In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:
Charles Demas wrote:

In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:

Charles Demas wrote:


In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:


Charles Demas wrote:



In article ,
Michael wrote:



Scawny Dog Johnson wrote in message
news:41def944a8ea406de359c0232abb8905@news. teranews.com...



On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02:44 GMT, Dan Logcher
wrote:




Well, I was returning from some Christmas shopping at
a distance mall, driving down the high not far from my
favorite sushi bar and decided to have lunch.



Dan, This newsgroup is not titled, alt.whatdan.hadforlunch.
What makes you think we are even slightly interested in what you had



Snipping of bozo's mind fart.

Keep it up Dan, about as on topic as possible.



I'm surprised that you rose to the bait Michael.

Look at who you're responding to.

Dan hardly needs encouragement to keep posting and I suspect that that
ole fry cook just love seeing Dan rise to his bait *EACH* *AND* *EVERY*
time he throws out a hook.

It annoys me that Dan can't restrain himself from responding, and
reresponding again, but I expected better from you, Michael.


Why does it annoy you? He doesn't get a rise out of me, just a
response. A rise would be if I were ****ed off or something, and
I know he's just a nobody Frycook (all of his multiple personalities).


OK, but just remember, you asked for an explanation.

He's generally disruptive in this newsgroup, and would go away if
he weren't getting responses. I'd prefer that he went away unfulfilled.

As long as you keep responding to him, he'll stick around,

WHICH IS'NT WHAT I WANT!

DON'T YOU GET IT DAN?

YOU'RE GIVING HIM EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS!

As I see it, there are two explanations:

1. You're really that f**king stupid.

2. You're really the fry cook and you're playing a very clever game.

Whichever it is, I find it annoying, and FWIW, I don't think it's
explanation number 2.

3. Maybe I do it expressly to annoy you.

4. I don't see it as giving him anything.

He's not going away, and neither am I. You should lighten up, Chuck.
It's not good for ones health to be all annoyed at such trivial things.


Definitely #1.

BTW, I never asked you to go away.

I responded originally to Michael saying that I thought he was
smarter than to have responded to the fry cook. I long ago gave up
expecting you to do anything intellegent, but occasionally I say to
myself, "He can't really be *THAT* stupid. He'll learn."

Wrong every time. :~(

Maybe you're the one with intellegence problem. Just because it bothers
you don't make it stupid if anyone else replies to him. You're not the
authority on here or anywhere.

You asked why I was annoyed. I'm annoyed because I see something
wrong and there's nothing I can do to make it better, and I see
you, actively making it worse.

Dan, you have no impulse control. Intellegence is the capacity to
adapt, but you don't.

The fry cook posts, and Dan responds, ... every time.

People (not only me) tell Dan, "Don't play with trolls."

The fry cook posts, and Dan responds.

It's really too bad, because aside from that trait, you seem to be
a mice guy, with a lot of experience eating sushi.


Chuck Demas

--
Eat Healthy | _ _ | Nothing would be done at all,
Stay Fit | @ @ | If a man waited to do it so well,
Die Anyway | v | That no one could find fault with it.
| \___/ | http://world.std.com/~cpd

Charles Demas wrote:

In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:

Charles Demas wrote:


In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:


Charles Demas wrote:



In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:



Charles Demas wrote:




In article ,
Michael wrote:




Scawny Dog Johnson wrote in message
news:41def944a8ea406de359c0232abb8905@news .teranews.com...




On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02:44 GMT, Dan Logcher
wrote:





Well, I was returning from some Christmas shopping at
a distance mall, driving down the high not far from my
favorite sushi bar and decided to have lunch.




Dan, This newsgroup is not titled, alt.whatdan.hadforlunch.
What makes you think we are even slightly interested in what you had




Snipping of bozo's mind fart.

Keep it up Dan, about as on topic as possible.




I'm surprised that you rose to the bait Michael.

Look at who you're responding to.

Dan hardly needs encouragement to keep posting and I suspect that that
ole fry cook just love seeing Dan rise to his bait *EACH* *AND* *EVERY*
time he throws out a hook.

It annoys me that Dan can't restrain himself from responding, and
reresponding again, but I expected better from you, Michael.



Why does it annoy you? He doesn't get a rise out of me, just a
response. A rise would be if I were ****ed off or something, and
I know he's just a nobody Frycook (all of his multiple personalities).



OK, but just remember, you asked for an explanation.

He's generally disruptive in this newsgroup, and would go away if
he weren't getting responses. I'd prefer that he went away unfulfilled.

As long as you keep responding to him, he'll stick around,

WHICH IS'NT WHAT I WANT!

DON'T YOU GET IT DAN?

YOU'RE GIVING HIM EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS!

As I see it, there are two explanations:

1. You're really that f**king stupid.

2. You're really the fry cook and you're playing a very clever game.

Whichever it is, I find it annoying, and FWIW, I don't think it's
explanation number 2.


3. Maybe I do it expressly to annoy you.

4. I don't see it as giving him anything.

He's not going away, and neither am I. You should lighten up, Chuck.
It's not good for ones health to be all annoyed at such trivial things.


Definitely #1.

BTW, I never asked you to go away.

I responded originally to Michael saying that I thought he was
smarter than to have responded to the fry cook. I long ago gave up
expecting you to do anything intellegent, but occasionally I say to
myself, "He can't really be *THAT* stupid. He'll learn."

Wrong every time. :~(

Maybe you're the one with intellegence problem. Just because it bothers
you don't make it stupid if anyone else replies to him. You're not the
authority on here or anywhere.


You asked why I was annoyed. I'm annoyed because I see something
wrong and there's nothing I can do to make it better, and I see
you, actively making it worse.


You think if I stop replying that he'll go away? I doubt it.


Dan, you have no impulse control. Intellegence is the capacity to
adapt, but you don't.


I adapt in different ways from you, thats all.


The fry cook posts, and Dan responds, ... every time.

People (not only me) tell Dan, "Don't play with trolls."

The fry cook posts, and Dan responds.


I don't see the harm, and don't think this leads to the downfall
of humanity.


It's really too bad, because aside from that trait, you seem to be
a mice guy, with a lot of experience eating sushi.

Thanks, I enjoy sushi very much. We'll see what I can do to
change in the future. Perhaps we all can make some changes.

--
Dan

[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]

In article , Charles Demas
wrote:

In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:
Charles Demas wrote:

In article ,
Dan Logcher wrote:

Charles Demas wrote:


In article ,
Michael wrote:


Scawny Dog Johnson wrote in message
ranews.com...


On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02:44 GMT, Dan Logcher
wrote:



Well, I was returning from some Christmas shopping at
a distance mall, driving down the high not far from my
favorite sushi bar and decided to have lunch.


Dan, This newsgroup is not titled, alt.whatdan.hadforlunch.
What makes you think we are even slightly interested in what you had


Snipping of bozo's mind fart.

Keep it up Dan, about as on topic as possible.


I'm surprised that you rose to the bait Michael.

Look at who you're responding to.

Dan hardly needs encouragement to keep posting and I suspect that that
ole fry cook just love seeing Dan rise to his bait *EACH* *AND* *EVERY*
time he throws out a hook.

It annoys me that Dan can't restrain himself from responding, and
reresponding again, but I expected better from you, Michael.

Why does it annoy you? He doesn't get a rise out of me, just a
response. A rise would be if I were ****ed off or something, and
I know he's just a nobody Frycook (all of his multiple personalities).


OK, but just remember, you asked for an explanation.

He's generally disruptive in this newsgroup, and would go away if
he weren't getting responses. I'd prefer that he went away unfulfilled.

As long as you keep responding to him, he'll stick around,

WHICH IS'NT WHAT I WANT!

DON'T YOU GET IT DAN?

YOU'RE GIVING HIM EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTS!

As I see it, there are two explanations:

1. You're really that f**king stupid.

2. You're really the fry cook and you're playing a very clever game.

Whichever it is, I find it annoying, and FWIW, I don't think it's
explanation number 2.

3. Maybe I do it expressly to annoy you.

4. I don't see it as giving him anything.

He's not going away, and neither am I. You should lighten up, Chuck.
It's not good for ones health to be all annoyed at such trivial things.

Definitely #1.

BTW, I never asked you to go away.

I responded originally to Michael saying that I thought he was
smarter than to have responded to the fry cook. I long ago gave up
expecting you to do anything intellegent, but occasionally I say to
myself, "He can't really be *THAT* stupid. He'll learn."

Wrong every time. :~(

Dan and others gave cursive responses, not a shift in topic. If anybody
is giving the troll his feverish desire of attention and swamping the
boat it is you.

Please stop.

--
First they gerrymander us into one-party fiefs. Then they tell us they only
care about the swing districts. Then they complain about voter apathy.
-- Gail Collins

Dan, cool to hear about your experience with the shikaro. What is the
texture like? Haven't come across it yet.

And regarding trolling posts to the board - that's what killfilters
are for, yes?

I've been lurking and intermittently posting here since, like, '97. I
remember "Frycook". Don't let the bad apples spoil the sushi.

Scoop

Scoop wrote:

Dan, cool to hear about your experience with the shikaro. What is the
texture like? Haven't come across it yet.


The texture is disturbingly creamy (from a guy's point of view).

I believe it is a Winter season item, only had it twice and I
think the last time was a year ago. Art? Do you recall when
that was?

--
Dan

I've had shirako also, and was aware of it's origin when I ate it. It
is disturbingly creamy, but given what it is, I'd say that's a given.
Not a delicacy for the faint of heart or squeamish amongst you.
Prepared properly with ponzu, it is very good.

Joe
X Sushi Zone regular
Arlington Texas

The World-Wide Sushi Restaurant Reference
Glossary entry

Shirako. Sperms sacs of the cod fish.

Source: WordNet (r) 1.7

milt
n 1: fish sperm or sperm-filled reproductive gland; having a
creamy texture [syn: soft roe]
2: seminal fluid produced by male fish


Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

Milt \Milt\, n. [AS. milte; akin to D. milt, G. milz, OHG.
milzi, Icel. milti, Dan. milt, Sw. mj["a]lte, and prob. to E.
malt, melt. [root]108. See Malt the grain.] (Anat.)
The spleen.
Milt \Milt\, n. [Akin to Dan. melk, Sw. mj["o]lke, G. milch, and
E. milk. See Milk.] (Zo["o]l.)
(a) The spermatic fluid of fishes.
(b) The testes, or spermaries, of fishes when filled with
spermatozoa.
Milt \Milt\, v. t.
To impregnate (the roe of a fish) with milt.


On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 06:08:43 GMT, Dan Logcher
wrote:

Scoop wrote:

Dan, cool to hear about your experience with the shikaro. What is the
texture like? Haven't come across it yet.


The texture is disturbingly creamy (from a guy's point of view).

I believe it is a Winter season item, only had it twice and I
think the last time was a year ago. Art? Do you recall when
that was?

Dan Logcher wrote in message ...
SNIP

I don't see the harm, and don't think this leads to the downfall
of humanity.


It's really too bad, because aside from that trait, you seem to be
a mice guy, with a lot of experience eating sushi.

Thanks, I enjoy sushi very much. We'll see what I can do to
change in the future. Perhaps we all can make some changes.

maybe if you don't humor the guy, he goes off and tortures the cat
instead.

there's something about the different nuances of taste & texture that
are worth sharing about. it's no different than enjoying wine.

if some folks post things you'd rather not read, that's what killfiles
are for.

happy holidays.

barry chin
pasadena, ca

Joe wrote:

I've had shirako also, and was aware of it's origin when I ate it. It
is disturbingly creamy, but given what it is, I'd say that's a given.
Not a delicacy for the faint of heart or squeamish amongst you.
Prepared properly with ponzu, it is very good.

Joe
X Sushi Zone regular
Arlington Texas

The World-Wide Sushi Restaurant Reference
Glossary entry

Shirako. Sperms sacs of the cod fish.

Awww, you told them too much.

It's very mild tasting, takes on the ponzu flavor.

--
Dan

Dan Logcher wrote in message ...
Gerry wrote:
SNIP
I know have three things I'd prefer to avoid; natto, shirako and grated
yama-imo. Texture is the main component in all of them, but I didn't
care for the taste of the shirako eithr.

It's very mild tasting, taking on the ponzu sauce and pickled diakon.
The only things I avoid are natto and ika shiokara. Both have a foul
taste, in my opinion. But maybe it's like Limburger cheese.

i didn't care for natto until my chef confided to me that he didn't
like it either, but he did with mixed with raw egg & spicy mustard on
rice. it's not bad that way.

besides the raw egg/mustard natto concoction, this chef is the first
chef i've patronized that uses yuzu/yuzu kosho a lot. i don't think
i've had tai i enjoyed more than with yuzu and a little salt. it's
also a lot more subtle than lemon on mirugai. too bad his rice tends
to be on the hard side or i'd rate him a LOT higher...

bc

Dan and FC-- just like old times! Happy Holidays and a sushi-filled New
Year to all.

In article , Dan Logcher
wrote:

Dan, cool to hear about your experience with the shikaro. What is the
texture like? Haven't come across it yet.

The texture is disturbingly creamy (from a guy's point of view).

The texture is alright. What I find off-putting is how much sake I have
to drink to get it's "residue" out of my mouth. For those who don't
like the cream-cheese mouth-coating problem I find this stuff a little
more tenacious. But then I suppose the shikaro has a "job" to do.

--
First they gerrymander us into one-party fiefs. Then they tell us they only
care about the swing districts. Then they complain about voter apathy.
-- Gail Collins

David E. Cote wrote:

Dan and FC-- just like old times! Happy Holidays and a sushi-filled New
Year to all.

Thanks, Dave. Same to you and Peg. Maybe we'll
see you in January for another sushi show down.

--
Dan

Gerry wrote:

In article , Dan Logcher
wrote:


Dan, cool to hear about your experience with the shikaro. What is the
texture like? Haven't come across it yet.

The texture is disturbingly creamy (from a guy's point of view).


The texture is alright. What I find off-putting is how much sake I have
to drink to get it's "residue" out of my mouth. For those who don't
like the cream-cheese mouth-coating problem I find this stuff a little
more tenacious. But then I suppose the shikaro has a "job" to do.

Oh man, when you put it like that.. "job". That's funny.

--
Dan

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:06:35 GMT, Scawny Dog Johnson wrote:

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02:44 GMT, Dan Logcher
wrote:

Well, I was returning from some Christmas shopping at
a distance mall, driving down the high not far from my
favorite sushi bar and decided to have lunch.

Dan, This newsgroup is not titled, alt.whatdan.hadforlunch.
What makes you think we are even slightly interested in what you had
for lunch (had you robbed a bank on your lunch break and gotten shot,
THAT would have been interesting to know about) What sort of newsgroup
would this be if EVERYONE posted what they had for lunch even one day
a week...Can you see what I'm getting to, here, Dan? There was
nothing, nada, zilch,zero in your post that every human being on the
face of the earth couldn't have gotten along just fine with out
knowing. It was boring, Dan! BORING! BOOOOOOORING!
Don't do that again, Dan, Dozo!. Because I don't want to think of you
as a gross igoramous[1], Dan, but you are pushing the envelope.

[1] Gross ignoramus - 144 times worse than an ordinary ignoramus.


shut the **** up, you useless newbie troll.

I believe it is a Winter season item, only had it twice and I
think the last time was a year ago. Art? Do you recall when
that was?

I remember it was at Toraya in Arlington. I don't think it was a year ago,
unless time does really fly that fast.

It was the first and only time I've had it. I'd definitely order it again.

It would have been even better if Dan hadn't kept making "nuts" comments
everytime I ate a piece.

--Art

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with
diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring,
entertaining,and a source of mind-boggling amounts of
excrement when you least expect it."

- Gene Spafford, 1992