![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello there--
Much thanks in advance for where ever this email travels and for the eyeballs that take the time to read it. You probably encounter this question from time to time, but I am getting a lot of conflicting advice. I've been trying to create a natural sourdough starter for a few years now. I've been successful getting natural starters, but alas, none are sour. I'm in the East, Rockaway Beach, NYC. I'm going under the assumption that I can create a sourdough culture over here... I've tried organic flours (unbleached white, rye, and wheat in various combos) and filtered water. I've tried organic grapes with the above-- no luck. I've always gotten starters, no real problem, but none sour. I've lagged feedings on them as well, some for periods of several days... others more quickly. No difference, really. I've even tried cheating (out of frustration), by opening Lactobacillus Acidophillus gel caps and pouring the contents into a flour-water mixture. Voila! Sourness! After a few feedings, it hummed along. I was cheating, but, I finally had the sourness. After only another week or two, the yeasts took over and the bacteria seemed to be non-existent. No more sourness. It disappeared. All gone. No more. Bye-bye. One thing I have not done yet, but probably should, is temp control. I have fermented at 68-70F pretty consistently. I have heard that the temp should be closer to 90F. I did visit Acme in SF and they proof at 68F, I believe. I didn't ask what temp they kept their starter at, but I did notice that it seemd to be out in the same area as the proofing loaves. I dunno. Short of the temp issue (which I will try next) I am looking for ideas. I don't want to stoop to buying a culture! Any input appreciated. Ron Farrell __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:38:55 -0800 (PST), Ron Farrell
wrote: I've been trying to create a natural sourdough starter for a few years now. I've been successful getting natural starters, but alas, none are sour. Howdy Ron, I am not picking at words when I ask: Are you saying that the starter is not sour, or the bread you bake with it is not sour? I ask because the taste of the starter is really not relevant to the taste of the bread. Please respond to my question above and we can take it from there... HTH, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
Ron Farrell wrote:
.. After only another week or two, the yeasts took over and the bacteria seemed to be non-existent. No more sourness. It disappeared. All gone. No more. Bye-bye. One thing I have not done yet, but probably should, is temp control. I have fermented at 68-70F pretty consistently. I have heard that the temp should be closer to 90F. Temp is one of the main factors. May I point you the http://samartha.net/SD/docs/DW-post1-4n.html#058 It's not accurate information because you don't know what actually is growing in your starter and the growth maxima are very much dependend on species. But it gives you some idea what the influence can be. A graph would be better to see the temperture dependency, the maximums and where they overlap. Dan Wing shows some in his book. That's in celsius, here is a conversion from F to C (left column is F): 64 17 66 18 68 20 70 21 72 22 74 23 76 24 78 25 80 26 82 27 84 28 86 30 88 31 90 32 92 33 94 34 96 35 98 36 100 37 102 38 104 40 106 41 If you would be able to have a relatively constant temperature space at maybe 88 F, figure out your starter phases ( http://samartha.net/SD/SourdoughDefinition.html#GC ) at that temperature and do regular refreshments for maybe three days, keeping it at optimum growth you'll probably see a change more in your favor. Btw. the LB's from the pill, probably Acidophilus and Bifi-something you used won't stay in sourdough environment. I would bet that you have SD native LB's in your starter and just keep them subdued somehow. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? No I don't, I hate their ads! Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ sure, anything else? - I don't have TV, because I have not yet found anyone to pay me enough to watch the stuff. Samartha -- remove -nospam from my email address, if there is one SD page is the http://samartha.net/SD/ |
|
|||
|
"Ron Farrell" wrote in message=20 news:mailman.6.1067544678.57077.rec.food.sourdough @mail.otherwhen.com... You probably encounter this question from time to time, but I am getting a lot of conflicting advice. Too many are making SD bread. We try to limit the number by obfuscating. I've been trying to create a natural sourdough starter for a few years now. I've been successful getting natural starters, but alas, none are sour. Starters are not supposed to be sour. It is the bread that is supposed to be sour but even that view is losing popularity. Rye starters, however, are miserably sour. Rye bread thrives on misery. [ ... ] I don't want to stoop to buying a culture! You could stoop even further and get a one free. Any input appreciated. OK, appreciate that! --- DickA |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 11:56:09 -0500, Don Hellen
wrote: I don't want to stoop to buying a culture! You could stoop even further and get a one free. If you want a SF starter, try friends of carl: http://home.att.net/~carlsfriends/ Or, you can buy a reasonable inexpensive one by going to ebay and using the search terms "sourdough starter." Some sell ( through the "buy it now" option) for less than $6.00 or, if you are lucky, you might place a bid and get one for as little as $3.99. Yankee Harvest markets Mister Baker SF Sourdough Starter for around $7 which includes First Class USPS shipping. Mine came in a couple days. http://www.yankeegrocery.com/sourdough_bread.html I haven't tried it yet and will probably store it in the refrigerator until after I sort out my "natural starter" experiment. Of course there's Ed Wood's Sourdough International http://www.sourdo.com/ but he is far too expensive. I may change my mind later depending on the success of the other starters, but for now I can spend $20 on something else. Also I got a SF starter from King Arthur Flours for $7 ppd. I wrote and asked for an ingredient list and the reply said: bacteria, yeast and lactose. They forgot the beef drippings. Like the Yankee Harvest starter, this one is also in the refrigerator awaiting the outcome of my experiment. In this case you are instructed to use 1/4 tsp to make the sponge and then use it all for the dough. They do not provide instructions for making a traditional active starter for storage in the refrigerator. I had heard that KA does have instructions for stretching the packet to about 50 batches, but the reply claimed not to know but promised to research it for me. Even if all you get out of the packet is the 12 batches they allude to, that's only around 60 cents per batch, which for me amounts to 2 lbs of dough - enough for 3 plump baguettes. The claimed advantage of not maintaining an active starter is not only do you not have the hassle of messing with it, but there is less chance that it will develop into a "house starter" over time. Since I could not get several attempts to make a "house starter" to work, I doubt I have any "house organisms" to contaminate an active starter. What I'm thinking is that if you've been unsuccessful for a long time, why not start with something that is known to work? That Yankee Harvest starter has been written up on the Internet enough to be credible. I believe it's been around a good while, so it must have something going for it. Of course, that's you decision, and if you simply must make a starter yourself, See bloody details of the pain and agony of making your first natural starter on the thread entitled "Natural Starter Experiment". Ignore the lone troll post - he's desperate for attention because he has what psychiatrists call a Justifiable Inferiority Complex. you can keep on trying. That's what I did, thanks to the help and encouagement of friendly posters here. It's beginning to look like I might just have it working this time - it is now quite active and has developed a deep earthy sour smell. |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 18:04:31 GMT, (Bob) wrote:
Clarification: ...you are instructed to use 1/4 tsp to make the sponge and then use it all for the dough. I meant: Use all of the *sponge* for the dough, not all of the dry starter in the packet. They actually have you using commercial yeast in the dough. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sourdough Starter | CMMPDX2@aol.com | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 19-11-2003 03:37 PM |
| Sourdough Starters (6) Collection | thelimeyno1 | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 18-11-2003 02:26 PM |
| Sourdough Starters (8) Collection | andy.mich | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 17-11-2003 04:46 PM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 30-10-2003 10:38 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 12-10-2003 09:54 AM |