![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
bworthey wrote:
"Whirled Peas" wrote in message news:bnwgi.27205 Here is a link http://tinyurl.com/27fql3 to a basic, well-tried recipe for 100 servings of lasagna. You might get some idea of proportions from this. This comes from the Armed Forces Recipe Service. What size pan are they doing that in though? I have some at my church that appear to be around a 18x12, they are not quite 2 9X13 pans, so it might be an 11X17, not sure. Any idea? B-Worthey Interesting question. The recipe says that, after baking, the lasagna is cut into 20 pieces (4 x 5). No further serving instructions. My *guess* is that the lasagna is then taken to a standard steam table and served directly from the baking pan. A full-size steam table pan is 12" x 20", 2 1/2" (or 4" or 6") deep. This would make each individual serving to be 3" x 4" generous portions. 20 servings from a 1/2 size pan would make each 3" x 2", which seems small to me. I used to make lasagna for my large family always in a 1/2 size (12" x 10") steam table pan. I would get at least 12, maybe 15 satisfying portions out of it. Of course, small children don't have large appetites like young, highly active adults. |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
Marzano? San Marzano. Learn to quote. And try to learn - I know it will be hard for you - not to display your woeful ignorance so ostentatiously. The famous San Marzano tomatoes have been mentioned on this newsgroup alone about 100,000 times. You mean "plum" tomatoes? Sheesh. No I do not mean just any plum tomatoes. I mean San Marzano ones, from the Agro-Nocerino-Sarnese region in Campania. I hate it when home growers throw around variety names as if everyone has a choice. You have to learn to read for comprehension - this also will be hard for you, I know. I explicitly mentioned the San Marzano tomatoes as canned. Commercially. They are fairly ubiquitous in good groceries around the world. They are always explicitly labelled San Marzano, with the DOP (Denominazione di Origine Protetta - Protected Designation of Origin) label and generally cost a lot more than most any other tomatoes. Victor |
|
|||
|
Blair P. Houghton wrote:
When the weather is hot, I like to eat refrigerated canned tomatoes right out of the can - such juicy, cool goodness... Can't really do that with fresh tomatoes. Sure you can. I often end up eating half of any tomato I'm slicing. So do I, but it is not the same thing. Fresh tomatoes are rarely refrigerated and no matter the variety they are never remotely as juicy as canned ones. Each kind provides its own pleasure. Victor |
|
|||
|
Goomba38 wrote:
My understanding is that Marzano, just like Vidalia onions, are only grown in a certain area and something about the soil and growing conditions imparts a desired quality not universally found in other tomatoes. They are said to be amazing but I've never purchased them so have to take the word of the experts? San Marzanos come canned in this country. They're good, but not amazing. A good batch of cans from any domestic tomato patch can take 'em. After you add oil, garlic, parsley, oregano, marjoram, basil, bay, onions, mushrooms salt, vodka, sicilian salsiccia, pasta, and a fork, it's a question of the tomatoes just not being bitter. --Blair |
|
|||
|
In article , sf wrote:
Victor Sack wrote: Marzano ones are universally regarded as superior, but I find that the local widely marketed Sonnen-Bassermann brand is nearly as good at a third of the price. When the weather is hot, I like to eat refrigerated canned tomatoes right out of the can - such juicy, cool goodness... Can't really do that with fresh tomatoes. Marzano? You mean "plum" tomatoes? Sheesh. I hate it when home growers throw around variety names as if everyone has a choice. And I hate it when people make assumptions about things they don't know about. Perhaps they aren't called plum tomatoes throughout the whole world. Perhaps they aren't even called tomatoes. http://www.sanmarzanoimports.com/prod01.htm Not many people know they can eat a tomato like they would eat an apple. What a joyous experience when they are fresh and sweet! See my other post. |
|
|||
|
Victor Sack wrote:
I explicitly mentioned the San Marzano tomatoes as canned. Commercially. They are fairly ubiquitous in good groceries around the world. They are always explicitly labelled San Marzano, with the DOP (Denominazione di Origine Protetta - Protected Designation of Origin) label and generally cost a lot more than most any other tomatoes. Regular tomatoes are about $1.50/28-oz can, San Marzanos run 3 to 5 dollars. And, as I've said, they're tasty, but only about as tasty as a good can of the regular ones, even store-brand. Worth trying on a splurge, not really worth going out of the way for. --Blair |