I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.


--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:51:04 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.

Well, that's what killfiles are for, Denny.

I've been ignoring Dank for months now. You'll have to wander over to
alt.religion.kibology to see firsthand the pathetic way he follows me
around, posting follow-ups to everything I post but getting NO
response from anyone. It's sad, I tell you. He's so thoroughly
killfiled there that he might as well not exist.

He doesn't post much in AFB anymore because he's afraid that the
people here are going to learn about his creepy net-stalking and his
willingness to take a Usenet squabble to real life. When he decided to
start humping my leg here once again, I figured I'd do ya'll a favor
and let you know what kind of creepy coward you have in your midst.

'Course, he isn't man enough even to admit that he e-mailed my boss to
complain about me posting to Usenet. That's the truly pathetic part.

Anon wrote:

Hey Anon with not even a sig. Nice to
see you! ;-)



--
Steve

Never read the fine print. There ain't no way you're going to like it.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:25:48 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:

To this observer, repeating this factoid seems more like an attempt to bait
Mr. Kreuger into another unnecessary response.

So I'm responsible for Dank's posts now, huh?

Got it.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:25:48 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:

To this observer, repeating this factoid seems more like an attempt to
bait
Mr. Kreuger into another unnecessary response.

So I'm responsible for Dank's posts now, huh?

Got it.

I said that it seemed like you were attempting to bait Mr. Kreuger. If a
fisherman baits his hook, does he bear any of the responsibility of the fish
biting? If someone intentionally says something provocative, something they
have said before repeatedly, something that has repeatedly evoked a
response, are they at all responsible for the response?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:35:53 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:25:48 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:

To this observer, repeating this factoid seems more like an attempt to
bait
Mr. Kreuger into another unnecessary response.

So I'm responsible for Dank's posts now, huh?

Got it.

I said that it seemed like you were attempting to bait Mr. Kreuger. If a
fisherman baits his hook, does he bear any of the responsibility of the fish
biting? If someone intentionally says something provocative, something they
have said before repeatedly, something that has repeatedly evoked a
response, are they at all responsible for the response?


Bait him? Have you been paying attention? I bait him by being alive.
The creepy putz follows me from group to group, doing NOTHING but
following up to my posts with his sad, pathetic "flames."

Sure, I could ignore him. I've done so for months, and it merely makes
him stamp his feet and wave his arms all the more frantically. Same
with CAL. Every now and then I'll remind CAL that he's a gullible,
homophobic twit, and every now and then I'll remind people following
along at home that Dank is a creepy, sad, pathetic, and impotent Net
k00k.

You don't like it, killfile my posts.

Denny Wheeler wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.


I agree. Kevin Wilson has threatened to turn me in for replying to his
BS by email.

My ISP probably doesn't care but at the same time I can't let him post
his BS lies and not respond.

Dan

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:35:53 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:


"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
. ..

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:25:48 -0500, "Anon"
wrote:


To this observer, repeating this factoid seems more like an attempt to

bait

Mr. Kreuger into another unnecessary response.

So I'm responsible for Dank's posts now, huh?

Got it.

I said that it seemed like you were attempting to bait Mr. Kreuger. If a
fisherman baits his hook, does he bear any of the responsibility of the fish
biting? If someone intentionally says something provocative, something they
have said before repeatedly, something that has repeatedly evoked a
response, are they at all responsible for the response?



Bait him? Have you been paying attention? I bait him by being alive.
The creepy putz follows me from group to group, doing NOTHING but
following up to my posts with his sad, pathetic "flames."

Sure, I could ignore him. I've done so for months, and it merely makes
him stamp his feet and wave his arms all the more frantically. Same
with CAL. Every now and then I'll remind CAL that he's a gullible,
homophobic twit, and every now and then I'll remind people following
along at home that Dank is a creepy, sad, pathetic, and impotent Net
k00k.

You don't like it, killfile my posts.

You haven't ignored me for more than a day or two. Keep on trollin'.
Just do it back at alt.cult.kibology.

"Dan Krueger" wrote in message

but at the same time I can't let him post his BS lies and not respond.

Dan

Sure you can, but evidently don't have the balls to do so. Neither does
Kevin. So the ****ing contest will continue. So far, there are no winners,
but the losers are piling up. Hard to believe that any of you are mature,
educated people.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:37:14 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:51:04 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.

Well, that's what killfiles are for, Denny.

I've been ignoring Dank for months now

But you DON'T ignore him. You bait him.

--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:07:57 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

My ISP probably doesn't care but at the same time I can't let him post
his BS lies and not respond.

Yes. You can. You prefer not to, evidently. That's not the same as
"can't".

(note that I really do NOT care whether or not anything he says about
you--or vice versa--is true.)

--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:07:57 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

Denny Wheeler wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.


I agree. Kevin Wilson has threatened to turn me in for replying to his
BS by email.

I told you to stay out of my mailbox. When you continued to e-mail me,
I told you that you would abide by your ISP's Acceptable Use Policy or
I would call their attention to the fact that you were continuing to
harass me via e-mail, in violation of their AUP.

My ISP probably doesn't care but at the same time I can't let him post
his BS lies and not respond.

If your ISP didn't care, they wouldn't have a provision in their AUP
prohibiting users from harassing others via e-mail.

Go stalk someone else, creep.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:26:37 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:37:14 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:51:04 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.

Well, that's what killfiles are for, Denny.

I've been ignoring Dank for months now

But you DON'T ignore him. You bait him.

So you haven't been paying attention, after all. Google it up. Watch
Dank follow-up to my posts, here and in alt.religion.kibology, solely
to hump my leg. It doesn't matter what I post. I could post a freakin'
recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."

That's what creepy net k00ks do, you know. But don't take my word for
it. Google it, here and in ARK.

Watch
Dank follow-up to my posts, here and in alt.religion.kibology, solely
to hump my leg. It doesn't matter what I post. I could post a freakin'
recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."



wahhhhhhhhh. wahhhhhhhhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message
.. .

"Dan Krueger" wrote in message

but at the same time I can't let him post his BS lies and not respond.

Dan

Sure you can, but evidently don't have the balls to do so. Neither does
Kevin. So the ****ing contest will continue. So far, there are no
winners, but the losers are piling up. Hard to believe that any of you
are mature, educated people.


IAWTP. I've had enough, too and it's filter time.

Jack