![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sushi (alt.food.sushi) For talking sushi. (Sashimi, wasabi, miso soup, and other elements of the sushi experience are valid topics.) Sushi is a broad topic; discussions range from preparation to methods of eating to favorite kinds to good restaurants. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I'm probably going to (re)open up a can of worms, but I was curious as
to the view on California Rolls and what is considered 'traditional'. Although California Rolls were not part of the standard offering of 'traditional' sushi establishments, is that still the case? With enough time and enough places to make (non-traditional) sushi mainstream, I wonder when (not if) California rolls will become 'traditional'... I hear thay have invaded (at least some) restaurants in Japan. Personally, most of the sushi I eat I make myself. As for the taste of California rolls, I do like it - but it is much better with say snow crab than with the imitation crab. Is the opposition to these rolls still based on the use of 'non-traditional' ingredients (avocado, crab) or is it due to the use of fake crab (which can be rectified). Or is the taste not in keeping with 'Japanese' cuisine? - unfortunately I don't think sushi is 'Japanese' cuisine any more (at least in the US) - just of Japanese origin. Das |
|
|||
|
Das wrote: I'm probably going to (re)open up a can of worms, but I was curious as to the view on California Rolls and what is considered 'traditional'. Although California Rolls were not part of the standard offering of 'traditional' sushi establishments, is that still the case? With enough time and enough places to make (non-traditional) sushi mainstream, I wonder when (not if) California rolls will become 'traditional'... I hear thay have invaded (at least some) restaurants in Japan. Avocado doesn't strike me as alien and wrong. My family was eating it in sort of a "sashimi" style long before California rolls became trendy. Personally, most of the sushi I eat I make myself. As for the taste of California rolls, I do like it - but it is much better with say snow crab than with the imitation crab. Is the opposition to these rolls still based on the use of 'non-traditional' ingredients (avocado, crab) or is it due to the use of fake crab (which can be rectified). Or is the taste not in keeping with 'Japanese' cuisine? - unfortunately I don't think sushi is 'Japanese' cuisine any more (at least in the US) - just of Japanese origin. All those weird rolls are definitely not "Japanese". It's escaped and gone into the mainstream. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Egg Rolls | Duckie ® | Recipes | 0 | 06-05-2004 09:00 PM |
| Good California Olives or Olive Oil | Richard M. Kennedy | General Cooking | 6 | 13-12-2003 10:17 AM |
| Egg Rolls | Nicholas Zhou | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 07-11-2003 01:29 PM |
| REC: Onion Rolls | Ariane Jenkins | General Cooking | 1 | 15-10-2003 05:46 AM |