"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:07:57 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I agree. Kevin Wilson has threatened to turn me in for replying to his
BS by email.

I told you to stay out of my mailbox. When you continued to e-mail me,
I told you that you would abide by your ISP's Acceptable Use Policy or
I would call their attention to the fact that you were continuing to
harass me via e-mail, in violation of their AUP.

And why do you beg his attention by researching and posting this sort of
threat? Sounds like netk00ker at work to me! ...and you call him a
stalker.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
It doesn't matter what I post.
I could post a freakin' recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."


That's what creepy net k00ks do

Hmm. Children, can you see the irony in this?

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:05:48 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
It doesn't matter what I post.
I could post a freakin' recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."


That's what creepy net k00ks do

Hmm. Children, can you see the irony in this?

In the fact that you do exactly the same thing as Dank? That you've
been doing it for months, even though you are for the most part
ignored? That you managed to become both AFB and ARK's resident
punching bag in the process? Ironic indeed.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:04:25 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:07:57 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I agree. Kevin Wilson has threatened to turn me in for replying to his
BS by email.

I told you to stay out of my mailbox. When you continued to e-mail me,
I told you that you would abide by your ISP's Acceptable Use Policy or
I would call their attention to the fact that you were continuing to
harass me via e-mail, in violation of their AUP.

And why do you beg his attention by researching and posting this sort of
threat? Sounds like netk00ker at work to me! ...and you call him a
stalker.

Researching? Posting? You just look stupid when you are purposely
obtuse.

You know the rules as well as I do: When someone tells you to stay
out of his mailbox, further unsolicited e-mail is harassment. That's
why prohibitions against such harassment are standard in ISP
acceptable use policies. Dank refused to stay out of my mailbox until
I convinced him that it would be in his best interest to do so?

But you knew all of that already, didn't you, obtuse one?

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:05:48 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
It doesn't matter what I post.
I could post a freakin' recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."


That's what creepy net k00ks do

Hmm. Children, can you see the irony in this?

In the fact that you do exactly the same thing as Dank? That you've
been doing it for months, even though you are for the most part
ignored? That you managed to become both AFB and ARK's resident
punching bag in the process? Ironic indeed.

My lord you are delusional. I wonder how many thread that I don't
particiapte in on ARK has 'CAL' mentioned in them? Same with DanK.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:22:25 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:05:48 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
It doesn't matter what I post.
I could post a freakin' recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."


That's what creepy net k00ks do

Hmm. Children, can you see the irony in this?

In the fact that you do exactly the same thing as Dank? That you've
been doing it for months, even though you are for the most part
ignored? That you managed to become both AFB and ARK's resident
punching bag in the process? Ironic indeed.

My lord you are delusional. I wonder how many thread that I don't
particiapte in on ARK has 'CAL' mentioned in them? Same with DanK.

Yep, the two of you have contributed two new synonyms to the English
language, one meaning "dimwit" and the other "creepy, pathetic,
impotent coward," respectively. Or haven't you noticed that your name
and Dank's only come up when someone wishes to draw an unflattering
comparison?

Not all attention is good, sonny.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:04:25 GMT, cl wrote:


And why do you beg his attention by researching and posting this sort of
threat? Sounds like netk00ker at work to me! ...and you call him a
stalker.

Researching? Posting? You just look stupid when you are purposely
obtuse.

You are the one being thick-headed. I guess you knew his ISP and their
AUP already and didn't look it up in order to get him in trouble, didt
yah?


You know the rules as well as I do: When someone tells you to stay
out of his mailbox, further unsolicited e-mail is harassment.

Your continued discussions with him after the fact pretty much negates
your request to him to desist from communications with you. You reppened
that channel.

That's
why prohibitions against such harassment are standard in ISP
acceptable use policies. Dank refused to stay out of my mailbox until
I convinced him that it would be in his best interest to do so?

You realize that your public libel *after your communication to stop
emailing* is greater offence don't you. One that he has all rights to
contact you privately about via whatever medium? That includes email

But you knew all of that already, didn't you, obtuse one?

No Prof. I don't have the mass to contain the mental acuity that posses.
Twinkies have have done you good.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:22:25 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:05:48 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
It doesn't matter what I post.
I could post a freakin' recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."


That's what creepy net k00ks do

Hmm. Children, can you see the irony in this?

In the fact that you do exactly the same thing as Dank? That you've
been doing it for months, even though you are for the most part
ignored? That you managed to become both AFB and ARK's resident
punching bag in the process? Ironic indeed.

My lord you are delusional. I wonder how many thread that I don't
particiapte in on ARK has 'CAL' mentioned in them? Same with DanK.

Yep, the two of you have contributed two new synonyms to the English
language, one meaning "dimwit" and the other "creepy, pathetic,
impotent coward," respectively. Or haven't you noticed that your name
and Dank's only come up when someone wishes to draw an unflattering
comparison?

So you agree to your fitting of your definition of a "creepy net k00k"

Charlie wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:51:04 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

I've seen on-topic stuff from each of you. That's fine. But:

If y'all can't be bothered to grow up and just ignore each other, how
about taking your games to private email, or to alt.tasteless or
someplace where it'd be welcome and/or fit in?

It's become old. Very.


Good work, Denny!

You just had to pick up a stick and whack the nest, didn't ya!

--
Charlie


Don't be too hard on him. If I found a nest of Kevin's I'd whack the ****
out of it as well G


TFM®

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:09:05 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

But you DON'T ignore him. You bait him.

So you haven't been paying attention, after all. Google it up. Watch
Dank follow-up to my posts, here and in alt.religion.kibology, solely
to hump my leg. It doesn't matter what I post. I could post a freakin'
recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."

You're deliberately not getting it. You damnwell know you could
simply ignore anything he says, and not reply/respond. (best way to
ignore what he says, of course, is to not read his posts)

--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:09:29 -0500, Charlie wrote:

Good work, Denny!

You just had to pick up a stick and whack the nest, didn't ya!

Yup.

Is anyone being forced to read this thread?

--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:46:12 -0700, Denny Wheeler
wrote:

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:09:05 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

But you DON'T ignore him. You bait him.

So you haven't been paying attention, after all. Google it up. Watch
Dank follow-up to my posts, here and in alt.religion.kibology, solely
to hump my leg. It doesn't matter what I post. I could post a freakin'
recipe here and he would compulsively, obsessively follow up with an
impotent, illiterate "flame."

You're deliberately not getting it. You damnwell know you could
simply ignore anything he says, and not reply/respond. (best way to
ignore what he says, of course, is to not read his posts)

Let's see if you feel the same way when he starts humping your leg,
e-mailing your boss, etc. Quite likely he will, you know. All it takes
is to be smarter than him, and that ain't exactly difficult.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
news
snip

All it takes is to be smarter than him, and that ain't exactly difficult.


As I was once told, 20% of precious little equals **** all.

Worry not, Kevin, he'll be IM your boss next g

Graeme

"TFM$B%g(B" wrote in message
m...


Don't be too hard on him. If I found a nest of Kevin's I'd whack the ****
out of it as well G


TFM$B%g(B



C'mon, Fat's. Whats the collective term for Kevin's?

It's surely not a nest.

Graeme

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:10:22 +0100, "Graeme...in London"
wrote:


"TFM$B%g(B" wrote in message
om...


Don't be too hard on him. If I found a nest of Kevin's I'd whack the ****
out of it as well G


TFM$B%g(B



C'mon, Fat's. Whats the collective term for Kevin's?

It's surely not a nest.

Far too subtle for this crowd, Graeme.