![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Arnie N. Techball wrote: Did they have real recipes for something or were they just a bunch of cannibals who ate each other ? This may be a troll, but I'm just foolish enough to respond: Early in Margaret Visser's book, _The Rituals of Dinner_, she discussed cannibals, She began by examining the assumption that civilized people are horrified by cannibalism and that they, in turn, imagine that cannibals must be devoid of anything remotely resembling etiquette. She points out that these primitive cultures -- where one would not expect to find well-developed table manners -- have extremely clear sets of guidelines for correct behavior, especially as applies to something as important as the eating of other humans. All humans are very concerned about the foods they do and do not eat, the "correct" way to prepare them, etc. Neanderthals did not, as far as anyone knows, write -- so if you mean recipes in our modern sense, of course they did not have recipes. However, if we examine pre-literate societies that do, or have, practised cannibalism as a regular part of their culture (leaving aside, for our current purpose, individual psychotic cannibals), we find that they definitely do have standardised, culturally approved methods of preparation. These include such details as how the flesh is cut, stored, cooked, and which ingredients should accompany the flesh during cooking. I have collected a number of these "recipes" (which, I hasten to add, I have not tried). Survival cannibals, like the famous Uruguayan rugby team of _Alive!_, tend to impose socially-approved rules upon something as supposedly antisocial as the eating of one's companions -- and they make distinctions between preparation methods, different cuts, etc. Even in extremis, the urge to think, and organize one's thoughts, about food in social ways suggests that "recipes" (in the broadest sense) are a natural part of human existence. Neanderthals were human and, while we don't know if they had speech or not, they must have had ways of transmitting their accumulated cooking knowledge to younger generations of Neanderthals. Such hearth-side cooking classes must have included some rudimentary recipes. __________________________________________________ _____ Gary Allen On the Table http://www.hvinet.com/gallen |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Soup | Scented Nectar | Vegan | 1493 | 02-02-2005 10:53 PM |