![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Sourdough (rec.food.sourdough) Discussing the hobby or craft of baking with sourdough. We are not just a recipe group, Our charter is to discuss the care, feeding, and breeding of yeasts and lactobacilli that make up sourdough cultures. |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"TG" wrote in message oups.com... On 22 Apr, 13:59, "no" wrote: . I make beer, so am always careful about temperature and yeast when there's a 5-gallon batch at stake. Beer yeast is particularly sensitive to temperature because it's bred for slow fermentation. I also sometimes make beer bread using homebrew with live yeast, just (unpasteurized) homebrew, flour, and salt. It's also a slow rise process, producing decent flavor and texture and not sour at all. It would probably make better bread, but worse beer, without the hops. Hi, The first thing that I thought when I read your original post was 'is some other brewer's / commercial yeast getting in to the starter?' Is this a possibility? This is the first time I've read anyone complain about the stability of Carl's starter. It reminds me of complaints about starters made using commercial yeast. Jim I bake yeast bread and/or pizza once or twice a week using Fleischmann's from a jar. That jar lives right next to my starter in the fridge. Both have airtight lids, for what it's worth. I do make a point of not opening my starter jar when I'm messing with commercial yeast, even if there's a commercial yeast sponge brewing elsewhere in the kitchen. There's always a chance that Fleischmann's has invaded the environment, though. I think I'll move the sourdough operation to another room for a while. Thanks for the tip. Dave |
|
|||
|
no wrote:
I bake yeast bread and/or pizza once or twice a week using Fleischmann's from a jar. That jar lives right next to my starter in the fridge. Both have airtight lids, for what it's worth. I do make a point of not opening my starter jar when I'm messing with commercial yeast, even if there's a commercial yeast sponge brewing elsewhere in the kitchen. There's always a chance that Fleischmann's has invaded the environment, though. I think I'll move the sourdough operation to another room for a while. Thanks for the tip. Baker's Yeast (Fleischmann) doesn't stand a chance in a SD environment - that's established. 3 days max and they are gone! The remains probably eaten by LB's. And - doubtful if the yeasts make spores - the one's from Fleischmann don't need to - the continuation of their species is taken care of by humans and that's going on for - ? maybe 3/4 of a century of continuous human nursing at Fleischmann's - extreme yeast decadence. What do they get to eat? Cornstarch or something like that. If you have two kinds of sourdough in the same fridge, it's another story. And - compare the SD's fed with full grain flours - they are still in contact with nature and have to compete. Battle hardened warriors snuffing the yeast wimps for pleasure. It seems there is a multitude of LB's in a natural sourdough anyway and just the one's liking the provided environment best, dominate at a given time. I would not worry at all with that yeast accomplishing anything on your sourdoughs. Samartha |
|
|||
|
Samartha Deva wrote:
Baker's Yeast (Fleischmann) doesn't stand a chance in a SD environment - that's established. 3 days max and they are gone! The remains probably eaten by LB's. Michael Gaentzle says 2 feedings will take care of the invaders. And - doubtful if the yeasts make spores - the one's from Fleischmann don't need to - the continuation of their species is taken care of by humans and that's going on for - ? maybe 3/4 of a century of continuous human nursing at Fleischmann's - extreme yeast decadence. What do they get to eat? Cornstarch or something like that. Since about 1880 actually. Around 125 years. And, I think it's molasses. Still not very good.... I would not worry at all with that yeast accomplishing anything on your sourdoughs. No argument there. Even if your starter is weak, when it revives, it will kill off the bakers yeast. Mike |
|
|||
|
It seems there is a multitude of LB's in a natural sourdough anyway and just the one's liking the provided environment best, dominate at a given time. recent scientific literature, mostly from various Italian teams seems to identify 5 different yeasts (and sometimes different versions of same yeast) that can be dominant in a given SD cultures and 16 different Lacto Bacilli. But for LB particularly there seems to be some additionally that current scientific methods can't cultivate and therefore identify. But while a given SD culture may have a certain dominant flora, it seems samples of other yeasts and LB can survive in a culture alongside the dominant. Presumably a change in regime might alter balance of power so to speak. I believe this doesn't mean however that all SD cultures contain all 5 yeasts and all 16 LB. for anyone themselves being or with customers being gluten intolerant (celiac sprue) this paper may be of interest http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/70/2/1088 yours andy f I would not worry at all with that yeast accomplishing anything on your sourdoughs. Samartha |
|
|||
|
"Mike Avery" wrote in message news:mailman.2.1177214051.89402.rec.food.sourdough @mail.otherwhen.com... : The starter paper you pointed to put a lot of emphasis on temperature. I haven't found it to be very critical. Remember, historically speaking effective temperature control is a relatively recent technology - sourdough has been used since at least the time of the pharaohs. On that scale, thermometers are recent introductions. And yet, sourdough worked. Frequency of feeding is more critical. : Mike Well, either my "temperature therapy" or just a few weeks of vigilant feeding have brought it back to life and I've managed to create a few decent loaves lately. Unfortunately, I've also made one brick and one over-proofed monster that looked a lot like something from "Alien." So my question for the veterans is: how do you schedule this type of baking? If everything works just right, I can sponge overnight, start the first rise in the morning, the second rise after work, and bake later that evening. As often as not, though, (recalling the numerous times I've gotten serious about this and then moved on to other things after some frustration) the first rise gets ahead of itself and I come home to the guts-eaten-out Alien, or it's in a slow mood and I end up putting it in the fridge to stall the process. So, who has figured out a rhythm that gets dependable loaves every few days throughout the week? A few times a month over the past 10+ years I make pizza using good old commercial yeast. The timing works out just about right if I knead in the morning, put it in the fridge, get someone to take it out at around 4:00, and it's good to punch and form by 6:00. I suspect that the fridge may be the answer to weekday sourdough, but haven't figured out a schedule yet. Dave |