![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Seems like a "classic" Pu-eh bingcha nominally weighs 357 grams.
Although China (PRC) went metric in 1987, I get the impression that 100, 400 and 500g cakes are a relatively recent phenomenon. 357g is presumably someone's interpretation of ten tael or Chinese ounces, now 50g but formerly about 37.5g. At the same time, in none of the superficial reading I've done has there been a tael of exactly 37.5g; the imperial treasury tael of 37.3g seems closest. Anyone know the origin of the 357g "standard" bingcha? Or why 375g, a non-round number, is also common? I'm guessing that it's partly marketing (perhaps invoking archaic terminology, as age is respected in China), and partly the difficulty of specifying a precise weight when water content can easily vary by 10% or more. The baker's dozen was allegedly invented because short-weighting loaves could lead to shortening of limbs, so bakers gave a little extra as insurance. Or does that weight or the number 357 have some other significance? -DM |
|
|||
|
This is interesting. I've always wondered about this myself. The
number itself is attractive for some reason--maybe it is because 3, 5, and 7 have a kind of pattern to them (first three odd numbers outside of one). Somehow I'm guessing that isn't the reason for the number, though. Could it have something to do with the way tea was packaged? If, as the Wikipedia entry on pu-er states, traditional packaging of bings is seven to one tong, then the weight of a tong would be a much rounder number of approximately 2.5 kg. In turn, one jian of 12 tong would be approximately 30 kg. This seems easier to work with than 357. cha bing |
|
|||
|
"DogMa" wrote in message ... Seems like a "classic" Pu-eh bingcha nominally weighs 357 grams. Although China (PRC) went metric in 1987, I get the impression that 100, 400 and 500g cakes are a relatively recent phenomenon. 357g is presumably someone's interpretation of ten tael or Chinese ounces, now 50g but formerly about 37.5g. At the same time, in none of the superficial reading I've done has there been a tael of exactly 37.5g; the imperial treasury tael of 37.3g seems closest. Anyone know the origin of the 357g "standard" bingcha? Or why 375g, a non-round number, is also common? I'm guessing that it's partly marketing (perhaps invoking archaic terminology, as age is respected in China), and partly the difficulty of specifying a precise weight when water content can easily vary by 10% or more. The baker's dozen was allegedly invented because short-weighting loaves could lead to shortening of limbs, so bakers gave a little extra as insurance. Or does that weight or the number 357 have some other significance? -DM 375g equals 10 liang. Etymologically, tael comes from liang, a Chinese traditional weight unit. |
|
|||
|
chance wrote:
Seems like a "classic" Pu-eh bingcha nominally weighs 357 grams. 357g is presumably someone's interpretation of ten tael or Chinese ounces ... 375g equals 10 liang. Etymologically, tael comes from liang, a Chinese traditional weight unit. Right. So why 357g for a bingcha? Perhaps 10 tael/liang of wet maocha, drying to a nominal 357g? -DM |
|
|||
|
Ive bought teas in Chinatown by the tael 37.5g or 1.2 ounce. Look at
the previous posts under QiZi or ChiTse including the space between the word pairs. 7 * 357 is one gram short of 2.5k. Jim DogMa wrote: chance wrote: Seems like a "classic" Pu-eh bingcha nominally weighs 357 grams. 357g is presumably someone's interpretation of ten tael or Chinese ounces ... 375g equals 10 liang. Etymologically, tael comes from liang, a Chinese traditional weight unit. Right. So why 357g for a bingcha? Perhaps 10 tael/liang of wet maocha, drying to a nominal 357g? -DM |
|
|||
|
There are two popular expanations to this, both unrelated.
1 kati, or jin, equals 16 taels, or liang In the old days, each tea disc weighed at 7 liang, Each tong has 7 cakes, which amounts to 49 liang, or about 3 jin On the horse-tea route where horses and mules were used to transport the tea It was calculated that for the animals to efficiently transport the tea without overly labored, each animal could carry a maximum of 60kg, with 30kg on each side. Each tong has 7 pieces, each batch has 12 tongs, that amounts to 84 cakes. Divide that by 30kg, one gets 357g. Since animals are no longer required to transport tea these days, tea manufacturers have relaxed on the old rule and produced cakes of different weights. kev |
|
|||
|
On Oct 12, 6:08*am, DogMa wrote:
The baker's dozen was allegedly invented because short-weighting loaves could lead to shortening of limbs, so bakers gave a little extra as insurance. Interesting. My understanding is that the buyer would get one to taste, and then buy a dozen to take home. If only Dunkin Donuts still did that! Alan |