Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
I've seen this term several times- what does it mean to spatchcock a
bird? Thanks, JimnGin |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
JimnGin wrote:
> I've seen this term several times- what does it mean to spatchcock a > bird? > > Thanks, > > JimnGin > With poultry shears cut out the backbone. (save it for stock) Place the chicken breast up and mash it down flat. Now you can grill an entire chicken and get it all done properly. Takes less time as well. -- TFM® |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
JimnGin wrote:
> I've seen this term several times- what does it mean to spatchcock a > bird? It's a term some of these guys like for butterflying the chicken. Cut out the backbone, spread it flat. Speeds up cooking time but takes more space and doesn't give a nice whole bird for presentation, if that matters (usually the grub is more important). Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
Steve Wertz wrote:
> On 5 Mar 2006 18:39:28 GMT, "Default User" > > wrote: > > > It's a term some of these guys like for butterflying the chicken. > > Cut out the backbone, spread it flat. Speeds up cooking time but > > takes more space and doesn't give a nice whole bird for > > presentation, if that matters (usually the grub is more important). > > There's really no practical way to grill a whole bird without > spatchcocking. I think it looks much more presentable than > grilling individual pieces, fer sure. Oh sure, for a whole bird in direct heat heat application. For indirect heat, it's not as necessary. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
JimnGin wrote:
> I've seen this term several times- what does it mean to spatchcock a > bird? > > Thanks, > > JimnGin As the others mentioned, you cut out the backbone and spread it open. Then after it's spread open, you make a slit in the cartilage covering the breasbone and you can pop it out. This part was easier than I thought it was going to be, and it makes the bird lie totally flat. This also seems like it would be a logical step in "halving" a chicken, since it seems like it would now be very easy to cut into two symetrical pieces. I think the chicken looks really neat layed flat like this. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:12:05 -0600, Steve Wertz
> wrote: >On 5 Mar 2006 18:39:28 GMT, "Default User" > wrote: > >>It's a term some of these guys like for butterflying the chicken. Cut >>out the backbone, spread it flat. Speeds up cooking time but takes more >>space and doesn't give a nice whole bird for presentation, if that >>matters (usually the grub is more important). > >There's really no practical way to grill a whole bird without >spatchcocking. I think it looks much more presentable than >grilling individual pieces, fer sure. > >-sw Here are directions on spatchcocking with pics: http://tinyurl.com/e8oec -Chef Juke "EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!" www.chefjuke.com |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
Denny Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:53:11 -0800, Chef Juke > > wrote: > >> Here are directions on spatchcocking with pics: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/e8oec > > Thanks for the pic-link, Juke (saved)--but I quibble with some of the > text the "Hints: Don't use smoke - chicken absorbs it REALLY well > and, after 1 hour, you might not like the results." > > eeeek. I *love* the flavor smoke imparts to birds. Problem of course > is to get that and crispy skin. Especially a problem for me, as I > don't have a grill. Vertical watersmoker, yes. Oh well. I can do > w/o the skin. > My K7 has a 8 lb spatchcocked chicken in it with four modest sized chunks of black cherry. I _always_ smoke poultry when it's on the K. Matthew -- What if you arrived at the fountain of youth, only to find dead toddlers floating in the pond? -- John O on AFB |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
Denny Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:53:11 -0800, Chef Juke > > wrote: > > > Here are directions on spatchcocking with pics: > > > > http://tinyurl.com/e8oec > > Thanks for the pic-link, Juke (saved)--but I quibble with some of the > text the "Hints: Don't use smoke - chicken absorbs it REALLY well > and, after 1 hour, you might not like the results." > > eeeek. I love the flavor smoke imparts to birds. Problem of course > is to get that and crispy skin. Especially a problem for me, as I > don't have a grill. Vertical watersmoker, yes. Oh well. I can do > w/o the skin. I tend to agree. I don't use a lot of smoke in this situation, but a small piece of apple wood lends a nice understated flavor to it. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:21:10 -0800, Denny Wheeler
> wrote: >On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:53:11 -0800, Chef Juke > >wrote: > >>Here are directions on spatchcocking with pics: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/e8oec > >Thanks for the pic-link, Juke (saved)--but I quibble with some of the >text the "Hints: Don't use smoke - chicken absorbs it REALLY well >and, after 1 hour, you might not like the results." > >eeeek. I *love* the flavor smoke imparts to birds. Problem of course >is to get that and crispy skin. Especially a problem for me, as I >don't have a grill. Vertical watersmoker, yes. Oh well. I can do >w/o the skin. Uhh... Well, dang it. I just looked at the pics for showing the spatchcocking...didn't actually READ the thing... My Bad. "Smoke GOOD!" -Frankie Stein -Chef Juke "EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!" www.chefjuke.com |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message ... > On 5 Mar 2006 18:39:28 GMT, "Default User" > > wrote: > > >It's a term some of these guys like for butterflying the chicken. Cut > >out the backbone, spread it flat. Speeds up cooking time but takes more > >space and doesn't give a nice whole bird for presentation, if that > >matters (usually the grub is more important). > > There's really no practical way to grill a whole bird without > spatchcocking. I think it looks much more presentable than > grilling individual pieces, fer sure. > > -sw Rotisserie works well but is more work/prep than spatchcocking. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:38:30 -0800, Chef Juke >
wrote: >On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:21:10 -0800, Denny Wheeler > wrote: > >>On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:53:11 -0800, Chef Juke > >>wrote: >> >>>Here are directions on spatchcocking with pics: >>> >>>http://tinyurl.com/e8oec >> >>Thanks for the pic-link, Juke (saved)--but I quibble with some of the >>text the "Hints: Don't use smoke - chicken absorbs it REALLY well >>and, after 1 hour, you might not like the results." >> >>eeeek. I *love* the flavor smoke imparts to birds. Problem of course >>is to get that and crispy skin. Especially a problem for me, as I >>don't have a grill. Vertical watersmoker, yes. Oh well. I can do >>w/o the skin. > > >Uhh... > >Well, dang it. I just looked at the pics for showing the >spatchcocking...didn't actually READ the thing... > >My Bad. > >"Smoke GOOD!" >-Frankie Stein > >-Chef Juke >"EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!" >www.chefjuke.com It seems that hardly anybody does research anymore, Juke. I have posted on Kamado Forum and on the binary group [with pics] about how to spatch a chicken an get crispy skin - it is so easy that now I let my 10-year old Ruglet Unit do it. Mind you she's a pretty good cook. When our 'First Born' [her mother], was that age, she could/did set up a 4 ribber roast beast with all the accompaniments [Yorkshire, gravy, veg & sides], She is an accomplished [but not all that creative - but The Ruglet Unit is Both. We are quite delighted with her. Harry |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
Denny Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:38:35 -0500, "Matthew L. Martin" > > wrote: > >> My K7 has a 8 lb spatchcocked chicken in it with four modest sized >> chunks of black cherry. I _always_ smoke poultry when it's on the K. > > 8!!! pounds??? You sure that isn't a very young turkey? Yes. Perdue roaster chickens range from 6.5 to 8 lbs. The local Hannaford brand roasters run up to 9.5 #. Both are minimally processed, tender and juicy. Whenever the Hannaford brand are on sale (.59-.69 per lb) we stock up the freezer. Matthew -- What if you arrived at the fountain of youth, only to find dead toddlers floating in the pond? -- John O on AFB |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
"Denny Wheeler" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:52:26 -0500, "Matthew L. Martin" > > wrote: > > >Denny Wheeler wrote: > >> On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:38:35 -0500, "Matthew L. Martin" > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> My K7 has a 8 lb spatchcocked chicken in it with four modest sized > >>> chunks of black cherry. I _always_ smoke poultry when it's on the K. > >> > >> 8!!! pounds??? You sure that isn't a very young turkey? > > > >Yes. Perdue roaster chickens range from 6.5 to 8 lbs. The local > >Hannaford brand roasters run up to 9.5 #. Both are minimally processed, > >tender and juicy. Whenever the Hannaford brand are on sale (.59-.69 per > >lb) we stock up the freezer. > > So where's 'local'? I wouldn't mind some of those--but I've never > seen nor heard of such here in the NorthWet. > > -- > -denny- > "Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?" > > "It's come as you are, baby." > > -over the hedge http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...ford%2Cchicken ----------------------------- http://tinyurl.com/jp5nx |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
"Spatchcocking" a chicken.
"Denny Wheeler" > wrote in message news > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:20:57 GMT, "tommy g" > wrote: > >>> >Yes. Perdue roaster chickens range from 6.5 to 8 lbs. The local >>> >Hannaford brand roasters run up to 9.5 #. Both are minimally processed, >>> >tender and juicy. Whenever the Hannaford brand are on sale (.59-.69 per >>> >lb) we stock up the freezer. >>> >>> So where's 'local'? I wouldn't mind some of those--but I've never >>> seen nor heard of such here in the NorthWet. >>> >>> -- >>> -denny- >> >>http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...ford%2Cchicken >>----------------------------- >>http://tinyurl.com/jp5nx > > Well, I suppose Florida may be a hair less local to me--but Maine is > definitely not in my shopping zone. Oh well. > > -- > -denny- > "Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth > unannounced?" > > "It's come as you are, baby." > > -over the hedge I can't remember where I read this, I think it was in a blog, but someone was writing about telling their father-in-law that they were about to spatchcock a chicken to which he replied "Oh yeah? I'm gonna bitchslap a sirloin." I spit beer out of my nose and onto my monitor reading that. Chris |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|