A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Food and Cooking » Sourdough
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures.

chef vs regular starter?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 04:36 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Mike Romain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default chef vs regular starter?

TG wrote:
On 13 Dec, 21:53, Mike Romain wrote:
Dick Adams wrote:
"Mike Romain" wrote in shosting.com...
[ ... ]
'Chef' is just dormant starter that has gone 'flat' and lost it's
bubbles, after a grow period same as 'mother'. I call that dormant
Starter. If I leave mine like that for very long, it dies.
Levian, biga, sour just mean 'sponge'.
I have been using the terms starter and sponge which mean the same thing.
'Sour' to me is the smell. ...
Herewith, based on my authority as R.F.S. Chief Immoderator, I designate and
confirm you, Mike Romain, as Minister of Misinformation for this newsgroup.
--
Dicky

Yup, me quoting right from this FAQ, eh.http://www.faqs.org/faqs/food/sourdo...ection-35.html

LOL!

I think Darrell Greenwood should take 'some' of the credit too, his FAQ
for this newsgroup....

Mike- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


There's a lesson there Mike. Don't talk crap about crap you don't know
crap about.

Jim


Actually Jim, I am right.

No one has corrected my post other than to just say it's wrong in
'their' educated or uneducated opinion.

After reviewing the literature, my post still stands as posted.

Wet snow, deep snow, dry snow, squeaky snow, corn snow, no matter, all
are still just 'snow'.

Mike
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 04:40 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Mike Romain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default chef vs regular starter?

TG wrote:
On 12 Dec, 22:54, Mike Romain wrote:
...
The commercial yeast gives one good blast to make you think something is
going on, then it dies and you have to wait the 4 to 7 days for the wild
yeast to take over.
...
Mike


You talk like you've tested your starter Mike. I suspect you're
talking from your Google. How do you know that wild yeasts have taken
over? My experience of using yeast is that it never dies. It may well
revert to type becoming like wild S.c. but it never dies out from my
experience. At least it has always made bread that tastes like it was
made with S.c.

Jim


I used a recipe to grow my starter that called for the pinch of yeast.
It reacted as stated above.

If my SD starter goes dormant for 2 or 3 days despite feedings, it has
died, so it would stand that the commercial yeast would die under the
same circumstances.

My bread sure looks and tastes like 'real' sourdough. My starter's
'mother' has been going since May I think.

Mike
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 05:44 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Mike Romain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default chef vs regular starter?

TG wrote:

He really is full of himself.


In full troll mode today eh?

So what? One, maybe two more drinks before you become incoherent again?

Mike
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 06:40 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Kenneth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 513
Default chef vs regular starter?

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:07:16 -0800 (PST), TG
wrote:

My experience of using yeast is that it never dies. It may well
revert to type becoming like wild S.c. but it never dies out from my
experience. At least it has always made bread that tastes like it was
made with S.c.


Howdy,

'Not likely...

The s.c. are unable to survive in the lower pH environment.

In effect (and assuming that one is not adding commercial
yeast over time) one starts a "commercial yeast" culture.
But, as it is fed, (and again, over time) the "wild" yeasts
and lactobacilli carried in on the added flour start to
multiply. With that, the pH lowers, and the commercial yeast
is unable to survive. Eventually, one is left with the
culture derived from the critters other than the commercial
yeast used at the outset.

All the best,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 19-12-2007, 06:42 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Kenneth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 513
Default chef vs regular starter?

On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:40:22 -0500, Mike Romain
wrote:

If my SD starter goes dormant for 2 or 3 days despite feedings, it has
died, so it would stand that the commercial yeast would die under the
same circumstances.


Huh...?

Using that logic, one could argue that if birds can fly,
snakes can fly.

All the best,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 08:46 AM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 19 Dec, 16:36, Mike Romain wrote:
TG wrote:
On 13 Dec, 21:53, Mike Romain wrote:

After reviewing the literature, my post still stands as posted.


Mike- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The point is Mike, that right or wrong, you are talking out of your
arse because you are just regurgatating what you've read with no
understanding or more to the point humility. Many of us have been
there Mike, and many of us have caught the flak for being a out of
line. If you stop spouting what you've read as if you had first hand,
in depth knowledge of it you will stop getting laughed at and poked.
You're like the little Chihuahua who goes into the pack of Pit Bulls
shouting the odds. You don't have the muscle to back up your
missdeeds. Be respectful to those who actually have the knowledge
Mike. Having read a web page doesn't give you knowledge. You only know
what was written. It means Jack shit.

Jim
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 08:52 AM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 19 Dec, 16:40, Mike Romain wrote:
I used a recipe to grow my starter that called for the pinch of yeast.
It reacted as stated above.

If my SD starter goes dormant for 2 or 3 days despite feedings, it has
died, so it would stand that the commercial yeast would die under the
same circumstances.

My bread sure looks and tastes like 'real' sourdough. My starter's
'mother' has been going since May I think.

Mike- Hide quoted text -


See Mike, this is the consequence of spouting your mouth off about
that which you know nought. Your words mean nothing. Since what you're
saying flies in the face of both mine and many other peoples
experience, not to mention bakers throughout history, this is the chef
you've been carping on about, no body is going to take seriously what
you've said about one single incidence of a self confessed no nought
quoting from the FAQ as if he knew something.

Okay I've gone far enough.

Jim
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 08:54 AM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 19 Dec, 17:44, Mike Romain wrote:
TG wrote:

He really is full of himself.



In full troll mode today eh?

So what? One, maybe two more drinks before you become incoherent again?

Mike


Oh, grow up Mike.

Jim
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 09:03 AM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 19 Dec, 18:40, Kenneth wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:07:16 -0800 (PST), TG

wrote:
My experience of using yeast is that it never dies. It may well
revert to type becoming like wild S.c. but it never dies out from my
experience. At least it has always made bread that tastes like it was
made with S.c.


Howdy,

'Not likely...

The s.c. are unable to survive in the lower pH environment.

In effect (and assuming that one is not adding commercial
yeast over time) one starts a "commercial yeast" culture.
But, as it is fed, (and again, over time) the "wild" yeasts
and lactobacilli carried in on the added flour start to
multiply. With that, the pH lowers, and the commercial yeast
is unable to survive. Eventually, one is left with the
culture derived from the critters other than the commercial
yeast used at the outset.

All the best,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."


Kenneth, with all respect. I have a culture going in my kitchen that
if left, as is the case sometimes, it becomes as low as pH 2.6, I
refresh it and it carries on as normal. It's the Ginger Beer Plant. Go
to the Yahoo Group and read the literature
"An Exposition on the Fermentation of Ginger- Beer Plant
Brewing with the Gelatinous Ginger Beer Plant:
Converting Lactic-Acid Beverages to Alcoholic Ginger Beer
Composition of the Ginger- Beer Plant:
As Isolated by H. Marshall Ward"
http://tinyurl.com/3dz8s7
http://tinyurl.com/ysuh7z

No Mike, I'm not just quoting, I'm using this as reference. I've got
17 years of experience using both sourdough and yeasted starters, not
to mention my family's bakery running since the middle of the 19th C.


You'll see that it contains amongst other things S.c.. S.c. is and was
a wild yeast. Like domesticated dogs they can quickly return to type.
Mike Avery also use this analogy with very good reason. See the recent
thread the S,c and S.e.

Jim
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 09:18 AM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 19 Dec, 16:36, Mike Romain wrote:
TG wrote:
On 13 Dec, 21:53, Mike Romain wrote:
Dick Adams wrote:
"Mike Romain" wrote in shosting.com...
[ ... ]
'Chef' is just dormant starter that has gone 'flat' and lost it's
bubbles, after a grow period same as 'mother'. I call that dormant
Starter. If I leave mine like that for very long, it dies.
Levian, biga, sour just mean 'sponge'.
I have been using the terms starter and sponge which mean the same thing.
'Sour' to me is the smell. ...
Herewith, based on my authority as R.F.S. Chief Immoderator, I designate and
confirm you, Mike Romain, as Minister of Misinformation for this newsgroup.
--
Dicky
Yup, me quoting right from this FAQ, eh.http://www.faqs.org/faqs/food/sourdo...ection-35.html


LOL!


I think Darrell Greenwood should take 'some' of the credit too, his FAQ
for this newsgroup....


Mike- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


There's a lesson there Mike. Don't talk crap about crap you don't know
crap about.


Jim


Actually Jim, I am right.

No one has corrected my post other than to just say it's wrong in
'their' educated or uneducated opinion.


Actually Mike, I'll put it another way. You aren't right at all, the
person you are quoting may or may not be right. But you have no
position what so ever because, you only have read something. That is
meaningless without the experience to back it up.

You may as well be saying 'Landing on the moon would be impossible
because the surface is like quicksand. I'm right. I read it and no one
has corrected me.'

You have a very smart peace of kit inside your head. Use it.

The irony of all this last bit of the thread is you're disputing the
existence of the very thing you're quoting about at the start. You may
as well be carrying a pigs bladder on a stick.

Jim
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 01:00 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Kenneth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 513
Default chef vs regular starter?

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:03:53 -0800 (PST), TG
wrote:

On 19 Dec, 18:40, Kenneth wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:07:16 -0800 (PST), TG

wrote:
My experience of using yeast is that it never dies. It may well
revert to type becoming like wild S.c. but it never dies out from my
experience. At least it has always made bread that tastes like it was
made with S.c.


Howdy,

'Not likely...

The s.c. are unable to survive in the lower pH environment.

In effect (and assuming that one is not adding commercial
yeast over time) one starts a "commercial yeast" culture.
But, as it is fed, (and again, over time) the "wild" yeasts
and lactobacilli carried in on the added flour start to
multiply. With that, the pH lowers, and the commercial yeast
is unable to survive. Eventually, one is left with the
culture derived from the critters other than the commercial
yeast used at the outset.

All the best,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."


Kenneth, with all respect. I have a culture going in my kitchen that
if left, as is the case sometimes, it becomes as low as pH 2.6, I
refresh it and it carries on as normal. It's the Ginger Beer Plant. Go
to the Yahoo Group and read the literature
"An Exposition on the Fermentation of Ginger- Beer Plant
Brewing with the Gelatinous Ginger Beer Plant:
Converting Lactic-Acid Beverages to Alcoholic Ginger Beer
Composition of the Ginger- Beer Plant:
As Isolated by H. Marshall Ward"
http://tinyurl.com/3dz8s7
http://tinyurl.com/ysuh7z


Howdy,

I gather from your "with all respect" comment that you are
disagreeing with something I wrote, but I don't know what it
is.

What did I say that you are at odds with?

Thanks,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 02:35 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
TG[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 322
Default chef vs regular starter?

On 20 Dec, 13:00, Kenneth wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:03:53 -0800 (PST), TG





....net wrote:
....net wrote:
My experience of using yeast is that it never dies. It may well
revert to type becoming like wild S.c. but it never dies out from my
experience. At least it has always made bread that tastes like it was
made with S.c.


Howdy,


'Not likely...


The s.c. are unable to survive in the lower pH environment.


In effect (and assuming that one is not adding commercial
yeast over time) one starts a "commercial yeast" culture.
.... With that, the pH lowers, and the commercial yeast
is unable to survive. Eventually, one is left with the
culture derived from the critters other than the commercial
yeast used at the outset.


Kenneth



Kenneth, with all respect. I have a culture going in my kitchen that
if left, as is the case sometimes, it becomes as low as pH 2.6, I
refresh it and it carries on as normal. It's the Ginger Beer Plant. Go
to the Yahoo Group and read the literature
"An Exposition on the Fermentation of Ginger- Beer Plant
Brewing with the Gelatinous Ginger Beer Plant:
Converting Lactic-Acid Beverages to Alcoholic Ginger Beer
Composition of the Ginger- Beer Plant:
As Isolated by H. Marshall Ward"
http://tinyurl.com/3dz8s7
http://tinyurl.com/ysuh7z


Howdy,

What did I say that you are at odds with?

Thanks,
--
Kenneth


- Show quoted text -


Kenneth, and you a smart guy. Okay I should have deleted all the other
rubbish. I've done that now so you can see it more clearly. Even so I
don't think it looks like we're agreeing with each other. I don't
often disagree with what you say Kenneth but on this occasion I think
you're repeating what others have said rather than relying on
experience. I'm not saying that lb's don't move in. It was/ is a wild
yeast after all. Don't forget that S.c was around long before Pasteur
isolated it. Bakers were using it long before it was cultured
sparately. It's survived in the ginger beer plant culture for who
knows how many centuries along with lb's and other yeasts. Suddenly
some guy found it didn't survive in his culture in the lab and all
that history is forgotten.

Jim
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 02:58 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Kenneth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 513
Default chef vs regular starter?

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:35:39 -0800 (PST), TG
wrote:


Kenneth, and you a smart guy. Okay I should have deleted all the other
rubbish. I've done that now so you can see it more clearly. Even so I
don't think it looks like we're agreeing with each other. I don't
often disagree with what you say Kenneth but on this occasion I think
you're repeating what others have said rather than relying on
experience. I'm not saying that lb's don't move in. It was/ is a wild
yeast after all. Don't forget that S.c was around long before Pasteur
isolated it. Bakers were using it long before it was cultured
sparately. It's survived in the ginger beer plant culture for who
knows how many centuries along with lb's and other yeasts. Suddenly
some guy found it didn't survive in his culture in the lab and all
that history is forgotten.

Jim


Hi again Jim,

Why do you believe that it is s.c. that is alive and well in
the low pH cultures you describe?

Thanks,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 04:29 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Dick Adams[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 563
Default chef vs regular starter?


"Kenneth" wrote in message ...
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:35:39 -0800 (PST), TG
"TG" wrote:


[ ... ]


Killfiling "TG" and Mike Romain really cleans this group up. If you, Kenneth,
insist on coddling and encouraging these bumblebrains, you'll need to go, as well.

Well, probably you won't see this, as you have had me killfiled for years.

--
Dicky
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 20-12-2007, 05:12 PM posted to rec.food.sourdough
Mike Romain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default chef vs regular starter?

Kenneth wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:40:22 -0500, Mike Romain
wrote:

If my SD starter goes dormant for 2 or 3 days despite feedings, it has
died, so it would stand that the commercial yeast would die under the
same circumstances.


Huh...?

Using that logic, one could argue that if birds can fly,
snakes can fly.

All the best,


You are right, it was a bad analogy.

Mike
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Gym Lockers - Honda Car Forum - Best Credit Cards - Mortgage