christ wrote:
Is cannibalism just as ethical as any other diet? Depends. Who gets eaten? -- Graham Kennedy Creator and Author, Daystrom Institute Technical Library http://www.ditl.org |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
"Cannibals for Christ" wrote in message
... Is cannibalism just as ethical as any other diet? Not from a 'social contract' point of view I suppose: "You don't try to eat me and I won't kill you to stop you trying to eat me". Alun Harford |
|
|||
|
Is cannibalism just as ethical as any other diet?
Self correcting, like inbreeding. The closer a food animal is to the creature that eats it, epidemologically and histologically, the more care is required to avoid being infected by your food. Habitual cannibalism in several societies that have practiced it have turned up some unique neurological diseases like kuru, which vector from human meat to human cannibal. In a world where cannibalism was socialized, with modern hygiene and cooking technologies, it might be less of an issue. But a society that practices it widely before those tools become available is unlikely to survive as a coherent community long enough to develop them. So again, good negative feedback. |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Steve Knight wrote: On 25 Nov 2003 14:56:49 -0800, (Cannibals for Christ) wrote: Is cannibalism just as ethical as any other diet? Q. What did Dahmer say to Mrs. Bobbit? A. You gonna eat that? Cannibal 1: "I hate my mother-in-law." Cannibal 2: "Then just eat your vegetables." -Steve Makohin | Reply to | (hotmail acct is spam catcher) |
|
|||
|
"Steve Knight" wrote in message ... On 25 Nov 2003 14:56:49 -0800, (Cannibals for Christ) wrote: Is cannibalism just as ethical as any other diet? Q. What did Dahmer say to Mrs. Bobbit? A. You gonna eat that? Q. What would you call a statue of John Wayne Bobbit? A. The Penis De Milo. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:38:56 -0500, Beowulf
posted in alt.atheism: And yet there still are "Stone Age" cannibalistic societies, aren't there? At least there have been up into recorded history. There have been claims by many primitive (neolithic and later) peoples that they heard from a neighboring tribe that someone in that tribe knew someone who had heard that some other tribe was cannibalistic - or some hearsay like that. Actual ritualistic cannibalism is, and always has been, extremely rare. It would seem that the pressure against wouldn't be too strong for it to persist. Unless, the cannabils that were recently discovered hadn't been doing it for too long (like it was the latest fad or something) and hadn't had an oppurtunity to infect themselves out of existence. Cooking, which is the only thing relevant to prion-caused disease, has been around since man discovered fire. Even homo erectus cooked his food. -- "I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be under- stood as anthropomorphic. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism." - 1954 or 1955; quoted in Dukas and Hoffman _Albert Einstein the Human Side_, p. 39 (random sig, produced by SigChanger) rukbat at optonline dot net |
|
|||
|
SPEARS TOPS WEB HATE LIST
Pop star Britney Spears has topped a new survey of Internet hate sites -- beating off stiff competition from Saddam Hussein, Michael Jackson and vegetables. Research into Internet search engine Google.com found that the 22-year-old star has 2,000 websites boasting "I hate Britney Spears" as their motto, with deposed Iraqi leader Hussein having less than half that amount -- 744. Britney's ex-boyfriend Justin Timberlake was found to have 206 hate sites, actress Gwyneth Paltrow has 96, and Jennifer Lopez has 163 -- but the runner-up to Spears was found to be vegetables, which have collected 1120 derogatory sites. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...hive/2003/12/0 3/ddish.DTL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cannibals who ate missionary ready to apologize | Harry Crun | General Cooking | 20 | 14-11-2003 05:47 PM |