![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article , Becca
wrote: Ranée at Arabian Knits wrote: The problem with that is that multivitamins, or singular vitamins aren't absorbed as well as vitamins found in food. There is also the problem of how vitamins and minerals work together, which nobody knows completely about, and how to get those combinations to work properly in a pill. It's better to get vitamins and minerals from food. Although I do take vitamins, there are phytonutrients in foods, that we are not even aware of, yet, at least this is what my doctor told me. You have to eat a variety of vegetables, fruits, beans and whole grains to make sure you are covered. Becca Indeed! But the value of GOOD vitamin supplements should not be underestimated. :-) I do understand tho' that vitamins are NOT a substitute for a good diet. They just are very helpful. -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |
| Ads |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:19:53 -0600, Becca wrote:
there are phytonutrients in foods, that we are not even aware of, yet, at least this is what my doctor told me. Be careful. I have to look up big words like phytonutrients. sf impressed -- Forget the health food. I need all the preservatives I can get. |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:19:53 -0600, Becca wrote: there are phytonutrients in foods, that we are not even aware of, yet, at least this is what my doctor told me. Be careful. I have to look up big words like phytonutrients. sf impressed The stuff she knows is simply amazing. She can hold her own in almost any conversation on damn near any subject. But today she isn't feeling well so I made her soup for lunch and I did a big pot of spaghetti sauce for supper and she is sitting in the living room wrapped in a blanket watching TV and hopefully napping. When she gets sick, ***I*** am the Boss around here... and she'll get some rest and take her meds whether she likes it or not. George L |
|
|||
|
In article ,
George Shirley wrote: Omelet wrote: In article , Becca wrote: Omelet wrote: People in America have an unrealistic idea of proportions and the amounts of food they eat. That is why there is an epidemic of obesity... Americans do have a problem with obesity. Also, Stu's body requires more calories than ours. A man can eat 2200 calories per day while we may eat 1600. Your nephews, within a two year time period, will double their caloric intake. In a few years, they will eat your refrigerator bare, so be prepared. :-P When my oldest son turned 12, we were having lunch, he ate his tuna salad sandwich then he asked if I was going to eat the other half of mine. That is when I knew he had reached puberty. Becca laughs I've heard that! Men do have Testosterone on their side. It's so unfair! Until they get old and then they have to take pills for it. G snork -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |
|
|||
|
In article
, Ranée at Arabian Knits wrote: There is also the problem of how vitamins and minerals work together, which nobody knows completely about, and how to get those combinations to work properly in a pill. It's better to get vitamins and minerals from food. I agree up to a point (as per my previous post). Vitamin supplements should always be taken with a meal! That really does make a difference. I see you've done your homework. g Yes. :-) We predominately use multivitamins when I am pregnant or when we are getting sick. I also keep some in our emergency stash, because I figure it is better to have them to supplement when we don't know what foods will be available to us. Mostly, though, we try to eat lots of vegetables, fruits, meats, fish, dairy, eggs, whole grains, etc, Regards, Ranee Variety is the spark of life... And it's more fun too! -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |
|
|||
|
In article ,
George Leppla wrote: sf wrote: On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:19:53 -0600, Becca wrote: there are phytonutrients in foods, that we are not even aware of, yet, at least this is what my doctor told me. Be careful. I have to look up big words like phytonutrients. sf impressed The stuff she knows is simply amazing. She can hold her own in almost any conversation on damn near any subject. But today she isn't feeling well so I made her soup for lunch and I did a big pot of spaghetti sauce for supper and she is sitting in the living room wrapped in a blanket watching TV and hopefully napping. When she gets sick, ***I*** am the Boss around here... and she'll get some rest and take her meds whether she likes it or not. George L Oh dear! Give her a sympathetic hug for me please? I hope she gets better quickly! -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
(Steve Pope) wrote: Omelet wrote: People in America have an unrealistic idea of proportions and the amounts of food they eat. That is why there is an epidemic of obesity... You mean like north Americans eat an average of 4,500 calories per day per person, and think that's perfectly okay? AND complain about immigrants coming in to use our resourses? Unemployment is 15%, household income down 30% but caloric input remains at its historical all-time high. So much for fat = rich. More like fat = hopelessly in hock to the international capital markets... Just wait and we'll see what happens. Will the results be a surprise? Nope. There will be no more than a token pullback on energy use, and the planet will continue to suffer the effects of uncontrolled human overconsumption. Whether this means radical climate change or not, is unclear, but whatever it is, it will be radical and destructive beyond what we've yet witnessed. I support locavores and others who are conscious of their food resource use but I don't hold out much hope they can turn the tide. My personal MAINTENANCE calorie intake is 1,200 to 1,500 kc per day. If I eat more than that, I gain weight. But, I also have hypothyroidism. If I want to lose weight, I have to cut to below 1,000 and it's not that hard to do once you change your attitude towards food. It's been an ongoing learning process. Interesting. I have just learend a friend has hypothyroidism; I had noticed his low food intake and he reported a low pulse rate, but I didn't make the connection. Steve |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:27:18 -0600, George Leppla
wrote: But today she isn't feeling well so I made her soup for lunch and I did a big pot of spaghetti sauce for supper and she is sitting in the living room wrapped in a blanket watching TV and hopefully napping. When she gets sick, ***I*** am the Boss around here... and she'll get some rest and take her meds whether she likes it or not. Awww! That's what's nice about having a man around the house that can cook. As my dad used to say during his years as a Hawaiian, "give her a pat on the popo" for me. Just wait until she gets better. You'll be like GWB and say: "I'm not the decider anymore". ![]() -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
As for the rest of your post, the planet will always survive... even if the human race does not. Certainly. I admit up-front that my preference for causing as little human damage to the planet as possible is fundamentally an aesthetic need on my part, albeit a very strong one, and one I feel okay about imposing on the rest of everybody via our governmental institutions. But eventually, an impact event will occur that liquefies the crust of the earth and kills everything but a few extremophiles. Apparently this is no more than 8 million years off, when a hypervelocity star is predicted to pass through the Oort cloud, sending hundreds of thousands of impactors into the inner solar system. But it would be nice to maintain a reasonable, stable environment without excessive species death or human suffering until that point, wouldn't it? Steve |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:54:37 +0000 (UTC), (Steve
Pope) wrote: But eventually, an impact event will occur that liquefies the crust of the earth and kills everything but a few extremophiles. Apparently this is no more than 8 million years off, The human race will be long gone before that happens. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:54:37 +0000 (UTC), (Steve But eventually, an impact event will occur that liquefies the crust of the earth and kills everything but a few extremophiles. Apparently this is no more than 8 million years off, The human race will be long gone before that happens. Yes, if the human race continues to behave as it is now behaving. But we could, with the right policies, survive up until that point. It's physically possible. It's a matter of whether we have the will to do it. Steve |
|
|||
|
In article ,
(Steve Pope) wrote: But eventually, an impact event will occur that liquefies the crust of the earth and kills everything but a few extremophiles. Apparently this is no more than 8 million years off, when a hypervelocity star is predicted to pass through the Oort cloud, sending hundreds of thousands of impactors into the inner solar system. But it would be nice to maintain a reasonable, stable environment without excessive species death or human suffering until that point, wouldn't it? Steve That would be nice, but world wide cataclysmic events seem to be a standard theme on this hunk of rock. Just think what would happen if Yellowstone Park (a known super-volcano) were to erupt? -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |
|
|||
|
In article ,
sf wrote: On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 21:39:00 +0000 (UTC), (Steve Pope) wrote: Nope. There will be no more than a token pullback on energy use, and the planet will continue to suffer the effects of uncontrolled human overconsumption. Whether this means radical climate change or not, is unclear, but whatever it is, it will be radical and destructive beyond what we've yet witnessed. There will never be anything other than over consumption until we get the population growth rate under control. Italy seems to be in the negative numbers with reproduction, and educated populations are at least reproducing 1:1 for the most part... but the rest of the world - OY! This is so very true... -- Peace! Om "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." --Steve Rothstein Web Albums: http://picasaweb.google.com/OMPOmelet Subscribe: |