![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Mark A.Meggs wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:40:30 -0600, Del Cecchi wrote: Mark A.Meggs wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:55:04 -0800 (PST), Susan wrote: On Feb 16, 9:38 pm, Mark A.Meggs wrote: I'm getting backing into baking bread. I'm currently using my KitchenAid mixer with a 4.5 quart bowl to mix/knead the dough. I'd like to make enough dough for 2 largish loaves (9x5 pans, 1.5 to 2 pounds each). WhenI try this with the KitchenAid, the dough starts climbing above the top of the bowl. I'm thinking I need something with about a 6 quart capacity, and just as sturdy as the KitchenAid. Does any one have suggestions - preferably based on experience? Thanks in advance! - Mark You like the kitchenaid, and want 6 quarts. Why not get the 6 quart kitchenaid? ?? Pierre That is one of the options. Since KA is the only thing I have experience with, I was hoping to get some information on others. Thanks! - Mark There is a function on Google that lets one search newsgroups to find posts from the past. Some people use it to avoid barging into newsgroups and irritating people by expecting them to drop everything and provide free consulting. t If you have confined yourself to using Google for Usenet access, I truly feel for you. Google groups is so separated from Usenet that I can't begin to describe it. e Perhaps you should consider using that function as part of your information gathering, especially since you seem to have exacting requirements for the answers. It is not as if the subject of mixers hasn't been discussed often in this group. - Mark You apparently can't read OR use a search engine to find past threads in this group or alt.bread.recipes related to mixers suitable for your exacting baking requirements. Or perhaps you are so wrapped up in yourself that you were unaware that the google newsgroup archive allows searching? I believe the proper response to your arrogance is *plonk* goodnight and good luck. |
|
|||
|
Mark A.Meggs wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:40:30 -0600, Del Cecchi If you have confined yourself to using Google for Usenet access, I truly feel for you. Google groups is so separated from Usenet that I can't begin to describe it. Perhaps you should consider using that function as part of your information gathering, especially since you seem to have exacting requirements for the answers. It is not as if the subject of mixers hasn't been discussed often in this group. Mark, I think Del was referring to the search feature that is now in Google. Years ago it was on another site that went away. It's a great way to search the archives of any Usenet group. I didn't read his post to have anything to do with reading postings on Google. -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
|
|||
|
Del Cecchi wrote:
You apparently can't read OR use a search engine to find past threads in this group or alt.bread.recipes related to mixers suitable for your exacting baking requirements. Or perhaps you are so wrapped up in yourself that you were unaware that the google newsgroup archive allows searching? I believe the proper response to your arrogance is *plonk* goodnight and good luck. I just went to Google and searched this group for "bread mixers" and found 400+ posts. There is a very interesting thread in 2006 that describes lots of different machines. I think you gave him a wonderful suggestion and he deserves a good "plonking" from you, Del. g -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:26:23 -0600, Janet Wilder
wrote: Mark, I think Del was referring to the search feature that is now in Google. Years ago it was on another site that went away. Hi Janet, That was Deja-News... ('always loved that name.} All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:38:38 -0500, Mark A.Meggs
wrote: I'm getting backing into baking bread. I'm currently using my KitchenAid mixer with a 4.5 quart bowl to mix/knead the dough. I'd like to make enough dough for 2 largish loaves (9x5 pans, 1.5 to 2 pounds each). WhenI try this with the KitchenAid, the dough starts climbing above the top of the bowl. I'm thinking I need something with about a 6 quart capacity, and just as sturdy as the KitchenAid. Does any one have suggestions - preferably based on experience? Thanks in advance! - Mark Of the 28 responses to my original message, exactly 2 addressed the question I asked. Thanks very much to "The Cook" and cowguy@aol,com "Susan/Pierre". Thank you Peter A for understanding where I was coming from! For the rest of you - if you don't have anything tos ay, don't say anything. Good Baking! - Mark |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:21:09 -0500, Mark A.Meggs
wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:38:38 -0500, Mark A.Meggs wrote: I'm getting backing into baking bread. I'm currently using my KitchenAid mixer with a 4.5 quart bowl to mix/knead the dough. I'd like to make enough dough for 2 largish loaves (9x5 pans, 1.5 to 2 pounds each). WhenI try this with the KitchenAid, the dough starts climbing above the top of the bowl. I'm thinking I need something with about a 6 quart capacity, and just as sturdy as the KitchenAid. Does any one have suggestions - preferably based on experience? Thanks in advance! - Mark Of the 28 responses to my original message, exactly 2 addressed the question I asked. Thanks very much to "The Cook" and cowguy@aol,com "Susan/Pierre". Thank you Peter A for understanding where I was coming from! For the rest of you - if you don't have anything tos ay, don't say anything. Good Baking! - Mark Interesting calculation Mark... First, the vast majority of "the 28 responses" were not directed to you at all. Also, I suggested that you consider a used Hobart, and later when you commented on flour mills, I offered you my experiences with C.S. Bell, and Diamant as on the link you provided to Lehman's. You did not bother to respond to either. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:40:12 -0500, Kenneth
wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:21:09 -0500, Mark A.Meggs wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:38:38 -0500, Mark A.Meggs wrote: I'm getting backing into baking bread. I'm currently using my KitchenAid mixer with a 4.5 quart bowl to mix/knead the dough. I'd like to make enough dough for 2 largish loaves (9x5 pans, 1.5 to 2 pounds each). WhenI try this with the KitchenAid, the dough starts climbing above the top of the bowl. I'm thinking I need something with about a 6 quart capacity, and just as sturdy as the KitchenAid. Does any one have suggestions - preferably based on experience? Thanks in advance! - Mark Of the 28 responses to my original message, exactly 2 addressed the question I asked. Thanks very much to "The Cook" and cowguy@aol,com "Susan/Pierre". Thank you Peter A for understanding where I was coming from! For the rest of you - if you don't have anything tos ay, don't say anything. Good Baking! - Mark Interesting calculation Mark... First, the vast majority of "the 28 responses" were not directed to you at all. All of the responses occured as a result of my original post. Also, I suggested that you consider a used Hobart Yes you did - I apologise for overlooking that response. Thank you! , and later when you commented on flour mills, I offered you my experiences with C.S. Bell, and Diamant as on the link you provided to Lehman's. You did not bother to respond to either. Since it was OT, no I did not. And, yes I am aware that my response to Will was OT. All the best, - Mark |
|
|||
|
On Feb 19, 9:21 am, Mark A.Meggs wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:38:38 -0500, Mark A.Meggs Of the 28 responses to my original message, exactly 2 addressed the question I asked. Not for nothing Mark, and I mean this constructively... but if I posed a query to a newsgroup and only 7% of the responses were relevant, I would conclude that: a) my question was poorly articulated or b) I was mis-interpreting the response. For the rest of you - if you don't have anything to say, don't say anything. I would not conclude that everyone was stupid. :-) |
|
|||
|
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:10:14 -0800 (PST), Will
wrote: On Feb 19, 9:21 am, Mark A.Meggs wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:38:38 -0500, Mark A.Meggs Of the 28 responses to my original message, exactly 2 addressed the question I asked. Not for nothing Mark, and I mean this constructively... but if I posed a query to a newsgroup and only 7% of the responses were relevant, I would conclude that: a) my question was poorly articulated or b) I was mis-interpreting the response. For the rest of you - if you don't have anything to say, don't say anything. I would not conclude that everyone was stupid. :-) Hi Will, You may remember that the unpleasant part of this thread started with Mark writing: "I know this is going to make me sound like an ass, but..." and then continuing to make his comment anyway. How dearly I value my hard won lessons in that arena: I now know with certainty that if I am aware that something I am about to say is going to make me look like an ass (or something worse) I should not say it. On occasion, I am even able to allow that knowledge to guide my behavior... All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
Kenneth wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:26:23 -0600, Janet Wilder wrote: Mark, I think Del was referring to the search feature that is now in Google. Years ago it was on another site that went away. Hi Janet, That was Deja-News... ('always loved that name.} All the best, So it was! My rememberer often malfunctions. Thank you. -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
|
|||
|
On Feb 19, 7:28 pm, Kenneth wrote:
You may remember... What I've noticed over the years is that threads, if they're going to go snarky, tend to start down that path in the evening. Check the timestamps. The old "in vino veritas" syndrome. Got a Poilane going :-) . If I get into the oven tomorrow evening, it will be ready Saturday. You probably know this... but if you pull back on the water a bit, that formula makes a killer bagel. Will |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:59:41 -0800 (PST), Will
wrote: You probably know this... but if you pull back on the water a bit, that formula makes a killer bagel. Hi Will, Well, no, I did not know that... And just last evening I was talking with my son about the fact that I had not made bagels in quite a while. All the best, and thanks for the tip, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |