On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT), TG
wrote:

Jim, if I didn't understand you, it wasn't the first time. So, as
Vince said more artistically, "whatever".

Burney


I'll take that to mean you have nothing to refute, so finally got the
point. It was a very simple point and really didn't need all that.
Everything else is besides the point. It's got nothing to do with
anything personal. It's sad that Burney couldn't understand that I
was in fact arguing for a more relaxed understanding of the word
rather than the small, narrow minded version quoted above, it's sad
that some people always assume the worst of people they have taken a
dislike to, that they aren't capable of being broad minded enough to
understand what is actually going on in front of them, only seeing the
world coloured by their hatred, so small minded as to think that
everything is personal.

Oh well, all things change.

Jim

On 16 Mar, 02:46, viince wrote:
...
Jim:http://www.waxmansrugs.com/images/whatever.jpg




Burney dot Huff at Mindspring dot com

Hi Burney

Oh yes, I'm quite aware of that, but I hardly think I can be blamed
for you failing to take the time to read properly what has been
written.

It seems rfs is descending into school girl rhetoric. It's a pity the
level of wit and intelligence wasn't comparable.

All things change.

Jim


On 16 Mar, 20:54, BH wrote:


Jim, if I didn't understand you, it wasn't the first time. *...

Burney



...

At times the tone of the wit doesn't translate as clearly in the
written form and can be misinterpreted. Or, could it be the cultural
differences at play...whatever...











Lucy

bla bla bla