![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Thu 15 May 2008 01:17:58p, Pete C. told us...
Ms P wrote: "kilikini" wrote in message ... jmcquown wrote: Pete C. wrote: jmcquown wrote: What says "serves 4" means serves 2, at least in my world. My serving size isn't generally 5 tablespoonfuls of whatever. Wouldn't it be funny if they started marking vegetables this way? Oh no, sorry, that big honkin' baked potato serves 4! Jill Yea, I seem to recall that the government standard bagel is about 1/6 the size of what anyone would consider a normal bagel (in the US at least). God forbid I should eat an entire biscuit, then! LOL Oh, no, you must only have half and dunk it into a thimble-sized rameken of soup. :~) kili Why do people think that you can only have one serving of anything and that serving must be however much they want to put on their plate? It's no wonder people in this country are getting so fat. A biscuit is probably two servings of bread. A bowl of soup is probably two servings. You are ALLOWED to have more than ONE serving!!! Ms P I'm also allowed to define what I consider a serving, and tell the government and other serving size nazis to **** off. hehehe! I'm wit ya! -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Thursday, 05(V)/15(XV)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- Countdown till Memorial Day 1wks 3dys 10hrs 30mins ------------------------------------------- It's always easier to just fall than to try to climb. ------------------------------------------- |
|
|||
|
On Thu 15 May 2008 01:17:58p, Pete C. told us...
Ms P wrote: "kilikini" wrote in message ... jmcquown wrote: Pete C. wrote: jmcquown wrote: What says "serves 4" means serves 2, at least in my world. My serving size isn't generally 5 tablespoonfuls of whatever. Wouldn't it be funny if they started marking vegetables this way? Oh no, sorry, that big honkin' baked potato serves 4! Jill Yea, I seem to recall that the government standard bagel is about 1/6 the size of what anyone would consider a normal bagel (in the US at least). God forbid I should eat an entire biscuit, then! LOL Oh, no, you must only have half and dunk it into a thimble-sized rameken of soup. :~) kili Why do people think that you can only have one serving of anything and that serving must be however much they want to put on their plate? It's no wonder people in this country are getting so fat. A biscuit is probably two servings of bread. A bowl of soup is probably two servings. You are ALLOWED to have more than ONE serving!!! Ms P I'm also allowed to define what I consider a serving, and tell the government and other serving size nazis to **** off. Reminds of back in the 1960s and a friend with whom I used often cook and eat with. If we bought a package of something and it said "serves 6", we'd say "or two pigs". :-) That was us. -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Thursday, 05(V)/15(XV)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- Countdown till Memorial Day 1wks 3dys 10hrs 30mins ------------------------------------------- It's always easier to just fall than to try to climb. ------------------------------------------- |
|
|||
|
cshenk wrote:
"jmcquown" wrote Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. It always kills me to see what you describe. Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? I think their aim on soups is usually that you serve them also with a samwich or largish salad, hence less per person. I have no idea what their "aim" is when it comes to canned soup. I generally only order a "cup" of soup (in lieu of salad) at a restaurant. If I order a bowl of soup that's the meal. Jill |
|
|||
|
Wayne wrote on Thu, 15 May 2008 20:33:37 GMT:
Ms P wrote: I'm also allowed to define what I consider a serving, and tell the government and other serving size nazis to **** off. hehehe! I'm wit ya! A very reasonable viewpoint but many of us read the nutrition information quickly without checking what is a serving size since what we are interested in is the daily allotment of, say, salt. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
|
|||
|
jmcquown wrote on Thu, 15 May 2008 15:45:10 -0500:
cshenk wrote: "jmcquown" wrote Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. It always kills me to see what you describe. Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? I think their aim on soups is usually that you serve them also with a samwich or largish salad, hence less per person. I have no idea what their "aim" is when it comes to canned soup. I generally only order a "cup" of soup (in lieu of salad) at a restaurant. If I order a bowl of soup that's the meal. Roughly speaking, I agree but it would be good to know what a restaurant considers a "cup" and a "bowl". They might as well say "small" and "regular" which is just as specific! -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
|
|||
|
James wrote to jmcquown on Thu, 15 May 2008 21:12:25 GMT:
cshenk wrote: "jmcquown" wrote Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. It always kills me to see what you describe. Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? I think their aim on soups is usually that you serve them also with a samwich or largish salad, hence less per person. I have no idea what their "aim" is when it comes to canned soup. I generally only order a "cup" of soup (in lieu of salad) at a restaurant. If I order a bowl of soup that's the meal. Roughly speaking, I agree but it would be good to know what a restaurant considers a "cup" and a "bowl". They might as well say "small" and "regular" which is just as specific! I'll just add that my favorite Pho restaurant has two sizes: "regular" and "large". If you don't share the large you might as well resign yourself to napping after lunch! -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
|
|||
|
James Silverton wrote:
I'll just add that my favorite Pho restaurant has two sizes: "regular" and "large". If you don't share the large you might as well resign yourself to napping after lunch! I don't drink coffee, and rarely go into Starbucks for a cup of tea. I sit there baffled by the size selection- large? grande? venti? HUH? |
|
|||
|
Goomba38s wrote:
James Silverton wrote: I'll just add that my favorite Pho restaurant has two sizes: "regular" and "large". If you don't share the large you might as well resign yourself to napping after lunch! I don't drink coffee, and rarely go into Starbucks for a cup of tea. I sit there baffled by the size selection- large? grande? venti? HUH? Are you sure you didn't wnder into Victoria's Secret by mistake? ![]() |
|
|||
|
Goomba38 wrote: James Silverton wrote: I'll just add that my favorite Pho restaurant has two sizes: "regular" and "large". If you don't share the large you might as well resign yourself to napping after lunch! I don't drink coffee, and rarely go into Starbucks for a cup of tea. I sit there baffled by the size selection- large? grande? venti? HUH? I just order "large" and never have an issue. Homie don't play the "venti" game... |
|
|||
|
"Ms P" wrote:
"jmcquown" wrote in message ... James Silverton wrote: Hello All! Today, I used some Campbell's French Onion Soup. The ingredient list indicated "about 2.5 servings". Why would any want to serve half a person or is it just a way to reduce the amounts of fat or salt listed? Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. �It always kills me to see what you describe. �Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? What says "serves 4" means serves 2, at least in my world. �My serving size isn't generally 5 tablespoonfuls of whatever. Wouldn't it be funny if they started marking vegetables this way? �Oh no, sorry, that big honkin' baked potato serves 4! Jill What you put on your plate or in your bowl is not the serving size. That big honkin' baked potato might very well be 4 SERVINGS and not serve 4 people. �A single serving is about 1/2 cup. �You can of course have more than ONE serving. �Unless of course you consider that big honkin' potato ONE serving then you're going to be way over eating. Depends on many other factors... if you don't eat the hunks of bread slathered with butter, don't have the typical empty calorie appetizers, no dessert and don't drink the entirte bottle of dago red then that jumbo spud is not over eating... potatoes in of themselvs are not fattening, in fact just the opposite, they make a healthful filling vegetable so you don't eat all the chazeri. A large baked potato with a dollop of fat free yogurt sprinkled with herbs makes for a very nutritious and health conscious part of a meal, goes a long way to keep the meat portion smaller too. |
|
|||
|
"James Silverton" wrote A very reasonable viewpoint but many of us read the nutrition information quickly without checking what is a serving size since what we are interested in is the daily allotment of, say, salt. If you're worried about the sodium or calories, whatever, you'd better check the serving size and do the math. You could be in for a real shock. They will make the serving size small enough to make the numbers look reasonable. Like, who eats a half a pot pie? At the same time, if I have a can of soup for lunch, assuming the numbers aren't outlandish (you know the sodium is probably going to be high!), I am not splitting it with 1 1/2 other people. That's my lunch, all 385 calories, back off! Heh. nancy |
|
|||
|
On Thu 15 May 2008 01:45:10p, jmcquown told us...
cshenk wrote: "jmcquown" wrote Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. It always kills me to see what you describe. Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? I think their aim on soups is usually that you serve them also with a samwich or largish salad, hence less per person. I have no idea what their "aim" is when it comes to canned soup. I generally only order a "cup" of soup (in lieu of salad) at a restaurant. If I order a bowl of soup that's the meal. Jill Yeah, I don't get it either. A standard can of condensed soup, reconstituted, is usually 16 fluid ounces, or 2 cups. If it were for a meal with bread or crackers, then the whole can would be the meal. Even served as a "cup of soup", it would only serve 2 in my house, not 2 and a half. -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Thursday, 05(V)/15(XV)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- Countdown till Memorial Day 1wks 3dys 10hrs ------------------------------------------- 'Help wanted telepath: you know where to apply' ------------------------------------------- |
|
|||
|
"James Silverton" wrote in message news:elYWj.3680$LL.1299@trnddc04... Hello All! Today, I used some Campbell's French Onion Soup. The ingredient list indicated "about 2.5 servings". Why would any want to serve half a person or is it just a way to reduce the amounts of fat or salt listed? James Silverton Potomac, Maryland It's just a way to manipulate the nutritional information so it doesn't look quite so heinous. kimberly |
|
|||
|
"jmcquown" wrote in message ... kilikini wrote: Ms P wrote: No wonder the country gets fatter every day. Ms P I'd eat half the potato, take the other half home and call it a day. :~) kili I can barely eat the potato, forget about the bread basket. Mrs.P is projecting her fat self on everyone else. Jill Wrong. Apparently I'm the only one that understands what servings are and how many servings you should have in one day. Go to any nutritionist and get an education. Ms P |
|
|||
|
jmcquown said...
cshenk wrote: "jmcquown" wrote Serving sizes are probably regulated by someone, somehow, for some obscure reason. It always kills me to see what you describe. Like what, you're going to feed two adults and a small child from that can of soup? I think their aim on soups is usually that you serve them also with a samwich or largish salad, hence less per person. I have no idea what their "aim" is when it comes to canned soup. I generally only order a "cup" of soup (in lieu of salad) at a restaurant. If I order a bowl of soup that's the meal. Jill Lightweight!!! I'll eat Pea Soup Andersen's bottomless split pea soup in Buelton, CA and a tri-tip steak sandwich until the... ??? peas come home? Andy |