![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
In article , zxcvbob wrote: Using mine today for mixing grout -- I only wanted to mix up 1/4 of a box for the first batch, and for weighing a package. Used it a couple of days ago for weighing lead ingots. I use it occasionally for cooking, too (especially with hard- or messy-to-measure items like brown sugar, honey, lard, etc) Bob Ooh, never thought of using it to weigh ingots. Why? Do you sell them? I'd use the grain scale after they were cast... The grain scale has only a dedicated use. I'll never use it for food. ??? what does a scale care what is weighed on it? I weigh anything on mine. It switches from metric to pounds and helps avoid stodgy baking on very humid days-- common here . -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Giusi wrote: Omelet wrote: In article , zxcvbob wrote: Using mine today for mixing grout -- I only wanted to mix up 1/4 of a box for the first batch, and for weighing a package. Used it a couple of days ago for weighing lead ingots. I use it occasionally for cooking, too (especially with hard- or messy-to-measure items like brown sugar, honey, lard, etc) Bob Ooh, never thought of using it to weigh ingots. Why? Do you sell them? I'd use the grain scale after they were cast... The grain scale has only a dedicated use. I'll never use it for food. ??? what does a scale care what is weighed on it? I weigh anything on mine. It switches from metric to pounds and helps avoid stodgy baking on very humid days-- common here . Sweetie, a grain scale is for measuring bullet weights and powder load weights for charging gun cartridges. The weights are too critical for me to mess up the scale using food, and it weighs in grains rather than ounces or grams. I'm not going to mess with conversions. ;-) I have a salter scale that weighs in Ounces and Grams for cooking and food! -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
In article , The grain scale has only a dedicated use. I'll never use it for food. ??? what does a scale care what is weighed on it? I weigh anything on mine. It switches from metric to pounds and helps avoid stodgy baking on very humid days-- common here . Sweetie, a grain scale is for measuring bullet weights and powder load weights for charging gun cartridges. The weights are too critical for me to mess up the scale using food, and it weighs in grains rather than ounces or grams. I'm not going to mess with conversions. ;-) I have a salter scale that weighs in Ounces and Grams for cooking and food! Ahhh, I'd forgotten about those. You'd need a dedicated PC to convert the weights. You must work all night, yes? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
|||
|
In article ,
Giusi wrote: Omelet wrote: In article , The grain scale has only a dedicated use. I'll never use it for food. ??? what does a scale care what is weighed on it? I weigh anything on mine. It switches from metric to pounds and helps avoid stodgy baking on very humid days-- common here . Sweetie, a grain scale is for measuring bullet weights and powder load weights for charging gun cartridges. The weights are too critical for me to mess up the scale using food, and it weighs in grains rather than ounces or grams. I'm not going to mess with conversions. ;-) I have a salter scale that weighs in Ounces and Grams for cooking and food! Ahhh, I'd forgotten about those. You'd need a dedicated PC to convert the weights. You must work all night, yes? Yes, I work night shifts... I don't post from work tho'. I'm on vacation this week but my sleep schedules are still messed up. :-) -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:38:14 -0700, merryb wrote:
On Jun 6, 8:53 am, Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Vote now! Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey -- Cheers Chatty Cathy Is this scale for weighing ingredients or portion control? I use one when I bake. Either one. This survey popped into my mind as I was ordering a couple of new scales from www.wholesale-scale.com. (Just a satisfied customer.) Kitchen scales 2000 g +-1 g are $20, but I've already got one. I don't use it often but when it's needed, it's really needed. If'n you're REALLY cheap they've got a 600 gram scale good to 0.1 g for ten bucks (American Weigh ZX3-600). It's a bit small, hard to weigh a bowl on it. Best -- Terry |
|
|||
|
On Jun 6, 2:38 pm, Sheldon wrote:
Omelet wrote: I do have one and the only thing I've used it for lately is sausage making. There are times when measuring really counts. :-) I would think for sausage you'd use a yardstick... you mean you weigh them too? hehe Sheldon Quite a while ago, I saw something in my husband's Penthouse about measuring by displacement. That way you can optimize in two dimensions rather than in just one. Cindy Hamilton |
|
|||
|
I love mine.
I have a Salter brand and I use it for food and mail.-L. Ok good, I'm not the only one that uses mine for mail. I do use it for baking as well. Much more precise than a measuring cup. -- Queenie *** Be the change you wish to see in the world *** |
|
|||
|
Omelet wrote:
In article , zxcvbob wrote: Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Vote now! Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Using mine today for mixing grout -- I only wanted to mix up 1/4 of a box for the first batch, and for weighing a package. Used it a couple of days ago for weighing lead ingots. I use it occasionally for cooking, too (especially with hard- or messy-to-measure items like brown sugar, honey, lard, etc) Bob Ooh, never thought of using it to weigh ingots. Why? Do you sell them? No, I wanted to see how much lead I had recovered. Also curious to see what weight ingots the little 2.5 ounce muffin-shaped condiment cups threw (about 1 pound 10 ounces) I suppose I could have calculated that from the volume and the specific gravity of lead, discounting a little for the tin, etc. The Revereware pan that I used for smelting the dirt and scum skimmed off from the first melt will never be the same. :-) But from 6 pounds of "dirt" that was suspiciously heavy, I recovered almost 4 more pounds of hard lead that casts well without any added tin. (You can email me for more details cuz this is kind of off-topic.) I also know that next time I melt scrounged lead that's badly oxidized to add some oil and let it cook in a tightly covered pan for an hour or two. The oil will try to burn, and the only source of oxygen will be from reducing the metal oxides, increasing the yield quite a bit. It doesn't even stink and smoke all that /much/ (still, do it outside) because the lid traps most of it until it eventually burns up as carbon dioxide and water vapor. Bob |
|
|||
|
In article ,
zxcvbob wrote: Omelet wrote: In article , zxcvbob wrote: Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Vote now! Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Using mine today for mixing grout -- I only wanted to mix up 1/4 of a box for the first batch, and for weighing a package. Used it a couple of days ago for weighing lead ingots. I use it occasionally for cooking, too (especially with hard- or messy-to-measure items like brown sugar, honey, lard, etc) Bob Ooh, never thought of using it to weigh ingots. Why? Do you sell them? No, I wanted to see how much lead I had recovered. Also curious to see what weight ingots the little 2.5 ounce muffin-shaped condiment cups threw (about 1 pound 10 ounces) I suppose I could have calculated that from the volume and the specific gravity of lead, discounting a little for the tin, etc. What are you melting? Are you doing what I am doing and harvesting berm led? :-) If you need an ingot mold, let me know. I can get them from Cabela's and they are only 19 miles down the freeway. The Revereware pan that I used for smelting the dirt and scum skimmed off from the first melt will never be the same. :-) I plan on getting a cheap Lodge cast iron pot and one of those outdoor propane flame thingies they use to deep fry turkeys. It'll be dedicated for lead harvesting. But from 6 pounds of "dirt" that was suspiciously heavy, I recovered almost 4 more pounds of hard lead that casts well without any added tin. (You can email me for more details cuz this is kind of off-topic.) I am curious, is this e-mail valid? If I can avoid having to purchase tin... I can get Antimony for $8.00 per lb. but have yet to find a good Tin source. I also know that next time I melt scrounged lead that's badly oxidized to add some oil and let it cook in a tightly covered pan for an hour or two. The oil will try to burn, and the only source of oxygen will be from reducing the metal oxides, increasing the yield quite a bit. It doesn't even stink and smoke all that /much/ (still, do it outside) because the lid traps most of it until it eventually burns up as carbon dioxide and water vapor. Ok, I don't understand that one. Oil??? Bob Danke! :-) E-mail sent. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:53:56 +0200, Chatty Cathy
wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Vote now! Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Looking at the results today.... I'm guessing a lot of Americans are on diets. I don't think the "scales" would tip so heavily in favor of weighing food if that wasn't the case because I don't think we have enough OW (Other World) participants to tip them like that. So a follow up survey could be about the reason why people use food scales. PS: I don't invent surveys, I just expand them (in my mind). -- See return address to reply by email |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:46:38 -0500, Skyhooks
wrote: Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Vote now! Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey -- Cheers Chatty Cathy Yippee, I made the first vote But, oh the dilemma, which TFH toselect G. Cathy, thanks for doing all the surveys - I very much enjoy them. Sky Which hat did you settle on... or did you design a new one? -- See return address to reply by email |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:53:56 +0200, Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Looking at the results today.... I'm guessing a lot of Americans are on diets. I don't think the "scales" would tip so heavily in favor of weighing food if that wasn't the case because I don't think we have enough OW (Other World) participants to tip them like that. So a follow up survey could be about the reason why people use food scales. PS: I don't invent surveys, I just expand them (in my mind). I don't think that follows. Weighing is more accurate, always. If you need to scale a recipe up or down, weighing outdoes measuring every time. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
|||
|
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:55:27 +0200, Giusi wrote:
sf wrote: On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:53:56 +0200, Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Looking at the results today.... I'm guessing a lot of Americans are on diets. I don't think the "scales" would tip so heavily in favor of weighing food if that wasn't the case because I don't think we have enough OW (Other World) participants to tip them like that. So a follow up survey could be about the reason why people use food scales. PS: I don't invent surveys, I just expand them (in my mind). I don't think that follows. Of course it does - if you're an American. Weighing is more accurate, always. If you need to scale a recipe up or down, weighing outdoes measuring every time. I am not a scientist and don't pretend to be one, so I don't need to weigh food and don't have any desire to begin. The only time I've ever weighed food was to get an idea of portion control for a diet... IOW what x oz of something looked like. After I got the general idea, I stopped weighing food and the scale went on the top shelf to gather dust until it was thrown out. So, for me: Weighing food as portion control while dieting is a possibility Weighing food just to cook - never. -- See return address to reply by email |
|
|||
|
sf wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:55:27 +0200, Giusi wrote: sf wrote: On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:53:56 +0200, Chatty Cathy wrote: http://www.recfoodcooking.com/ Thanks go to Terry (P'rfesser) for sending in this survey Looking at the results today.... I'm guessing a lot of Americans are on diets. I don't think the "scales" would tip so heavily in favor of weighing food if that wasn't the case because I don't think we have enough OW (Other World) participants to tip them like that. So a follow up survey could be about the reason why people use food scales. PS: I don't invent surveys, I just expand them (in my mind). I don't think that follows. Of course it does - if you're an American. Weighing is more accurate, always. If you need to scale a recipe up or down, weighing outdoes measuring every time. I am not a scientist and don't pretend to be one, so I don't need to weigh food and don't have any desire to begin. The only time I've ever weighed food was to get an idea of portion control for a diet... IOW what x oz of something looked like. After I got the general idea, I stopped weighing food and the scale went on the top shelf to gather dust until it was thrown out. So, for me: Weighing food as portion control while dieting is a possibility Weighing food just to cook - never. Baking requires accuracy and recipes from any professional source are pretty much always by weight. |
|
|||
|
"Pete C." wrote in message ... sf wrote: On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:55:27 +0200, Giusi wrote: I don't think that follows. Of course it does - if you're an American. Weighing is more accurate, always. If you need to scale a recipe up or down, weighing outdoes measuring every time. I am not a scientist and don't pretend to be one, so I don't need to weigh food and don't have any desire to begin. The only time I've ever weighed food was to get an idea of portion control for a diet... IOW what x oz of something looked like. After I got the general idea, I stopped weighing food and the scale went on the top shelf to gather dust until it was thrown out. So, for me: Weighing food as portion control while dieting is a possibility Weighing food just to cook - never. Baking requires accuracy and recipes from any professional source are pretty much always by weight. Baking doesn't *require* that degree of accuracy. Recipes from professional sources generally make way too much for the home cook. Not many people have an oven large enough to make a full sheet cake. It's possible to bake a cake or bread without even using measuring cups and spoons!!! I know, a rather shocking statement. My Great Grandmother did it for around 80 years though. I use measuring cups and spoons because I have to use something to get the ingredients out of the canister/container and I have them. Ms P |