![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:44:23 -0600, crymad wrote:
blues Lyne wrote: Well I ended up with some more Fukamushi-Cha, some Uji-Gyokuro, and Aha-Cha New Crop Presorted Green Tea (a blend of first picked tea with Fukamushi-Cha, Kuki-Cha, and Kona-Cha). I really like the Aha-Cha, the Gyokuro is a little grassy for me. After reading a bit more about brewing Gyokuro on the internet I brewed a cup using 2 tablespoons of tea, 122 degree water for 2 minutes, and while I like the Gyokuro I got from Special Teas better, it's not a bad cup of tea. The aftertaste is better than the flavor while I'm drinking it. The Fukamushi-Cha and Aha-Cha are both from the Yamama Masudeaen Co. and were $2.99 for 2 Oz. The Gyokuro was 9.99 for 8oz. [snip] You may want to try the Gyokuro using 1 tablespoon and bumping up the temperature at bit, say 150. I wonder, though, whether this tea is in fact true Gyokuro, given that the price you mention is inconceivably cheap. I'd say it is not. I have some and have been able to get a taste reminiscent of Gyokuro but not quite Gyokuro. However, for the price (I paid a similiar price) it is a good tea. A 'poor mans Gyokuro' if you will. --crymad J |
|
|||
|
Well, I have personally seen tea trees some three meters high and about 800
years old (planted in the Song dynasty, people say) on Fenghuang (Phoenix) mountain, near to Chaozhou. As soon as I can scan the slide, I will provide you with a picture. L "Space Cowboy" ha scritto nel messaggio k.net... I think that is a Chinese pull-your-leg folklore for gullible Occidentals because from a little research the life of a plantation tea plant is about 65 years. Established plantations are maintained from graphing so how old is a clone? Jim "Lewis Perin" wrote in message news ![]() "WNW" writes: "Lewis Perin" wrote in message news
"Space Cowboy" writes:[..."Vintage Oolong" as a precursor to pu-erh...] You mean it's already aged? Or is it somehow especially suitable for aging? I understand that in the Indian Darjeeling region, "vintage" tea refers to tea made from the leaves of older, vintage plants (possibly from very old strains, or from the actual very old plants?). I wonder whether this is ever done in China? It's certainly *advertised* in China. I've read about tea from 800-year old plants. /Lew |
|
|||
|
I'll give you that for trees in the wild just because it is simply an
evergreen. Here in the US our old world forrests are thousands of years old. I mentioned cultivated tea bushes on plantations and their usefull life. The locals might harvest an old tea tree but I don't think there is enough for commercial use. It is more probable these trees are picked by monkeys. Jim "Livio Zanini" wrote in message ... Well, I have personally seen tea trees some three meters high and about 800 years old (planted in the Song dynasty, people say) on Fenghuang (Phoenix) mountain, near to Chaozhou. As soon as I can scan the slide, I will provide you with a picture. L "Space Cowboy" ha scritto nel messaggio k.net... I think that is a Chinese pull-your-leg folklore for gullible Occidentals because from a little research the life of a plantation tea plant is about 65 years. Established plantations are maintained from graphing so how old is a clone? Jim "Lewis Perin" wrote in message news ![]() "WNW" writes: "Lewis Perin" wrote in message news
"Space Cowboy" writes:[..."Vintage Oolong" as a precursor to pu-erh...] You mean it's already aged? Or is it somehow especially suitable for aging? I understand that in the Indian Darjeeling region, "vintage" tea refers to tea made from the leaves of older, vintage plants (possibly from very old strains, or from the actual very old plants?). I wonder whether this is ever done in China? It's certainly *advertised* in China. I've read about tea from 800-year old plants. /Lew |
|
|||
|
Space link.net10/28/03
I'll give you that for trees in the wild just because it is simply an evergreen. Here in the US our old world forrests are thousands of years old. I mentioned cultivated tea bushes on plantations and their usefull life. The locals might harvest an old tea tree but I don't think there is enough for commercial use. It is more probable these trees are picked by monkeys. Jim Roy Fong on the Imperial Tea Court Oolong web page shows an "old bush oolong," which he claims has the most "pronounced honey-peachiness we have ever tasted," among other glowing comments. I'd be curious as to just how old these ten trees are. Web page URL: http://www.imperialtea.com/AB1002000...roduct_ID=591& Category_ID=14 Be it as it may, I have an ounce of it here and will give it a shot before long. Picked by monkeys beyond a shadow of a doubt. We do after all train them to assist people who can't leave chair or bed. They can retrieve any number of things by name. You could use dogs I suppose, but they'd look so stupid climbing the trees. Michael |
|
|||
|
Michael Plant writes:
[...] Picked by monkeys beyond a shadow of a doubt. We do after all train them to assist people who can't leave chair or bed. They can retrieve any number of things by name. You could use dogs I suppose, but they'd look so stupid climbing the trees. Cats! But you'd have to convince them first, wouldn't you? /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Once upon a time, Lewis Perin wrote:
Michael Plant writes: Picked by monkeys...You could use dogs I suppose Cats! But you'd have to convince them first, wouldn't you? /Lew HA! Cats can be cajoled, persuaded, flattered, and--upon the rarest of occasions--fooled into doing something you ask of them, but convinced? Not hardly! Cats remain the true skeptics of the universe. At all times, a cat's primary motivation, excluding sex and food, of course, is its own amusement. Come to think of it, maybe sex and food fall under the amusement category, as well. Martha (formerly known by her cats as 'Our Lady of the Food Jar') |
|
|||
|
After 800 years you'd figure a monkey troup would learn how to pluck leaves
from a tea tree. I guess the smart ones are too busy at the typewriter. Jim "Michael Plant" wrote in message ... Lewis 10/28/03 Michael Plant writes: [...] Picked by monkeys beyond a shadow of a doubt. We do after all train them to assist people who can't leave chair or bed. They can retrieve any number of things by name. You could use dogs I suppose, but they'd look so stupid climbing the trees. Cats! But you'd have to convince them first, wouldn't you? Motivation. You'd have to place cat-goodies at various intervals through the trees, but then you might as well pick the leaves yourself as long as you're there. How about pigs? You could hang truffles from the branches. On a related note, I'm going to try the ITC Old Bush oolong today. I'm all psyched up by the site's description. Hope it's not disappointing. Michael |
|
|||
|
Space link.net10/29/03
After 800 years you'd figure a monkey troup would learn how to pluck leaves from a tea tree. I guess the smart ones are too busy at the typewriter. Jim Ah, yes; that they are; that we are. (But do they wash the leaves at the shore before eating them?) Michael |
|
|||
|
"Space Cowboy" wrote in message link.net...
I'll give you that for trees in the wild just because it is simply an evergreen. Here in the US our old world forrests are thousands of years old. I mentioned cultivated tea bushes on plantations and their usefull life. The locals might harvest an old tea tree but I don't think there is enough for commercial use. It is more probable these trees are picked by monkeys. Jim "Livio Zanini" wrote in message ... Well, I have personally seen tea trees some three meters high and about 800 years old (planted in the Song dynasty, people say) on Fenghuang (Phoenix) mountain, near to Chaozhou. As soon as I can scan the slide, I will provide you with a picture. L I've got several teas that come from tea trees, some wild some not. Menghai produces a wild tree green pu-erh that's quite good. All of the dan cong family oolongs come from trees rather than bushes (phoenix, shui xian, etc...). While very few of them will be 800 years old, they're not just the hedge-like tea bushes. Cameron |
|
|||
|
Lewis Perin wrote in message ...
(Cameron Lewis) writes: "Space Cowboy" wrote in message link.net... [...tea from trees rather than bushes...] I've got several teas that come from tea trees, some wild some not. Menghai produces a wild tree green pu-erh that's quite good. All of the dan cong family oolongs come from trees rather than bushes (phoenix, shui xian, etc...) When you mention Shui Xian I assume you mean the rare strain of Feng Huang rather than the common Fujian oolong? /Lew --- The sources that I've gotten Shui Xian from list it as a member of the dan cong group which is by definition a tree tea. I wasn't aware there was a bush variety. What is the difference between the Feng Huang variety and the common strain? Cameron |
|
|||
|
Cameron 10/29/03
Lewis Perin wrote in message ... (Cameron Lewis) writes: "Space Cowboy" wrote in message link.net... [...tea from trees rather than bushes...] I've got several teas that come from tea trees, some wild some not. Menghai produces a wild tree green pu-erh that's quite good. All of the dan cong family oolongs come from trees rather than bushes (phoenix, shui xian, etc...) When you mention Shui Xian I assume you mean the rare strain of Feng Huang rather than the common Fujian oolong? /Lew --- The sources that I've gotten Shui Xian from list it as a member of the dan cong group which is by definition a tree tea. I wasn't aware there was a bush variety. What is the difference between the Feng Huang variety and the common strain? Cameron Cameron and all, What are your sources? I'd like to read more about tea sub-species varietals, but the only source I know is Clifford and Wilson, whose book costs well over $200. USC and is currently available on the British Amazon.com site for far more than that. Besides, if I recall, it was published over 20 years ago, not that that's so bad. Michael |
|
|||
|
The nomenclature refers to Shui Xian as a bush or tree. The pictures I've
seen indicates it is a tall bush rather than a tree. It has no trunk or limbs. In our nomenclature it would be a strappling with trunk no larger than an inch or two. I've seen pictures of tea trees with the plucking done by people on ladders with five foot elevation for ten foot high limbs. I think the Chinese word for tree means something different than our description. Jim "Cameron Lewis" wrote in message m... Lewis Perin wrote in message ... (Cameron Lewis) writes: "Space Cowboy" wrote in message link.net... [...tea from trees rather than bushes...] I've got several teas that come from tea trees, some wild some not. Menghai produces a wild tree green pu-erh that's quite good. All of the dan cong family oolongs come from trees rather than bushes (phoenix, shui xian, etc...) When you mention Shui Xian I assume you mean the rare strain of Feng Huang rather than the common Fujian oolong? /Lew --- The sources that I've gotten Shui Xian from list it as a member of the dan cong group which is by definition a tree tea. I wasn't aware there was a bush variety. What is the difference between the Feng Huang variety and the common strain? Cameron |
|
|||
|
Michael Plant wrote in message ...
Cameron 10/29/03 Lewis Perin wrote in message ... (Cameron Lewis) writes: "Space Cowboy" wrote in message link.net... [...tea from trees rather than bushes...] I've got several teas that come from tea trees, some wild some not. Menghai produces a wild tree green pu-erh that's quite good. All of the dan cong family oolongs come from trees rather than bushes (phoenix, shui xian, etc...) When you mention Shui Xian I assume you mean the rare strain of Feng Huang rather than the common Fujian oolong? /Lew --- The sources that I've gotten Shui Xian from list it as a member of the dan cong group which is by definition a tree tea. I wasn't aware there was a bush variety. What is the difference between the Feng Huang variety and the common strain? Cameron Cameron and all, What are your sources? I'd like to read more about tea sub-species varietals, but the only source I know is Clifford and Wilson, whose book costs well over $200. USC and is currently available on the British Amazon.com site for far more than that. Besides, if I recall, it was published over 20 years ago, not that that's so bad. Michael Hi, the full name of the tea is called FengHuang Dancong. Fenghuang means Pheonix. FengHuang Dancong are divided in to 2 main types. MiXiang FengHuang Dancong and QingXiang fenghunag Dancong. You can easily differentiate both by the infused tea color. The color of MiXiang FHDC is maroon and QingXiang FHDC is yellow. Chinese Tea |