![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General (rec.food.drink) For general discussions related to drink that are NOT appropriate for other forums. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Following up to Peter H.M. Brooks
Not shocked, but it would be a nice thing if there was a sort of appelation controllee system for such things, for instance, meat not grown in the place it alleges to come from. Why exactly do you support this protectionism? Knowing the true source of a product is not protectionism. If the source has to be concealed, what does that say of the reputation of the true producing area? Is it that you like the idea of third world farmers starving? What has political non alignment got to do with it? But no, I always buy vietnamese champagne, chinese beef and african whisky. I strongly believe the developing countries should be given a helping hand by being allowed to forge developed world products. Or is it that you imagine that specifying the location also ensures the quality? Ah yes, I have been waiting for this one since you mentioned cheddar. When a producer can guarantee his product will not be counterfeited he is in the position to build a reputation for quality if he wishes. The consumer, knowing the source is able to descriminate between the good and the bad over time. A piece of cheese just labelled "cheddar" tells us almost nothing about the cheese in the present situation. -- Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso UK walking "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" -- you can email us@ this site Spain,cuisines and walking "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" -- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap |
|
|||
|
"mUs1Ka" wrote in message ... "Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote in message ... However the issue isn't the speed of drinking. It is the exponential increase in the time conversations take as you increase the number of people. It takes much longer to serve, chat to, and move through to the dining room, ten people, than it does six - much, much longer. Try it some day. Already have, not a problem. Conversations are in small groups. In my experience, the exponential effect you described just doesn't take place. Conversations continue en route to the dining room and thereafter. The secret is to invite the right people. Oh, yes, inviting the right people is just the ticket - however, inviting the same people all the time isn't. So you have to take calculated risks. If the conversation is in small groups then, unless you are entertaining fifteen or more people (which I advise against), you have failed. The trick is to have one group conversation that may, from time to time, divide into small sub-converstions, but, like a variation on a theme in music, rejoins the main theme. Otherwise you end up inviting some people and never enjoying the conversation with them - unless you go in for the horrible '60s cocktail party convention of 'circulating' what a bore. -- Middle age is when you're sitting at home on a Saturday night and the telephone rings and you hope that it isn't for you - 'It takes all sorts' Milton Shulman |
|
|||
|
"Reidİ" wrote in message ... Following up to Peter H.M. Brooks Actually it depends rather on the sort of olive oil. Highly refined (pure yellow) olive oil does have a high smoke point. Extra Virgin Olive Oil, since it contains many 'ímpurities' has a much lower smoke point and is quite unsuitable for deep frying. the usual reason given for not using extra virgin for frying is cost for no benefit. Quite. You might as well deep fry crayfish. -- Middle age is when you're sitting at home on a Saturday night and the telephone rings and you hope that it isn't for you - 'It takes all sorts' Milton Shulman |
|
|||
|
"Reidİ" wrote in message ... Following up to Peter H.M. Brooks Not shocked, but it would be a nice thing if there was a sort of appelation controllee system for such things, for instance, meat not grown in the place it alleges to come from. Why exactly do you support this protectionism? Knowing the true source of a product is not protectionism. If the source has to be concealed, what does that say of the reputation of the true producing area? Knowing the true source isn't protectionism, agreed, that can be on the label. Insisting that a generally understood generic name (cheddar, sherry, port, etc.) is legally only attached to one place is. Is it that you like the idea of third world farmers starving? What has political non alignment got to do with it? But no, I always buy vietnamese champagne, chinese beef and african whisky. I strongly believe the developing countries should be given a helping hand by being allowed to forge developed world products. If you believe that then you can't, at the same time, support the protectionism that would insist that whisky comes from Scotland (whiskey, of course can come from Ireland, Yankland or Outer Mongolia) and that cheddar only comes from Cheddar etc. etc.. Beef comes from cattle, the location isn't important. Or is it that you imagine that specifying the location also ensures the quality? Ah yes, I have been waiting for this one since you mentioned cheddar. When a producer can guarantee his product will not be counterfeited he is in the position to build a reputation for quality if he wishes. The consumer, knowing the source is able to descriminate between the good and the bad over time. A piece of cheese just labelled "cheddar" tells us almost nothing about the cheese in the present situation. Indeed. This is another protectionist measure, trade marking. It can mean that the produce is identified with a particular producer for good or ill. This, however, has nothing to do with regional identities. Joe Bloggs can buy an acre in Rhiems, plant a few grapes and call the muck he produces Champagne, if he does the same a dozen kilometres away, he can be prosecuted. This makes no sense. -- Middle age is when you're sitting at home on a Saturday night and the telephone rings and you hope that it isn't for you - 'It takes all sorts' Milton Shulman |
|
|||
|
On 30 Sep 2003 21:21:13 GMT, Adrian Tupper
wrote: "Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote in news:3F795E9E.6050601 : Chota Hazri - Five Thirty (05h30) What's one o' them then? Pukka and Chota Hazri are Hindi words adopted by the English during the time of the Raj. Pukka means, basically, 'well cooked'. For the English it came to mean first class or proper. Chota Hazri is little breakfast or early morning tea taken before dawn. For the English, it means bed tea or light breakfast snack. Burra Hazri would be the later big breakfast. |
|
|||
|
"Robert Klute" wrote in message ... On 30 Sep 2003 21:21:13 GMT, Adrian Tupper wrote: "Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote in news:3F795E9E.6050601 : Chota Hazri - Five Thirty (05h30) What's one o' them then? Pukka and Chota Hazri are Hindi words adopted by the English during the time of the Raj. Pukka means, basically, 'well cooked'. For the English it came to mean first class or proper. Chota Hazri is little breakfast or early morning tea taken before dawn. For the English, it means bed tea or light breakfast snack. Burra Hazri would be the later big breakfast. Care is needed with the pronunciation. Burra (often, bara) has the u of 'cup' and means big. Burra with the u of 'full' means bad. You eat it, you choose. m. |
|
|||
|
"mUs1Ka" wrote in message ... "Robert Klute" wrote in message ... On 30 Sep 2003 21:21:13 GMT, Adrian Tupper wrote: "Peter H.M. Brooks" wrote in news:3F795E9E.6050601 : Chota Hazri - Five Thirty (05h30) What's one o' them then? Pukka and Chota Hazri are Hindi words adopted by the English during the time of the Raj. Pukka means, basically, 'well cooked'. For the English it came to mean first class or proper. Chota Hazri is little breakfast or early morning tea taken before dawn. For the English, it means bed tea or light breakfast snack. Burra Hazri would be the later big breakfast. Care is needed with the pronunciation. Burra (often, bara) has the u of 'cup' and means big. Burra with the u of 'full' means bad. You eat it, you choose. What a useful distinction to bear in mind if you have an unpleasant breakfast! -- 'They.. sucked the Tobacco smoak in greedily, swallow it down with the Water. For which reason..generally at..the first Pipe in the Morning, they fall down drunk and insensible.' - 1698 A. Brand 'Embark Muscovy to China' |
|
|||
|
Care is needed with the pronunciation. Burra (often, bara) has the u
of 'cup' and means big. Burra with the u of 'full' means bad. You eat it, you choose. Maybe it's just me but 'cup' and 'full' have the same 'u' sound /Jaqy --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003 |
|
|||
|
"MC_Emily" wrote in message ... Care is needed with the pronunciation. Burra (often, bara) has the u of 'cup' and means big. Burra with the u of 'full' means bad. You eat it, you choose. Maybe it's just me but 'cup' and 'full' have the same 'u' sound /I knew somebody was going to say that. I was going to go into a further description of the cup sound, but in the end, I couldn't be arsed. m. |
|
|||
|
Robert Bannister wrote in news:3F7B602F.5080802
@it.net.au: Adrian Tupper wrote: No it's the difference between leaping out of bed when the alarm goes off and pausing for a minute or two after waking up naturally. What a strange life style. I only have an alarm clock so that I can keep my eyes closed till the last minute. I am always awake beforehand. Perhaps, if I were to attempt getting up at an odd time (currently, I go for 5.30 am), then your method might be appropriate, although I have never had problems with waking at 2, 3 or 4 am when required. My body clock tells me to wake up. Me too. I don't use an alarm. When I did I set it at the latest time possible and, because I hate the things so much, I would wake up just beforehand, get up and turn it off. Progression onto not having an alarm at all was quite simple. I can't reliably wake up too early though. I tend to wake frequently during the night when I try. -- Adrian |
|
|||
|
Reidİ wrote:
Following up to Robert Bannister No it's the difference between leaping out of bed when the alarm goes off and pausing for a minute or two after waking up naturally. What a strange life style. I only have an alarm clock so that I can keep my eyes closed till the last minute. but there are many who are not like that. I call most of those 'teenagers'. I went through that phase too. -- Rob Bannister |
|
|||
|
Peter H.M. Brooks wrote:
"Robert Bannister" wrote in message ... Peter H.M. Brooks wrote: The post-pub curry is a late supper. If it is a very late opening pub then it might be a Midnight Feast. Back in the 60s, I knew a curry shop in Bethnal Green that served very hot and quite horrible curries till 2 am. This was more an on-the-way-home snack. In my youth there was a late night horror known as Twiggies Pie Cart. You could order a number of exotic dishes to stimulate the palate you could specify that 'hotters' were added. The pies were all at least a day old. If you made the mistake of dining there (for, at that time of night everything else was closed) you learned, early in life, quite what the combination of a bad hangover and heart burn felt like. An unforgettable experience was the pie cart in the centre of Adelaide. After an evening on the beer, one went there and had a 'pie floater'. This consists of a particularly obnoxious meat pie 'floating' in a thinnish pea soup. Tomato sauce (ketchup) is, of course, compulsory. I'm not sure whether the pie cart is still there. Perhaps a South Australian contributor can tell us. -- Rob Bannister |
|
|||
|
Peter H.M. Brooks wrote:
"Reidİ" wrote in message ... Following up to Peter H.M. Brooks Tio Pepe is very nice, though these days, being in Cape Town, I usually have South African sherries, which are very good indeed. Sherry comes from Jerez. South Africa should think up their own designation for their fortified wines. Indeed. No doubt some day the Yanks will be forced to think up some different name for the gnat's **** that they call 'Budweiser'. Presumably you are as shocked when you come accross cheese claiming to be cheddar that doesn't come from Cheddar. Only when it's orange. Don't the French or the Belgians call it 'chester'? -- Rob Bannister |
|
|||
|
Frances Kemmish wrote:
Robert Bannister wrote: Peter H.M. Brooks wrote: I think that the heat moves things out a bit at mid-day and the cool of the evening moves them back a little. Not just weather - life style. In most of the famous Russian novels, the aristocracy have breakfast (zavtrak) around noon, a meal whose name I have forgotten in the early evening, dinner (obyed) towards midnight and supper in the small hours of the morning. In "Buddenbrooks", by Thomas Mann, which I read in English, the family always ate "first breakfast', and then another breakfast later in the morning. I don't know what term was used in the original though. "Zweites Frühstück" (second breakfast) is still the normal term in Germany for what we might call 'morning coffee'. Manual workers and tradesmen, who start work very early, will commonly stop for '2nd breakfast' at about 9 am. -- Rob Bannister |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:58:43 +0100, "mUs1Ka" wrote:
Care is needed with the pronunciation. Burra (often, bara) has the u of 'cup' and means big. Burra with the u of 'full' means bad. You eat it, you choose. I know, the burra mem sahib has hit upside of the head a couple of times when my 'mis-pronounciation' was too well timed. ![]() |