![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On 2008-04-22, niisonge wrote:
Standards in China are questionable compared to requirements here in the US. It seems it's not about Chinese producers being negligent. It seems, rather it's a difference in regulations - both inside China, and internationally. In China, you got federal regulations, provincial regulations, and even industry regulations. That all makes everything so complicated and confusing. Then there are international standards that must be adhered to. So that makes everything different. Well I think what the person who posted that comment might have been referring to (at least in part) is the corruption (and ease of forging documents or lying about a tea's origin) prevalent in China. You're probably in a better place than I am to tell how true that is, but my understanding is that it's pretty easy to either forge documents or bribe officials (or simply mislead them) with the organic regulations in a lot of parts of China. As in the US, standards like USDA and the EU standards are a mixed bag. They are theoretically pretty stringent, which helps a little bit with ensuring that the standards mean something and that consumers know what they're getting into, but they favor large producers and make it much more difficult for small operations to compete. The fact that they typically require a transitional period where no pesticides are used helps ensure that there aren't residual pesticides in the ground. If you're buying locally, it makes sense to know your farmers, and trust that they're telling you the truth about their farming methods... however, for those of us in the US buying tea produced in other countries, that's difficult because the tea passes through a lot of hands, and any of those people can easily lie or pass on a lie. Even when buying directly from the producer, and even if you've visited the place where the tea is grown, it's never really possible to know for sure unless you're watching the tea every minute of every day. Unfortunately (and possibly for some of the reasons mentioned), most of the certified organic tea I've had has not been very tasty. I try to just go by a tea's taste and how it makes me feel. Also, if there are bug bites, that's usually a good sign (and for Oriental Beauty, they're actually necessary). btw, there have been a couple of long threads about pesticides and toxins in tea. The two I remember are the two starting with message-ids om . com. Worth a read for those who didn't read them the first time around. Ankit mentioned (in one of those threads) the possibility of doing tests of samples if anyone wanted to send him some. However, he said they need about 250g of leaf to do the tests, which definitely dampened my enthusiasm... most of the teas I like enough to want to test, I don't want to give up 250g of. w |