![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
All,
Its been sometime since I've kept a starter alive and so I'm trying to build a new one. I'm working with some potato peelings and KA WW flour to get it started. 100% Hydration in my cool kitchen - between 55-65 deg. F. I am not going to measure PH - so don't even ask. Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. Anyone have an idea what I should use for water temp to encourage the yeast and discourage the bacteria for a little while? I remember reading that the bacteria liked it a little warmer - but I just read (somewhere) that the bacteria might prefer the cold. So anyway - if I want to keep the bacteria in check, but give the yeast a boost - does anyone have a temperature recommendation? I've already dropped some more potato pieces back in the starter to give it a shot - so I'll see how that helped when I get home. Thanks in advance, Tom |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:38:59 -0800 (PST), Tom_Stanton
wrote: All, Its been sometime since I've kept a starter alive and so I'm trying to build a new one. I'm working with some potato peelings and KA WW flour to get it started. 100% Hydration in my cool kitchen - between 55-65 deg. F. I am not going to measure PH - so don't even ask. Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. Anyone have an idea what I should use for water temp to encourage the yeast and discourage the bacteria for a little while? I remember reading that the bacteria liked it a little warmer - but I just read (somewhere) that the bacteria might prefer the cold. So anyway - if I want to keep the bacteria in check, but give the yeast a boost - does anyone have a temperature recommendation? I've already dropped some more potato pieces back in the starter to give it a shot - so I'll see how that helped when I get home. Thanks in advance, Tom Hi Tom, I do suspect that trying to maintain your starter at the 55-65F temp you describe is the source of your problem: The bacteria growth rate does go up when the starter is warmer, but I doubt that adding a bit of warmer water will do it. You would need to find a way to keep the starter at the warmer temperature for many hours. Also, (and unrelated) you might want to just eat the potato, as it is unlikely to add anything of value to the starter. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:48:07 -0500, Kenneth
wrote: On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:38:59 -0800 (PST), Tom_Stanton wrote: All, Its been sometime since I've kept a starter alive and so I'm trying to build a new one. I'm working with some potato peelings and KA WW flour to get it started. 100% Hydration in my cool kitchen - between 55-65 deg. F. I am not going to measure PH - so don't even ask. Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. Anyone have an idea what I should use for water temp to encourage the yeast and discourage the bacteria for a little while? I remember reading that the bacteria liked it a little warmer - but I just read (somewhere) that the bacteria might prefer the cold. So anyway - if I want to keep the bacteria in check, but give the yeast a boost - does anyone have a temperature recommendation? I've already dropped some more potato pieces back in the starter to give it a shot - so I'll see how that helped when I get home. Thanks in advance, Tom Hi Tom, I do suspect that trying to maintain your starter at the 55-65F temp you describe is the source of your problem: The bacteria growth rate does go up when the starter is warmer, but I doubt that adding a bit of warmer water will do it. You would need to find a way to keep the starter at the warmer temperature for many hours. Also, (and unrelated) you might want to just eat the potato, as it is unlikely to add anything of value to the starter. All the best, My apologies... Just as I posted my note above, I re-read your message, and I had things backwards. So, starting again... When you describe "loads of sour flavor" and "almost no rise" are you talking about your bread, or your starter? If it is the starter, I would suggest that you might not have a stable culture as yet. Also, the temps at which you are working are rather (though not impossibly) low. If you could keep your starter in the range of 80F you would be likely to get better results more quickly, but adding warmer water will not do it. If you added water at 80 or 85, and left the starter in your rather cool kitchen, it would drop in temperature too quickly. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
Tom_Stanton wrote:
Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. You wish to search on this group for "leuconostoc bacteria." I believe there's a wikipedia entry even. Anyway, how your starter tastes has nothing to do with its performance in bread, and it's more recommended to eat your bread and not your starter. You're in the right ballpark with trying to warm your product, though. While my starter here in San Francisco (that I would refer to as a San Francisco starter, but it would set some off on a tangent) works at relatively cooler temps of around 60, after 20 years it's quite established. A just-begun starter isn't going to develop that low. Wrap the bowl in a heating pad, or if you have an oven with a pilot light put it in there. B/ B/ |
|
|||
|
Tom_Stanton wrote:
Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. Once year is regular. Could you elaborate a bit? Kenneth asked if it was your bread or your starter that was too sour. A good call. In the end, the only reason I care about starter is because i need starter to make bread. We tend to focus too much on starter around here. And I'm as guilty as the next person. We should focus on what makes good bread, not what makes good starter. Still, if you don't aim the arrow, you won't hit the target. Overall, I find a fresh smelling healthy starter makes the bread I want. I can vary the amount of starter I use to control the rise, the sour and the flavor of the bread. Under feeding tends to cause the starter to be more sour, to be less controllable, and to give me less rise. In general, more frequent feedings seem to favor the yeast side of the symbiosis. In a number of discussions with professional bakers who specialize in sourdough the consensus is that one feeding a day is not enough. Twice a day is the practical minimum. And the minimum amount to feed would be enough to double the size of the starter with each feeding. (I didn't say "every 12 hours" I said "twice a day." Closer to every 12 is probably better, but you have a life too.) The thickness of the starter is another factor. In general a thicker starter will produce more acetic acid, while a thinner starter will produce more lactic acid. We tend to taste the acetic acid more. Of course, with sourdough it always seems there is another factor. If you use a thinner starter it will process the available nutrients faster and will become very sour. To avoid this, more frequent feedings are needed. How wet, how dry? If you weigh your ingredients, one part of water to one part of flour is about as thin as you want to get. We call that 100% hydration. This is somewhere between 2 cups of water and 3 to 4 cups of flour (depending on how you fill your cups). A thicker starter is about 65% hydration, or 65 parts water to 100 parts flour. Or around 1 cup of water to 2 or 3 cups of water, depending on how you fill your cups. "How you fill your cups" is a matter for another discussion. Another factor is what you feed your starter. Higher ash flours tend to cause more sour. There are minor, but significant, changes between white flours. And there is a lot more ash content in whole grain flours than white. Anyway, how often, how much and what are you feeding your starters? And is this discussion about your starter or your bread? If it's about your bread, let's expand the question .... what recipe are you using, and what are your times and temperatures? Mike -- Mike Avery mavery at mail dot otherwhen dot com part time baker ICQ 16241692 networking guru AIM, yahoo and skype mavery81230 wordsmith A Randomly Selected Thought For The Day: Calm down. It's only ones and zeros. |
|
|||
|
OK - let me give a little more info.
I'm talking about my starter not any bread that I've tried to make with this starter. It's 100% hydration with mostly GM AP flour. As of now - I'm dumping it. It certainly does not smell fresh. So I'm just going to try again. But this time around I'll work on keeping it fed 2x / day. Thanks all! Tom On Dec 14, 5:53 pm, Mike Avery wrote: Tom_Stanton wrote: Anyway - on day 2 everything looked like it was doubling well. But after about 3 more days, I seem to have loads of sour flavor and smell, but almost no rise. I'm feeding it regularly - so I'm not getting hooch or a deflate. Once year is regular. Could you elaborate a bit? Kenneth asked if it was your bread or your starter that was too sour. A good call. In the end, the only reason I care about starter is because i need starter to make bread. We tend to focus too much on starter around here. And I'm as guilty as the next person. We should focus on what makes good bread, not what makes good starter. Still, if you don't aim the arrow, you won't hit the target. Overall, I find a fresh smelling healthy starter makes the bread I want. I can vary the amount of starter I use to control the rise, the sour and the flavor of the bread. Under feeding tends to cause the starter to be more sour, to be less controllable, and to give me less rise. In general, more frequent feedings seem to favor the yeast side of the symbiosis. In a number of discussions with professional bakers who specialize in sourdough the consensus is that one feeding a day is not enough. Twice a day is the practical minimum. And the minimum amount to feed would be enough to double the size of the starter with each feeding. (I didn't say "every 12 hours" I said "twice a day." Closer to every 12 is probably better, but you have a life too.) The thickness of the starter is another factor. In general a thicker starter will produce more acetic acid, while a thinner starter will produce more lactic acid. We tend to taste the acetic acid more. Of course, with sourdough it always seems there is another factor. If you use a thinner starter it will process the available nutrients faster and will become very sour. To avoid this, more frequent feedings are needed. How wet, how dry? If you weigh your ingredients, one part of water to one part of flour is about as thin as you want to get. We call that 100% hydration. This is somewhere between 2 cups of water and 3 to 4 cups of flour (depending on how you fill your cups). A thicker starter is about 65% hydration, or 65 parts water to 100 parts flour. Or around 1 cup of water to 2 or 3 cups of water, depending on how you fill your cups. "How you fill your cups" is a matter for another discussion. Another factor is what you feed your starter. Higher ash flours tend to cause more sour. There are minor, but significant, changes between white flours. And there is a lot more ash content in whole grain flours than white. Anyway, how often, how much and what are you feeding your starters? And is this discussion about your starter or your bread? If it's about your bread, let's expand the question .... what recipe are you using, and what are your times and temperatures? Mike -- Mike Avery mavery at mail dot otherwhen dot com part time baker ICQ 16241692 networking guru AIM, yahoo and skype mavery81230 wordsmith A Randomly Selected Thought For The Day: Calm down. It's only ones and zeros. |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:26:00 -0800 (PST), Tom_Stanton
wrote: OK - let me give a little more info. I'm talking about my starter not any bread that I've tried to make with this starter. It's 100% hydration with mostly GM AP flour. As of now - I'm dumping it. It certainly does not smell fresh. So I'm just going to try again. But this time around I'll work on keeping it fed 2x / day. Thanks all! Hi Tom, Don't be hasty in tossing it out... You probably are in the early stages of creating your own starter. If you still have it, just follow the suggestions Mike offered. If not, of course you can start again, but you will be a few days behind. (And, stop tasting the starter... Taste the bread.) All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:26:00 -0800 (PST), Tom_Stanton
wrote: OK - let me give a little more info. I'm talking about my starter not any bread that I've tried to make with this starter. It's 100% hydration with mostly GM AP flour. As of now - I'm dumping it. It certainly does not smell fresh. So I'm just going to try again. But this time around I'll work on keeping it fed 2x / day. Thanks all! Tom Hi Tom, You've got the hydration right, 100% is good. The flour is okay, I use an all purpose flour in my starter also. I have a few suggestions: Start with a clean glass container. If you have city water, boil the water for 2 or 3 minutes to remove the chlorine and let it cool to room temp before mixing in the flour. Store covered, at room temp and feed once a day. Pour out half of the starter and replace with an equal amount of water (de-chlorinated) and flour. If you feed more often, you will be throwing out starter that is trying to get established and actually slowing down the process. It will take somewhere around a week to ten days to get the beginnings of a starter. The odor will be strange in the beginning, it won't smell like something you want to eat. As the starter gets going the smell will change into something that reminds me of beer or wine, a yeasty, alcohol smell. Don't taste the starter, it won't hurt you but it won't tell you anything either. After the starter is established, you can store it in the fridge and reduce your feedings to about once a week. When you need it for bread, take it out about 48 hours before you want to bake. Feed it twice to be sure it is activated and growing good. If after 5 or 6 tries you still don't have a good starter, maybe you should give up. You might be one of those rare folks who kill yeast. I had an aunt like that, she couldn't even get bread to rise using commercial yeast. Good luck. Jack |
|
|||
|
Retired VIP wrote:
[..] It will take somewhere around a week to ten days to get the beginnings of a starter. That's probably because you are suggesting/using white (highly refined) flour which is not only counterproductive to growing a new starter but also unhealthy: For example: http://www.themessenger.info/archive/Nov2001/Bobak.html Better in both aspects - starting a sourdough starter and feeding your and other bodies - are full grain flours. 2 - 3 days to get a starter going with better flours should be more typical. Sam |
|
|||
|
Sam wrote:
Retired VIP wrote: [..] It will take somewhere around a week to ten days to get the beginnings of a starter. That's probably because you are suggesting/using white (highly refined) flour which is not only counterproductive to growing a new starter but also unhealthy: For example: http://www.themessenger.info/archive/Nov2001/Bobak.html Better in both aspects - starting a sourdough starter and feeding your and other bodies - are full grain flours. 2 - 3 days to get a starter going with better flours should be more typical. Several of the old timers here have written that they have NEVER been able to start a starter with white flour. The micro-organisms we need to start a starter seem to be on the outer layers of the grain, and when the grain is milled and refined, the outer layers are removed from the flour. Whole wheat or a whole grain rye work much better. As Dick Adams has pointed out, whole grain flours are bacteriologically rich. (Actually, he said dirty.) Starting a sourdough starter with them is a lot like trying to tame a wild lot. A few years back, we bought the vacant lot behind our house. We wanted to subdue the weeds and get a decent grass cover on the lot without spending a lot of money on it. A friend told us to water and mow often and fertilize from time to time. I did that. Weeds thrive when they are taller. Cutting them frequently prevents them from seeding. The grasses we want like to be watered often compared to weeds. At the end of the first summer, the lot looked a lot better. By the end of the third summer, the lot looked quite nice. Starting a sourdough starter is similar. There are many micro-organisms in the flour we use to start the starter. We want one of a limited selection of yeasts and one from a limited number of lactobacillus bacteria to become dominant. Luckily for us, they usually do that on their own if we just keep them fed, watered and mowed. As the bacteria we want develop, the increase the acidity of the starter and produce antibiotics, both of which discourage most competing microorganisms. Feeding regularly helps the bacteria and yeast we want to thrive. Weeding involves discarding half the starter before feeding it again. While this is somewhat wasteful, it is less wasteful than doubling the size of the starter with each feeding and not discarding. If you start with a cup of flour and water and double the size of the starter twice a day, in just 12 days you'll have an Olympic sized swimming pool full of starter. And 12 hours later, you'll have two pools full of starter. You can save the starter that you remove from the main container and use it to make cake, pancakes, muffins, biscuits or even bread. Samartha has step by step instructions on how to start a rye starter on his web page http://www.samartha.net that work very well. I have several sets of instructions on how to start a wheat starter (all of which work) on my web site http://www.sourdoughhome.com/startingastarter.html However, while it is very easy for an experienced person to start a starter, I always recommend beginners start with a known good starter. It eliminates lots of variables and helps keep people from becoming frustrated. I get more unhappy letters from people who are trying to start a starter than all other topics combined. Mike -- Mike Avery mavery at mail dot otherwhen dot com part time baker ICQ 16241692 networking guru AIM, yahoo and skype mavery81230 wordsmith Once seen on road signs all over the United States: Santa's Whiskers Need no trimmin' He kisses kids Not the wimmin Burma-Shave |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:30:51 -0700, Mike Avery
wrote: Sam wrote: Retired VIP wrote: [..] It will take somewhere around a week to ten days to get the beginnings of a starter. That's probably because you are suggesting/using white (highly refined) flour which is not only counterproductive to growing a new starter but also unhealthy: For example: http://www.themessenger.info/archive/Nov2001/Bobak.html Better in both aspects - starting a sourdough starter and feeding your and other bodies - are full grain flours. 2 - 3 days to get a starter going with better flours should be more typical. There you go Tom, I don't know what I'm talking about. But now that the experts have spoken, you should have no further trouble getting a starter growing. Jack |
|
|||
|
Retired VIP wrote:
There you go Tom, I don't know what I'm talking about. But now that the experts have spoken, you should have no further trouble getting a starter growing. If you read what I wrote, you have seen the words "more typical". Atypical is a new starter grown with white (AP style) flour getting so sour after two days that it stops growing - as it happened. In such a situation, without recognizing what is going on and taking adequate steps, the whole experiment would be considered a failure. At one point, there was somebody selling sourdough starters along with litmus papers for pH testing which I think is a very good idea. Sam |
|
|||
|
On 18 Dec, 14:35, Sam wrote:
Retired VIP wrote: [..] It will take somewhere around a week to ten days to get the beginnings of a starter. That's probably because you are suggesting/using white (highly refined) flour which is not only counterproductive to growing a new starter but also unhealthy: For example:http://www.themessenger.info/archive/Nov2001/Bobak.html Better in both aspects - starting a sourdough starter and feeding your and other bodies - are full grain flours. 2 - 3 days to get a starter going with better flours should be more typical. Sam You're not turning into an evangelical health nut I hope Sam. Jim |