On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:06:51 GMT, "Gregory Morrow"
gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net wrote:


Dan Abel wrote:

In article ,
"Bob Terwilliger" wrote:

Jim wrote:

I see the "meaning" of my post passed right over your head. Show me
that letter you wrote to the legal department at Baja Fresh describing
their business as a swindle.

Here's a BETTER definition of the word "shill" than the one you chose:


Have you two guys thought about taking this to Email?


Lol...b00b and Empanada Jim seem to have quite the grudge match going --
except it's not real entertaining to watch anymore ;-)

I don't have a grudge match - that implies he would be worth having
one with - he is not - he is a cypher named zero with an iq to match.
Actually, he is cheap entertainment, but not quite ready for prime
time.


jim

enchiladajim blustered:

I suppose you'll tell me you are a member of Mensa, but that would be
alie, they wouldn;t admit anyone as dumb as you are.

Put up your money and we'll compare IQ's. I've offered to put MY money up
and be fairly adjudicated; where's YOUR money? Are you indigent or just
cowardly?

If you lack the courage to put your money where your mouth is, then you
ought to just shut the **** up and crawl away with your tail between your
legs. If you're indigent, then you ought to spend less time on Usenet and
more time on a job-hunt.

The word "fyce" comes from the Old South. It means a little dog that puts
on a brave face and yaps like crazy when its owner is standing right next to
it, but when the dog faces anything by itself, it runs away. When cornered,
it cowers. That's you to a T, isn't it, Jimbaby? Isn't that exactly what
you're doing?

A man doesn't act the way you're acting. A man stands up for himself. A man
has the willingness and the wherewithal to back up the things he says. I'm
a man. You're a fyce.

Bob

On 30 Mar 2006 05:07:04 -0600, "Bob Terwilliger"
wrote:

enchiladajim blustered:

I suppose you'll tell me you are a member of Mensa, but that would be
alie, they wouldn;t admit anyone as dumb as you are.

Put up your money and we'll compare IQ's. I've offered to put MY money up
and be fairly adjudicated; where's YOUR money? Are you indigent or just
cowardly?

If you lack the courage to put your money where your mouth is, then you
ought to just shut the **** up and crawl away with your tail between your
legs. If you're indigent, then you ought to spend less time on Usenet and
more time on a job-hunt.

The word "fyce" comes from the Old South. It means a little dog that puts
on a brave face and yaps like crazy when its owner is standing right next to
it, but when the dog faces anything by itself, it runs away. When cornered,
it cowers. That's you to a T, isn't it, Jimbaby? Isn't that exactly what
you're doing?

A man doesn't act the way you're acting. A man stands up for himself. A man
has the willingness and the wherewithal to back up the things he says. I'm
a man. You're a fyce.

Bob


Yeah right, zip for brains. You are still a zero any way you cut it.
Were you a man, you would have had the courage to walk away from your
continuing stupidity. You have not been able to do so.


jim

Jim was still afraid:

Were you a man, you would have had the courage to walk away from your
continuing stupidity. You have not been able to do so.

In other words, you're letting us know that what YOU are doing here is
walking away from your continuing stupidity, while tacitly admitting that
you'd lose any valid comparison of IQ -- and you're calling that "courage"
because you don't want to call it by its real name, "cowardice." Bet you're
sorry you brought that IQ issue up, aren't you? It exposed you as a dunce, a
coward, AND a shill.

Bob

Okay, I went. Got a couple of steak tacos, Ron got a combination
plate I failed to see on the menu, he got fish tacos. Was good, I have
no complaints. Salsa bar was very good, too. As advertised, everything
seemed quite fresh.

Next time I would try the tortilla soup, maybe the pork carnitas.
Whatever that is.

Authentic in one regard, the cashier spoke barely a word of English
after Welcome to Baja Fresh! Made ordering interesting, I foolishly
(before I realize the language thing) asked, what makes a taco
Baja Style?

nancy

On 30 Mar 2006 21:41:02 -0600, "Bob Terwilliger"
wrote:

Jim was still afraid:

Were you a man, you would have had the courage to walk away from your
continuing stupidity. You have not been able to do so.

In other words, you're letting us know that what YOU are doing here is
walking away from your continuing stupidity, while tacitly admitting that
you'd lose any valid comparison of IQ -- and you're calling that "courage"
because you don't want to call it by its real name, "cowardice." Bet you're
sorry you brought that IQ issue up, aren't you? It exposed you as a dunce, a
coward, AND a shill.

Bob


Seed Nancy's reply to the thread. Says it all. She went and tried it
and says okay.

Any of that go over your mentalmidgetness?

You are still a cypher named zero with an IQ to match.

You prove your stupidity by not undersatnding the difference between
an insult and a statement of fact. Did that go over your head? Sure
did, didn't it?

But your continuing chewing on a non-issue sure says plenty about your
psychology and self-image problems you have.


jim

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:48:34 -0500, "Nancy Young"
wrote:

Okay, I went. Got a couple of steak tacos, Ron got a combination
plate I failed to see on the menu, he got fish tacos. Was good, I have
no complaints. Salsa bar was very good, too. As advertised, everything
seemed quite fresh.

Next time I would try the tortilla soup, maybe the pork carnitas.
Whatever that is.

Authentic in one regard, the cashier spoke barely a word of English
after Welcome to Baja Fresh! Made ordering interesting, I foolishly
(before I realize the language thing) asked, what makes a taco
Baja Style?

nancy


I run onto this all the time, employees who can recognize names and
read them on the register. I haven't tried the Mexico City style. Will
have to do that sometime.


jim

ensenadafyce wrote;

Seed Nancy's reply to the thread. Says it all. She went and tried it
and says okay.

I have no problem with that (other than the typo you perpetrated in your
slavering eagerness to share your views with this NG). But as I pointed out
earlier, when someone asks for opinions, it's stupid and pointless to say,
"try it for yourself" like you did.


You prove your stupidity by not undersatnding the difference between
an insult and a statement of fact. Did that go over your head? Sure
did, didn't it?

Here's the difference: The insults I offered to describe you (shill,
buffoon, fyce, etc.) *were* statements of fact, and I provided supporting
evidence with each one. You brought IQ into the discussion, and then beat a
hasty retreat when challenged. Now you are trying to distance yourself from
your derogatory remarks about my IQ, thereby admitting that they were empty
bluster and devoid of content germane to the debate, and that you only
resorted to such a kindergarten tactic for lack of a real point to make. I
accept your apology and your admission that you were overmatched in this
discussion. Now recite an Act of Contrition and sin no more.

Bob

On 31 Mar 2006 23:42:11 -0600, "Bob Terwilliger"
wrote:

ensenadafyce wrote;

Seed Nancy's reply to the thread. Says it all. She went and tried it
and says okay.

I have no problem with that (other than the typo you perpetrated in your
slavering eagerness to share your views with this NG). But as I pointed out
earlier, when someone asks for opinions, it's stupid and pointless to say,
"try it for yourself" like you did.


You prove your stupidity by not undersatnding the difference between
an insult and a statement of fact. Did that go over your head? Sure
did, didn't it?

Here's the difference: The insults I offered to describe you (shill,
buffoon, fyce, etc.) *were* statements of fact,

You are a liar. I have not shilled, sfb. You can try to make it fit,
but it does not.

and I provided supporting
evidence with each one. You brought IQ into the discussion, and then beat a
hasty retreat when challenged.

I made a simple insult that you could nbot distinguish from stating a
fact. And that IS a fact. Leads me to bvelieve you are not as smart as
I was giving you credit for being, otherwise, you should have picked
up on it and ignored it. But you simply could not. That has something
to do with your insecurites and self-image problems.

Now you are trying to distance yourself from
your derogatory remarks about my IQ, thereby admitting that they were empty
bluster and devoid of content germane to the debate, and that you only
resorted to such a kindergarten tactic for lack of a real point to make. I
accept your apology and your admission that you were overmatched in this
discussion. Now recite an Act of Contrition and sin no more.

Here you go: FOAD, zero. We are undertaking a new rating and your IQ
has sunken to a minus 10. You are the worst of the least. Well done.
It ALL went right over your head.


jim

ensenadafyce wrote:

I made a simple insult that you could nbot distinguish from stating a
fact. And that IS a fact. Leads me to bvelieve you are not as smart as
I was giving you credit for being, otherwise, you should have picked
up on it and ignored it. But you simply could not. That has something
to do with your insecurites and self-image problems.

Your panic-stricken disavowal is noted. And comical.


Here you go: FOAD, zero. We are undertaking a new rating and your IQ
has sunken to a minus 10. You are the worst of the least. Well done.
It ALL went right over your head.

I win!

Sure you don't want to mention Nazi Germany here?

Bob

On 1 Apr 2006 09:16:19 -0600, "Bob Terwilliger"
wrote:

ensenadafyce wrote:

I made a simple insult that you could nbot distinguish from stating a
fact. And that IS a fact. Leads me to bvelieve you are not as smart as
I was giving you credit for being, otherwise, you should have picked
up on it and ignored it. But you simply could not. That has something
to do with your insecurites and self-image problems.

Your panic-stricken disavowal is noted. And comical.

And you continual lies are noted as well. But do tell us about your
self-esteem problems, bobbie, although opening that can of worms may
be detrimental to the health of rfc. So post it in
alt.who.gives.a.****.about terwilliger's.mental.problems


Here you go: FOAD, zero. We are undertaking a new rating and your IQ
has sunken to a minus 10. You are the worst of the least. Well done.
It ALL went right over your head.

I win!

Only in the shit you have for a brain, But note that you have found
some wisdom in my words and quit making a childish scene over your
zero IQ.


Sure you don't want to mention Nazi Germany here?

Why bother, that would go over your head too.


jim

ensenadafyce wrote:

Your panic-stricken disavowal is noted. And comical.

And you continual lies are noted as well. But do tell us about your
self-esteem problems

So you're switching from one insult to another? Want me to make you retract
this one as well, chihuahua-boy?


Bob

On 1 Apr 2006 16:15:08 -0600, zero iq mentalmidget "Bob Terwilliger"
wrote:

ensenadafyce wrote:

Your panic-stricken disavowal is noted. And comical.

And you continual lies are noted as well. But do tell us about your
self-esteem problems

So you're switching from one insult to another? Want me to make you retract
this one as well, chihuahua-boy?


Bob



You think you deserve any respect, moron? Your self-esteem problems
are readily evident. As I said, anyohe with any iq at all would
disregard any isnult thrown at it. Instead, because of your
self-esteem problems, you went ballistic.

It was only after I pointed the above out to you that you finally got
control of yourself. You did lose it and it was really funny watching
you.


jim

Jim wrote:

So you're switching from one insult to another? Want me to make you
retract this one as well, chihuahua-boy?

You think you deserve any respect, moron?

Your censure rates the same disdain from me as your applause.


Your self-esteem problems are readily evident. As I said, anyohe [sic]
with any iq [sic] at all would disregard any isnult [sic] thrown at it.
Instead, because of your self-esteem problems, you went ballistic.

There you go mentioning IQ again, when you've already run yipping away from
any real contest in the matter. Regarding self-esteem, I've still got that
ten thousand dollars, and I can easily get a psychologist to certify that I
have absolutely no problems in that area at all. Want to show the color of
your money NOW, or are you going to show the yellow streak down your shorts
again?

Regarding anyone's "going ballistic," I remind you that your "FOAD" was a
frustrated, splenetic admission on your part that I had utterly overmatched
you. You groveled like the surly-yet-cowardly little fyce you are.


It was only after I pointed the above out to you that you finally got
control of yourself. You did lose it and it was really funny watching
you.

The truly comical part was your frantic backpedaling when you were forced to
retract what you said about my IQ. I anticipate a similar reaction now that
I've offered a wager to prove my self-esteem. Go ahead, we're all waiting
for you to say, "I didn't MEAN it, Mister! I was just makin' fun!"

Bob