"Derek" wrote in message
...

"Dutch" wrote in message
...
"Derek" wrote

Answer the question. Do you think child slavery exists?

Define it.

I don't need to, because we all know what slavery
is,

As usual, you foolishly ASSume that words have singular meanings when in
fact their meanings must be expressly clarified for each situation.

I assume from your answer that by slavery you mean the type of race slavery
that existed in the US in the 1700's and 1800's. Or do you mean underpaid,
underaged workers who have had their futures bartered away by their
families?

but that answer you just gave shows that you
want to pretend it doesn't exist, and this is so you
can continue making the claim that vegans are
responsible for the collateral deaths caused by farmers
while consumers of goods produce by slave labour aren't.
What a hoot!

Consumers ARE responsible for the means of production of their goods. Once
they become aware of the means they become acutely responsible.

"Ipse dixit" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:30:54 GMT, Jonathan Ball
wrote:

Derek wrote:

"Dutch" wrote in message
...

"Derek" wrote


Answer the question. Do you think child slavery exists?

Define it.


I don't need to, because we all know what slavery
is,

Doesn't cut it, you fat ****.

Do you and your friend Dutch dismiss the existence of child slavery?

I dismiss "child slavery", not it's existence, but the weak tu quoque
argument it's being presented as.