Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:

> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
> asshole, facts be damned!

Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from
119 posters, all captured in their glory:

1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area
and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to
e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail.

*That* is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes
he's that ****ed in the head and starved for attention that he'd
claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get
sucked into his little circus.

The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably originate
from Sandman.net."

2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by
behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I
wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the amazing
silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him."

3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
disrupting the newsgroup."

4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."

5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
not just let them go away and show how responsible a member of
CSMA you are? You could show your enemies up by being better than
then, rise above the low level you so obviously dislike.
Anything, just stop...."

6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you
set to expire, but it's fixed now."

7- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same.."

8- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group,
but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a
decent discussion about anything.

The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some
people just can't stop feeding him."

9- [b]unny: "snit makes me sad."

10- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."

11- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him "shit", and rightly so,
for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the
bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.

It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk*
him..."

12- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for
you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter."

13- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
"win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why
must you keep this up? What results are you expecting?"

14- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already
misread what I had previously written. What makes you think that
you're correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got
a history of reading into things what you wanted people to have
said instead of what they really said.

I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you
look foolish."

Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have
so many diverse people who share a common perception where do you
think the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The
answer doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out."

15- Dave Fritzinger: "Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a
woman, do something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!"

16- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was
presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."

17- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick,
so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop responding to you.
you almost always start responding back in a semi normal way, but
inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for
having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well,
if your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to
the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to her). "

18- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the
worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger,
and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you
to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and
forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be
one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your
sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all
times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you."

19- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go
see a doctor."

20- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the
points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit. "

21- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
trying there best to best the other person. The one common thing
among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but
facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great
percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more
about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has
always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank
it up to the point that this place is no longer fun.
Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own
personal circus."

22- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the
Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will
drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to
be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up
strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"

23- : "Hitting the vodka tonight
Snit?"

24- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."

25- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in
a while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are
starting to make sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your
politics. Then you post stuff like this and it destroys any
respect that I have for you."

26- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"

27- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to
offer support for your statements, you're reduced to personal
attacks on me. Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see
that I have offered no straw men, and have only asked you to
explain how the things you state as facts can be true. I'm really
sorry that you're taking this attitude, the topic is an
interesting one and I thought you might have some insights. I've
snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was
just repeated. "

28- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people
on usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and
refresh your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over
and over. Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."

29- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."

30- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."

31- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a
12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't
help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it
detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have no place in
a newsgroup such as this."

32- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"

33- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
topic and not hijack threads."

34- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of
responses to OT things and garbage?"

35- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather
than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course
I suppose."

36- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'"

37- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
are you bitching about?"

38- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more
like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even
entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and
lock it up? Please??"

39- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter
his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the next one
when I see his name."

40- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about
being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and
best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by medication. He's
here to do one thing, get attention from people. He says the
crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a
rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it."

John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without
adding drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to
get out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."

41- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this
posting? Because I certainly cannot find it."

42- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the
few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling to
more fertile ground."

43- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets
of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support
your position, instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and
humming, hoping it'll all go away."

44- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad
hominem attacks.You make silly claims and then avoid the subject
of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always
have been."

45- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid."

46- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*"

47- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've
been an annoying little ****wit lately. You started out with the
pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you
in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting every bit the troll."

48- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."

"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by
that effete candy-ass beggars belief".

49- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"

50- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
truth, or indeed, if he ever has."

51- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life."

52- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
refutes your "facts", you run away and ignore them. Refuting your
"facts" is easily done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it. "

53- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I
see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a
compliment!"

54- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead
I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that
happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware
of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this
notion. Please seek professional help."

55- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on."

56- Mojo: "Actually, these facts **** everybody off because they
are off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring
and clearly show that you are crying out for attention."

57- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual."

58- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any
pre-school or kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach
you a thing or two about social behavior."

59- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them
are trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me."

60- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't
convinced that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people
losers, I certainly am now. Why bother responding to his
stupidities anyway?"

61- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry
sense of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just
a waste of time, and you've done more than anybody to make this
group a cesspool. Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."

62- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling
as children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do
now ... I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is
that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke and
complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive' and
mutually beneficial manner even now."

63- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I
killfiled him?"

64- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and
desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of
things."

65- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:
Select offending Author, example Snit...
Go to the Filters Menu, Choose "Kill this Author"
Click "OK"
Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice.
Then to see your work...
Choose the Filter Menu again,
Then "Refilter Articles"...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!"

66- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather
discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that
matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully
inadequate?"

67- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "

68- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone
who talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable"
you appear to be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."

69- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option
with Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing."

70- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take
your argument with sandman into the private room."

71- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and
someti... err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon
he has something useful to say."

72- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were
not different windowing environments? Message-ID, please.
Experience has told me not to trust you on anything without
backing evidence."

73- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma
posters even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There
are certainly other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no
others are so intent on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot"

74- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."

75- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like
you single out persons to target your attentions upon and then
continuously berate them with constant barbs and goads to
perpetuate their acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond
in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for
Macs and your overbearing pompous nature aside, this is what
convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting this and
other groups is to troll."

76- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."

77- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You
trash people that are trying their level best to cope with a
horrendous situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of
what is going on."

78- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as
a troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy."

79- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if
you quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate
perched on the shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out
that you run the risk of looking ridiculous when you quote
something patently stupid. If that's your goal, you're on the
right track, and more power to you."

80- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux
and how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you
requesting help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an
advocacy group? As the old saying goes, those who can do, those
who can't teach. Your posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."

81- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the
-HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost
hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just
about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet,
trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that I
actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what
-EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong. Only
Tholen himself can match this behaviour."

82- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice.
Honestly, even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront
made more sense than this. You been doing drugs or something?"

83- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises
to remove smut from your harddrive."

84- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways.
and he thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he
figures he's pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the
personality tests and the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you
see he's soooooooo well adjusted."

85- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is
that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small
cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast
majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."

86- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of
elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in
the "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour, and
CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung."

87- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility
with me for your rediculous argument regarding this."

88- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has
lost all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words
like 'asses' when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally
superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of
your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)."

89- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him
then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."

90- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the
one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount
to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone
points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to
insist that they provide no evidence, or that the evidence given
is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on straw men and
disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in your
favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA, Shit.
*Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are. "

91-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you
see, you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really
are. Why just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you,
the king of liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar."

92- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the
poor sick fool can get attention. My ****ing God, he's taken to
hanging out with and supporting racist pig ****ers like MuahMuah.
It is true that no-one likes him and those that pretend they do
are just using him or don't know him - but come on- it's not his
fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All these idiot
trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all
so alike. I pity each and every one of them"

93- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you
could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here."

94- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"

95- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into
one of your Circus acts?"

96- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was:
Stop polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive
"writings". You give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your
goal you have succeeded! That also goes for all that bullshit on
your website"

97- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one
wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with
all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental illness."

98- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish
to define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter
or bend the rules when inevitably things do not go to your
liking, for this reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to
play your game."

99- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're
the first person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) "

100- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"

101- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of
posts, to prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like
that to people without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in
the record. Ping Snit to do a search - you will flatter him, and
give meaning to his tawdry little life."

102- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to
draw more people into the debate I'm currently having with
Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic is fairly trollish."

103- High Plains Thumper: "Well, for one who is trolling this
group, those were extremely poorly done examples, making problems
that do not exist except an invention of Snit's own mind."

104- Geoff M. Fitton: "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n".

105- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental
breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser.
What a f#cked up mess he is'.

106- Tattoo Vampi "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again".

107- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual".

108- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep
posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will
not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and
accept that is not my problem".

109- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home
more than he's anywhere near a classroom".

110- : "The thought is probably to show
everyone here just how bad a troll snit is".

111- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
.... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the
idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
didn't see his posts, only your reply".

112- bobinv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same".

113- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye".

114- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in separate
threads, are you doing this on purpose to **** people off? I dont
ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix
it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in
a row. So uh, change your client or something".

115- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".

116- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and
worthless. You must be related to our resident racist troll, he
lies as much as you."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....08c00330c8b58d

117- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
else who has read your idiocy knows it. O took your statement,
showed it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick
and REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.v...7944511b74b82f

118- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your
sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.f...89029a5b5be5f8

119- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example
of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone who
disagrees with you. As such, I consider this to be a purposeful
attempt by you to try to libel me. This is your only warning to
consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder that you, and
you alone are responsible for that accusation, both in the
ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".'

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....96641a3426293a

120- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)'

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....517ced5134934d

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>
>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
>> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
>> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
>> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
>> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
>> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
>> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
>> asshole, facts be damned!
>
> Why post a partial list, Michael?

See! I am Snit! I am Snit! How do we know? Because High Plains Thumper
says I am. Sure, I deny it and so does anyone else who is not a liar, but
who cares? This is Usenet? All it takes is for High Plains Thumper to say
it and it is proved!

I am Snit I tell you!

High Plains Thumper > writes:

> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>
>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
>> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
>> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
>> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
>> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
>> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
>> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
>> asshole, facts be damned!
>
> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from
> 119 posters, all captured in their glory:

Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?

Hadron wrote:
> High Plains Thumper > writes:
>
>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>
>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
>>> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
>>> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
>>> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
>>> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
>>> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
>>> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
>>> asshole, facts be damned!
>>
>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from
>> 119 posters, all captured in their glory:
>
> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?

What? Are you now going to defend that asshole Snit? So what that High
Plains Thumper can not show Snit actually doing anything wrong and would
clearly trade his mother's life if he could? He has said that Snit is evil
and that settles that! You would have to be a ****ing moron to defend this
Snit guy. Who is me, remember that! High Plains Thumper said I am Snit so
I am. Settled and proved!

Gary M. Stewart wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:42:43 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>
>> High Plains Thumper > writes:
>>
>>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>>
>>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
>>>> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
>>>> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
>>>> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
>>>> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
>>>> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
>>>> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
>>>> asshole, facts be damned!
>>>
>>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from
>>> 119 posters, all captured in their glory:
>>
>> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?
>
>
> High Plains Humper isn't smart enough to know.
> The guy is obviously a *poof* who doesn't have a clue.
> Maybe his boyfriend will explain it to him.

Why would you doubt High Plains Thumper? Who cares that he fails to show
Snit doing any wrong doing? So what? Don't you ****ing get this is Usenet?
He has no need to support his words. He says it and others agree so it must
be true. Group rule on the Internets!

Gary M. Stewart wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:51:53 -0700, Rhino Plastee wrote:
>
>> Gary M. Stewart wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:42:43 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> High Plains Thumper > writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly
>>>>>> huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper,
>>>>>> Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they
>>>>>> cannot find any example of him actually lying? So what that
>>>>>> they clearly lie about him and about me and about others. The
>>>>>> whole ****ing world is becoming one new order democracy and if
>>>>>> they say he is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing
>>>>>> asshole, facts be damned!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from
>>>>> 119 posters, all captured in their glory:
>>>>
>>>> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?
>>>
>>>
>>> High Plains Humper isn't smart enough to know.
>>> The guy is obviously a *poof* who doesn't have a clue.
>>> Maybe his boyfriend will explain it to him.
>>
>> Why would you doubt High Plains Thumper? Who cares that he fails to
>> show Snit doing any wrong doing? So what? Don't you ****ing get
>> this is Usenet? He has no need to support his words. He says it and
>> others agree so it must be true. Group rule on the Internets!
>
> Hahaha!
>
> Whatever you think of snit, HPT is a complete idiot.
> That's something most of us can agree on.

How can he be a complete idiot when he is joining Steve Carroll, Wally, Tim
Adams and a host of other ****ing geniuous in ripping Snit's brains out his
nose and then skull ****ing him? They can not all be wrong! Who the ****
cares that they have nothing to back up their crap. This is 2009 and the
wild west of the Internet.

Hadron wrote:
> High Plains Thumper writes:
>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>
>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly huge.
>>> Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper, Wally, Steve
>>> Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they cannot find any
>>> example of him actually lying? So what that they clearly lie about
>>> him and about me and about others. The whole ****ing world is
>>> becoming one new order democracy and if they say he is a ****ing
>>> asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing asshole, facts be damned!
>>
>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from 119
>> posters, all captured in their glory:
>
> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?

Why yes it is ___________________________________________^^^^^^^ ^^

This is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper writes:
>>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>>
>>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is clearly huge.
>>>> Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes Thumper, Wally, Steve
>>>> Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So what that they cannot find any
>>>> example of him actually lying? So what that they clearly lie about
>>>> him and about me and about others. The whole ****ing world is
>>>> becoming one new order democracy and if they say he is a ****ing
>>>> asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing asshole, facts be damned!
>>>
>>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one from 119
>>> posters, all captured in their glory:
>>
>> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains Hypocrite?
>
> Why yes it is ___________________________________________^^^^^^^ ^^
>
> This is an example of:
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
>
>

Quote:

> 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics > > 45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist > transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux Advocates, but, > ignore the same and even worse transgressions are being committed by > your fellow Trespassers. >

And don't you forget it. Does not matter how ****ed in the head High Plains
Thumper is what matters is if he can say the shit he says and my god man
does he say it! This is the wild west of 2009! This is the crazy anything
goes Internets! **** truth! **** evidence! High Plains Tumper has said it
so it must be so!

Gary M. Stewart wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>>
>>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is
>>>> clearly huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High
>>>> Planes Thumper, Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and
>>>> more. So what that they cannot find any example of him
>>>> actually lying? So what that they clearly lie about him
>>>> and about me and about others. The whole ****ing world
>>>> is becoming one new order democracy and if they say he
>>>> is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing asshole,
>>>> facts be damned!
>>>
>>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one
>>> from 119 posters, all captured in their glory:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> 3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak
>>> the truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll
>>> and keep disrupting the newsgroup."
>>>
>>> 4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your
>>> headers to weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an
>>> asshole."
>>>
>>> 5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up,
>>> Snit? Why not just let them go away and show how
>>> responsible a member of CSMA you are? You could show your
>>> enemies up by being better than then, rise above the low
>>> level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...."
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> 116- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and
>>> worthless. You must be related to our resident racist
>>> troll, he lies as much as you."
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp....08c00330c8b58d
>>>
>>> 117- BaJoRi: Snit: "You are, of course, lying." BaJoRi:
>>> "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
>>> else who has read your idiocy knows it. O took your
>>> statement, showed it to be wrong, then added even more,
>>> just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a fool. You
>>> need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
>>> are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar."
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.v...7944511b74b82f
>>>
>>> 118- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off
>>> your sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something
>>> profound.'
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.f...89029a5b5be5f8
>>>
>>> 119- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
>>> definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear
>>> example of how you attempt to maliciously debase against
>>> anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I consider this
>>> to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
>>> This is your only warning to consider rescinding your
>>> remark, with the reminder that you, and you alone are
>>> responsible for that accusation, both in the ethical as
>>> well as the full legal meaning of the word "responsible".'
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp....96641a3426293a
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains
>> Hypocrite?
>
> High Plains Humper isn't smart enough to know.
> The guy is obviously a *poof* who doesn't have a clue.
> Maybe his boyfriend will explain it to him.

This is an example of:

http://www.webservertalk.com/message1474739.html

http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/...arb-troll.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/...ish-troll.html

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Gary M. Stewart wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is
>>>>> clearly huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High
>>>>> Planes Thumper, Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and
>>>>> more. So what that they cannot find any example of him
>>>>> actually lying? So what that they clearly lie about him
>>>>> and about me and about others. The whole ****ing world
>>>>> is becoming one new order democracy and if they say he
>>>>> is a ****ing asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing asshole,
>>>>> facts be damned!
>>>>
>>>> Why post a partial list, Michael? Here is a complete one
>>>> from 119 posters, all captured in their glory:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> 3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak
>>>> the truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll
>>>> and keep disrupting the newsgroup."
>>>>
>>>> 4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your
>>>> headers to weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an
>>>> asshole."
>>>>
>>>> 5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up,
>>>> Snit? Why not just let them go away and show how
>>>> responsible a member of CSMA you are? You could show your
>>>> enemies up by being better than then, rise above the low
>>>> level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...."
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> 116- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and
>>>> worthless. You must be related to our resident racist
>>>> troll, he lies as much as you."
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp....08c00330c8b58d
>>>>
>>>> 117- BaJoRi: Snit: "You are, of course, lying." BaJoRi:
>>>> "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
>>>> else who has read your idiocy knows it. O took your
>>>> statement, showed it to be wrong, then added even more,
>>>> just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a fool. You
>>>> need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
>>>> are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar."
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.v...7944511b74b82f
>>>>
>>>> 118- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off
>>>> your sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something
>>>> profound.'
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.f...89029a5b5be5f8
>>>>
>>>> 119- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
>>>> definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear
>>>> example of how you attempt to maliciously debase against
>>>> anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I consider this
>>>> to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
>>>> This is your only warning to consider rescinding your
>>>> remark, with the reminder that you, and you alone are
>>>> responsible for that accusation, both in the ethical as
>>>> well as the full legal meaning of the word "responsible".'
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp....96641a3426293a
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Is this an example of an ad-hominem attack High Plains
>>> Hypocrite?
>>
>> High Plains Humper isn't smart enough to know.
>> The guy is obviously a *poof* who doesn't have a clue.
>> Maybe his boyfriend will explain it to him.
>
> This is an example of:
>
> http://www.webservertalk.com/message1474739.html
>
>

Quote:

> Subject: 3.4 The nasty Troll > > If anyone does anything which will interfere with the troll's > ability to cause mayhem, they can become very nasty, posting from > obviously incorrect variations of the name etc. insults, call > them netcops, netnannies, homosexuals. [...] > > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. > > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious personal > attacks throughout usenet. Examples a "XXXXs animals!" "is a > cannibal" "is a hermaphrodite!" "is a molester of boys" "in > panties gets XXXXed up the arse" "is a Nazi!" "is a cocksucking > queer" "is a hermaphrodite just like Maryanne Kehoe" "molests > boys on American Airlines" "Sexually harassed by" "is an anthrax > pervert" "AT *** PARTY" "sucks his father's cock" "is a pervert" > "hated wherever he goes!" "White Racist" "Usenet spammer!" > "Usenet k00k!" "I hope you die SOON". >

>
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/...arb-troll.html
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/...ish-troll.html

But let us remember that being nasty does not count when you claim I am a
sock puppet of Snit or that Snit is into incest or whatever the **** you and
your chums say! No! No! That is not a personal attack because you and
your chums all agree and you post a whole ****ing lot. You do not need to
prove your claims on the wild west of the internet in 2009! You go!

Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Gary M. Stewart wrote:
>>
>>> High Plains Humper isn't smart enough to know. The guy is
>>> obviously a *poof* who doesn't have a clue. Maybe his
>>> boyfriend will explain it to him.
>>
>> This is an example of:
>>
>> http://www.webservertalk.com/message1474739.html
>>
>>

Quote:

Subject: 3.4 The nasty Troll >> >> If anyone does anything which will interfere with the >> troll's ability to cause mayhem, they can become very nasty, >> posting from obviously incorrect variations of the name >> etc. insults, call them netcops, netnannies, homosexuals. >> [...] >> >> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups. >> >> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious personal >> attacks throughout usenet. Examples a "XXXXs animals!" >> "is a cannibal" "is a hermaphrodite!" "is a molester of >> boys" "in panties gets XXXXed up the arse" "is a Nazi!" "is >> a cocksucking queer" "is a hermaphrodite just like Maryanne >> Kehoe" "molests boys on American Airlines" "Sexually >> harassed by" "is an anthrax pervert" "AT *** PARTY" "sucks >> his father's cock" "is a pervert" "hated wherever he goes!" >> "White Racist" "Usenet spammer!" "Usenet k00k!" "I hope you >> die SOON".

>>
>> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/...arb-troll.html
>> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/...ish-troll.html
>
> But let us remember that being nasty does not count when you
> claim I am a sock puppet of Snit or that Snit is into incest
> or whatever the **** you and your chums say! No! No! That
> is not a personal attack because you and your chums all agree
> and you post a whole ****ing lot. You do not need to prove
> your claims on the wild west of the internet in 2009! You go!

This is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

Proof of Rhino Plastee as Snit:

http://tinyurl.com/9qr5lo

--
HPT

Rhino Plastee wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:
>>
>>> The list of people who clearly hate this charactor is
>>> clearly huge. Peter Kulhman, Tattoo Vampire, High Planes
>>> Thumper, Wally, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams and more. So
>>> what that they cannot find any example of him actually
>>> lying? So what that they clearly lie about him and about
>>> me and about others. The whole ****ing world is becoming
>>> one new order democracy and if they say he is a ****ing
>>> asshole he is. Snit is a ****ing asshole, facts be
>>> damned!
>>
>> Why post a partial list, Michael?
>
> See! I am Snit! I am Snit! How do we know? Because High
> Plains Thumper says I am. Sure, I deny it and so does anyone
> else who is not a liar, but who cares? This is Usenet? All
> it takes is for High Plains Thumper to say it and it is
> proved!
>
> I am Snit I tell you!

Proof of Rhino Plastee as Snit:

http://tinyurl.com/9qr5lo

Rhino Plastee (Michael Glasser AKA Snit) wrote:

> How can he be a complete idiot when he is joining Steve
> Carroll, Wally, Tim Adams and a host of other ****ing geniuous
> in ripping Snit's brains out his nose and then skull ****ing
> him? They can not all be wrong! Who the **** cares that they
> have nothing to back up their crap. This is 2009 and the
> wild west of the Internet.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....c90976fe66fb80

Proof of Rhino Plastee as Snit:

http://tinyurl.com/9qr5lo

--
HPT