On 2006-08-03, Kevin S Wilson wrote:

I'm going to do you a favor here, son. There are places on the
Interweb called "sites" where you can click on "links" with your
"electronic mouse" in order to look up the meaning of words before you
manage to make yourself look pig-ignorant in public. You can even do
so before looking like a pretentious putz with delusions of adequacy,
presuming to lecture your betters on matters you know little or
nothing about. One such "site" is www.dictionary.com.

I remember a building full of big, papery things that had information
in them. Do you know what they did with it?

--
He could feel the creature inside his mind and taste
its dank, ghastly breath as it breathed through his
mouth. [G.P. Taylor]

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:21:11 -0400, "Otto Bahn"
wrote:

wrote

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:04:22 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

Trust me, Swertz, I hold you in the same regard as I do the many
pig-ignorant racists who hang out here, and have exactly the same
desire to "associate" with you as I do with them -- none. You were
just barely smart enough to keep your mouth shut while your friends
were falling all over themselves to reveal their racist ignorance, but
I've long suspected you sympathize with them and their point of view.

Have those Black Cabal helicopters been buzzing around your home
in the wee hours of the night? If you ask us nicely, we'll ask
them to leave you alone so you can get some needed rest.

Shall I put it to you as a direct question, or will you dodge that,
too?

You certainly weren't among those who publicly chastized the Fat Boi
and the other pig-ignorant racists. One can only draw the obvious
inferrence.

Inferrence? Let's see, he implies and you infer. Seems to me you're the
"one" honing your bone for the "leg hump" here. Perhaps you're misusing
"infer" like many of the pretentiously educated who've been taken beyond
their mental ability and stability.

I'm going to do you a favor here, son. There are places on the
Interweb called "sites" where you can click on "links" with your
"electronic mouse" in order to look up the meaning of words before you
manage to make yourself look pig-ignorant in public. You can even do
so before looking like a pretentious putz with delusions of adequacy,
presuming to lecture your betters on matters you know little or
nothing about. One such "site" is www.dictionary.com.

Seems to me that I'm well within the meanings of your leg humping reachings.
BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

It was a common expression where I grew up in West Virginia.

Prolly equally common wherever D. Winsor was whelped. Well, at least
in the immediate vicinity of his hovel, that is.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:24:36 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:40:46 GMT, Steve Wertz
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:04:22 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

Trust me, Swertz, I hold you in the same regard as I do the many
pig-ignorant racists who hang out here, and have exactly the same
desire to "associate" with you as I do with them -- none. You were
just barely smart enough to keep your mouth shut while your friends
were falling all over themselves to reveal their racist ignorance,
but
I've long suspected you sympathize with them and their point of
view.

Have those Black Cabal helicopters been buzzing around your home
in the wee hours of the night? If you ask us nicely, we'll ask
them to leave you alone so you can get some needed rest.

Shall I put it to you as a direct question, or will you dodge that,
too?

You certainly weren't among those who publicly chastized the Fat Boi
and the other pig-ignorant racists. One can only draw the obvious
inferrence.

Inferrence? Let's see, he implies and you infer. Seems to me you're
the
"one" honing your bone for the "leg hump" here. Perhaps you're misusing
"infer" like many of the pretentiously educated who've been taken beyond
their mental ability and stability.

I'm going to do you a favor here, son. There are places on the
Interweb called "sites" where you can click on "links" with your
"electronic mouse" in order to look up the meaning of words before you
manage to make yourself look pig-ignorant in public. You can even do
so before looking like a pretentious putz with delusions of adequacy,
presuming to lecture your betters on matters you know little or
nothing about. One such "site" is www.dictionary.com.

Seems to me that I'm well within the meanings of your leg humping
reachings.
BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody with
Kevin's booming regularity.

WHOOSH!

Try again, Barbara. Aim lower.

(Careful with this one. He's been giving us lessons in grammar and
semantics lately, stuff that a girl like you is unlikely to know much
about.)

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:32:17 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

snip

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody with
Kevin's booming regularity.

However smart Kevin might or might not be, I think it's fair to say
that not everyone who is as regular as Kevin is as smart as he is.
Even a lot of really dim people know to eat prunes and a lot of fiber
and such.

That's not a bad impression of Kent, AFB's Village Idiot, but you need
to work in the neoligism "rectal orifice" in every other post. He has
this . . . um . . . thing about scatology.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:51:51 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:24:36 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
news:m854d2pge14itroe0ik3eo3i8lkeheo37d@4ax. com...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:40:46 GMT, Steve Wertz
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:04:22 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

Trust me, Swertz, I hold you in the same regard as I do the many
pig-ignorant racists who hang out here, and have exactly the same
desire to "associate" with you as I do with them -- none. You were
just barely smart enough to keep your mouth shut while your friends
were falling all over themselves to reveal their racist ignorance,
but
I've long suspected you sympathize with them and their point of
view.

Have those Black Cabal helicopters been buzzing around your home
in the wee hours of the night? If you ask us nicely, we'll ask
them to leave you alone so you can get some needed rest.

Shall I put it to you as a direct question, or will you dodge that,
too?

You certainly weren't among those who publicly chastized the Fat Boi
and the other pig-ignorant racists. One can only draw the obvious
inferrence.

Inferrence? Let's see, he implies and you infer. Seems to me you're
the
"one" honing your bone for the "leg hump" here. Perhaps you're misusing
"infer" like many of the pretentiously educated who've been taken beyond
their mental ability and stability.

I'm going to do you a favor here, son. There are places on the
Interweb called "sites" where you can click on "links" with your
"electronic mouse" in order to look up the meaning of words before you
manage to make yourself look pig-ignorant in public. You can even do
so before looking like a pretentious putz with delusions of adequacy,
presuming to lecture your betters on matters you know little or
nothing about. One such "site" is www.dictionary.com.

Seems to me that I'm well within the meanings of your leg humping
reachings.
BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody with
Kevin's booming regularity.

WHOOSH!

Duh! That *was* the idea.

Try again, Barbara. Aim lower.

No thanks. He's not my type.

(Careful with this one. He's been giving us lessons in grammar and
semantics lately, stuff that a girl like you is unlikely to know much
about.)

Maybe he's the moron who was giving utterly incorrect grammatical
advice to a friend of mine last weekend. It was so goofy I had a hard
time taking it seriously. Then I remembered Usenet.

BW

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

snip

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody
with
Kevin's booming regularity.

However smart Kevin might or might not be, I think it's fair to say
that not everyone who is as regular as Kevin is as smart as he is.
Even a lot of really dim people know to eat prunes and a lot of fiber
and such.

Yes, and then there's the punny people who like to act like nobody else has
ever had a book or learning in their life. That's the people who go right
past the casually implied meaning to humour their own self-inferred
superiority.

BW

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:24:36 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
news:m854d2pge14itroe0ik3eo3i8lkeheo37d@4ax. com...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:40:46 GMT, Steve Wertz
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:04:22 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

Trust me, Swertz, I hold you in the same regard as I do the many
pig-ignorant racists who hang out here, and have exactly the same
desire to "associate" with you as I do with them -- none. You were
just barely smart enough to keep your mouth shut while your
friends
were falling all over themselves to reveal their racist ignorance,
but
I've long suspected you sympathize with them and their point of
view.

Have those Black Cabal helicopters been buzzing around your home
in the wee hours of the night? If you ask us nicely, we'll ask
them to leave you alone so you can get some needed rest.

Shall I put it to you as a direct question, or will you dodge that,
too?

You certainly weren't among those who publicly chastized the Fat Boi
and the other pig-ignorant racists. One can only draw the obvious
inferrence.

Inferrence? Let's see, he implies and you infer. Seems to me you're
the
"one" honing your bone for the "leg hump" here. Perhaps you're
misusing
"infer" like many of the pretentiously educated who've been taken
beyond
their mental ability and stability.

I'm going to do you a favor here, son. There are places on the
Interweb called "sites" where you can click on "links" with your
"electronic mouse" in order to look up the meaning of words before you
manage to make yourself look pig-ignorant in public. You can even do
so before looking like a pretentious putz with delusions of adequacy,
presuming to lecture your betters on matters you know little or
nothing about. One such "site" is www.dictionary.com.

Seems to me that I'm well within the meanings of your leg humping
reachings.
BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody
with
Kevin's booming regularity.

WHOOSH!

Try again, Barbara. Aim lower.

(Careful with this one. He's been giving us lessons in grammar and
semantics lately, stuff that a girl like you is unlikely to know much
about.)

I'll save formal grammar and semantics for formal papers. Making fools of
ponces is just pig-ignorant sport for me.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the
hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

"D. Winsor" wrote

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody with
Kevin's booming regularity.

However smart Kevin might or might not be, I think it's fair to say
that not everyone who is as regular as Kevin is as smart as he is.
Even a lot of really dim people know to eat prunes and a lot of fiber
and such.

Yes, and then there's the punny people who like to act like nobody else has
ever had a book or learning in their life. That's the people who go right
past the casually implied meaning to humour their own self-inferred
superiority.

Man, this is like casting URL's before swine.

--oTTo--

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:14:07 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

Do you recall a study conducted four or five years ago that found that
incompetent people are largely unaware of their incompetence, and in
fact significantly overestimate their competence?

Just wondering.

I bet you spend a whole lot of time "just wondering". Ever heard of the
word "which"? Boy-oh-boy,writing the likes of "that found that", and you
teach formal writing? I would have more precisely wrote those people
"significantly overestimate their" own "competence if I was trying to fill
the overstuffed persona you are.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the
hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:00:57 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:22:52 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

snip

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

That'd be me, but I ain't the one claiming to be smarter than everybody
with
Kevin's booming regularity.

However smart Kevin might or might not be, I think it's fair to say
that not everyone who is as regular as Kevin is as smart as he is.
Even a lot of really dim people know to eat prunes and a lot of fiber
and such.

Yes, and then there's the punny people who like to act like nobody else has
ever had a book or learning in their life. That's the people who go right
past the casually implied meaning to humour their own self-inferred
superiority.


It's difficult to tell, but I think he's trying to flirt you, Barbara.

Does anyone have a copy of the post before it was translated?

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:10:50 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:14:07 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

Do you recall a study conducted four or five years ago that found that
incompetent people are largely unaware of their incompetence, and in
fact significantly overestimate their competence?

Just wondering.

I bet you spend a whole lot of time "just wondering".

WHOOSH, again!

Ever heard of the
word "which"? Boy-oh-boy,writing the likes of "that found that", and you
teach formal writing?

Oh, my. This is NOT going to be pretty. Brace yourself, Barbara.
Sandra Dee Winsor is fixin' to lecture us on the difference between
restrictive and non-restrictive clauses.

I would have more precisely wrote those people
"significantly overestimate their" own "competence if I was trying to fill
the overstuffed persona you are.

Would you have also figured out how to use quotation marks correctly?

What's your occupation, Sandra? If you tell me, I'll be glad to show
you how these lecturettes on English make you look exceedingly
foolish, ESPECIALLY when directed at me and Barbara.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:20:49 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:10:50 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:14:07 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:01:28 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant".

As far as you could tell.

Do you recall a study conducted four or five years ago that found that
incompetent people are largely unaware of their incompetence, and in
fact significantly overestimate their competence?

Just wondering.

I bet you spend a whole lot of time "just wondering".

WHOOSH, again!

Ever heard of the
word "which"? Boy-oh-boy,writing the likes of "that found that", and you
teach formal writing?

Oh, my. This is NOT going to be pretty. Brace yourself, Barbara.
Sandra Dee Winsor is fixin' to lecture us on the difference between
restrictive and non-restrictive clauses.

I would have more precisely wrote those people
"significantly overestimate their" own "competence if I was trying to fill
the overstuffed persona you are.

Would you have also figured out how to use quotation marks correctly?

What's your occupation, Sandra? If you tell me, I'll be glad to show
you how these lecturettes on English make you look exceedingly
foolish, ESPECIALLY when directed at me and Barbara.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Before you jump all over it, Sandra, I meant to say "Barbara and I."
That's how you would've written it, right?

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked

[www.dictionary.com and stuff]

No cluons were harmed when "Otto Bahn"
wrote:
Some of us still just have access to the usenet.

Is that the thingy what has all the pictures of nekkid chyx? Or is
that IRC?


Mark-You-have-been-slapped-by-a-trout-Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

[snips]

No cluons were harmed when "D. Winsor"
wrote:
BTW, I've hardly ever met anybody who's "pig-ignorant". Why do you
suppose
you meet so many who are by your estimation?

Um, I'm just guessing, but is it because you have so many friends
here?


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:10:50 GMT, "D. Winsor"
wrote:

I would have more precisely wrote

Oops.

BW