![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
"sleurB kciN" wrote in message ... It's bracingly bitter. Beautifully hoppy. Nicely dry. IIRC, I found the 97 Bf to be similarly lovely. The intervening years, though, eh. Discuss. I'm really liking this years batch. I don't detect a radical change. Seems like Bigfoot to me. I've got 2001, 2002 and 2003 years to sample alongside it, but of course they changed character with age and the hoppy blast is subdued. Personally, I like my Bigfoot fresh. Garry |
|
|||
|
I tasted it for the first time this year so I couldn't relate a comparison
to other years but I really enjoyed the 2004 and will now be buying more each year. I like the big hoppy finish and the alcohol bite. How long have they been making Bigfoot? Since SN has been open? "Garry Simmons" wrote in message ... "sleurB kciN" wrote in message ... It's bracingly bitter. Beautifully hoppy. Nicely dry. IIRC, I found the 97 Bf to be similarly lovely. The intervening years, though, eh. Discuss. I'm really liking this years batch. I don't detect a radical change. Seems like Bigfoot to me. I've got 2001, 2002 and 2003 years to sample alongside it, but of course they changed character with age and the hoppy blast is subdued. Personally, I like my Bigfoot fresh. Garry |
|
|||
|
I didn't like it as much when I first bought it, but after not tasting any
for a month or two I had some again and it was pretty amazing. I don't tend to notice much difference between fresh samples of each year, so best ever, eh, who can tell. -- ************************************************** *************** Dan Iwerks thinks that the beer you're drinking probably sucks. The fundamental problem with Solipsism is it makes me responsible for the fact that you're a complete idiot. ************************************************** *************** |
|
|||
|
It's bracingly bitter. Beautifully hoppy. Nicely dry. IIRC,
I still have some 2000 and 2001 in the fridge to try it against sometime, but I can't remember ever being as awed by a huge, overwhelming river of exploding black-liquorice like this one is. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| REQUESTS from Monday, June 28, 2004 | Patricia D. Hill | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 29-06-2004 11:05 PM |
| REQUESTS from Friday, June 25, 2004 | Patricia D. Hill | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 26-06-2004 11:50 PM |
| REQUESTS from Sunday, June 6, 2004 | Patricia D. Hill | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 07-06-2004 02:21 PM |
| REQUESTS from Monday, March 8, 2004 | Patricia D. Hill | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 09-03-2004 02:24 PM |
| REQUESTS from Thursday, February 12, 2004 | Patricia D. Hill | Recipes (moderated) | 0 | 13-02-2004 04:06 PM |