A Food and drink forum. FoodBanter.com

Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

Go Back   Home » FoodBanter.com forum » Drinking » Beer
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop.

Stella Artois - adverse effects?



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 01:18 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

Hi all,

I have a number of friends who claim that Stella Artois effects them in an
adverse manner. Basically, they reckon they get a lot more drunk on Stella
than on the same amount of any other lager/beer of the same alcohol content.
Not sure where most of you come from, but Stella has the nickname
"wifebeater" here in England, due to it's supposed propensity to incite
violence in it's drinkers. Personally, I don't find it effects me any
differently to beers of the same strength. Does anyone know if there really
is anything about it that would make it more potent than other beers? Or is
it, as I suspect, all in their minds?!

Cheers,
Dan


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 05:35 AM
Lew Bryson
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

a wrote in message
...
Hi all,

I have a number of friends who claim that Stella Artois effects them in an
adverse manner. Basically, they reckon they get a lot more drunk on Stella
than on the same amount of any other lager/beer of the same alcohol

content.
Not sure where most of you come from, but Stella has the nickname
"wifebeater" here in England, due to it's supposed propensity to incite
violence in it's drinkers. Personally, I don't find it effects me any
differently to beers of the same strength. Does anyone know if there

really
is anything about it that would make it more potent than other beers? Or

is
it, as I suspect, all in their minds?!


You're right. This is local wazooism. Most places on the globe, there is one
beer that is mysteriously supposed to do...something; get you drunker, make
you an asshole, give you ferocious headaches, give you a whopping boner,
whatever. It's all superstition. As an old fart I know once told me, "Beer's
beer, Lew. There ain't no difference." On one level, of course, he was
completely talking out his ass. But on another level, he was more right than
I realized for some years. Calling Stella "wifebeater" is more a reflection
on the type of guy who drinks Stella than it is on Stella.

--
Lew Bryson

"As for talking shit in this NG, Lew, you're the undisputed king, and
that's no SHITE." -- Bob Skilnik, 1/31/02

www.lewbryson.com


  #3 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 12:14 PM
Paul Sherwin
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 03:35:53 GMT, "Lew Bryson"
wrote:

Calling Stella "wifebeater" is more a reflection
on the type of guy who drinks Stella than it is on Stella.


That's exactly what I was going to post Lew. It's a 5% beer, so if you
drink 10 pints of it you're going to get drunk, and if you're the sort
of person that gets violent when they're drunk...

BTW, I've never heard Stella called 'wifebeater' here - crap,
expensive etc. are more common terms. It's marketed as a premium beer,
unlike in Belgium where it is an everyday session pilsner.

Best regards, Paul
--
Paul Sherwin Consulting http://paulsherwin.co.uk
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 02:06 PM
Steve Moore
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

Paul Sherwin wrote:

BTW, I've never heard Stella called 'wifebeater' here - crap,
expensive etc. are more common terms. It's marketed as a premium beer,
unlike in Belgium where it is an everyday session pilsner.


Well, the name does translate to English as Lone Star.

Cheers,

Steve
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 03:21 PM
Dan Iwerks
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

a wrote in :

Hi all,

I have a number of friends who claim that Stella Artois effects them
in an adverse manner.


I suppose forcing your taste buds to interact with Stella counts as an
"adverse manner" in my book.
--
************************************************** ***************
Dan Iwerks thinks that the beer you're drinking probably sucks.
The fundamental problem with Solipsism is it makes me
responsible for the fact that you're a complete idiot.
************************************************** ***************
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 04:09 PM
Joris Pattyn
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

Well, the name does translate to English as Lone Star.

??
"Stella" translates into "star", in Latin (Stella started life as a
Christmas pilsner).
"Artois" is a family name, related to a region in North France-Flanders.

Whence the "lone"?
Joris


  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 06:02 PM
Brian Lundeen
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?


a wrote in message
...

Not sure where most of you come from, but Stella has the nickname
"wifebeater" here in England, due to it's supposed propensity to incite
violence in it's drinkers. Personally, I don't find it effects me any
differently to beers of the same strength.


So, you beat your wife no matter what you drink?

Brian


  #8 (permalink)  
Old 15-07-2004, 06:39 PM
dgs
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

Joris Pattyn wrote:

Well, the name does translate to English as Lone Star.


??
"Stella" translates into "star", in Latin (Stella started life as a
Christmas pilsner).
"Artois" is a family name, related to a region in North France-Flanders.

Whence the "lone"?


It's a joke. "Lone Star" refers to beer from Texas, legendary home
of "Bubba the wife-beater." Bubba gets a little mean and nasty when
he's drunk enough Lone Star beer. He's sort of a notorious Texas
stereotype.
--
dgs

  #9 (permalink)  
Old 16-07-2004, 01:59 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

"st" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:18:01 +0100, a wrote:

Hi all,

I have a number of friends who claim that Stella Artois effects them in

an
adverse manner. Basically, they reckon they get a lot more drunk on

Stella
than on the same amount of any other lager/beer of the same alcohol

content.
Not sure where most of you come from, but Stella has the nickname
"wifebeater" here in England, due to it's supposed propensity to incite
violence in it's drinkers. Personally, I don't find it effects me any
differently to beers of the same strength. Does anyone know if there

really
is anything about it that would make it more potent than other beers? Or

is
it, as I suspect, all in their minds?!


Here in Australia at least, compared to most other standard beers
(local or imported), it has a slightly higher alcohol content. So if
you go 1:1 with a mate or whatever, the bloke drinking Stella would be
more ****ed.

I get really monstrous hangovers after a night on Stella. That,
coupled with the fact that is it horrendously expensive here, makes me
drink it less than I'd like to.


Yes, this is another claim often made - "I get a worse hangover on Stella
than anything else". I can't think of any scientific reason for this so I
suspect it's another figment of their imagination. I asked a friend to
clarify why Stella effects them more today, the answer was along the lines
of "there's some chemical that it's got more of"! I have to agree with all
the posts saying it's a load of rubbish, was hoping someone might suprise me
with a strange fact or stat though...

Also, I didn't realise how unpopular Stella was - have to admit it's usually
my choice of lager in a UK pub (typical draught lager choice is Kronenbourg,
Carling, Grolsch, Stella). This is probably why I hear the evils of the
drink from other people so much!

Cheers,
Dan


  #10 (permalink)  
Old 16-07-2004, 02:00 AM
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?


"Paul Sherwin" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 03:35:53 GMT, "Lew Bryson"
wrote:

Calling Stella "wifebeater" is more a reflection
on the type of guy who drinks Stella than it is on Stella.


That's exactly what I was going to post Lew. It's a 5% beer, so if you
drink 10 pints of it you're going to get drunk, and if you're the sort
of person that gets violent when they're drunk...

BTW, I've never heard Stella called 'wifebeater' here - crap,
expensive etc. are more common terms. It's marketed as a premium beer,


I think "wifebeater" is a northern expression, I say this despite being from
Southampton so am probably wrong! Certainly the majority of people in my age
group (20's) seem to know the 'affectionate' nickname.

Cheers,
Dan


  #11 (permalink)  
Old 16-07-2004, 02:51 AM
Lew Bryson
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

a wrote in message
...
"st" wrote in message
I get really monstrous hangovers after a night on Stella. That,
coupled with the fact that is it horrendously expensive here, makes me
drink it less than I'd like to.


Yes, this is another claim often made - "I get a worse hangover on Stella
than anything else". I can't think of any scientific reason for this so I
suspect it's another figment of their imagination. I asked a friend to
clarify why Stella effects them more today, the answer was along the lines
of "there's some chemical that it's got more of"! I have to agree with all
the posts saying it's a load of rubbish, was hoping someone might suprise

me
with a strange fact or stat though...


Singha often gets accused of having formaldehyde in it. I did a piece on
this (and a few other beer myths) for Beverage Business last year
(http://www.beveragebusiness.com/art98/bryson0603.html), and after talking
to a brewing chemist I know, and the Boon Rawd folks, pretty much figure
that 1)Singha is stronger than most beers in the area at 6%, and 2)Singha is
distinctly hoppier than most "international lagers" like Stella, for
instance. Strange taste from the hops, walloped by the higher alcohol, well,
it can't be the drinker...must be the fooking formaldehyde in the Singha!

Sheesh...

--
Lew Bryson

"As for talking shit in this NG, Lew, you're the undisputed king, and
that's no SHITE." -- Bob Skilnik, 1/31/02

www.lewbryson.com


  #12 (permalink)  
Old 16-07-2004, 04:45 AM
Steve Jackson
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

a wrote in message
...

Yes, this is another claim often made - "I get a worse hangover on Stella
than anything else". I can't think of any scientific reason for this so I
suspect it's another figment of their imagination.


Well, there's nothing I know of in Stella that would cause a worse hangover,
but it's not entirely baseless to say "Beer X gives me a worse hangover."

There are some fermentation by-products that affect some people in such a
fashion to make their hangovers worse. American Budweiser's yeast is
well-known as a prodigious producer of acetaldehyde, which some people react
to in such a way that it worsens their hangover (in fact, it's a chemical
that naturally occurs in hangovers, so more of it certainly isn't going to
help). Certain beers, such as some higher-alcohol Belgian beers (and I'm
talking like 8-12 percent), can have higher levels of fusel alcohols that
some people may also react poorly too.

But, yes, 9 times out of 10, the "I get a worse hangover" claim holds as
much water as the "I get drunker from" claim. And, as I mentioned, to my
knowledge Stella does not have unusual levels of either of those chemicals.

-Steve


  #13 (permalink)  
Old 16-07-2004, 11:16 AM
Paul Sherwin
Usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Stella Artois - adverse effects?

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:59:00 +0100, a wrote:

Also, I didn't realise how unpopular Stella was - have to admit it's usually
my choice of lager in a UK pub (typical draught lager choice is Kronenbourg,
Carling, Grolsch, Stella).


A lot of it gets drunk, and I'd agree that it's probably the best
draught lager available in a typical UK pub. I used to quite like UK
brewed Kronenbourg (nothing to do with the French beers of the same
name) but it's become very nondescript over the last few years.

Most people using this NG tend to be interested in specialist beers
and won't be too sympathetic towards Interbrew industrial beers
whatever they taste like.

Best regards, Paul
--
Paul Sherwin Consulting http://paulsherwin.co.uk
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


fitness forum |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2004-2008 FoodBanter.com, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Loans - Dirty Dozen Brass Band - Credit Card - Electricity Suppliers