![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi.
It may seem like I'm a bit sensitive to caffeine, so for a while I thought I'd try some decaff tea. Unless there is some recommendable commercial tea around, I guess I'll stick to the home-production water method. Are there any teas/sorts of tea that are better for this procedure than others, preferably green? (And just to make su the right procedure is 1) pour water 2) stir for 5 seconds 3)pour the water out and 4)fill with new water and let it steep the noramal time.) thanks in advance. ole k |
|
|||
|
Ole Kvaal wrote:
It may seem like I'm a bit sensitive to caffeine, so for a while I thought I'd try some decaff tea. Unless there is some recommendable commercial tea around, I guess I'll stick to the home-production water method. Are there any teas/sorts of tea that are better for this procedure than others, preferably green? (And just to make su the right procedure is 1) pour water 2) stir for 5 seconds 3)pour the water out and 4)fill with new water and let it steep the noramal time.) I don't think there are any types of tea that decaffeinate better than others. However, your stir time seems very short. Other procedures I have read for this call for a 30 second steep (no stiring). There are many green teas available that are good for 2 or even 3 steepings, so even if you did a full steep and threw it away, you should still be able to enjoy some good teas. Note, however, that there will still be much more caffeine left in a 2nd steep than there are in decaff teas (which generally have 1% by weight). I occsionally drink Upton tea's decaff "China Green". It is fairly good. Randy |
|
|||
|
"Ole Kvaal" wrote in message ... Hi. It may seem like I'm a bit sensitive to caffeine, so for a while I thought I'd try some decaff tea. Unless there is some recommendable commercial tea around, I guess I'll stick to the home-production water method. Are there any teas/sorts of tea that are better for this procedure than others, preferably green? (And just to make su the right procedure is 1) pour water 2) stir for 5 seconds 3)pour the water out and 4)fill with new water and let it steep the noramal time.) 1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Up to 80% of the caffeine is removed with this method within the first 30 seconds. There's no point to going over 45 seconds as rate greatly decreases. As for commercially available decaf'd green tea, my favorites are Upton's decaf green (ZG09) and The Tea Table's (http://www.theteatable.com) decaf green tea (it's sencha) with apricot (DGTA). HTH. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
|
|||
|
Bluesea wrote:
As for commercially available decaf'd green tea, my favorites are Upton's decaf green (ZG09) and The Tea Table's (http://www.theteatable.com) decaf green tea (it's sencha) with apricot (DGTA). Thanks to both you and RJP. That's two votes for Upton's. Guess I'll place my order today, perhaps after giving the home version a few more times. rgds, ole k |
|
|||
|
Bluesea wrote:
1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Sorry, one more question: does this steeping time also go for green teas (as their steeping time normally is shorter than most blacks)? ole k |
|
|||
|
"gomper" wrote:
Bluesea wrote: 1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Sorry, one more question: does this steeping time also go for green teas (as their steeping time normally is shorter than most blacks)? As Bluesea doesn't seem to be around today, I'll give you my answer, which I bet is the same thing (s)he will say. Yes, this decaffeinating steep time is independent of tea type. The fact that greens get astringent at normal steep times for blacks is not really relevant - its how quickly the caffeine goes into solution, which ought not to depend so much on tea type (although it probably varies with leaf size). -- Randy (To reply by e-mail, remove DeLeTe and SPAMFREE from my address) |
|
|||
|
"gomper" wrote in message ... Bluesea wrote: As for commercially available decaf'd green tea, my favorites are Upton's decaf green (ZG09) and The Tea Table's (http://www.theteatable.com) decaf green tea (it's sencha) with apricot (DGTA). Thanks to both you and RJP. That's two votes for Upton's. Guess I'll place my order today, perhaps after giving the home version a few more times. The Upton's, the decaf apricot green, and Upton's Lung Ching are my standard green teas and I enjoy the decaf greens both hot and refrigerator brewed. I think the main advantage to a commercially CO2 decaf'd tea is that 99% of the caffeine is removed without any residual chemical alteration of the tea's flavor compared to up to 80% for the do-it-yourself method. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Spam is great in musubi but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
|
|||
|
"RJP" wrote in message ... "gomper" wrote: Bluesea wrote: 1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Sorry, one more question: does this steeping time also go for green teas (as their steeping time normally is shorter than most blacks)? As Bluesea doesn't seem to be around today, I'll give you my answer, which I bet is the same thing (s)he will say. Yes, this decaffeinating steep time is independent of tea type. The fact that greens get astringent at normal steep times for blacks is not really relevant - its how quickly the caffeine goes into solution, which ought not to depend so much on tea type (although it probably varies with leaf size). Thanks, Randy. I've been busy off-line poring over an Upton catalog for gift selections for a couple of friends .Yes, I agree. Because caffeine is water soluble, the degree of oxidation (black, green, white, etc.) doesn't really matter. However, leaf type/location on the plant does matter because, for example, a tippy leaf (first or second) contains more caffeine than do other leaves. Which leads me to think that the reason that older/bigger leaves contain less caffeine is simply because they've been exposed to more rain which has rinsed some of the caffeine away. This is, of course, if all other factors such as variety of tea plant, soil and climate conditions, altitude, etc., are the same. But, when self-decaffeinating, a smaller leaf (particle) will release its caffeine faster than a larger leaf so a small leaf may reach the 80% level in 20 seconds while a large leaf may need 30 seconds or a little longer to reach the 80% level. Interestingly enough, an article in Food Research International, Vol 29, 325-330 (1996), compared the content of caffeine in various teas finding that one of the Formosa oolongs had less caffeine than the green and black teas on a dry weight basis, but they all had similar caffeine levels when prepared to the directions provided. -- ~~Bluesea~~ Caffeine: an exception to "i before e except after c." Spam is great in musubi but not in email. Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
|
|||
|
gomper wrote:
Bluesea wrote: 1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Sorry, one more question: does this steeping time also go for green teas (as their steeping time normally is shorter than most blacks)? Yes. That time is related to the solubility of the caffeine. Now, it will affect the taste more for green teas since it's now longer in proportion to the total steeping time, but it still works well and doesn't make much of a change. This may not work well for something like a gunpowder tea which is in balls that need some soaking to open, because you won't have as good an opportunity to get the caffeine into solution. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
|
|||
|
I think caffeine is directly proportional to taste. It is just another
component that makes up tea taste. A weak tasting second cup means much less caffeine than the first. If multilple infusions hold up in taste then more caffeine in each cup. Most of the elements that make up tea taste are determined by leaching rates and not solubility. The CO2 processing for reducing caffeine and not affecting taste is a different principle than adding water to leaves and pouring off the first infusion and declaring the caffeine arbitrarily reduced by a percentage. Jim Scott Dorsey wrote: gomper wrote: Bluesea wrote: 1. Pour water. 2. Let steep for 30 - 45 seconds - no stirring required. 3. Pour water out. 4. Using fresh water, steep as usual. Sorry, one more question: does this steeping time also go for green teas (as their steeping time normally is shorter than most blacks)? Yes. That time is related to the solubility of the caffeine. Now, it will affect the taste more for green teas since it's now longer in proportion to the total steeping time, but it still works well and doesn't make much of a change. This may not work well for something like a gunpowder tea which is in balls that need some soaking to open, because you won't have as good an opportunity to get the caffeine into solution. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
|
|||
|
On 21 Aug 2005 09:37:36 -0700, "Space Cowboy"
wrote: I think caffeine is directly proportional to taste. It is just another component that makes up tea taste. True, caffeine does affect taste, it is bitter. A weak tasting second cup means much less caffeine than the first. If multilple infusions hold up in taste then more caffeine in each cup. Neither of these statements make much scientific sense unless it is just coincidence based on your method of brewing. To draw these conclusions you must assume that caffeine will be extracted at the same rate as the other flavor components, it has been scientifically proven that these components dissolve at very different rates and that caffeine is one of the fastest dissolving components by a long shot. Most of the elements that make up tea taste are determined by leaching rates and not solubility. What is the difference? Are they not flip sides of the same coin with regards to extraction? The CO2 processing for reducing caffeine and not affecting taste is a different principle than adding water to leaves and pouring off the first infusion and declaring the caffeine arbitrarily reduced by a percentage. Nothing arbitrary as the caffeine is significantly reduced, it is quite proven, now the exact percentage extracted depends on several variables mostly involving leaf permeability and the process of extraction being used, time, temp, method, etc. In addition to the CO2 process there is also a "Swiss Water" process that uses only water to decaffeinate the beans, unfortunately in the case of coffee it also removes flavor components as well. http://www.swisswater.com/decaf Mike Petro http://www.pu-erh.net "In this work, when it shall be found that much is omitted, let it not be forgotten that much likewise is performed." Samuel Johnson, 1775, upon finishing his dictionary. |
|
|||
|
Space Cowboy wrote:
I think caffeine is directly proportional to taste. It is just another component that makes up tea taste. It is, it adds some bitterness to the taste. But it's only one component, and it's one that is more soluble than most of the others. A weak tasting second cup means much less caffeine than the first. If multilple infusions hold up in taste then more caffeine in each cup. Most of the elements that make up tea taste are determined by leaching rates and not solubility. I suspect you'll find that they are almost nearly the same thing. But it shouldn't take much to find out. Xanthine titres are easy to do in your kitchen without much work. The CO2 processing for reducing caffeine and not affecting taste is a different principle than adding water to leaves and pouring off the first infusion and declaring the caffeine arbitrarily reduced by a percentage. It certainly is, but what does that have to do with anything? There are a bunch of other solvent methods possible as well. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
|
|||
|
You need to drink more types of tea and then come back in 30 years and
give us your answer versus the amount of caffeine in multiple infusions as a general rule. Some teas maintain their astringency after several infusions and for a few it even gets worse. That means the caffeine is still present while the taste is gone. It is easily reproducible in some cases by drinking the first infusion then drinking the second a while later and noting the physical characteristcs like the jitters, sweating, alertness, palpatations, etc. I say that in general where there is taste there is caffeine. When you do drink tea that is decaf it seems to be missing something. So when we speak of caffeine water solubility that doesn't preclude a leaching rate which might be similar to the other taste components. It doesn't take a chemistry major to conclude the less caffeine by weight in the first cup by weight the less in the second if taste is the starting point. I use a lot less puerh per cup than say Yunnan black gold which I think the stronger the better. I wouldn't drink it before bedtime because it makes a lousy cup of weak tea. It's a great breakfast drink. I say that one is a good candidate for caffeine in the second or third infusion with the described physical caffeine reaction. I think the Yunnan's in general have multiple infusions with caffeine and taste. In other words they hold something back on the first infusion all things being equal. It is the cultivar and not some given rate of caffeine solution for all teas. Duh. Jim Mike Petro wrote: On 21 Aug 2005 09:37:36 -0700, "Space Cowboy" wrote: I think caffeine is directly proportional to taste. It is just another component that makes up tea taste. True, caffeine does affect taste, it is bitter. A weak tasting second cup means much less caffeine than the first. If multilple infusions hold up in taste then more caffeine in each cup. Neither of these statements make much scientific sense unless it is just coincidence based on your method of brewing. To draw these conclusions you must assume that caffeine will be extracted at the same rate as the other flavor components, it has been scientifically proven that these components dissolve at very different rates and that caffeine is one of the fastest dissolving components by a long shot. Most of the elements that make up tea taste are determined by leaching rates and not solubility. What is the difference? Are they not flip sides of the same coin with regards to extraction? The CO2 processing for reducing caffeine and not affecting taste is a different principle than adding water to leaves and pouring off the first infusion and declaring the caffeine arbitrarily reduced by a percentage. Nothing arbitrary as the caffeine is significantly reduced, it is quite proven, now the exact percentage extracted depends on several variables mostly involving leaf permeability and the process of extraction being used, time, temp, method, etc. In addition to the CO2 process there is also a "Swiss Water" process that uses only water to decaffeinate the beans, unfortunately in the case of coffee it also removes flavor components as well. http://www.swisswater.com/decaf Mike Petro http://www.pu-erh.net "In this work, when it shall be found that much is omitted, let it not be forgotten that much likewise is performed." Samuel Johnson, 1775, upon finishing his dictionary. |
|
|||
|
On 21 Aug 2005 14:28:12 -0700, "Space Cowboy"
wrote: You need to drink more types of tea and then come back in 30 years and give us your answer versus the amount of caffeine in multiple infusions as a general rule. I do believe I have paid the price of admission Jim. Just because I have a website about puerh doesn't mean I don't drink other teas. I drink a lot of them. I now drink so much Shincha/Sencha/Gyokuro that I order them directly from Japan, I drink a lot of the same Yunnan teas you describe, I drink a lot of oolongs as well although I have not developed a full appreciation for them yet, I also drink the occasional first flush cream of the crop Indian teas thanks to some friends of mine. So please lets just debate the facts. Some teas maintain their astringency after several infusions and for a few it even gets worse. That means the caffeine is still present while the taste is gone. It is easily reproducible in some cases by drinking the first infusion then drinking the second a while later and noting the physical characteristcs like the jitters, sweating, alertness, palpatations, etc. I say that in general where there is taste there is caffeine. Here is the fallacy of your assumptions. You make it sound like you can measure caffeine content strictly by taste, I sincerely doubt that your taste buds are that calibrated. Astringency does not "equal" caffeine content. Caffeine is bitter but so are a lot of other things. Just because a tea is astringent does NOT mean that caffeine is the source of that astringency. Caffeine is NOT proportional to total flavor, it is but one component that has been proven to dissolve quicker than most others. There may be trace amounts left in the 8th steep but percentage wise it is almost negligible. Now I do agree that in some teas there enough "other" components that get extracted with a hot rinse to make them taste bland however that is not the case with puerh. I also would assume that you could play with the temperature to find a happy medium in those cases. snip It is the cultivar and not some given rate of caffeine solution for all teas. Duh. To look only at the cultivars is to look at the issue in a vacuum. The brewing method, length of steep, temperature of water, size and age of the leaf, all have an effect on caffeine content and extraction. Once again, the "original thread" here was that you can decaffeinate tea to a large degree by flushing it with hot water, you have offered no proof to the contrary other than to deviate from the topic. I cannot quote precise quantities because that would require laboratory equipment that most of us don't have but all existing data from existing research back up this method. Mike Petro http://www.pu-erh.net "In this work, when it shall be found that much is omitted, let it not be forgotten that much likewise is performed." Samuel Johnson, 1775, upon finishing his dictionary. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for new and different green bean recipes | bbcrock@gmail.com | Vegetarian cooking | 8 | 25-04-2005 12:27 AM |
| Green Tea Samples from Adagio | elgoog | Tea | 1 | 21-02-2005 09:42 PM |
| rec.food.drink.tea FAQ | Christopher Roberson | Tea | 8 | 08-01-2005 07:59 PM |
| Green Bananas (5) Collection | Andy & Shell | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 01-06-2004 05:28 PM |
| Green Chile Cheesecake (3) Collection | Edoc | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 25-03-2004 01:24 PM |