![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Restaurants (rec.food.restaurants) Providing a location-independent forum for the discussion of restaurants and dining out in general, and for the collection of information about good dining spots in remote locations. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at
least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:28:42 -0500, Shawn Hirn wrote:
Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? It is because in the areas where lots of chain restaurants exist, 5-10 years ago they were just undeveloped fields. There are no locally owned restaurants. If you get out to newly developed areas in the northeast, such as those that were farmland 5 years ago, you'll find the same proportion of chain restaurants. And it is not a good thing. |
|
|||
|
Shawn Hirn wrote:
Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? I'm sure Tim will have lots to say about this, but I'm sure it has to do with how many wets there are in an area. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
"Shawn Hirn" wrote in message
... Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. Visit Texas sometime. You'll be blown away by all the fast food places there. |
|
|||
|
Shawn Hirn wrote:
Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? Good reasons suggested so far. I've also heard that many of them started out there, though I haven't looked up the data myself. You're right though about the limited selection in the NJ-PA area. It's tough reading all these discussions (in aff-f) about Del Taco, JitB, etc. with no frame of reference. There are plenty of local burger places in my area (Newark/Elizabeth) where you can get a quick, inexpensive fried and flattened burger to go, at prices that compete with the major chains. From my experience you can find some pretty awesome, cheap Mexican takeout in New Brunswick where there's a large Hispanic population, once you get away from the college neighborhoods. Once, while driving through PA, I stopped somewhere near Bethlehem and saw what appeared to be a hot dog and donuts restaurant. And they had a drive-thru, which according to the Dialogues of Saukretes makes it a certified fast food establishment. So, I tend to believe we have a nice variety of fast food in this region, but you have to go digging around for it. -- Albert Worschey |
|
|||
|
In article , Albert
Worschey wrote: Good reasons suggested so far. I've also heard that many of them started out there, though I haven't looked up the data myself. You're right though about the limited selection in the NJ-PA area. It's tough reading all these discussions (in aff-f) about Del Taco, JitB, etc. with no frame of reference. To the list of good reasons submitted so far, I would add two others: 1. Economy in decline in the Northeast. Fast food franchises have tended to expand rapidly in booming areas, not declining refinery or steel towns. 2. The toll road system. It's been awhile since I was in a car in Penn/NJ/NY, but my recollection was of a lot of toll roads, with limited access points. Fast food places grow like mushrooms at the onramps and offramps and cloverleafs of our freeway system. In-N-Out, for example, almost always tries to find a location where there large yellow and red signs are visible from a mile away and where motorists can decide to exist at the offramp, grab a burger, and get back on the highway. This is possible to do on toll roads, but at much higher cost and hassle. (I suppose the fast food chains could cut deals to locate on the actual toll road...I recall that this is how Howard Johnson operated. Makes it hard for newer FF chains to do the same.) In California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Oregon, places I am well familiar with, there are very few toll roads. (One I know of is in Southern California, linking San Juan Bautista to Irvine, about a 20-mile private stretch. And, sure enough, limited access points and no clusters of fast food chains and gas stations at the access points.) In Florida, there are both freeways ("free") and toll roads. On one long toll road from Fort Lauderdale down to the tip, we passed no fast food places at all. On the neighboring highway, hundreds of them. I don't think this is the primary reason for fewer FF places, just something to add to the list. --Tim May |
|
|||
|
Tim May wrote:
In article , Albert Worschey wrote: Good reasons suggested so far. I've also heard that many of them started out there, though I haven't looked up the data myself. You're right though about the limited selection in the NJ-PA area. It's tough reading all these discussions (in aff-f) about Del Taco, JitB, etc. with no frame of reference. To the list of good reasons submitted so far, I would add two others: 1. Economy in decline in the Northeast. Fast food franchises have tended to expand rapidly in booming areas, not declining refinery or steel towns. 2. The toll road system. It's been awhile since I was in a car in Penn/NJ/NY, but my recollection was of a lot of toll roads, with limited access points. Fast food places grow like mushrooms at the onramps and offramps and cloverleafs of our freeway system. In-N-Out, for example, almost always tries to find a location where there large yellow and red signs are visible from a mile away and where motorists can decide to exist at the offramp, grab a burger, and get back on the highway. What if they decide not to exist? This is possible to do on toll roads, but at much higher cost and hassle. (I suppose the fast food chains could cut deals to locate on the actual toll road...I recall that this is how Howard Johnson operated. Makes it hard for newer FF chains to do the same.) In California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Oregon, places I am well familiar with, there are very few toll roads. (One I know of is in Southern California, linking San Juan Bautista to Irvine, about a 20-mile private stretch. And, sure enough, limited access points and no clusters of fast food chains and gas stations at the access points.) In Florida, there are both freeways ("free") and toll roads. On one long toll road from Fort Lauderdale down to the tip, we passed no fast food places at all. On the neighboring highway, hundreds of them. There's fast-food every 40 miles, or so, on the FL Turnpike and the access is much easier than exiting off of I95 or I75. I don't think this is the primary reason for fewer FF places, just something to add to the list. --Tim May |
|
|||
|
Dan wrote:
Tim May wrote: In article , Albert Worschey wrote: Good reasons suggested so far. I've also heard that many of them started out there, though I haven't looked up the data myself. You're right though about the limited selection in the NJ-PA area. It's tough reading all these discussions (in aff-f) about Del Taco, JitB, etc. with no frame of reference. To the list of good reasons submitted so far, I would add two others: 1. Economy in decline in the Northeast. Fast food franchises have tended to expand rapidly in booming areas, not declining refinery or steel towns. 2. The toll road system. It's been awhile since I was in a car in Penn/NJ/NY, but my recollection was of a lot of toll roads, with limited access points. Fast food places grow like mushrooms at the onramps and offramps and cloverleafs of our freeway system. In-N-Out, for example, almost always tries to find a location where there large yellow and red signs are visible from a mile away and where motorists can decide to exist at the offramp, grab a burger, and get back on the highway. What if they decide not to exist? They can exist into the trees along the highway. This is possible to do on toll roads, but at much higher cost and hassle. (I suppose the fast food chains could cut deals to locate on the actual toll road...I recall that this is how Howard Johnson operated. Makes it hard for newer FF chains to do the same.) In California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Oregon, places I am well familiar with, there are very few toll roads. (One I know of is in Southern California, linking San Juan Bautista to Irvine, about a 20-mile private stretch. And, sure enough, limited access points and no clusters of fast food chains and gas stations at the access points.) In Florida, there are both freeways ("free") and toll roads. On one long toll road from Fort Lauderdale down to the tip, we passed no fast food places at all. On the neighboring highway, hundreds of them. There's fast-food every 40 miles, or so, on the FL Turnpike and the access is much easier than exiting off of I95 or I75. This is also true of the toll roads in NJ and the PA turnpike. Every 40-50 miles or so there's a service area along the road (usually one in each direction or on median between them) that invariably has a contract with one or more fast food outlets. But Tim makes a good observation regarding non-tolled highways. Routes 1 and 22, just to name two here, are untolled smorgssbords in every direction. But as for fast food, it's mostly the same three major chains Shawn mentioned repeating themselves every few miles, with an Arby's here and there and maybe a couple Checkers drive-thrus. -- Albert Worschey |
|
|||
|
On Jan 9, 8:15 am, Golden California Girls
wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? I'm sure Tim will have lots to say about this, but I'm sure it has to do with how many wets there are in an area. The variety of fast food burger places in the bay area is not amazing. I've never seen a Sonic, a Whataburger, or a Fat Burger here. In-n-Out took a half-century to move north. And Carl's Jr. owns Hardee's. Further, we have no White Castles, and even Dairy Queens are few and far between. The part of the west that we live in is not blessed with fast food chains in general. Fried chicken joints are in short supply; hating KFC I would drive to East SJ to get Church's. Luckily now there are a few PopeYes outposts. Sometimes nothing satisfies like deep fried food: Where are the Long John Silvers, the Arthur Treachers? The lone Dunkin' Donuts went out of business. |
|
|||
|
On Jan 9, 5:59*pm, wrote:
The variety of fast food burger places in the bay area is not amazing. I've never seen a Sonic, a Whataburger, or a Fat Burger here. In-n-Out took a half-century to move north. And Carl's Jr. owns Hardee's. Further, we have no White Castles, and even Dairy Queens are few and far between. The part of the west that we live in is not blessed with fast food chains in general. Fried chicken joints are in short supply; hating KFC I would drive to East SJ to get Church's. Luckily now there are a few PopeYes outposts. Sometimes nothing satisfies like deep fried food: Where are the Long John Silvers, the Arthur Treachers? *The lone Dunkin' Donuts went out of business. I enjoyed deep fried oysters today for lunch at Cook's in Menlo Park. Also, had a mini crab louie. Not cheap, though... $15. Karen |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Albert Worschey wrote: Shawn Hirn wrote: Something I have been wondering about is, why do the western states, at least California and Nevada have so many more different fast food restaurants then we do in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey? For example, in California, there are tons of fast food faux Mexican places such as Del Taco, Polo Loco, etc. while in the northeast, the only one I can think of is Taco Bell. The variety of fast food burger places out west is amazing. Just a few off the top of my had: In-N-Out, Fat Burger, Whataburger, Sonic, Burger King, McDonalds, Carls Jr., Jack In the Box, Hardee's, and Wendays. In my area, its only Wendy's, McD's, and BK. For fast food chicken, I think we're pretty much on par east and west coasts, but for burger and Mexican joints, there seems like a lot of untapped opportunity here in the northeast. I wonder why the variety of fast food places is so much better in the west coast than east coast? Do any of you have any ideas? Good reasons suggested so far. I've also heard that many of them started out there, though I haven't looked up the data myself. You're right though about the limited selection in the NJ-PA area. It's tough reading all these discussions (in aff-f) about Del Taco, JitB, etc. with no frame of reference. There are plenty of local burger places in my area (Newark/Elizabeth) where you can get a quick, inexpensive fried and flattened burger to go, at prices that compete with the major chains. From my experience you can find some pretty awesome, cheap Mexican takeout in New Brunswick where there's a large Hispanic population, once you get away from the college neighborhoods. Once, while driving through PA, I stopped somewhere near Bethlehem and saw what appeared to be a hot dog and donuts restaurant. And they had a drive-thru, which according to the Dialogues of Saukretes makes it a certified fast food establishment. So, I tend to believe we have a nice variety of fast food in this region, but you have to go digging around for it. You might be right. We also have great diners, which I don't believe exist at all in the western states. Some diners have great burgers, but they are definitely not fast food. |
|
|||
|
In article , Shawn
Hirn wrote: You might be right. We also have great diners, which I don't believe exist at all in the western states. Some diners have great burgers, but they are definitely not fast food. We have diners. Even a chain version of them called "Margie's Diner," seen in many of the same locations In-N-Out is located. (And such canonical Western places as Denny's, Sambo's, and IHOP all started in California. They are essentially diners, albeit not in railroad cars.) There are also authentic "train car" kinds of diners in several big cities, including ones in downtown San Francisco. For exactly the same reason as on the east coast, these tend to be downscale places. A Santa Rosa restaurant owner even has a show on "Food Network" called "Diners, Dives, and Drive-Ins," where he visits various places. He recently visited several diners in California. And also the Felafel Drive-In in San Jose, a place I started going to in the 1970s. BTW, there are also diners out in places like Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, etc. Tim May |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:11:22 -0800, Tim May wrote:
1. Economy in decline in the Northeast. Have you taken a look at the census tables of average income by state? -- Larry |
|
|||
|
Tim May wrote:
In article , Shawn Hirn wrote: You might be right. We also have great diners, which I don't believe exist at all in the western states. Some diners have great burgers, but they are definitely not fast food. We have diners. Even a chain version of them called "Margie's Diner," seen in many of the same locations In-N-Out is located. (And such canonical Western places as Denny's, Sambo's, and IHOP all started in California. They are essentially diners, albeit not in railroad cars.) There are also authentic "train car" kinds of diners in several big cities, including ones in downtown San Francisco. For exactly the same reason as on the east coast, these tend to be downscale places. We still have quite a few "railcar" diners around here (most of them manufactured in Asbury Park, NJ in the mid-20th century), and they're also typically downscale. But for what they lack in class they make up for in speed and (usually) taste. There's one about 3 miles from my home that operates 24 hours and serves a very tasty griddle burger (I'd estimate it at 3-4 oz) on a fresh hard roll in under 2 minutes for about $2. They're part of a once prevalent local chain that has been dying off and mutating since the 1970's. This may have happened elsewhere as well, but in northern NJ quite a few railcar diners and greasy spoons seemed to want to cash in on the White Castle craze when it took off. So we have a lot of one-offs and small chains called "White Something-or-other", usually tucked away in neighborhoods and away from major highways. The burgers seem to have an ancestry in the White Castle formula but now trump WC in taste and value. The White Manna in Hackensack make sliders worthy of a 50 mile pilgrimage. Of course, it also helps that White Castle's burgers have gone downhill since their golden days. -- Albert Worschey |