A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Food and Cooking » General Cooking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Pasta question?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 08:16 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
James Silverton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,092
Default Pasta question?

Dee wrote on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:09:06 -0400:


DD sf wrote in message
...
?? I'm turning into a stabber. I just don't like to twirl
?? anymore unless it's linguine and clams. So, intead of
?? spaghetti - I prefer rigatoni with my meat sauce. --
??
?? I LOVE penne!
??
?? Me too. In all sizes. Have you tried the mini penne?
?? --

I like all the various thicknesses of spaghetti (I know there
are fancy names for them but I've never straightened them out
:-). Tho' I like other forms of pasta too, I'm a twirler (no
spoon) for spaghetti. I't's pretty much the same as spaghetti
but I find chopsticks great for eating the noodles in Vietnamese
pho. There is a difference in that I think the individual
strands are shorter.

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

  #32 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 08:50 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
aem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,439
Default Pasta question?

On Sep 30, 9:16 am, ChattyCathy wrote:
[snippage]
OK - one other thing - we live at an altitude of approx. 1600 meters
(about 5000 feet) above sea level - so our water boils at a little under
100 Deg C. Wonder if that has anything to do with it?? [snip]


At about 5000 feet water boils at about 205 degrees. If the temp is
lower then the time has to be longer to accomplish the same cooking
result. Type of pasta, size of pot, volume of water are irrelevant.
How can that not be automatic in the thinking of someone who lives at
altitude? Did you just move there?

Incidentally, if the package recommends adding oil to the cooking
water, find a different brand. They don't know how to cook so why buy
their product? If you want to dress your pasta with oil, toss in a
little after draining the pasta. It serves no efficient purpose in
the water. -aem

  #33 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 09:04 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
ChattyCathy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,375
Default Pasta question?

aem wrote:

yet more snipping

At about 5000 feet water boils at about 205 degrees. If the temp is
lower then the time has to be longer to accomplish the same cooking
result. Type of pasta, size of pot, volume of water are irrelevant.
How can that not be automatic in the thinking of someone who lives at
altitude? Did you just move there?

Incidentally, if the package recommends adding oil to the cooking
water, find a different brand. They don't know how to cook so why buy
their product? If you want to dress your pasta with oil, toss in a
little after draining the pasta. It serves no efficient purpose in
the water. -aem


You comments are duly noted - thankyew.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Garlic: the element without which life as we know it would be impossible
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 09:52 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
JoeSpareBedroom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,636
Default Pasta question?

"ChattyCathy" wrote in message
. ..
Heh. I am talking store-bought (dried?) spaghetti here.... so sue me!

The cooking "destructions" say that it should be cooked in boiling
(salted) water (with a tablespoon of oil added to the water) for 10-12
minutes...

Yeah right!

Mine always takes *at least* 25 minutes before it's "al dente" i.e. it's
not "soggy".
And yes, before anyone asks, the water is *boiling* the whole time...

Is it just me or...???

Comments welcome


That length of time is strange.

And, adding oil to the water serves absolutely no purpose.


  #35 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 09:52 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
JoeSpareBedroom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,636
Default Pasta question?

"ChattyCathy" wrote in message
. ..
jmcquown wrote:


Cathy, I've never had dried pasta take that long to cook. In fact,
sometimes after I get the water to a rapid boil I add the spaghetti
(broken
into 3rds for manageability) then simply remove it from the heat and
cover
it. It cooks 'al dente' in 10, maybe 12, minutes without further ado and
I've freed up a burner for other things. I have noticed some pastas
labelled "whole wheat" (an oxymoron? they do look more brown in colour)
take
a little longer to cook, but not by much.


Here's what it says on the package:


What brand of pasta is this?


  #36 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:02 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Davlo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default Pasta question?


"ChattyCathy" wrote in message
. ..

The cooking "destructions" say that it should be cooked in boiling
(salted) water (with a tablespoon of oil added to the water) for 10-12
minutes...

Yeah right!

Mine always takes *at least* 25 minutes before it's "al dente" i.e. it's
not "soggy".
And yes, before anyone asks, the water is *boiling* the whole time...

Is it just me or...???

Comments welcome



Based on so many of the comments here, most of you really need to learn some
basics of Italian cooking.

1. You NEVER put oil/butter in the water. Never.
2. Never rinse the pasta.
3. Don't salt the water till its come to a rolling boil.
4. Use enough water - the pasta needs to move around freely in LOTS of
water.

Cathy, your problem might stem from your definition of *boiling*. The water
has to maintain a rolling (vigorous) boil the whole time (except for
ravioli). Try a "real" brand of pasta, like De Cecco, or even Barilla. No
pasta company should be telling you to oil the frigging water!

Sorry to say, but once you get away from the Northeast, Italian food is an
abomination. You Midwestern types could use a lesson from a good old Italian
grandma like so many of us in the NY/New England region grew up with.

Best of luck.



  #37 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:06 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
James Silverton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,092
Default Pasta question?

Davlo wrote on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:02:57 -0400:


D "ChattyCathy" wrote in message
D . ..
??
?? The cooking "destructions" say that it should be cooked in
?? boiling (salted) water (with a tablespoon of oil added to
?? the water) for 10-12 minutes...
??
?? Yeah right!
??
?? Mine always takes *at least* 25 minutes before it's "al
?? dente" i.e. it's not "soggy". And yes, before anyone asks,
?? the water is *boiling* the whole time...
??
?? Is it just me or...???
??
?? Comments welcome

D Based on so many of the comments here, most of you really
D need to learn some basics of Italian cooking.

D 1. You NEVER put oil/butter in the water. Never.
D 2. Never rinse the pasta.
D 3. Don't salt the water till its come to a rolling boil.
D 4. Use enough water - the pasta needs to move around freely
D in LOTS of water.

D Cathy, your problem might stem from your definition of
D *boiling*. The water has to maintain a rolling (vigorous)
D boil the whole time (except for ravioli). Try a "real" brand
D of pasta, like De Cecco, or even Barilla. No pasta company
D should be telling you to oil the frigging water!

D Sorry to say, but once you get away from the Northeast,
D Italian food is an abomination. You Midwestern types could

Hmmh! I thought Cathy was a South African!

D use a lesson from a good old Italian grandma like so many
D of us in the NY/New England region grew up with.



James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

  #38 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:12 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Pandora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,545
Default Pasta question?

Also here in Italy we have pasta which cook in 25 minutes. And after 25
minutes it is "al dente"!
But not for this, it is a good type of pasta. A good pasta cook in 10 - 13
minutes!
And yes. I agree with you: better brands are DeCecco (my favourite) and
Barilla.

--
Kisses
Pandora
----------------------------------------

"Davlo" ha scritto nel messaggio
...

"ChattyCathy" wrote in message
. ..

The cooking "destructions" say that it should be cooked in boiling
(salted) water (with a tablespoon of oil added to the water) for 10-12
minutes...

Yeah right!

Mine always takes *at least* 25 minutes before it's "al dente" i.e. it's
not "soggy".
And yes, before anyone asks, the water is *boiling* the whole time...

Is it just me or...???

Comments welcome



Based on so many of the comments here, most of you really need to learn
some basics of Italian cooking.

1. You NEVER put oil/butter in the water. Never.
2. Never rinse the pasta.
3. Don't salt the water till its come to a rolling boil.
4. Use enough water - the pasta needs to move around freely in LOTS of
water.

Cathy, your problem might stem from your definition of *boiling*. The
water has to maintain a rolling (vigorous) boil the whole time (except for
ravioli). Try a "real" brand of pasta, like De Cecco, or even Barilla. No
pasta company should be telling you to oil the frigging water!

Sorry to say, but once you get away from the Northeast, Italian food is an
abomination. You Midwestern types could use a lesson from a good old
Italian grandma like so many of us in the NY/New England region grew up
with.

Best of luck.





  #39 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:36 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Michael Kuettner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 658
Default Pasta question?


"Pandora" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Also here in Italy we have pasta which cook in 25 minutes. And after 25
minutes it is "al dente"!
But not for this, it is a good type of pasta. A good pasta cook in 10 - 13
minutes!
And yes. I agree with you: better brands are DeCecco (my favourite) and
Barilla.

Be careful here.
We're dealing mostly with USAns here. The simple fact that there are 10
different
thicknesses for Barilla spaghetti (I prefer numero 3) might cause a
culture-shock.

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner


  #40 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:40 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Andy[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,829
Default Pasta question?

Davlo said...

No pasta company should be telling you to oil the frigging water!


The reason to add oil to the water is to prevent foam overs, not for the
pasta's benefit. Oil is going to ride on the surface anyway and has that
effect. A couple drops would probably do.

Maybe that company's pasta foams over more than other brands and they're
trying to solve the problem that way instead of making better pasta?

Andy
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:44 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Omelet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,561
Default Pasta question?

In article ,
ChattyCathy wrote:

cybercat wrote:


TWENTY FIVE MINUTES FOR PASTA???


Yep.

Cathy just finished eating her pasta with meat sauce

Altitude: 5000 feet


When we lived at 6,000 in California, boiled stuff did take a bit longer
(I was a kid so don't remember the details) but that might account for
it some.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:46 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Omelet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,561
Default Pasta question?

In article , Andy q wrote:

ChattyCathy said...

Heh. I am talking store-bought (dried?) spaghetti here.... so sue me!

The cooking "destructions" say that it should be cooked in boiling
(salted) water (with a tablespoon of oil added to the water) for 10-12
minutes...

Yeah right!

Mine always takes *at least* 25 minutes before it's "al dente" i.e. it's
not "soggy".
And yes, before anyone asks, the water is *boiling* the whole time...

Is it just me or...???

Comments welcome



Cathy,

That sounds like too long for spaghetti. Are you making it in a pot with
LOTS of water or are you crowding the spaghetti into "shallow waters?"

My vermicelli takes 8-10 minutes.

Good luck,

Andy


Andy.

Atmospheric pressure affects the temperature at which water boils, and
that is affected by altitude.

Her boiling water is not as hot as yours, so it's going to take longer
to cook stuff.

There is not a lot that can be done about that, but it's one major
reason mom got to be really good with a pressure cooker when we lived at
8,000 ft. in Colorado.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:48 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Pandora
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,545
Default Pasta question?


"Michael Kuettner" ha scritto nel messaggio
...

"Pandora" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Also here in Italy we have pasta which cook in 25 minutes. And after 25
minutes it is "al dente"!
But not for this, it is a good type of pasta. A good pasta cook in 10 -
13 minutes!
And yes. I agree with you: better brands are DeCecco (my favourite) and
Barilla.

Be careful here.
We're dealing mostly with USAns here. The simple fact that there are 10
different
thicknesses for Barilla spaghetti (I prefer numero 3) might cause a
culture-shock.

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner


Yes. But I was generally speaking!BTW I would say that some brands of
pastas which cook in 25 minutes (and which are very expensive) can be
replaced with Barilla or De Cecco which are better and less expensive.
Ofcourse, some types of pastas cook in less minutes, but for this you must
look on the package

--
Kisses
Pandora


  #44 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:48 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
James Silverton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,092
Default Pasta question?

Michael wrote on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:36:31 +0200:


MK "Pandora" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
MK ...
?? Also here in Italy we have pasta which cook in 25 minutes.
?? And after 25 minutes it is "al dente"! But not for this,
?? it is a good type of pasta. A good pasta cook in 10 - 13
?? minutes! And yes. I agree with you: better brands are
DeCecco
?? (my favourite) and Barilla.
??
MK Be careful here.
MK We're dealing mostly with USAns here. The simple fact that
MK there are 10 different
MK thicknesses for Barilla spaghetti (I prefer numero 3) might
MK cause a culture-shock.

It's quite a number tho' I can't say that I have ever been
concerned or even thought much about it :-)

I have seen Barilla and DeCecco on sale quite often in the US
and I think I did see some numbers but I bought the spaghetti by
inspection. To tell the truth, I can't tell much difference in
taste betwen imported and domestic. I tend to give it 8 minutes
to cook and test for "al dente" at that point. It's often quite
enough time for my taste.


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not

  #45 (permalink)  
Old 30-09-2007, 10:48 PM posted to rec.food.cooking
Omelet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,561
Default Pasta question?

In article , "cybercat"
wrote:

"Goomba38" wrote in message
. ..
jmcquown wrote:
In fact,
sometimes after I get the water to a rapid boil I add the spaghetti
(broken
into 3rds for manageability)


clutching chest in pain
Oh no no no, Jill. Don't do this! This is horrible. Just twirl a few
strands on your fork to make a compact package you then can lift to your
mouth. It isn't hard, and is a more grown up way of eating.
Short broken pieces of spaghetti don't twirl worth a shit.


Why are you telling anyone how to eat pasta, FFS? I like mine
the way you like yours, but I make my husband's the way HE likes
it--broken in to thirds.


Because she _likes_ to tell people what they can and cannot do.

We always break pasta noodles in 1/2 to make them easier to eat.

Really long noodles make for too big of a bite and are a pain in the
ass, unless you have a really big mouth!

Oh.

Nevermind.

eg
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phones - Free phpBB forum - Electricity Suppliers - Problem Mortgage - Credit Card