I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology, and he gets away
with it without being charged with abuse because of this relationship.
Perhaps it takes much more to abuse one's posting privileges than this sort
of spam.

I've already kf'd him, but perhaps I can do another message rule where a
posting is deleted where the name "chung" is included.

I usually kf all of this respondents, but this "blocked senders" list is
getting a little long; thusly, it is not as easily searchable when I am
looking to unblock a sender that I have blocked by mistake.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just make a message rule for a particular
subject.


Dee Dee

Naomi wrote:

I'm not an expert on Chung, nor do I care to become one, but when this
started happening I got the impression that someone from here had
engaged him elsewhere and that's how he got over here. He may have
initiated the crossposting or the other person may have.

Right. Bob Pastorio.

"Dee Randall" wrote in message
...
I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology, and he gets
away with it without being charged with abuse because of this
relationship. Perhaps it takes much more to abuse one's posting privileges
than this sort of spam.


I don't think there is any intent. It happens accidentally due to the
abysmal stupidity of these people and their complete disregard for norms of
USENET courtesy.

I don't know who is dumber, chung or the people who try to reason with him.
Might as well talk to a turnip.


--
Peter Aitken

"Peter Aitken" wrote in message
m...
"Dee Randall" wrote in message
...
I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology, and he gets
away with it without being charged with abuse because of this
relationship. Perhaps it takes much more to abuse one's posting
privileges than this sort of spam.


I don't think there is any intent. It happens accidentally due to the
abysmal stupidity of these people and their complete disregard for norms
of USENET courtesy.

I don't know who is dumber, chung or the people who try to reason with
him. Might as well talk to a turnip.


--
Peter Aitken



There must be *some* intent, because it keeps happening. I can see where
someone might accidentally send a message to an irrelevant newsgroup, in
additon to the intended one, but not over & over again.

In article ,
"Dee Randall" wrote:

I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

Pastorio is a rival of Chung's so now he always adds RFC to his
crosspostings to bug This One.

The act of a true troll. sigh
I just KF the posters and subjects.


But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology, and he gets away
with it without being charged with abuse because of this relationship.
Perhaps it takes much more to abuse one's posting privileges than this sort
of spam.

He does it to abuse and annoy people.
It's what trolls do.

Hope that helps?


I've already kf'd him, but perhaps I can do another message rule where a
posting is deleted where the name "chung" is included.

I usually kf all of this respondents, but this "blocked senders" list is
getting a little long; thusly, it is not as easily searchable when I am
looking to unblock a sender that I have blocked by mistake.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just make a message rule for a particular
subject.


Dee Dee



--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson

"Dee Randall" writes:

I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

I must have had him killfiled for a long time, I don't see those posts
you're talking about. Are they the religious posts?
The "burger wars" thread was crossposted to ARK by me, which I did
because some regulars there have some good posts about food. Or, they
used to. I forgot the only people left on ARK are dickheads. My
mistake. And now I guess they're trolling "(this one)". Whether he
deserves it or not is an exercise left up to the reader.

But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology,

If it's the guy I'm thinking of, I've seen him on alt.obits, some
health groups, and a few science groups. He just trolls Usenet
constantly, we're not the only lucky ones.

Stacia

~patches~ writes:

It's the same thing as what is happening with one of the Bobs. Someone
crossposted and there were some replies then the crossposting is now up
to 3 ng instead of 2. It is now destined to grow from there

Is the person who goes by "(this one)" Bob Pastorio? I had no idea.
If he's the one who brought Chung here then who knows how long that
thread I x-posted to ARK will go on. Gah. I suck.

Stacia

Glitter Ninja wrote:
~patches~ writes:

It's the same thing as what is happening with one of the Bobs. Someone
crossposted and there were some replies then the crossposting is now up
to 3 ng instead of 2. It is now destined to grow from there

Is the person who goes by "(this one)" Bob Pastorio?

Yes. I am.

I had no idea.
If he's the one who brought Chung here

Chung brought himself here. He started crossposting to several groups I
read to try to embarrass me.

Pastorio

Dee Randall wrote:

I am curious as to how it was determined to add rec.food.cooking to the
various other cross postings of Chung's. I know I would have to ask
Chung -- which I don't care to do.

But I'm wondering if he does this with other groups as well; or if this
group is singled out because of his interest in cardiology, and he gets away
with it without being charged with abuse because of this relationship.
Perhaps it takes much more to abuse one's posting privileges than this sort
of spam.

I've already kf'd him, but perhaps I can do another message rule where a
posting is deleted where the name "chung" is included.

I usually kf all of this respondents, but this "blocked senders" list is
getting a little long; thusly, it is not as easily searchable when I am
looking to unblock a sender that I have blocked by mistake.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just make a message rule for a particular
subject.

Dee Dee

I just delete his posts and the responses to them. His posts do
nothing to promote Christianity. My church encourages evangelism, but
there is a time and place and this forum is not it.....Sharon

"Bob (this one)" wrote in message
...
Glitter Ninja wrote:
~patches~ writes:

It's the same thing as what is happening with one of the Bobs. Someone
crossposted and there were some replies then the crossposting is now up
to 3 ng instead of 2. It is now destined to grow from there

Is the person who goes by "(this one)" Bob Pastorio?

Yes. I am.

I had no idea. If he's the one who brought Chung here

Chung brought himself here. He started crossposting to several groups I
read to try to embarrass me.

Pastorio

Really? Everything I have seen from chang is an embarrassment to himself, no
one else. His Jesus malarkey is the most feeble-minded tripe I have ever
heard. Do you really want to waste your time on him?


--
Peter Aitken
Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

Peter Aitken wrote:

Really? Everything I have seen from chang is an embarrassment to himself, no
one else. His Jesus malarkey is the most feeble-minded tripe I have ever
heard. Do you really want to waste your time on him?

It might help a little if, whenever (this) wastes his time by posting a
response to Chung he would delete rfc from the header and just send it
to the other group(s). We'd be spared at least one post's worth of
that crap. (Well, I assume it's crap -- I don't read it. All the
headers still clog things up.) -aem

"Dee Randall" wrote in message
...
I've already kf'd him, but perhaps I can do another message rule where a
posting is deleted where the name "chung" is included.

I usually kf all of this respondents, but this "blocked senders" list is
getting a little long; thusly, it is not as easily searchable when I am
looking to unblock a sender that I have blocked by mistake.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just make a message rule for a particular
subject.


I was getting so sick of all the posts replying to his posts, so I just
thought of creating the rule that deletes all the words I could think of to
do with religion in the subject line. Hopefully that will do the trick.

Jen

In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Glitter Ninja wrote:
~patches~ writes:

It's the same thing as what is happening with one of the Bobs. Someone
crossposted and there were some replies then the crossposting is now up
to 3 ng instead of 2. It is now destined to grow from there

Is the person who goes by "(this one)" Bob Pastorio?

Yes. I am.

I had no idea.
If he's the one who brought Chung here

Chung brought himself here. He started crossposting to several groups I
read to try to embarrass me.

Pastorio

You have my sincere sympathies Bob. :-(
I've had trolls do that to me and it really sux!

At least he is not copying your identity. I've had that happen too.
Now if and when I engage trolls, I use a different ID. MT newswatcher
makes that easy.

The alternative identity can then be easily killfiled by me and everyone
else. :-)

I don't see any of chung's posts. I have a "word" kill function and even
if he changes ID's, "Chung" is nearly always in the sender title. I only
see replies to it so I use a subject killfile for those.
--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson

"Jen" wrote in message
...

"Dee Randall" wrote in message
...
I've already kf'd him, but perhaps I can do another message rule where a
posting is deleted where the name "chung" is included.

I usually kf all of this respondents, but this "blocked senders" list is
getting a little long; thusly, it is not as easily searchable when I am
looking to unblock a sender that I have blocked by mistake.

Perhaps the best thing to do is just make a message rule for a particular
subject.


I was getting so sick of all the posts replying to his posts, so I just
thought of creating the rule that deletes all the words I could think of
to do with religion in the subject line. Hopefully that will do the
trick.

Jen


I've got it! I've got it!
Here's how.
Using OE. I subscribed to all the newsgroups that I think Chung's and
related persons are posted to. Then I made a message rule for each of these
particular newsgroups to be deleted before coming in. Then I unsubscribed
to them.
(P.S. - I could not delete these newsgroups until I actually subscribed to
them).
Dee Dee

"Dee Randall" wrote in message
...
I've got it! I've got it!
Here's how.
Using OE. I subscribed to all the newsgroups that I think Chung's and
related persons are posted to. Then I made a message rule for each of
these particular newsgroups to be deleted before coming in. Then I
unsubscribed to them.
(P.S. - I could not delete these newsgroups until I actually subscribed to
them).


I was wondering if we could do something like that. I noticed I could
delete messages from different newsgroups. But now I've deleted all the
messages and I have no idea which newsgroups he posts to.

Jen