I'm looking for some links on nutrition in the past (especially the
Omnivore/Fructivore debate). May be Kellogg as well

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including trolls...)


Hail Eris,
Paul

On Feb 21, 6:23 am, Paul Hilbert wrote:
I'm looking for some links on nutrition in the past (especially the
Omnivore/Fructivore debate). May be Kellogg as well

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including trolls...)

Hail Eris,
Paul

Google Weston Price and read about real science and real nutrition.

TC

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 21, 6:23 am, Paul Hilbert wrote:
I'm looking for some links on nutrition in the past (especially the
Omnivore/Fructivore debate). May be Kellogg as well

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including trolls...)

Did I hear my name taken in vain???

Kellogg and Granose go back quite a way. I do know that. As far as teh Vegan
Society is concerned, I thing they started in teh 30s - I'm not quite sure.
It'll be on their website.

As far as Fruitarians are concerned - I did know just one Fritarian, and he
used to stress it wasn;t a diet for teh faint-hearted. They hed to know a
hell of a lot about nutrition - or die!

I remember my mum telling me that the only concession Vegetarians got from
rationing during WW2 was they got a few peanuts instead of their meat
ration.

Praps bunging appropriate search-strings into Google might come up with the
right info, such as omnivore+vegetarian+vegan+history. That sort of thing.

And BTW - as this is the only group I frequent where I haven't done so
already, may I announce my forthcoming retirement on March 12th. and the
happy state of affairs where my seven years as a Traffic Warrior, sorry,
Warden, 25 or so years ago has earned me a small pension and two lump sums.

The state's Pension Credit has turned out to be fairly generous as well -
and I get free travel on the buses, London Underground and Docklands Light
Railway and a winter fuel subsidy - and apart from all this - the main point
is, knowing a lot about nutrition as I do from being Vegan for 45 years, I
can eat very cheaply indeed, leaving plenty for serious things like a new PC
(or Mac - I *hate* Vista!), building a new railway layout etc., etc. )
Another advantage.

Ohhhh! It's really like being in heaven, to retire in 2007!!

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))

"nemo" wrote in message
k...

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 21, 6:23 am, Paul Hilbert wrote:
I'm looking for some links on nutrition in the past (especially the
Omnivore/Fructivore debate). May be Kellogg as well

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including
trolls...)

Did I hear my name taken in vain???

Kellogg and Granose go back quite a way. I do know that. As far as the Vegan
Society is concerned, I thing they started in the 30s - I'm not quite sure.
It'll be on their website.

As far as Fruitarians are concerned - I did know just one Frutarian, and he
used to stress it wasn't a diet for the faint-hearted. They had to know a
hell of a lot about nutrition - or die!

I remember my mum telling me that the only concession Vegetarians got from
rationing during WW2 was they got a few peanuts instead of their meat
ration.

Praps bunging appropriate search-strings into Google might come up with the
right info, such as omnivore+vegetarian+vegan+history. That sort of thing.

And BTW - as this is the only group I frequent where I haven't done so
already, may I announce my forthcoming retirement on March 12th. and the
happy state of affairs where my seven years as a Traffic Warrior, sorry,
Warden, 25 or so years ago has earned me a small pension and two lump sums.

The state's Pension Credit has turned out to be fairly generous as well -
and I get free travel on the buses, London Underground and Docklands Light
Railway and a winter fuel subsidy - and apart from all this - the main point
is, knowing a lot about nutrition as I do from being Vegan for 45 years, I
can eat very cheaply indeed, leaving plenty for serious things like a new PC
(or Mac - I *hate* Vista!), building a new railway layout etc., etc. )
Another advantage.

And I'll add, being able to go to concerts, opera and ballet (don't laugh!)
again and buy the odd book, bottle of Scotch etc.!

Ohhhh! It's really like being in heaven, to retire in 2007!!

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))))))))))))

dumbo wrote:

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including
trolls...)

Did I hear my name taken in vain???

Your name is vain, liar. You're also the most incompetent timekeeper in
the history of the world.

I've been Vegan for over 30 years...
-- 21 Mar 2002 (http://tinyurl.com/25ulyl)

...over 35 years of being Vegan...
-- 12 May 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/2wtzt2)

You gained five years of veganism in a span of 15 months. Bloody ****ing
amazing!

I went Veggie when I was about 16 and Vegan at about 20. That
was 36 years ago.
-- 10 Jun 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/2qazf9)

When I became veggie in 1962.... 35 years a Vegan...
-- 8 Nov 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/33lj3v)

Then you managed to loae an entire year in a matter of about five
months. Not difficult given your desire to malnourish yourself, not to
mention your propensity to one-up others with your wild testimony.

I've been Vegan for nearly 41 years now...
-- 20 Jun 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/28qfdg)

Then you regained six years of veganism in about three years. Or do you
keep time in dog years, liar?

Been Vegan for around 45 years! ))))))
-- 27 Dec 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/3debw7)

Around! You figured out you were good for four more years of veganism in
just six months. What a ****tard!

...a Vegan of 37 years standing, sitting and lying down...
-- 25 Jul 2005 (http://tinyurl.com/2tkh75)

I've been Vegan for nearly 50 years. When I started eveyone
except
teh few Vegans I knew said I'd die! Actually, I'm still doing very well
on
it. That's no fallacy!
-- 8 Jan 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/2cupsf)

Heh, coming from your lips? That makes it a fallacy. Just look at the
summary timeline, dipshit, and explain how you're honest:

YEAR
of
POST YEARS CLAIMED VEGAN BY "NEMO"
-------------------------------------
2002 30+
2003 35+, 36, 35
2005 37
2006 50, 41, 45
2007 45

Thirty years one year, then fifty ****ing years a couple years later,
followed by forty-five the next. You'd have no virtue if it weren't for
the ersatz stuff you get from your veganism, no matter how long it's
been in real years. L-I-A-R.

Praps bunging appropriate search-strings into Google might come up
with

....more of your wild lies.

And BTW - as this is the only group I frequent where I haven't done so
already, may I announce my forthcoming retirement on March 12th. and
the
happy state of affairs where my seven years as a Traffic Warrior

Hanging up your lollipop? Tired of mischievous seven year-olds getting
the better of you before and after school?

point is, knowing a lot about nutrition as I do from being Vegan for
45
years,

You know nothing about nutrition, consistency (except in your congenital
lying), timekeeping, or truthtelling:

YEAR
of
POST YEARS CLAIMED VEGAN BY "NEMO"
-------------------------------------
2002 30+
2003 35+, 36, 35
2005 37
2006 50, 41, 45
2007 45

I can eat very cheaply indeed, leaving plenty for serious things
like a new PC (or Mac - I *hate* Vista!)

You know even less about Vista than you know about timekeeping and
truthtelling. Nobody will stop you from running DOS, XP, or anything
else -- legally -- on a new PC, moron.

Am Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:52:49 -0800 schrieb tunderbar:

On Feb 21, 6:23 am, Paul Hilbert wrote:
I'm looking for some links on nutrition in the past (especially the
Omnivore/Fructivore debate). May be Kellogg as well

Maybe Nemo's the right one to ask (as I can remember from a past
reading experience), but I may as well ask you all (including trolls...)

Hail Eris,
Paul

Google Weston Price and read about real science and real nutrition.

TC

I do know your W.P. and his "ideas".
Go home dumb****.

Did I hear my name taken in vain???

Kellogg and Granose go back quite a way. I do know that. As far as teh Vegan
Society is concerned, I thing they started in teh 30s - I'm not quite sure.
It'll be on their website.

I remember a thread a longer time ago (also heavily vandalized by
tunderbar) and I thought it was you who had a lot of information
about anthropological tropholoy.

Anyone who is prepared to go to all that trouble over an irrelevance had got
to be nothing but a nutter!

So I'm fallible. So what? Who isn't? I wasn't sure how long I'd been Vegan
until I found my old welcome letter from the Vegan Society dated 1962. Happy
daze.

So well done. You've waded all that way back through my old messages and
achieved - nothing!!!!

Now. Listen very carefully - I shall say this only wirnce: Go and stick your
head up a dead bear's bum!

VIMN!

Happy Nemo!

"Paul Hilbert" wrote in message
news
Did I hear my name taken in vain???

Kellogg and Granose go back quite a way. I do know that. As far as teh
Vegan
Society is concerned, I thing they started in teh 30s - I'm not quite
sure.
It'll be on their website.

I remember a thread a longer time ago (also heavily vandalized by
tunderbar) and I thought it was you who had a lot of information
about anthropological tropholoy.

I've never won a tropholy in my life!

nemo, congenital liar and soon to be retired lollipop lady, wrote:

Anyone who is prepared to go to all that trouble over an irrelevance

It wasn't any trouble, and it isn't an irrelevance. Your credibility is
nil. You're a congenital liar.

So I'm fallible.

You're not merely fallible, you have a serious character flaw: you
fabricate your own experience as "evidence."

So well done. You've waded all that way back through my old messages

It took me less than ten minutes sort out a search using your pseudonym
and keywords like "years."

and achieved - nothing!!!!

I aggregated the different bonafides you've offered for your veganism,
and you yourself thereby establish your own lack of credibility -- even
when claiming "that's no fallacy":
I've been Vegan for over 30 years...
-- 21 Mar 2002 (http://tinyurl.com/25ulyl)

...over 35 years of being Vegan...
-- 12 May 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/2wtzt2)

I went Veggie when I was about 16 and Vegan at about 20. That
was 36 years ago.
-- 10 Jun 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/2qazf9)

When I became veggie in 1962.... 35 years a Vegan...
-- 8 Nov 2003 (http://tinyurl.com/33lj3v)

I've been Vegan for nearly 41 years now...
-- 20 Jun 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/28qfdg)

Been Vegan for around 45 years! ))))))
-- 27 Dec 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/3debw7)

...a Vegan of 37 years standing, sitting and lying down...
-- 25 Jul 2005 (http://tinyurl.com/2tkh75)

I've been Vegan for nearly 50 years. When I started eveyone
except teh few Vegans I knew said I'd die! Actually, I'm still doing
very well on it. That's no fallacy!
-- 8 Jan 2006 (http://tinyurl.com/2cupsf)

SUMMARY...
YEAR
of
POST YEARS CLAIMED VEGAN BY "NEMO"
-------------------------------------
2002 30+
2003 35+, 36, 35
2005 37
2006 50, 41, 45
2007 45

BTW, it would take me even less to go through the posts about your
obesity and health issues. So much for veganism being inherently
healthier, eh.