There it's 100% secure from all bacteria, insects and critters that will eat it.

So I recommend to store your food on Mars, too.

(Moon is also ok, but I can't recommend Venus and Mercury, too hot)

There it's 100% secure from all bacteria, insects and critters that will eat it.

So I recommend to store your food on Mars, too.


I tried that one time and my food still went bad. What am I doing
wrong?

Lemme tell ya' , it really sent me into orbit!


Signed:


Frustrated in gravity

Craig Watts wrote:

There it's 100% secure from all bacteria, insects and critters that will eat it.

So I recommend to store your food on Mars, too.


I tried that one time and my food still went bad. What am I doing
wrong?

A Martian day is 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35.244 seconds long. So you
cannot use the times in the Terran books.

B/

Brian Mailman wrote:

Craig Watts wrote:

There it's 100% secure from all bacteria, insects and critters that will eat it.

So I recommend to store your food on Mars, too.


I tried that one time and my food still went bad. What am I doing
wrong?

A Martian day is 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35.244 seconds long. So you
cannot use the times in the Terran books.

Plus the barometric pressure is all wrong. Check your barometer and
altitude, and correct using the proper USDA charts.

"Craig Watts" wrote in message
...
There it's 100% secure from all bacteria, insects and critters that will
eat it.

So I recommend to store your food on Mars, too.


I tried that one time and my food still went bad. What am I doing
wrong?

Lemme tell ya' , it really sent me into orbit!


Signed:


Frustrated in gravity


You might have neglected to remember that, since there's less atmosphere on
Mars, more radiation gets through. Who knows what effects that might have
on stored food! (Not to mention the bacteria, etc, that might be there, but
we simply haven't discovered yet!)

Blanche Nonken wrote:

Plus the barometric pressure is all wrong. Check your barometer and
altitude, and correct using the proper USDA charts.

It would have to be the UMDA charts.... Unless Mars outsizes Texas and
becomes the 51st State.

B/

The OP has posted trash to every food-related newsgroup I've gone. This
is by far his least-offensive post.

--
to respond, change "spamless.invalid" with "optonline.net"
please mail OT responses only

"Scott" wrote in message
...
The OP has posted trash to every food-related newsgroup I've gone. This
is by far his least-offensive post.


Yes, I see he recently appeared on the wine ng also. His name re-arranges to
"Homosexual Troll," you may have noticed. Cute.

il Sun, 16 May 2004 10:35:05 -0400, "Ken Anderson" ha scritto:

"Scott" wrote in message
...
The OP has posted trash to every food-related newsgroup I've gone. This
is by far his least-offensive post.


Yes, I see he recently appeared on the wine ng also. His name re-arranges to
"Homosexual Troll," you may have noticed. Cute.

Cute? Desperate more like it, to post meaningless drivel at random
newsgroups.
I mean,one should stick to meaningful drivel. ;-)))
--
Cheers,
Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ]

Brian Mailman wrote:

Blanche Nonken wrote:

Plus the barometric pressure is all wrong. Check your barometer and
altitude, and correct using the proper USDA charts.

It would have to be the UMDA charts.... Unless Mars outsizes Texas and
becomes the 51st State.

Bah. You one of them "Mars First!" hooligans?

In article ,
Blanche Nonken wrote:

Brian Mailman wrote:

Blanche Nonken wrote:

Plus the barometric pressure is all wrong. Check your barometer and
altitude, and correct using the proper USDA charts.

It would have to be the UMDA charts.... Unless Mars outsizes Texas and
becomes the 51st State.

Bah. You one of them "Mars First!" hooligans?

Not me! "Earth First - we can mine the other planets later."
Anyway, wouldn't the ambiant radiation on Mars sterilize the food?