![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
In article ,
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. It is possible. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
|
|||
|
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. Very easy to accomplish if one or two sets of twins. Well, easy except for finding the energy to have sex with a house full of toddlers. Bob |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
In article , Peter A wrote: This is the main point - too many people consider any large, whole, cooked potato to be "baked" when a microwaved potato is in fact steamed. Even so, when I have been in a hurry for a real baked potato, I have found that a few minutes in the microwave followed by finishing in the oven will cut your cooking time in half and give a result that is hard to tell from the real thing. I'm wondering what kind of results I'm going to get from a solar oven when I finally get around to building one. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson Good solar ovens will produce results directly comparable to a conventional oven as they produce an environment of dry external non-radient heat. Be aware however, that a good many of the designs you'll find are not good solar ovens and have undersized collector area relative to the cooking area and won't generate enough heat for normal oven type cooking. The small box ovens with reflector "petals" aren't really adequate for cooking, really only for heating to consumption temperature, say 160 degrees. An example of a good solar oven would be a steel oven box, insulated on 5 sides and not the bottom, with a diffuser "pizza stone" type device inside on the bottom, located at the focal point of a good sized parabolic collector. Figure a good 6' dia collector for a cubic foot sized oven. This setup will put sufficiently concentrated energy on the bottom of the box to heat the oven interior to "normal" oven temperatures like 350 degrees. With this design you can also interchange the oven box with a pot holder so you can boil or simmer food. You do have to periodically re-aim the collector, which is also how you regulate the temp by aiming a little off to reduce the heat. |
|
|||
|
Pete C. wrote:
You can certainly cook a potato in the microwave and get the same result as famous industrial chain food restaurants but it isn't a baked potato. This is the main point - too many people consider any large, whole, cooked potato to be "baked" when a microwaved potato is in fact steamed. A microwaved potato is no more steamed than a baked one. In both cases the heat introduced produces some internal steam. I think there is a difference. If you bake a potato by simply putting it on the oven rack the skin will develop crispness and there will be some browning and the skin will have a slightly nutty flavor. If you prepare a restaurant style potato as found in "famous chain places" you would wrap it in AL foil which retains the moisture and steams the potato. There is no browning or change of skin texture. If you microwave a potato you get the same result as wrapping in foil likely because the quick cooking doesn't liberate the moisture and lack of infrared for crisping. Of course this assumes that you have enough energy and time left after washing the potatoes... Even so, when I have been in a hurry for a real baked potato, I have found that a few minutes in the microwave followed by finishing in the oven will cut your cooking time in half and give a result that is hard to tell from the real thing. That technique certainly works, indeed very often my use of the microwave it to trim cooking time of an ingredient or two, like nuking diced green peppers for a couple minutes to sync them with the rest of the dish they are going in. |
|
|||
|
George wrote:
Pete C. wrote: You can certainly cook a potato in the microwave and get the same result as famous industrial chain food restaurants but it isn't a baked potato. This is the main point - too many people consider any large, whole, cooked potato to be "baked" when a microwaved potato is in fact steamed. A microwaved potato is no more steamed than a baked one. In both cases the heat introduced produces some internal steam. I think there is a difference. If you bake a potato by simply putting it on the oven rack the skin will develop crispness and there will be some browning and the skin will have a slightly nutty flavor. If you prepare a restaurant style potato as found in "famous chain places" you would wrap it in AL foil which retains the moisture and steams the potato. There is no browning or change of skin texture. If you microwave a potato you get the same result as wrapping in foil likely because the quick cooking doesn't liberate the moisture and lack of infrared for crisping. I didn't claim there was no difference between a baked and microwaved potato. I indicated that both methods generate some internal steam in the potato. Neither is actually "steamed". Of course this assumes that you have enough energy and time left after washing the potatoes... Yea, that extraordinarily difficult step applies in both cases. |
|
|||
|
"Sheldon" wrote in message oups.com... Omelet wrote: andreahunte wrote: For those of you who are interested, there is a place out there where you can buy frozen, fully baked potatoes that microwave in 3-4 minutes and taste like fresh, oven baked potatoes. I doubt that they will taste like just baked... and you can cook a potato from raw in a microwave oven in 3-4 minutes. And a person can bake a bunch of spuds and refrigerate for later.. in fact whenever I bake potatoes I bake the entire five pound bag, they can easily be reheated later but I like them cold too, I like to dice them into a salad. Cold baked potatoes make a very satisfying and healthful snack too, and I like them plain, cold it's like eating a piece of fruit. If you are nuking, you can nuke/bake a fresh potato too. It takes a bit longer, but not significantly so and it'll save you a LOT of money! I used to wrap a spud in waxed paper to nuke but graduated to placing them inside of a covered corningware baking dish with a little water. But that's steamed. You cannot bake anything in a microwave oven. I cook potatoes often in a microwave, but I'd never confuse them with baked... I wouldn't confuse them with boiled either, boiled potatoes are far better because they're more evenly cooked. I'll nuke a couple of spuds (becaue it's quick and no pot to clean) but have never yet had one that cooked evenly or any two that cooked to the same degree of doneness. I think you need to take a hint and snack on plain cold potatoes instead of all that salty crap you pig out on. Potaotes are very low calorie and high in nutrition... of course if you're gonna blend potatoes with your ham, olives, anchovie, and tons of mayo then you're just ****ing yourself. Well, if you can get your tits to swell instead of your fingers... heheheh I do potatoes in the microwave on occasion. Daughter is fond of those plastic wrapped ones that you just nuke. I think they leave something to be desired. Mainly when I make baked potatoes, I do them ahead of time, cool and stuff them using plain rice milk, olive oil, nutritional yeast and green onions, then a sprinkling of Hungarian Sweet Paprika. Works for me! |
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... On Aug 25, 10:43 am, "Pete C." wrote: wrote: For those of you who are interested, there is a place out there where you can buy frozen, fully baked potatoes that microwave in 3-4 minutes and taste like fresh, oven baked potatoes. Check it out at www.worldwidefoodsinc.com. Also find free recipes for baked potatoes. These are very convenient. I have 5 kids, age 6 and under and I use them at home often as they save me a lot of time in the kitchen. What a pathetic shill / spam post. Nuking a fresh, raw potato take a couple minutes longer and is more convenient and of course a lot cheaper. Nothing shill about telling you guys about a good potato. This company supplies national restaurant chains and now their potato is online. You are wrong about it being more convenient to use a fresh potato. Cheaper maybe but not more convenient. Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? I don't buy the green ones and it doesn't take long to wash them. But you can buy pre-washed ones these days. Wrapped in plastic and ready to nuke. |
|
|||
|
"Pete C." wrote in message ... wrote: snip Anyone who has time to eat said potato has the 30 seconds it takes to clean said potato before placing in the microwave. I suppose you also go to those stores that assemble a ready to "cook" meal kit for you while stroking your ego telling you that your life is too busy and your time is too valuable to spend the 15 minutes preparing the ingredients, the very same 15 minutes you spend at that store. Shill. I just don't understand those places. There is one near me and I took a peek in there after all these people I know were raving about what a good thing it was. Wouldn't work for me since we have food allergies and there were cross contamination issues everywhere. Plus most of the menus they have wouldn't go over well with us either. But I just couldn't see it. No appeal whatever to me. Why would I want to drive to a place to assemble a meal then bring it home and freeze it? Not for me. My mom tried to tell me if I didn't have the food allergies and I was working, I would love it. Well, no I would not. I can't see myself ever liking that. Oddly, I've never seen anyone in there making a meal. Never. |
|
|||
|
"zxcvbob" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. Very easy to accomplish if one or two sets of twins. Well, easy except for finding the energy to have sex with a house full of toddlers. Bob That, and thinking you can divide your attention between that many kids. Or, maybe she's one of those parents who gives no attention to the kids, so any number will do. |
|
|||
|
"Pete C." wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. With all the IVF (and other technique) induced multiple births these days, I don't think you have any grounds for that comment. Forget biology & medicine, and think about sanity (or lack of it). |
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Pete C." wrote: Good solar ovens will produce results directly comparable to a conventional oven as they produce an environment of dry external non-radient heat. Be aware however, that a good many of the designs you'll find are not good solar ovens and have undersized collector area relative to the cooking area and won't generate enough heat for normal oven type cooking. The small box ovens with reflector "petals" aren't really adequate for cooking, really only for heating to consumption temperature, say 160 degrees. An example of a good solar oven would be a steel oven box, insulated on 5 sides and not the bottom, with a diffuser "pizza stone" type device inside on the bottom, located at the focal point of a good sized parabolic collector. Figure a good 6' dia collector for a cubic foot sized oven. This setup will put sufficiently concentrated energy on the bottom of the box to heat the oven interior to "normal" oven temperatures like 350 degrees. With this design you can also interchange the oven box with a pot holder so you can boil or simmer food. You do have to periodically re-aim the collector, which is also how you regulate the temp by aiming a little off to reduce the heat. When I was in Junior high, we made some solar ovens. Some of them got up to 300 degrees or more and they used them to bake bread. They were fairly simple but the main thing that seemed to make the difference is that they used Mirror tiles, epoxied to the sides of a metal box with the heavy glass front. For a solar stove, I've managed to get (thru freecycle) an old satellite antennae. One of those little ones. I plan to use mirror tile on it (I'm sure I can get free broken mirror at the local glass shop) and then locate the focal point on it to locate the "burner" for pan or pot cooking. I'm still playing with the concept. :-) I understand that I'll have to "track" the sun with it. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
|
|||
|
Julie Bove wrote:
"Pete C." wrote in message ... wrote: snip Anyone who has time to eat said potato has the 30 seconds it takes to clean said potato before placing in the microwave. I suppose you also go to those stores that assemble a ready to "cook" meal kit for you while stroking your ego telling you that your life is too busy and your time is too valuable to spend the 15 minutes preparing the ingredients, the very same 15 minutes you spend at that store. Shill. I just don't understand those places. There is one near me and I took a peek in there after all these people I know were raving about what a good thing it was. Wouldn't work for me since we have food allergies and there were cross contamination issues everywhere. Plus most of the menus they have wouldn't go over well with us either. But I just couldn't see it. No appeal whatever to me. Why would I want to drive to a place to assemble a meal then bring it home and freeze it? Not for me. My mom tried to tell me if I didn't have the food allergies and I was working, I would love it. Well, no I would not. I can't see myself ever liking that. Oddly, I've never seen anyone in there making a meal. Never. Like I said, that store concept like a lot of other similarly stupid things all work on the principle of extracting money from the clueless by stroking their egos. Instead of say, teaching the subject how to cook, you instead tell them that they are too busy (read lazy) and their time is too valuable (they're self absorbed and neglecting their kids) for them to spend the huge amount of time (15 minutes) it takes to prepare ingredients for cooking. It's simply a yuppified TV dinner at a yuppified price. |
|
|||
|
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Pete C." wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. With all the IVF (and other technique) induced multiple births these days, I don't think you have any grounds for that comment. Forget biology & medicine, and think about sanity (or lack of it). Of course, anyone who wants to have more than two children should automatically be tossed in the loony bin. |
|
|||
|
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"zxcvbob" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. Very easy to accomplish if one or two sets of twins. Well, easy except for finding the energy to have sex with a house full of toddlers. Bob That, and thinking you can divide your attention between that many kids. Or, maybe she's one of those parents who gives no attention to the kids, so any number will do. Simply a superficial collector. Her life is built around possessions as a substitute for any character, children are simply another possession to try to show off, just like the micro mansion and yuppmobile. |
|
|||
|
"Pete C." wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Pete C." wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Dan Abel" wrote in message ... In article , zxcvbob wrote: wrote: Who has time or wants to wash/ scrub a bag of green potatoes you get from the grocery store? Because you are so busy doing what? Are you kidding? Five kids under the age of six? If they are her biological kids (not adopted), then she's lying about having that many kids. With all the IVF (and other technique) induced multiple births these days, I don't think you have any grounds for that comment. Forget biology & medicine, and think about sanity (or lack of it). Of course, anyone who wants to have more than two children should automatically be tossed in the loony bin. It's a safe bet that if you asked most women if they wanted that many kids in that length of time, the best situation would be that they'd say "no". But, I think most would punch your lights out just for asking. :-) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|