![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
RFDT is the most knowledgeable group on tea and always seeks for
current scientific knowlege on tea. And hence need of the hour is that rfdt members and the creators of RFDT group also have a list of FRF ( frequently repeated fallacies) as suggested by Lew in the following quoted message, and corrections if any be made in FAQ of RFDT. Recent message from Lew in RFDT "Maybe this newsgroup needs not just an FAQ list, but also an FRF (frequently repeated fallacies.) This one might come in as #3, behind: 1) Black tea has more caffeine than green. 2) Thirty seconds of steeping will remove most of the caffeine from tea leaves. " Any new FRF, besides the above two FRF, any new FRF should be added after through discussion. S.M. Changoiwala,Director Gopaldhara Tea Co Pvt LTD. KOLKOTA, INDIA Gardens- Darjeeling-Gopaldhara, Avongrove, Rohini Dooars - Soongachi and New Glencoe email- website- www.gopaldhara.com |
|
|||
|
1) Black tea has more caffeine than green.
I might append to this the related caffeine claims such as "white tea has the lowest levels of caffeine" and "puer has no caffeine," both of which I've heard fairly regularly...sometimes even in tea shops whose information is usually pretty good. --Michael J. Coffey-- www.teageek.net Ironic, isn't it? |
|
|||
|
1) Black tea has more caffeine than green.
I might append to this the related caffeine claims such as "white tea has the lowest levels of caffeine" and "puer has no caffeine," both of which I've heard fairly regularly...sometimes even in tea shops whose information is usually pretty good. --Michael J. Coffey-- www.teageek.net Ironic, isn't it? |
|
|||
|
This is fun! Sort of like Tea Mythbusters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters
Since we recently discussed this one and came to a consensus, I'll add it: Otherwise safe-to-drink water does NOT need to be boiled then cooled. It can simply be heated up to the desired temperature. Alan |
|
|||
|
snip [Alan] Since we recently discussed this one and came to a consensus, I'll add it: Otherwise safe-to-drink water does NOT need to be boiled then cooled. It can simply be heated up to the desired temperature. Hi Alan, Forgive me for entering a thread I've not even read, but despite the "consensus," are you saying it is *not* appropriate to heat water to the desired temperature instead of bringing the water to a boil and then letting it fall to the desired temperature? I think this is purely a matter of taste, and many I respect taste a better tea by stopping before the boil. Who am I to argue with folks' taste? Perhaps you refer to the oxygen issue, wherein some believe that bringing the water to a boil depletes oxygen. Anyway, probably my misunderstanding of your intention. Michael |
|
|||
|
On Oct 17, 6:40 pm, Michael Plant wrote:
snip [Alan] Since we recently discussed this one and came to a consensus, I'll add it: Otherwise safe-to-drink water does NOT need to be boiled then cooled. It can simply be heated up to the desired temperature. Hi Alan, Forgive me for entering a thread I've not even read, but despite the "consensus," are you saying it is *not* appropriate to heat water to the desired temperature instead of bringing the water to a boil and then letting it fall to the desired temperature? I think this is purely a matter of taste, and many I respect taste a better tea by stopping before the boil. Who am I to argue with folks' taste? Perhaps you refer to the oxygen issue, wherein some believe that bringing the water to a boil depletes oxygen. Anyway, probably my misunderstanding of your intention. Michael (not directed to Michael, I just used this as a jumping in point) I just wanted to pop in to add that the reason I've stayed away from this thread is that it is neigh impossible to list FRF's without introducing more fallacies and also inciting disagreements. Fallacies are fallacies, they are not always black and white. Many are borne of truths or custom, some are plain false, and the rest are shades of grey. I don't want to be the one to rain on anyones parade, but I think this idea of a "FRF" is best left alone. - Dominic I normally heat my water to the appropriate temp, but I've never been averse to letting water cool to the desired temp and then brewing. |
|
|||
|
On Oct 18, 11:04 am, SN wrote:
well it would be ok for some solid fallacies such as 'tea cures cancer' or 'tea cures syphillis' Damn it... you mean my Syphillis ain't going anywhere?!? That's it, I'm switching to coffee and leaving the group! - Dominic (Yes, I can see pointing out the obvious ones, but my Magic 8 Ball predicts that it won't stop there and be a hotbed of contention. Again, everyone is free to do what they want, I was just offering up my singular nay vote.) BTW What's the consensus on tea and Chlamydia? ...a friend wants to know. |
|
|||
|
On Oct 18, 11:28 am, "Dominic T." wrote:
On Oct 18, 11:04 am, SN wrote: well it would be ok for some solid fallacies such as 'tea cures cancer' or 'tea cures syphillis' Damn it... you mean my Syphillis ain't going anywhere?!? That's it, I'm switching to coffee and leaving the group! - Dominic (Yes, I can see pointing out the obvious ones, but my Magic 8 Ball predicts that it won't stop there and be a hotbed of contention. Again, everyone is free to do what they want, I was just offering up my singular nay vote.) BTW What's the consensus on tea and Chlamydia? ...a friend wants to know. ![]() if properly applied, oolong tea paste may cure chlamydia, but only if "your friend" has gonorrhea at the same time. / true, this topic it may end up very diverted from its intended point. |
|
|||
|
Michael Plant wrote: snip [Alan] Since we recently discussed this one and came to a consensus, I'll add it: Otherwise safe-to-drink water does NOT need to be boiled then cooled. It can simply be heated up to the desired temperature. Hi Alan, Forgive me for entering a thread I've not even read, but despite the "consensus," are you saying it is *not* appropriate to heat water to the desired temperature instead of bringing the water to a boil and then letting it fall to the desired temperature? I think this is purely a matter of taste, and many I respect taste a better tea by stopping before the boil. Who am I to argue with folks' taste? Perhaps you refer to the oxygen issue, wherein some believe that bringing the water to a boil depletes oxygen. Anyway, probably my misunderstanding of your intention. Michael I agree with you; in fact, you summarized that entire discussion! Consensus was that the "rule" to always boil water for tea came from a time when water safety was more of an issue than it is today. We noted that boiling the water would drive out desirable oxygen, so bringing safe water up to the desired temperature should maximize dissolved oxygen without compromising safety. Alan |
|
|||
|
How about a synopsis of significant discussion? Sort of a "Cliffs
Notes" for tea-lovers. Out-and-out fallacies could be identified as such, while less-absolute topics could be summarized with the different schools of thought. Alan |
|
|||
|
Alan writes:
How about a synopsis of significant discussion? Sort of a "Cliffs Notes" for tea-lovers. Out-and-out fallacies could be identified as such, while less-absolute topics could be summarized with the different schools of thought. That could be useful. But I was proposing something far simpler: just the out-and-out fallacies. The three I proposed are all falsified by measurements that have already been taken. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |
|
|||
|
On Oct 22, 3:05 pm, Alan wrote:
Michael Plant wrote: snip [Alan] Since we recently discussed this one and came to a consensus, I'll add it: Otherwise safe-to-drink water does NOT need to be boiled then cooled. It can simply be heated up to the desired temperature. Hi Alan, Forgive me for entering a thread I've not even read, but despite the "consensus," are you saying it is *not* appropriate to heat water to the desired temperature instead of bringing the water to a boil and then letting it fall to the desired temperature? I think this is purely a matter of taste, and many I respect taste a better tea by stopping before the boil. Who am I to argue with folks' taste? Perhaps you refer to the oxygen issue, wherein some believe that bringing the water to a boil depletes oxygen. Anyway, probably my misunderstanding of your intention. Michael I agree with you; in fact, you summarized that entire discussion! Consensus was that the "rule" to always boil water for tea came from a time when water safety was more of an issue than it is today. We noted that boiling the water would drive out desirable oxygen, so bringing safe water up to the desired temperature should maximize dissolved oxygen without compromising safety. Alan Incidentally.. I was thinking about this recently. China was making mostly green, white and oolong teas before, then it moved into making more black teas when the trade opened with Portugal and England. At the same time, water should have been boiled so that green tea would not taste very good.. Have chinese invented some way to get around this? Maybe boiling in clay kettles is better? I noticed that boiled water often has stronger metallic taste. But I haven't done thorough testing.. comment. |
|
|||
|
Incidentally.. I was thinking about this recently. China was making
mostly green, white and oolong teas before, then it moved into making more black teas when the trade opened with Portugal and England. At the same time, water should have been boiled so that green tea would not taste very good.. Have chinese invented some way to get around this? Maybe boiling in clay kettles is better? I noticed that boiled water often has stronger metallic taste. But I haven't done thorough testing.. comment. I have two answers, both of which are not direct experiences but those of folks who have either their own personal experiences or have done their own research. 1) In Chinese-culture societies (so as to cover both political descriptions of Taiwan), all teas are brewed with boiling or near boiling water. But instead of stewing them for as long as us Westerners do, they'll brew for MUCH shorter periods of time. I do have personal experience that this works, and you can too. Take, say, your favorite Yinzhen/Silver Needles white tea and measure out identical quantities. Brew one at 175 degrees (F) for 3-4 minutes, and brew one in a full boil water for 15-20 *seconds*. Taste them side by side. They will probably taste quite different, but neither will be unpleasant. 2) Tea DID taste unpleasant for a really large chunk of tea-drinking history--it was taken as a medicine for the first thousand years or so. Then, for nearly three thousand years, basic tea processing methods kept being developed to make it more tasty. (Of course, that suggests that the process isn't still continuing, but from what I've found there's been no new "category" or "family" of tea produced since the invention of fully-oxidized red/black tea which is why I'm saying it stopped a couple centuries ago.) 's just my take. --Michael J. Coffey-- www.teageek.net Ironic, isn't it? |
|
|||
|
Tea Geek writes:
[...] 1) In Chinese-culture societies (so as to cover both political descriptions of Taiwan), all teas are brewed with boiling or near boiling water. But instead of stewing them for as long as us Westerners do, they'll brew for MUCH shorter periods of time. I do have personal experience that this works, and you can too. Take, say, your favorite Yinzhen/Silver Needles white tea and measure out identical quantities. Brew one at 175 degrees (F) for 3-4 minutes, and brew one in a full boil water for 15-20 *seconds*. Taste them side by side. They will probably taste quite different, but neither will be unpleasant. There's a lot of truth in this, but I sure wouldn't subject a delicate green tea to boiling water even for a very short steep. Silver Needle can probably take this treatment because: - in a first steep of 15-20 seconds the thick buds barely get hydrated; - in subsequent steeps the buds start out saturated with tepid water, so after you pour on the boiling water the resulting temperature the tea steeps at will be well short of boiling. /Lew --- Lew Perin / http://www.panix.com/~perin/babelcarp.html |