On a sunny day (4 Nov 2004 22:28:59 GMT) it happened "Julia Ricolla"
wrote in
:



John Kerry did very well against Bush, if you consider that Bush is an
incumbent war-time president. Many of the swing states were very close.
In four years, Kerry should run again, with Hillary Clinton on the VP
side of the ticket. There will be no sitting president to run against,
due to term limits, Kerry would probably take the white house if he
decides to run again. Edwards should be left off the ticket next time.
Of cause there may not be a next time, if Bush performs in the same way
he did in the past 4 years, we have thermonuclear war in 2 years.
Have fun.
Jan

John Kerry did very well against Bush, if you consider that Bush is an
incumbent war-time president. Many of the swing states were very close.
In four years, Kerry should run again, with Hillary Clinton on the VP
side of the ticket. There will be no sitting president to run against,
due to term limits, Kerry would probably take the white house if he
decides to run again. Edwards should be left off the ticket next time.
Of cause there may not be a next time, if Bush performs in the same way
he did in the past 4 years, we have thermonuclear war in 2 years.
Have fun.

Dooms day, ahhhhhhhh, noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.... tard.

John Kerry did very well against Bush, if you consider that Bush is an
incumbent war-time president. Many of the swing states were very close.
In four years, Kerry should run again, with Hillary Clinton on the VP
side of the ticket. There will be no sitting president to run against,
due to term limits, Kerry would probably take the white house if he
decides to run again. Edwards should be left off the ticket next time.
Of cause there may not be a next time, if Bush performs in the same way
he did in the past 4 years, we have thermonuclear war in 2 years.
Have fun.

Dooms day, ahhhhhhhh, noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.... tard.

"Donald Link" wrote in message
...
Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes.

Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.

"Donald Link" wrote in message
...
Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes.

Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.

"jeffc" wrote in message
. com...
Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.



If only 1/2 of your posts were about golf, maybe folks wouldn't conside you
a jerk.

"jeffc" wrote in message
. com...
Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.



If only 1/2 of your posts were about golf, maybe folks wouldn't conside you
a jerk.

Yes well all I can say is Bush stands for Bush, War, Tax Breaks For
The Wealth, and the Carlyle Group which is still high funded by the
Saudi's, and was, and probable still funded by The bin Laden Group. So
you my fellow blind American that is the FOOL...

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:02:29 GMT, Donald Link
wrote:

Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes. Kerry has shot his
wad just like Gore did and he is done. PERIOD. Kerry was just a
person who has no convictions. He never really said specifically what
he stood for because he was just a Senator from a back water state and
only got the nomination because his competition were so radical.
Kerry is done and we should all say BYE, BYE loser. Kerry is a fine
example of it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think
you a fool than open it and remove all doubt.

On 4 Nov 2004 22:28:59 GMT, "Julia Ricolla"
wrote:

John Kerry did very well against Bush, if you consider that Bush is an
incumbent war-time president. Many of the swing states were very close.
In four years, Kerry should run again, with Hillary Clinton on the VP
side of the ticket. There will be no sitting president to run against,
due to term limits, Kerry would probably take the white house if he
decides to run again. Edwards should be left off the ticket next time.

Yes well all I can say is Bush stands for Bush, War, Tax Breaks For
The Wealth, and the Carlyle Group which is still high funded by the
Saudi's, and was, and probable still funded by The bin Laden Group. So
you my fellow blind American that is the FOOL...

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:02:29 GMT, Donald Link
wrote:

Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes. Kerry has shot his
wad just like Gore did and he is done. PERIOD. Kerry was just a
person who has no convictions. He never really said specifically what
he stood for because he was just a Senator from a back water state and
only got the nomination because his competition were so radical.
Kerry is done and we should all say BYE, BYE loser. Kerry is a fine
example of it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think
you a fool than open it and remove all doubt.

On 4 Nov 2004 22:28:59 GMT, "Julia Ricolla"
wrote:

John Kerry did very well against Bush, if you consider that Bush is an
incumbent war-time president. Many of the swing states were very close.
In four years, Kerry should run again, with Hillary Clinton on the VP
side of the ticket. There will be no sitting president to run against,
due to term limits, Kerry would probably take the white house if he
decides to run again. Edwards should be left off the ticket next time.

jeffc wrote:

"Donald Link" wrote in message
...

Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes.


Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.


It was closer to 3/4 this go round.

--
bill-o

jeffc wrote:

"Donald Link" wrote in message
...

Edwards left off the ticket. He was about the only one who was not a
clown. The reason Kerry got so many votes was because the Democrats
got everyone possible to register and vote and they still lost by 4
million. Just think if the next Republican is well liked and trusted
then the Republicans shoud win by 8 million votes.


Unless of course the entire population of the registered voters vote, in
which case Democrats would win in an avalanche of votes. The main reason
Republicans win is that only half of the people in the country can be
bothered to vote.


It was closer to 3/4 this go round.

--
bill-o

Yes well all I can say is Bush stands for Bush, War, Tax Breaks For
The Wealth, and the Carlyle Group which is still

If that's all you can say, then I suppose you'll keep on saying it. But you
still have to explain why 60 million people--not necessarily all rich
warmongers--voted for him.

Its been something like 40
years since a northern Democrat won a presidential election (Kennedy)

.. . . and just as long since a candidate went directly from the Senate to the
Presidency. I can't think of an example besides Kennedy (who squeaked by)
since Harding who did so. (Senators Truman and Johnson advanced to the
Presidency through the Vice Presidency).

The legislature is not a great launching pad to the Presidency. Governors,
Vice Presidents, and movie stars/pro wrestlers do much better.

Neil

Its been something like 40
years since a northern Democrat won a presidential election (Kennedy)

.. . . and just as long since a candidate went directly from the Senate to the
Presidency. I can't think of an example besides Kennedy (who squeaked by)
since Harding who did so. (Senators Truman and Johnson advanced to the
Presidency through the Vice Presidency).

The legislature is not a great launching pad to the Presidency. Governors,
Vice Presidents, and movie stars/pro wrestlers do much better.

Neil

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 01:02:29 GMT, Donald Link
wrote:

Kerry is a fineexample of it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think
you a fool than open it and remove all doubt.

That hasn't seemed to be a problem for Dubya, but he's always been a
joke. Don't kid yourself, he won because of the support of the
religious righties, not because of his leadership.