![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
jmcquown said...
Melba's Jammin' wrote: In article , Ted Campanelli wrote: The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". Boy, have you got THAT right!! Oh, wait! There is no moderator. What we're experiencing is the blessing and the curse of Usenet: anyone can say anything without much fear of reprisal by anyone other than being killfiled by the offended. The shame of that is that it should be necessary to do that in order to cull the crap. Ted, there's a moderated group for recipes only (no conversation), rec.food.recipes. Lots of people find fault with it, but the very first recipe I ever "got off the internet" came from r.f.r. Maybe rec.food.recipes would be more satisfying to you. Wasn't there a recent thread about so many of the recipes posted to rfr being bad? Can't recall who started it but IIRC they'd tried a couple (?) of the recipes and said they were awful. I recall some comments about the large number of recipes that call for canned soup and boxed mixes. But yes, it's moderated. There's really no give & take there. Jill I took part in that hailstorm! Complaining mostly about the typos and ingredient quantity errors. That's how we let off steam here at r.f.c. Take it out on r.f.r. Andy |
|
|||
|
said...
I nominate you as "moderator" of this "forum". Start zarking. I'll second! :-) Get moving, moderator. Get rid of the "shoes" posts. God forbid a moderator could do away with shoes!!! You KNOW how often shoestring potatoes discussions come up!!! ![]() Andy Still waiting for answers on the finer points of shoestring potatoes. What to serve with them? Are they gourmet or comfort food? Are they for breakfast? Do they freeze well? |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:33:32 -0600, "jmcquown" wrote: Do like I did, Ted. Filter out @gmail and you'll eliminate a lot of that crap. Some of it still comes through but not nearly as much. So, you're not reading me anymore? Oh, well. I still see (most?) of your posts, sf. If I could afford some other newsreader I'd get one. Does free Agent can do great filtering? And I seem to recall reading there isn't a free version anymore, could be wrong. Jill |
|
|||
|
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
In article , Ted Campanelli wrote: The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". Boy, have you got THAT right!! Oh, wait! There is no moderator. What we're experiencing is the blessing and the curse of Usenet: anyone can say anything without much fear of reprisal by anyone other than being killfiled by the offended. The shame of that is that it should be necessary to do that in order to cull the crap. Ted, there's a moderated group for recipes only (no conversation), rec.food.recipes. Lots of people find fault with it, but the very first recipe I ever "got off the internet" came from r.f.r. Maybe rec.food.recipes would be more satisfying to you. Wasn't there a recent thread about so many of the recipes posted to rfr being bad? Can't recall who started it but IIRC they'd tried a couple (?) of the recipes and said they were awful. I recall some comments about the large number of recipes that call for canned soup and boxed mixes. But yes, it's moderated. There's really no give & take there. Jill |
|
|||
|
Sqwertz wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:52:08 +0200, ravenlynne wrote: Sqwertz wrote: You need to killfile everything posted from Google. Show no mercy to those Google-whiners. If somebody gets offended, spit on them. Really, you should teach seminars. ;-) I'm thinking of starting my own religion - Wertzism. -sw What happens to the people who don't put money in the collection plate? -- -Gina in Italy http://www.myspace.com/ravenlynne1975 I'm a blogger: http://ravenwolflodge.blogspot.com |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:32:40 -0600, "jmcquown"
wrote: Sarah Gray wrote: Sheldon wrote: On Nov 1, 4:54?pm, Dave Smith wrote: Ted Campanelli wrote: The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". Your first post here and all you can write is an off topic comment to the non-existent moderator in an unmoderated newsgroup. Go back to lurking. This is far from his first post here. Ted Campanelli has posted to rfc longer than you or anyone who's joined this thread so far except me. I knew I recognized his name; I was wondering how a regular would think rfc was moderated... Or that OT posts are a surprise! Not a surprise, but that doesn't make it less annoying. On the rare occasion that there's no OT flame wars going on, the quality of the cooking threads improves from my observation. Lou |
|
|||
|
Michael "Dog3" said...
Andy q dropped this : in rec.food.cooking said... I nominate you as "moderator" of this "forum". Start zarking. I'll second! :-) Get moving, moderator. Get rid of the "shoes" posts. God forbid a moderator could do away with shoes!!! You KNOW how often shoestring potatoes discussions come up!!! ![]() Andy Still waiting for answers on the finer points of shoestring potatoes. What to serve with them? Are they gourmet or comfort food? Are they for breakfast? Do they freeze well? One must eat the shoes along with the "Do Not Eat" packet inside the box or one will die. Michael And ya gotta pay attention while cooking them or they'll taste like leather. There's a fine line between a good shoe... VBG Andy |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:58:50 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote: "Ted Campanelli" wrote in message .net... The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". The moderator is a drunk and pays little attention to what goes on. The job pays $65k a year. Interested? if i can stay drunk all the time i'll take it for $45k. your pal, blake |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:30:54 GMT, Janet Baraclough
wrote: The message from ravenlynne contains these words: Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "Ted Campanelli" wrote in message . net... The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". The moderator is a drunk and pays little attention to what goes on. The job pays $65k a year. Interested? Hell, I am for 65K a year... It's a jobshare with Sheldon. Janet christ, now you tell me. your pal, blake |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:12:39 +0200, ravenlynne
wrote: Sqwertz wrote: On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:52:08 +0200, ravenlynne wrote: Sqwertz wrote: You need to killfile everything posted from Google. Show no mercy to those Google-whiners. If somebody gets offended, spit on them. Really, you should teach seminars. ;-) I'm thinking of starting my own religion - Wertzism. -sw What happens to the people who don't put money in the collection plate? they are forced to become catholic. your pal, blake |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Dave Smith wrote: Ted Campanelli wrote: The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". Your first post here and all you can write is an off topic comment to the non-existent moderator in an unmoderated newsgroup. Go back to lurking. One of my pet peeves is people who post: "Your first post here and all you can write is an off topic comment to the non-existent moderator in an unmoderated newsgroup." Without bothering to check first. |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Janet Baraclough wrote: The message from ravenlynne contains these words: Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "Ted Campanelli" wrote in message . net... The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". The moderator is a drunk and pays little attention to what goes on. The job pays $65k a year. Interested? Hell, I am for 65K a year... It's a jobshare with Sheldon. And you don't share the job, you share your body. And the roundtrip airfare to New York each week comes out of the salary. |
|
|||
|
In article . com,
Sheldon wrote: On Nov 1, 4:54?pm, Dave Smith wrote: Ted Campanelli wrote: The moderator of this forum needs to step in and do something about all the posts for "EVERYTHING EXCEPT FOOD RELATED ITEMS". Your first post here and all you can write is an off topic comment to the non-existent moderator in an unmoderated newsgroup. Go back to lurking. This is far from his first post here. Ted Campanelli has posted to rfc longer than you or anyone who's joined this thread so far except me. I've been posting since 1991. How about you? |
|
|||
|
In article ,
"jmcquown" wrote: Melba's Jammin' wrote: Ted, there's a moderated group for recipes only (no conversation), rec.food.recipes. Lots of people find fault with it, but the very first recipe I ever "got off the internet" came from r.f.r. Maybe rec.food.recipes would be more satisfying to you. Wasn't there a recent thread about so many of the recipes posted to rfr being bad? Jill There was. To each one's own, yeah? I don't get many from there but the first one I ever took from the internet was from there. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Notes about our meals in Tuscany have been posted to http://www.jamlady.eboard.com; 10-16-2007 |