LOL, Oh good grief, I wasn't replying to you Mike. Go to Google and
look who I replied to. I was continuing the theme of Sam's post with a
small twist for a joke. If anyone should have been offended it should
have been Sam but he's big enough to have seen I was joking. You
really are quite offensive with your verbal abuse Mike, that makes you
quite the hypocrite. Take the advice I gave. Chill out. You don't need
a computer to overlook things that are best left till you've calmed
down. But as Brian said, if you don't have the self control perhaps a
kill file would be the best option. I'll send one for you. That is
also a joke Mike.

Jim


On 8 Apr, 17:30, Mike Romain wrote:
TG wrote:
By being abusive to me in such an uncalled for manner

Uncalled for?

You just accused me of calling someone stupid or an idiot just because
they don't have the 'recipe' in front of them.
....
Mike

Brian, he has gone beyond trolling. He is now in the realms of libel.
He had better cover his back the law is quite clear on this on.

Jim

On 8 Apr, 17:53, Brian Mailman wrote:
Mike Romain wrote:

If you didn't live for, or weren't 'trolling' for the abuse,

And by continuing to respond, "you" fall for the trolling. *By
definition, a troll is a message fishing for a response. *Time to spit
the hook.

B/

Sam wrote:
IMO - if there would be no public audience for this crap - it would not
exist with private email exchange.
Conclusions for the underlaying reasons can be taken from that.

S



Sam, the big problem with Usenet bullies is when they finally 'do' get
called out, they 'do' go to private email, like this one has done to me,
and do things like fill your inbox with sign up confirmation forms for
homosexual pornography all dealing with assholes.

Posters like that only deserve the cops to come knocking....

Mike

Mike you have seriously flipped now. Quit this libellous posting. You
are beginning to sound certifiable.

Jim

On 10 Apr, 15:55, Mike Romain wrote:
Sam wrote:
IMO - if there would be no public audience for this crap - it would not
exist with private email exchange.
Conclusions for the underlaying reasons can be taken from that.

S

Sam, the big problem with Usenet bullies is when they finally 'do' get
called out, they 'do' go to private email, like this one has done to me,
* and do things like fill your inbox with sign up confirmation forms for
homosexual pornography all dealing with assholes.

Posters like that only deserve the cops to come knocking....

Mike

Sam wrote:
IMO - if there would be no public audience for this crap - it would not
exist with private email exchange.
Conclusions for the underlaying reasons can be taken from that.

S


Late getting to this one! Have to agree with Sam. It really is beyond my
comprehension why a bunch of so called adults, when they become involved
with a usenet group must need act like a bunch of undisciplined 10 year
olds. Gadzooks, you folks behave worse than my children did prior to
their growing up! Dear me! Guess it goes back to WHY the American
revolution happened. Limeys and Yanks just cannot live on the same side
of the Atlantic :-))!
Cheers, old Doug in BC, too busy making sourdough bread to participate
in this crap...

Sam wrote:
IMO - if there would be no public audience for this crap - it would not
exist with private email exchange.
Conclusions for the underlaying reasons can be taken from that.

S


Late getting to this one! Have to agree with Sam. It really is beyond my
comprehension why a bunch of so called adults, when they become involved
with a usenet group must need act like a bunch of undisciplined 10 year
olds. Gadzooks, you folks behave worse than my children did prior to
their growing up! Dear me! Guess it goes back to WHY the American
revolution happened. Limeys and Yanks just cannot live on the same side
of the Atlantic :-))!
Cheers, old Doug in BC, too busy making sourdough bread to participate
in this crap...