![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
What can we do to stop aliens from eating us?
How about swearing off from eating meat? There seems to be a common bit of vegetarian propaganda that goes something like “if you eat animals how can you expect intelligent aliens not to eat you?” Let's think about this for a moment. We detect the sin of hypocrisy, which for our species seems to be the ultimate sin. Eating animals and yet asking not to be eaten ourselves on the grounds that we are sentient animals strikes us as in some way a form of hypocrisy. It probably is. So what? Is hypocrisy the ultimate sin recognized by all sentient lifeforms everywhere? If if it then surely acting like hypocrites would make us less attractive dinner table fare, wouldn't it? We would be less likely to eat a “sinful” species that ate dung and its own young than one that just ate grass, hung around in fields and went moo. Acting like hypocrites would make us appear less tasty and nutritious. Acting like hypocrites is probably a good survival strategy. Do we eat “wicked” weasels, hyaenas, snakes and tapeworms in preference to “noble” animals like deer and salmon? Which species do we refuse to eat on moral grounds? Do we avoid eating all peaceful herbivores? Hardly! In fact if we can see any patterns at all here it is that the more animals an animal eats the less likely it is we will want to eat it ourselves. The only carnivorous species that we eat on a regular basis are fish, animals that some people who call themselves vegetarians even try to redefine as some sort of vegetable. I've news for you veggies, haddock are animals that eat other animals, being cold bloodied, small-eyed and ugly doesn't change anything, fish are not vegetables. If you eat fish you cannot be a vegetarian. We prefer to eat peaceful herbivores, we actively give preference to those animals that eat a 100% pure vegetarian diet of grass. Why do we assume that aliens will prefer to eat old, evil, bitter, twisted and hypocritical animals like us rather than the nice innocent tender baa lambs that we like to eat? It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Why don't we eat carnivorous animals? There is no reason why we don't eat carnivorous animals apart from the fact that they are too expensive to farm economically. When dogs are raised to be eaten they are not fed on meat, they are given the cheapest food that will do the job, usually grain, vegetables and kitchen scraps, just like pigs. I read in a newspaper recently (or was it The Sun?) about a man who regularly dines off roadkill. He made no distinction between herbivore or carnivore and enjoyed stoats and weasels quite as much as squirrels and badgers. His finest meal was roast labrador, which apparently tastes just like lamb. The only problem with eating carnivores is you have to avoid their livers, which can contain dangerously high concentrations of vitamin A. The higher an animal (and yes fish are animals) is up the food chain the higher the concentration of poisons such as heavy metals the flesh may contain. Certain chemicals such as DDT and PCBs also build up in bodies and accumulate as you go up the food chain, the most effective way of riding them from the body is to breastfeed... If aliens did have a desire to eat people which people would they want to eat? It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out. Or a fully qualified butcher. The best cuts would come from young people raised on a pure Vegan diet, especially if they could be certified as Organic. Aliens would give preference to young hippie and Goth chicks raised on beansprouts, lentils and tofu not McDonalds and KFC. Card-carrying members of PETA would fetch a premium price. If you really want to avoid being eaten by aliens the best thing you can do to ensure they don't fancy the idea of eating you is to eat meat, ideally the meat and offal of diseased, evil, old, poor and hypocritical aliens. Or failing that, sausages. Being a vegetarian is as effective a remedy against hungry aliens as is being a conscientious objector in the face of hordes of Nazis. What does this aliens eating hypocrites argument remind you of? God? Yes, we seem to be very good at inventing fictional entities which can make the evil ones among us feel bad if only we can get them to swallow a line of bull. Are aliens likely to be able to eat us? There is a fair chance that we will actually be poisonous to aliens, and they could be poisonous to us. Elements that are rare on our planet tend to be poisonous to us, for example heavy metals such as lead, uranium, arsenic, cadmium, mercury and so on. They are poisonous largely because we have not evolved to cope with them. There is a reasonable chance that to aliens we will contain unacceptably high levels of elements that they are not able to cope with even if they find our alien proteins and fats attractive. We may be protected by traces of selenium, copper, chromium or zinc which could be absent from their biological systems and so be poisonous to them. Likewise they may have a biological system that requires an element that we cannot tolerate such as arsenic or lead as a nutrient. Perhaps alien children are told to eat up their vegetables because they contain lots of healthy cadmium (essential for healthy tentacles) while they would look on a Whooper, Big Mac or indeed a McHuman with Cheese as loaded with quite deadly levels of poisonous calcium and zinc and enough sodium to kill the Bugblatter Beast of Traal. -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
"Martin Willett" wrote in message
... What can we do to stop aliens from eating us? How about swearing off from eating meat? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hardly, silly Earthling! We don't want to eat skinny, sickly looking veg*ns when we arrive at your planet (soon). We're craving some nice, juicy, overfed, fast-food indulging, burger-wolfing fat-butt humans after our long intergalactic trip! You know, something we can really sink our alien fangs into..... There seems to be a common bit of vegetarian propaganda that goes something like “if you eat animals how can you expect intelligent aliens not to eat you?” Well well, those vegetarian Earthlings are pretty smart aren't they, despite their spindliness. Maybe their (obviously) oversized brains would be deliciously satisfying, though... -The Famished Alien Let's think about this for a moment. We detect the sin of hypocrisy, which for our species seems to be the ultimate sin. Eating animals and yet asking not to be eaten ourselves on the grounds that we are sentient animals strikes us as in some way a form of hypocrisy. It probably is. So what? Is hypocrisy the ultimate sin recognized by all sentient lifeforms everywhere? If if it then surely acting like hypocrites would make us less attractive dinner table fare, wouldn't it? We would be less likely to eat a “sinful” species that ate dung and its own young than one that just ate grass, hung around in fields and went moo. Acting like hypocrites would make us appear less tasty and nutritious. Acting like hypocrites is probably a good survival strategy. Do we eat “wicked” weasels, hyaenas, snakes and tapeworms in preference to “noble” animals like deer and salmon? Which species do we refuse to eat on moral grounds? Do we avoid eating all peaceful herbivores? Hardly! In fact if we can see any patterns at all here it is that the more animals an animal eats the less likely it is we will want to eat it ourselves. The only carnivorous species that we eat on a regular basis are fish, animals that some people who call themselves vegetarians even try to redefine as some sort of vegetable. I've news for you veggies, haddock are animals that eat other animals, being cold bloodied, small-eyed and ugly doesn't change anything, fish are not vegetables. If you eat fish you cannot be a vegetarian. We prefer to eat peaceful herbivores, we actively give preference to those animals that eat a 100% pure vegetarian diet of grass. Why do we assume that aliens will prefer to eat old, evil, bitter, twisted and hypocritical animals like us rather than the nice innocent tender baa lambs that we like to eat? It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Why don't we eat carnivorous animals? There is no reason why we don't eat carnivorous animals apart from the fact that they are too expensive to farm economically. When dogs are raised to be eaten they are not fed on meat, they are given the cheapest food that will do the job, usually grain, vegetables and kitchen scraps, just like pigs. I read in a newspaper recently (or was it The Sun?) about a man who regularly dines off roadkill. He made no distinction between herbivore or carnivore and enjoyed stoats and weasels quite as much as squirrels and badgers. His finest meal was roast labrador, which apparently tastes just like lamb. The only problem with eating carnivores is you have to avoid their livers, which can contain dangerously high concentrations of vitamin A. The higher an animal (and yes fish are animals) is up the food chain the higher the concentration of poisons such as heavy metals the flesh may contain. Certain chemicals such as DDT and PCBs also build up in bodies and accumulate as you go up the food chain, the most effective way of riding them from the body is to breastfeed... If aliens did have a desire to eat people which people would they want to eat? It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out. Or a fully qualified butcher. The best cuts would come from young people raised on a pure Vegan diet, especially if they could be certified as Organic. Aliens would give preference to young hippie and Goth chicks raised on beansprouts, lentils and tofu not McDonalds and KFC. Card-carrying members of PETA would fetch a premium price. If you really want to avoid being eaten by aliens the best thing you can do to ensure they don't fancy the idea of eating you is to eat meat, ideally the meat and offal of diseased, evil, old, poor and hypocritical aliens. Or failing that, sausages. Being a vegetarian is as effective a remedy against hungry aliens as is being a conscientious objector in the face of hordes of Nazis. What does this aliens eating hypocrites argument remind you of? God? Yes, we seem to be very good at inventing fictional entities which can make the evil ones among us feel bad if only we can get them to swallow a line of bull. Are aliens likely to be able to eat us? There is a fair chance that we will actually be poisonous to aliens, and they could be poisonous to us. Elements that are rare on our planet tend to be poisonous to us, for example heavy metals such as lead, uranium, arsenic, cadmium, mercury and so on. They are poisonous largely because we have not evolved to cope with them. There is a reasonable chance that to aliens we will contain unacceptably high levels of elements that they are not able to cope with even if they find our alien proteins and fats attractive. We may be protected by traces of selenium, copper, chromium or zinc which could be absent from their biological systems and so be poisonous to them. Likewise they may have a biological system that requires an element that we cannot tolerate such as arsenic or lead as a nutrient. Perhaps alien children are told to eat up their vegetables because they contain lots of healthy cadmium (essential for healthy tentacles) while they would look on a Whooper, Big Mac or indeed a McHuman with Cheese as loaded with quite deadly levels of poisonous calcium and zinc and enough sodium to kill the Bugblatter Beast of Traal. -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Try better bait you fat trolling git.
1. Never tell everything at once. Ken Venturi, Ken Venturi's Two Great Rules of Life |
|
|||
|
Michael Rippie wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:46:58 +0000, Martin Willett wrote: What can we do to stop aliens from eating us? Don't go to lunch with them. Lame, even by your low standards Rippie. You are really not winning this battle of wits are you? -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Famished Alien wrote:
"Martin Willett" wrote in message ... What can we do to stop aliens from eating us? How about swearing off from eating meat? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hardly, silly Earthling! We don't want to eat skinny, sickly looking veg*ns when we arrive at your planet (soon). We're craving some nice, juicy, overfed, fast-food indulging, burger-wolfing fat-butt humans after our long intergalactic trip! You know, something we can really sink our alien fangs into..... How likely is it that aliens would be hungry? If they were smart enough to get here don't you think they would be smart enough to take a packed lunch? There seems to be a common bit of vegetarian propaganda that goes something like “if you eat animals how can you expect intelligent aliens not to eat you?” Well well, those vegetarian Earthlings are pretty smart aren't they, despite their spindliness. Maybe their (obviously) oversized brains would be deliciously satisfying, though... -The Famished Alien Why assume that aliens would want to eat anything from the top of the food chain? Do we go and eat eagles and lions? If they were really famished I'm sure a couple of herds of wildebeest in between a couple of bakeries would go down a treat. http://mwillett.org/mind/eat-me.htm -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Martin Willett wrote: What can we do to stop aliens from eating us? How about swearing off from eating meat? There seems to be a common bit of vegetarian propaganda that goes something like "if you eat animals how can you expect intelligent aliens not to eat you?" Let's think about this for a moment. We detect the sin of hypocrisy, which for our species seems to be the ultimate sin. Eating animals and yet asking not to be eaten ourselves on the grounds that we are sentient animals strikes us as in some way a form of hypocrisy. It probably is. So what? Is hypocrisy the ultimate sin recognized by all sentient lifeforms everywhere? If if it then surely acting like hypocrites would make us less attractive dinner table fare, wouldn't it? We would be less likely to eat a "sinful" species that ate dung and its own young than one that just ate grass, hung around in fields and went moo. Acting like hypocrites would make us appear less tasty and nutritious. Acting like hypocrites is probably a good survival strategy. Do we eat "wicked" weasels, hyaenas, snakes and tapeworms in preference to "noble" animals like deer and salmon? Which species do we refuse to eat on moral grounds? Do we avoid eating all peaceful herbivores? Hardly! In fact if we can see any patterns at all here it is that the more animals an animal eats the less likely it is we will want to eat it ourselves. The only carnivorous species that we eat on a regular basis are fish, animals that some people who call themselves vegetarians even try to redefine as some sort of vegetable. I've news for you veggies, haddock are animals that eat other animals, being cold bloodied, small-eyed and ugly doesn't change anything, fish are not vegetables. If you eat fish you cannot be a vegetarian. We prefer to eat peaceful herbivores, we actively give preference to those animals that eat a 100% pure vegetarian diet of grass. Why do we assume that aliens will prefer to eat old, evil, bitter, twisted and hypocritical animals like us rather than the nice innocent tender baa lambs that we like to eat? It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Why don't we eat carnivorous animals? There is no reason why we don't eat carnivorous animals apart from the fact that they are too expensive to farm economically. When dogs are raised to be eaten they are not fed on meat, they are given the cheapest food that will do the job, usually grain, vegetables and kitchen scraps, just like pigs. I read in a newspaper recently (or was it The Sun?) about a man who regularly dines off roadkill. He made no distinction between herbivore or carnivore and enjoyed stoats and weasels quite as much as squirrels and badgers. His finest meal was roast labrador, which apparently tastes just like lamb. The only problem with eating carnivores is you have to avoid their livers, which can contain dangerously high concentrations of vitamin A. The higher an animal (and yes fish are animals) is up the food chain the higher the concentration of poisons such as heavy metals the flesh may contain. Certain chemicals such as DDT and PCBs also build up in bodies and accumulate as you go up the food chain, the most effective way of riding them from the body is to breastfeed... If aliens did have a desire to eat people which people would they want to eat? It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out. Or a fully qualified butcher. The best cuts would come from young people raised on a pure Vegan diet, especially if they could be certified as Organic. Aliens would give preference to young hippie and Goth chicks raised on beansprouts, lentils and tofu not McDonalds and KFC. Card-carrying members of PETA would fetch a premium price. If you really want to avoid being eaten by aliens the best thing you can do to ensure they don't fancy the idea of eating you is to eat meat, ideally the meat and offal of diseased, evil, old, poor and hypocritical aliens. Or failing that, sausages. Being a vegetarian is as effective a remedy against hungry aliens as is being a conscientious objector in the face of hordes of Nazis. What does this aliens eating hypocrites argument remind you of? God? Yes, we seem to be very good at inventing fictional entities which can make the evil ones among us feel bad if only we can get them to swallow a line of bull. Are aliens likely to be able to eat us? There is a fair chance that we will actually be poisonous to aliens, and they could be poisonous to us. Elements that are rare on our planet tend to be poisonous to us, for example heavy metals such as lead, uranium, arsenic, cadmium, mercury and so on. They are poisonous largely because we have not evolved to cope with them. There is a reasonable chance that to aliens we will contain unacceptably high levels of elements that they are not able to cope with even if they find our alien proteins and fats attractive. We may be protected by traces of selenium, copper, chromium or zinc which could be absent from their biological systems and so be poisonous to them. Likewise they may have a biological system that requires an element that we cannot tolerate such as arsenic or lead as a nutrient. Perhaps alien children are told to eat up their vegetables because they contain lots of healthy cadmium (essential for healthy tentacles) while they would look on a Whooper, Big Mac or indeed a McHuman with Cheese as loaded with quite deadly levels of poisonous calcium and zinc and enough sodium to kill the Bugblatter Beast of Traal. -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ We don't even have to go into the realm of the absurd aliens to investigate this concept. India is known for famous man-eating lions and tigers. Alligators in Florida. Crocodiles in South East Asia, Africa and Australia. Dingos in Australia and hyenas in Africa. Buzzards and vultures throuhout the world are known for eating dead human carcasses. Then there are bugs, worms, rats, bacteria, etc that feeds on humans alive and dead. And like humans eating other animals, there is no ethical or moral component involved. It is what it is, survival and thriving in ones environment. TC |
|
|||
|
wrote:
Martin Willett wrote: snip -- Martin (fatty) Willett http://mfattywillett.org/ We don't even have to go into the realm of the absurd aliens to investigate this concept. True. India is known for famous man-eating lions and tigers. Alligators in Florida. Crocodiles in South East Asia, Africa and Australia. Dingos in Australia and hyenas in Africa. Buzzards and vultures throuhout the world are known for eating dead human carcasses. Then there are bugs, worms, rats, bacteria, etc that feeds on humans alive and dead. And like humans eating other animals, there is no ethical or moral component involved. It is what it is, survival and thriving in ones environment. TC Most humans do have the ability to analyse and examine their values, and theories of conduct in order to see if a particular behavior is right or wrong. - This can clearly be applied to the human meat eating behavior, and therefore denial of a moral or ethical component to human meat consumption is fallacious. I guess it's your method of avoiding a discussion of your morals. - Perhaps in case it exposes your weaknesses. |
|
|||
|
Does being fat mean a person is not entitled to be treated as a human
being with a right to opinions? Is there another group of people you feel free to gratuitously insult? Would you consider it humorous to add "darkie" or "gay boy" to somebody's name? -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Martin Willett wrote:
Does being fat mean a person is not entitled to be treated as a human being with a right to opinions? Is there another group of people you feel free to gratuitously insult? Would you consider it humorous to add "darkie" or "gay boy" to somebody's name? Just playing you at your own game fatty. -- Martin fatty Willett http://mfattywillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Jean Clingfilm wrote:
Martin Willett wrote: Does being fat mean a person is not entitled to be treated as a human being with a right to opinions? Is there another group of people you feel free to gratuitously insult? Would you consider it humorous to add "darkie" or "gay boy" to somebody's name? Just playing you at your own game fatty. What do you mean by that? Have I gratuitously insulted you? -- Martin Willett http://mwillett.org/ |
|
|||
|
Jean Clingfilm wrote: wrote: Martin Willett wrote: snip -- Martin (fatty) Willett http://mfattywillett.org/ We don't even have to go into the realm of the absurd aliens to investigate this concept. True. India is known for famous man-eating lions and tigers. Alligators in Florida. Crocodiles in South East Asia, Africa and Australia. Dingos in Australia and hyenas in Africa. Buzzards and vultures throuhout the world are known for eating dead human carcasses. Then there are bugs, worms, rats, bacteria, etc that feeds on humans alive and dead. And like humans eating other animals, there is no ethical or moral component involved. It is what it is, survival and thriving in ones environment. TC Most humans do have the ability to analyse and examine their values, and theories of conduct in order to see if a particular behavior is right or wrong. - This can clearly be applied to the human meat eating behavior, and therefore denial of a moral or ethical component to human meat consumption is fallacious. I guess it's your method of avoiding a discussion of your morals. - Perhaps in case it exposes your weaknesses. Nonsense. There is no denial of a moral or ethical component to my eating meat. It is who we are and what we do, which is perfectly in line with other mammalian survival behavior. And that precludes anyones, ie. you and the animal rights extremists, attempt to apply these misdirected concepts of morality and ethics to the question. The denial is in those who refuse to accept the reality that we live in, which is that humans are primarily carnivorous omnivores. We eat other animals. That is who we are and what we do. We do not do it with malicious intent. Nor do we do it with immoral or unethical intent. And the vast majority of us meat eaters are as concerned as you that the animals we eat be as healthy and well raised as possible. And we object to producers who abuse animals anywhere in the process of raising them. We care about the welfare of animals. We just care in a much more reasonable and realistic fashion. Our morals or ethics are not compromised by harvesting and eating meat. Any more than are those of other animals who do the same. But they are compromised when we lie to people and tell them that an unhealthy diet (veganism) is healthy in order to convince them to eat that unhealthy diet in the name of animal rights and a severely skewed sense of moral outrage. TC |
|
|||
|
"Jean Clingfilm" wrote
Most humans do have the ability to analyse and examine their values, and theories of conduct in order to see if a particular behavior is right or wrong. Most humans have this ability, but not all know how to apply it. It has been a human tribal trait for thousands of years to place moral significance on some ritual or belief and then lay negative attributes on others who do not share the ritual or belief. The history of the middle-ages gives bloody testament, it was called The Inquisition. - This can clearly be applied to the human meat eating behavior, Yes it can, the analytical method can be applied, and the syndrome I described also can. and therefore denial of a moral or ethical component to human meat consumption is fallacious. It's not fallacious to deny there is a moral or ethical component to anything. I guess it's your method of avoiding a discussion of your morals. - Perhaps in case it exposes your weaknesses. Perhaps inferring moral weakness in others is something from which you derive a feeling of satisfaction. Perhaps you would be willing to explain how eating meat, which is lifeless, can possibly have a moral component. Perhaps you mean *killing* an animal (in order to eat it's meat) is what has a moral component. If so, why do you not equally attack all forms of agriculture and other processes which involve the systematic killing of animals? Why would you single out only that killing which results in humans obtaining meat? To say it another way, why is it wrong to kill a cow for food, but not wrong to kill the mice which threaten the food supply? The mother of compassion has fostered a stillborn child. |
|
|||
|
"Martin Willett" wrote in message
... Famished Alien wrote: "Martin Willett" wrote in message ... What can we do to stop aliens from eating us? How about swearing off from eating meat? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hardly, silly Earthling! We don't want to eat skinny, sickly looking veg*ns when we arrive at your planet (soon). We're craving some nice, juicy, overfed, fast-food indulging, burger-wolfing fat-butt humans after our long intergalactic trip! You know, something we can really sink our alien fangs into..... How likely is it that aliens would be hungry? If they were smart enough to get here don't you think they would be smart enough to take a packed lunch? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Of course we're that smart, goofy Earthling! We have been consuming our (boring) "packed lunches" on our journey to your planet, but now that we're nearly there we have stopped eating them to let our appetites build up in anticipation of our upcoming Earthling feasts, so we can really enjoy them! So yeah, we're really craving some nice, fresh, juicy, overfed burger-wolfing fat-butt humans to chow down on right about now... Yum! So do you eat lots of burgers, Earthling Martin? (My numerous mouths are watering in anticipation, and my fangs are all well sharpened...) There seems to be a common bit of vegetarian propaganda that goes something like “if you eat animals how can you expect intelligent aliens not to eat you?” Well well, those vegetarian Earthlings are pretty smart aren't they, despite their spindliness. Maybe their (obviously) oversized brains would be deliciously satisfying, though... Why assume that aliens would want to eat anything from the top of the food chain? Do we go and eat eagles and lions? Some of you Earthlings eat meat fed "KittyBeef"! See here how delicious looking: http://www.kittybeef.com/history.php So we prefer "HumanBeef". You got a problem with that, Earthling? If they were really famished I'm sure a couple of herds of wildebeest in between a couple of bakeries would go down a treat. You can't escape your (inevitable) fate that easily, Earthling. We'll use those for appetizers, before the main course of nice, fat, freshly caught burger-fed human. We expect that your species will quickly become a widely appreciated delicacy after we get the word out. Many aliens will soon be stopping by your planet regularly when passing through your corner of the galaxy, to lunch and munch on juicy, delicious, burger-fed humans. There are many, many of you freely available on your planet, enough for countless alien feasts for a good long time to come, and we won't let any of you go to waste, for sure. I'm sure you'll find it all very.... exciting! -The Famished Alien |
|
|||
|
wrote:
Jean Clingfilm wrote: wrote: Martin Willett wrote: snip -- Martin (fatty) Willett http://mfattywillett.org/ We don't even have to go into the realm of the absurd aliens to investigate this concept. True. India is known for famous man-eating lions and tigers. Alligators in Florida. Crocodiles in South East Asia, Africa and Australia. Dingos in Australia and hyenas in Africa. Buzzards and vultures throuhout the world are known for eating dead human carcasses. Then there are bugs, worms, rats, bacteria, etc that feeds on humans alive and dead. And like humans eating other animals, there is no ethical or moral component involved. It is what it is, survival and thriving in ones environment. TC Most humans do have the ability to analyse and examine their values, and theories of conduct in order to see if a particular behavior is right or wrong. - This can clearly be applied to the human meat eating behavior, and therefore denial of a moral or ethical component to human meat consumption is fallacious. I guess it's your method of avoiding a discussion of your morals. - Perhaps in case it exposes your weaknesses. Nonsense. There is no denial of a moral or ethical component to my eating meat. Please explain why you wrote "And like humans eating other animals, *there is no ethical or moral component* involved" and now you write "There is no denial of a moral or ethical component". It is who we are and what we do, which is perfectly in line with other mammalian survival behavior. Do you have to eat meat to survive? And that precludes anyones, ie. you and the animal rights extremists, attempt to apply these misdirected concepts of morality and ethics to the question. Why have you grouped me with "animal rights extremists"? The denial is in those who refuse to accept the reality that we live in, which is that humans are primarily carnivorous omnivores. We eat other animals. That is who we are and what we do. We do not do it with malicious intent. Nor do we do it with immoral or unethical intent. It is ethical to you. (If you believe there is an ethical or moral component). And the vast majority of us meat eaters are as concerned as you that the animals we eat be as healthy and well raised as possible. I'd like to see the evidence for that assertion. I would hazard a guess that most people buy meat based on price, availability and aesthetics. And we object to producers who abuse animals anywhere in the process of raising them. We care about the welfare of animals. We just care in a much more reasonable and realistic fashion. This sounds like an ethical or moral component. Our morals or ethics are not compromised by harvesting and eating meat. Any more than are those of other animals who do the same. I'm sure you have a choice of what to eat, animals do not. But they are compromised when we lie to people and tell them that an unhealthy diet (veganism) is healthy in order to convince them to eat that unhealthy diet in the name of animal rights and a severely skewed sense of moral outrage. Any 'type' of diet can be unhealthy. There are many other reasons to adopt a vegetarian or vegan diet than 'animal rights'. Who's lying? Why is a diet without meat unhealthy? What is and who has a "severely skewed sense of moral outrage"? TC |