![]() |
|
Welcome to FoodBanter.com forums which provide access to the finest food and drink related newsgroups. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most newsgroup discussions and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics to the food related newsgroups, communicate privately with other FoodBanter.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
|
|||||||
| Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
On Jul 23, 11:35 am, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:40:27 +0100, John Frum wrote (in message ): Ratebeer v. Beer Advocate Which do you reckon is better? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each? TIA Thanks everyone. What I really want to know is which is more authoritative in its ratings. This is all part of research I am doing for a book on US breweries. Neither should be considered authoritative. Rates beer is about the quaint of ratings and ranking beers and establishments while Beer Advocate is more holistic in it's approach to beer and promoting the industry as a whole. It personal preference which community you like. Some people choose to argue about it but I have friends who swear by both. I choose to use each for different purposes. I don't see how this thread would be relevant to your book? Good luck anyway. Cheers! Matt (Phatz) |
|
|||
|
On Jul 21, 4:40 pm, John Frum wrote:
Ratebeer v. Beer Advocate Which do you reckon is better? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each? TIA Difficult to say one is better than the other. Both are resources for information that have different approaches. |
|
|||
|
In rec.food.drink.beer John S. wrote:
On Jul 21, 4:40 pm, John Frum wrote: Ratebeer v. Beer Advocate Which do you reckon is better? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each? TIA Difficult to say one is better than the other. Both are resources for information that have different approaches. Don't really care about either, but when I find a new beer that I care enough about to see if anyone else has found and posted about it somewhere (like about once a year?), I go to ratebeer. To which I went just now, to post (so ****ing sorry about any formatting problems!): --- Zwickel/Keller/Landbier "Three related, minor, lager styles..." Whoops. ObPedanticismThatYou.veHopefullyHeardBeforeElswher eBetterExpressed: First, Zwickelbier. A "Zwickel" is what the sampling tap on a fermenting vat is (informally, usually) called. Zwickelbier as a style, such as what North American beergeeks are typically concerned with at places like ratebeer.com, simply does not exist. There are numerous beers which are marketed as "Zwickelbier", though they.re sold in bottled, kegged, and/or jugged at breweries. Real Zwickelbier is what you get when someone pours you a sample from a fermenting vat. Next, Kellerbier. Beer served at the Keller, the lagering cellar. In Franconia/Franken, it.s usually dug into a tree-covered hillside, which has been used to lager beer for centuries. Little countryside brewers found that people would come to the Keller to buy their beer: To take home, but also to drink there. The latter is more important nowadays, of course, and so Kellerbier just means beer served at the Bierkeller. Most are pale, at least nowadays. Should be basically what beer was back in those days: Unfiltered, poured from kegs hauled up out of the Keller and tapped on the spot. Sorry, the famous "Kellerbier" from St. Georgenbräu no longer seems to qualify, as it.s served under gas--even at the brewery.s own Keller--most probably filtered, and supposedly even colored to make it darker than most other fränkische Kellerbiere. There.s just something missing from St. G.s. Economy of scale, maybe? And...Landbier. Means absolutley nothing--stylistically or otherwise. Simply means "country beer". Can be dark, pale, malty, hoppy, filtered, unfiltered, etc. Says nothing about serving style. Jever or Becks could bottle a "Landbier", and it would be ever bit as authentic as Rittmayer's(Hallendorf)...though the latter.s brewery is actually located in the country. Or at least in a country village. So then...is it really accurate to lump these as "three related, minor, lager styles"? Is it fair to those wanting to learn about obscure "deutsche Biere"? Figure out how to replace the first five words of http://ratebeer.com/ShowStyle.asp?StyleID=74 and then move on to the rest of the verbiage there...and then explain how Victory Braumeister Harvest Pils can even be remotely considered next to such beers as Roppelt.s Kellerbier. Go on, I dare you. Was only motivated to post this because of the sublime, sensory-delighting excellence of the brand new Aufsesser Zwickelbier I picked up in *Bügelflaschen* at the bottle shop yesterday, ironically. Don.t make me post a review... --- TRIED to post that, but couldn't, because I can't bet bothered to keep up with passwords, and they can't be bothered to send my password per Email timely enough. So, discuss. AFA the other webbie goes, yay for them. |
|
|||
|
sleurB kciN .com wrote:
Zwickel/Keller/Landbier "Three related, minor, lager styles..." Whoops. ObPedanticismThatYou.veHopefullyHeardBeforeElswhe reBetterExpressed: Very nice rundown on the "styles" listed. Good on ya. -- Joel Plutchak "They're not people, they're HIPPIES!" $LASTNAME at VERYWARMmail.com - Eric Cartman |