|
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
10-06-2008, 05:59 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Food spoilage?
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
wrote: On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it. There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron spent almost all her day cleaning hers. * Lou *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. If nothing but females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is dust it now and then. Males? Completely opposite. N. it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on public johns, for they are delicate creatures. your pal, blake 
|
|
10-06-2008, 07:31 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Food spoilage?
On Jun 10, 11:59*am, blake murphy wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 wrote: On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it. There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron spent almost all her day cleaning hers. * Lou *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite. N. it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on public johns, for they are delicate creatures. your pal, blake- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers. N.
|
|
11-06-2008, 04:59 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Food spoilage?
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
wrote: wrote: On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it. There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron spent almost all her day cleaning hers. * Lou *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite. N. it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on public johns, for they are delicate creatures. your pal, blake- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers. The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too. Lou
|
|
12-06-2008, 04:22 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Food spoilage?
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:07 -0500, Lou Decruss
wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 wrote: wrote: On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it. There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron spent almost all her day cleaning hers. * Lou *- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite. N. it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on public johns, for they are delicate creatures. your pal, blake- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers. The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too. Lou god have mercy. your pal, blake
|
|
12-06-2008, 07:58 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Food spoilage?
"blake murphy" wrote: The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too. Lou god have mercy. Careful, dahling. Everyone knows that men who obsess on how "dirty" women are tend to be 1. really lousy in bed and 2. practicing or potential homosexuals.
|
|
13-06-2008, 03:06 PM
posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Food spoilage?
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:58:48 -0400, "cybercat"
wrote: "blake murphy" wrote: The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too. Lou god have mercy. Careful, dahling. Everyone knows that men who obsess on how "dirty" women are tend to be 1. really lousy in bed and 2. practicing or potential homosexuals. why the **** should i care if women **** on the floor just like men do? i'm not the janitor. your pal, blake
|
Linear Mode
