![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Kenneth said in the earlier "The 'No-Knead' technique" post about gluten
formation: The third is "formation by hydration." If you take wheat flour and mix it with water, the process of growth of gluten strands starts. As the flour becomes more fully hydrated over time, the strands grow further. Kenneth, is this same thing that Glezer refers to in her book "Artisan Baking" as "autolyse"? She states on page 12 (quoted directly from the book): "AUTOLYSE, a.k.a. RESTING The term "autolyse" (pronounced AUTO-lees and used as both noun and verb) was adopted by Professor Raymond Clavel, the esteemed French bread-baking teacher and inventor of this somewhat odd but very effective technique. During the rest time, the flour fully hydrates and its gluten further develops, encouraged by the absence of: compressed yeast, which would begin to ferment and acidify the dough (although instant yeast is included in autolyses lasting no longer than 30 minutes because of its slow activation); salt, which would cause the gluten to tighten, hindering its development and hydration; and pre-ferments (see pages 101-107), which would also acidify the dough. The flour's improved hydration and gluten development shorten the mixing time, increase extensibility (the dough rips less during shaping), and ultimately result in bread with a creamier colored crumb and more aroma and sweet wheat flavor." She goes on to say that after autolyse, the salt, yeast [yikes! - D_f_MO] and pre-ferments are added directly to the dough and worked in... I have been testing this method with my SD for quite a while now and it really does make the bread creamier in color, it has a great aroma and "seems" to work well for creating great SD bread. In my testing, I have been experimenting with different ratios of the flour and water for the autolyse. My goal was to get a good ratio of most of the flour and the water to create a soft dough (for autolyse) and to add some of dough flour and the salt to the starter to create another soft dough from it. Then after the autolyse period, mixing and kneading the two different doughs together to form the final dough for resting and rising. Has anyone else experimented with autolyse? Mike, in that earlier post you said at the end of your response to Jim, "IM(ns)HO, there is little reason to use an autolyse with sourdough, as much of the benefit of an autolyse is brought to the dough with a sourdough starter. " Can you elaborate on this? I am not sure how the starter would give the same results as an autolyse because in my experience (and IMHO) the autolyse step I have been using makes a huge difference in the resulting dough. Denny -- I can be reached by sending to "my posting name" at that free, Microsoft, electronic mail service. |
|
|||
|
On 1/18/06, Denny_from_MO wrote:
Has anyone else experimented with autolyse? Yes, I use it with a number of my yeasted breads. Mike, in that earlier post you said at the end of your response to Jim, "IM(ns)HO, there is little reason to use an autolyse with sourdough, as much of the benefit of an autolyse is brought to the dough with a sourdough starter. " Can you elaborate on this? Many of the techniques used by yeast bakers, such as biga, poolish, autolyse, were developed to try to get back some of the taste lost when they went to yeast from sourdough. Yes, the techniques do go back to the late 1800's. Bakers liked the speed and controlability of yeast, and that they didn't need to keep feeding the stuff. Another reason for biga and poolish is to reduce the cost of yeast - I can make 20+ loaves with about 5 grams of yeast. That doesn't make a single loaf of straight yeast bread. Bakers of yore were cheaper than bakers of today, and even today many bakers are pretty cheap. (Of course, I also have no idea how much yeast cost in the late 1800's.) The elaboration of a sourdough culture allows a good part of the flour to be worked slowly. I started feeding my cultures up on Friday for a bake that will happen next thursday. A 6 day lead time. I also started with about 3 grams of starter and will build it to about 15,000 grams of starter (call it 30 lbs). Using autolyse makes it easier to mix and knead dough. So does sourdough. Using autolyse helps unlock the flavor of the wheat. So does sourdough. Are there additional gains in using autolyse with sourdough? My experiments never convinced me that the results were worth the effort. Mike |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The 'No-Knead' Technique | VVizard | Sourdough | 43 | 26-01-2006 06:19 PM |
| Mixing/kneading Rye Doughs | Randall Nortman | Sourdough | 22 | 26-08-2005 09:38 PM |
| Kneading Comparison | Ed Bechtel | Sourdough | 52 | 26-04-2004 05:23 PM |
| Oven Spring | Marc Carter | Sourdough | 41 | 20-01-2004 03:57 PM |
| Sourdough Rye Bread is NOT sour - help | Denise Craig | Sourdough | 40 | 01-12-2003 05:25 AM |