![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello all
Another new one here, well old new anyway, lol. I'm just getting back into sourdough baking, did it years ago for a while. I have been using the starter from carlsfriends and been having good results. http://home.att.net/~carlsfriends/ma...tysLoaves.html will give you an idea of where I am at. I have a question regarding wheat bread. I usually use Gold Medal Better for Bread flour. Recently I came across some Gold Medal Better for Wheat Bread flour and liking the taste of wheat bread thought I'd give it a try. I mixed up a couple of loaves as I usually do except substituting the wheat flour for my usual stuff. The first rising went well, more than doubled. I cut it in half and put it into my two pullman pans, placed them in the oven with the light on, temp about 80F. Nothing happened. After 12 hours I baked it, put it on a coat hanger and hung it out in the yard, the squirrels can't even naw at it! Last weekend I used the same recipe but substituted only 2 cups of wheat flour and the same thing happened. As an experiment, after 10 hours, I dumped the two loaves back in the mixer, added a cup of starter and let it mix, didn't add any flour. I cut that in half, put it in the pans and back in the oven, in about 2 hours they had risen to the top of the pans, I baked it and got fairly good bread. This week I thought I'd get smart and do the same thing but put it in the pans for the first rising seeing as that always worked well. Well ha ha, guess what. It's been sitting there for 10 hours now and is still about 3/4 inch short of the top of the pan. When I am going to start a loaf here is what I do: Friday morning, take the starter out of the fridge and leave it on the counter for the day. Friday evening mix 3 cups of bread flour, two cups of room temperature spring water and one cup of starter in the mixer bowl. Cover it with plastic and put it in the oven with the light on. In the morning it is light and frothy and I mix in everything else, kneed it for about 20 minutes. Any ideas on what might be going on here? Thanks for your time. Marty in Massachusetts |
|
|||
|
Marty wrote:
losta details about dough Any ideas on what might be going on here? Anything how you treat your starter? Your dough times without anything happening look impressive (no pun intended). Also, there seems to be a lot of inconsistency happening - one day this, next day that but, as you said, you are doing the same thing, being smart and it fails. So, what's the difference? Contrary to different opinions at times here, I think that an established starter runs like a clockwork - all parameters the same (temp, time, hydration, inoculation amount and condition of it). What you describe that it rises initially, then, once in pans, nothing. Is your starter exhausting itself on the first run? It does not look like the flour change is doing this. You may see less rise with full grain, maybe longer fermentation, but consistent squirrel challenges just from flour change? With the old flour, was it working well? So, lotsa questions back ;-) Samartha -- remove -nospam from my email address, if there is one SD page is the http://samartha.net/SD/ |
|
|||
|
"Marty" wrote in message = ... [ ... ] (Click on the news ID to see the subject message again.) Any ideas on what might be going on here? It seems typical for dumb luck. The first time or two you get extraordinary results, then blah ... Whole grain flour is not so good for rising as white flour. It is loaded with pointy microcruntleys. Rye, if you ever get around to that, is worse, because it does not form gluten. There is a certain amount of carbon dioxide that will become available, and you may have to think about not wasting it. Dough manipulations may waste it. If your preferments and dough, at any point, get past yeast peak (to a state where starvation begins), you risk poor dough, that, for one thing, may leak gas. (I try to take the rise finally beyond yeast peak, for flavor and a touch of sourness, but I am not sure that is common practice -- it is a critical step which has as a hazard dough collapse.) Preferments, particularly the sponge, if the sponge=20 method is used, should be developed to vibrancy (yeast peak). Usually you will get a better rise, well, more vertical rise, with a firmer dough, other things being equal. (In a Pullman pan, though, that may not make any difference, at least as long as the dough does not climb above the top of the pan.) There is a strong current of thought at r.f.s. which=20 assumes that the dough does not need to be very=20 much inflated when it is put into the oven, because=20 the steam and radiant heat in the oven will blow it=20 up in any case. Well, that does not apply to what=20 you seem to be doing (Pullman loaves), so if you=20 are beginning to combine that rationale with the one=20 you started with, your results will most likely suffer. Your photo shows very nice bread, and reflects good photo technique. I hope and trust you will find your=20 way through the circumstances you are reporting upon. --- DickA |
|
|||
|
Samartha Deva wrote: Marty wrote: losta details about dough Any ideas on what might be going on here? Anything how you treat your starter? When I first got it from carlsfriends I mixed it into a cup of slightly warm water, let that set for half an hour or so then added a cup of KA AP flour and let it brew for a day or so while it got nice and bubbly. I then poured off a cup, cleaned the container, put it back with a cup of warmish water and a cup of KA AP flour. Did that two more times and it seemed well established. First loaf was nothing to write home about, after that things began working quite well. The first batch was most likely my technique. Now I keep about two cups of starter in a 40 oz. ex-peanut butter jar in the fridge. When I am going to make bread I take it out on Friday morning and leave it on the counter to warm, Friday evening I make up the sponge using 1 cup of starter, 3 cups of bread flour and 2 cups of room temperature spring water. In the morning his is frothy and light, no problem to this point, works every time. To the remaining starter I add 1 cup of KA AP flour and a cup of water, when I notice activity I put it back in the fridge. By the end of the week it has a layer of hooch about 3/8 inch deep if that means anything. I just stir that back in. Your dough times without anything happening look impressive (no pun intended). Also, there seems to be a lot of inconsistency happening - one day this, next day that but, as you said, you are doing the same thing, being smart and it fails. So, what's the difference? The only difference that I can think of is the time of year. This is an old house, about 115 years old, and has steam heat. In warm weather with the windows open everything is at a nice uniform warm, not so now that it is getting cold. I use the oven with the light on for proofing. Now the light isn't enough so I added a small laboratory type heater to get the temperature back up in the lo 80's Contrary to different opinions at times here, I think that an established starter runs like a clockwork - all parameters the same (temp, time, hydration, inoculation amount and condition of it). What you describe that it rises initially, then, once in pans, nothing. Is your starter exhausting itself on the first run? Last week when I re-mixed the two loaves with more starter I thought that might be the problem. That's why this week I put it in the pan for the first rising. It took 12 hours to get near the top of the pan and seemed to be going back down so I baked it. Rather dense but good tasting, not much good for a descent work/school lunch sandwich though so I made a leavened loaf of plain white, same pan, same oven, same flour (but all white) etc. and that came out fine. Note to self: Make a proofing box! It does not look like the flour change is doing this. You may see less rise with full grain, maybe longer fermentation, but consistent squirrel challenges just from flour change? With the old flour, was it working well? That is going to be next weeks project, right back to basics, see if that still works. So, lotsa questions back ;-) Thanks much for your, and others, help Marty P.S. Years ago I had some starter from Sourdough Jack that smelled wonderfull. If anyone is still using that and would like to share I'd appreciate it. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fabulous Bread from a Bread Machine | Blooming Rose News | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 26-06-2004 01:33 PM |
| Stale Bread (6) Collection. | Andy & Shell | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 20-12-2003 04:49 PM |
| Italian 00 Flour | drei | Baking | 13 | 23-10-2003 12:38 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ basicbread | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 12-10-2003 09:55 AM |
| rec.food.sourdough FAQ.Starter.Doctor | Darrell Greenwood | Sourdough | 0 | 12-10-2003 09:54 AM |