![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Historic (rec.food.historic) Discussing and discovering how food was made and prepared way back when--From ancient times down until (& possibly including or even going slightly beyond) the times when industrial revolution began to change our lives. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Coming from a family one side of which is (southern)
Italian, I know a great deal about pasta, having consumed, cooked, and made huge quantities of it in my younger days. In our family pasta was always cooked "al dente" and pasta that was even a bit beyond "al dente" was rejected. Watching a lot of cooking shows on TV nowadays I see them cooking the pasta "al dente" and then they dump this carefully cooked pasta into a pan containing the sauce and proceed to expose it to heat for another 5-10 minutes! Doesn't this turn it into mush? Where and when did this vile technique develop? -- Bob Kanyak's Doghouse http://www.kanyak.com |
|
|||
|
Opinicus wrote:
Coming from a family one side of which is (southern) Italian, I know a great deal about pasta, having consumed, cooked, and made huge quantities of it in my younger days. In our family pasta was always cooked "al dente" and pasta that was even a bit beyond "al dente" was rejected. Watching a lot of cooking shows on TV nowadays I see them cooking the pasta "al dente" and then they dump this carefully cooked pasta into a pan containing the sauce and proceed to expose it to heat for another 5-10 minutes! Doesn't this turn it into mush? Where and when did this vile technique develop? It's a commie plot. Actually, it has some currency in Italy, but done a bit differently. The appropriate pasta for the dish is undercooked and finished, briefly, in the sauce. Not for anything approaching 10 minutes, though. The premise is that the sauce will penetrate the pasta and thereby make the whole thing more tasty. In the US, it's based on the notion that actually tasting the pasta is not a good thing. In Italy, it's based on the notion of cramming more flavor into each mouthful. Pastorio |
|
|||
|
"Bob (this one)" wrote in message ... Opinicus wrote: Coming from a family one side of which is (southern) Italian, I know a great deal about pasta, having consumed, cooked, and made huge quantities of it in my younger days. In our family pasta was always cooked "al dente" and pasta that was even a bit beyond "al dente" was rejected. Watching a lot of cooking shows on TV nowadays I see them cooking the pasta "al dente" and then they dump this carefully cooked pasta into a pan containing the sauce and proceed to expose it to heat for another 5-10 minutes! Doesn't this turn it into mush? Where and when did this vile technique develop? It's a commie plot. No, no....it was those effete H'English poofters vacationing in Taormina Actually, it has some currency in Italy, but done a bit differently. The appropriate pasta for the dish is undercooked and finished, briefly, in the sauce. Not for anything approaching 10 minutes, though. I suspect that the custom arose in restaurant cooking and the prep of single servings. At home I always think of mixing the sauce with the pasta in the family serving bowl, pottery/stoneware, etc., which even if prewarmed, cools pretty quickly and halts the pasta breakdown. Watching restaurant chefs, they seem oftem to reverse the process, fixing the sauce then adding the pasta from the pot to the saute pan and mixing before plating the individual servings The premise is that the sauce will penetrate the pasta and thereby make the whole thing more tasty. In the US, it's based on the notion that actually tasting the pasta is not a good thing. In Italy, it's based on the notion of cramming more flavor into each mouthful. Perhaps, additionally, that sauce in Italy is a more precious commodity than pasta, and is expected to go farther. Brought up on US "servings", I can remember my first evening in Italy, waiting for the ship in Livorno, 1962. The flight from Naples had gotten me there in time to dump my gear and lunch on red mullet grilled over grapevine and herbs (and I suppose the first Italian white wine I had ever drunk - I wish I could remember which, but all I recall was that it came in a carafe from a barrel and how good it tasted and how well I napped afterwards). I had a late supper on the waterfront and their was a lot of pasta to a little clam sauce (but I was smart enough to pass on the cheese, so the waiter wouldn't think I was a complete gringo dumbass). TMO |
|
|||
|
Opinicus wrote:
Coming from a family one side of which is (southern) Italian, I know a great deal about pasta, having consumed, cooked, and made huge quantities of it in my younger days. In our family pasta was always cooked "al dente" and pasta that was even a bit beyond "al dente" was rejected. Watching a lot of cooking shows on TV nowadays I see them cooking the pasta "al dente" and then they dump this carefully cooked pasta into a pan containing the sauce and proceed to expose it to heat for another 5-10 minutes! Doesn't this turn it into mush? Where and when did this vile technique develop? Goodness only knows! If mine is to be cooked into a dish (such as a tuna pasta bake), I simply soak it in hot water for 10-15 minuets while I cook the sauce, then assemble the dish and then cook it. The pasta usually comes out just fine that way. I don't even bother soaking lasagna. -- Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
|
|||
|
The normal thing to do in an Italian home (rather than a restaurant, about which I don't know) is to have the sauce ready in a pan when the pasta is cooked. Drain the pasta very quickly (so that quite a lot of the water still clings to it) and put it straight into the pan where the sauce was prepared. Stir, so that they mingle, and serve immediately. Lazarus -- Remover the rock from the email address |
|
|||
|
The normal thing to do in an Italian home (rather than a restaurant, about which I don't know) is to have the sauce ready in a pan when the pasta is cooked. Drain the pasta very quickly (so that quite a lot of the water still clings to it) and put it straight into the pan where the sauce was prepared. Stir, so that they mingle, and serve immediately. Lazarus -- Remover the rock from the email address |
|
|||
|
Lazarus Cooke wrote:
The normal thing to do in an Italian home (rather than a restaurant, about which I don't know) is to have the sauce ready in a pan when the pasta is cooked. Drain the pasta very quickly (so that quite a lot of the water still clings to it) and put it straight into the pan where the sauce was prepared. Stir, so that they mingle, and serve immediately. Lazarus This is what I do with non-bake pasta. Fresh pasta takes seconds to cook. -- Kate XXXXXX R.C.T.Q Madame Chef des Trolls Lady Catherine, Wardrobe Mistress of the Chocolate Buttons http://www.diceyhome.free-online.co.uk Click on Kate's Pages and explore! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Al Dente Pasta Machine | charlie atherton | Cooking Equipment | 1 | 26-01-2004 12:10 AM |