Dr John wrote:
You are truly amazing. You continue to engage in debate knowing full
well I will reply once again TOP POSTING a message in an attempt to
enlighten you to the folly of your ways.

A simple question:

Who died and left you master of usenet and a.f.b?

Matthew

--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:46:56 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


Dr John wrote:


Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:



On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:



I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?



The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


This is Kevin's MO. He is a legendary troller and very proud of that.


And what are you going to do about it, you impotent little coward?
E-mail my boss again, Dank, to complain about me posting to Usenet?


Yes! To get you "censured or fired". That's the line, right?

cl wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:

Dr John wrote:


Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:



On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:



I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?



The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO.


When did he buy Missouri?

It's an abbreviation for a latin term "mmm-kay"?
But you already knew that.
Pro.

Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.

"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:

Dr John wrote:
You are truly amazing. You continue to engage in debate knowing full
well I will reply once again TOP POSTING a message in an attempt to
enlighten you to the folly of your ways.

A simple question:

Who died and left you master of usenet and a.f.b?

Matthew

Dr. John

Dr John wrote:
Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.


Why are you unable to understand that the group that you seem to want to
participate has, as a long standing custom, rules? One of the rules is
that interspersed posting is preferred. Regular participants in this
group frequently try to get top posters to adopt the rules of the group.
The smart ones do. The others end up talking to themselves because no
one else reads their posts.

It's your choice. Do what you want. With the attitude you are displaying
you will find this ng to be very unresponsive.

HAND

--
Matthew mlmartin@ .com (fill in the blank with user name)

We trained hard, but it seemed every time we were beginning to form up
into teams, we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that
we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising, and a wonderful
method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing
confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.

From Petronii Arbitri Satyricon AD 66 (Attributed to Gaius Petronus, a
Roman General who later committed suicide)

Matthew L. Martin wrote:
Dr John wrote:
Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.


Why are you unable to understand that the group that you seem to want to
participate has, as a long standing custom, rules? One of the rules is
that interspersed posting is preferred. Regular participants in this
group frequently try to get top posters to adopt the rules of the group.
The smart ones do. The others end up talking to themselves because no
one else reads their posts.

It's your choice. Do what you want. With the attitude you are displaying
you will find this ng to be very unresponsive.

HAND

Matthew,
You are writing to someone who claims to have been reading this group
for several years but was disappointed to find that his top posting was
unpopular. Pick smaller words. HTH.

Cam

Cam wrote:
Matthew L. Martin wrote:

Dr John wrote:

Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.


Why are you unable to understand that the group that you seem to want to
participate has, as a long standing custom, rules? One of the rules is
that interspersed posting is preferred. Regular participants in this
group frequently try to get top posters to adopt the rules of the group.
The smart ones do. The others end up talking to themselves because no
one else reads their posts.

It's your choice. Do what you want. With the attitude you are displaying
you will find this ng to be very unresponsive.

HAND


Matthew,
You are writing to someone who claims to have been reading this group
for several years but was disappointed to find that his top posting was
unpopular. Pick smaller words. HTH.


You make good sense.

--
Matthew mlmartin@ .com (fill in the blank with user name)

We trained hard, but it seemed every time we were beginning to form up
into teams, we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that
we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising, and a wonderful
method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing
confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation.

From Petronii Arbitri Satyricon AD 66 (Attributed to Gaius Petronus, a
Roman General who later committed suicide)

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:43:42 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:46:56 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


Dr John wrote:


Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:



On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:



I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?



The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


This is Kevin's MO. He is a legendary troller and very proud of that.


And what are you going to do about it, you impotent little coward?
E-mail my boss again, Dank, to complain about me posting to Usenet?


Yes! To get you "censured or fired". That's the line, right?

Only you know why you e-mailed my boss to complain about me posting to
Usenet, and only you know why you did it more than once after not
getting whatever results your feverish, creepy mind envisioned. You're
just not man enough to even admit that you did it.

And that's what makes you a creepy stalking putz, Dank.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:46:26 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

cl wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:

Dr John wrote:


Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:



On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:



I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?



The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO.


When did he buy Missouri?

It's an abbreviation for a latin term "mmm-kay"?
But you already knew that.
Pro.

Dank is turning on his only defender and best buddy CAL, his only
intellectual equal. Can total meltdown be far behind?

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:22:05 +0100, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:46:26 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

cl wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:

Dr John wrote:


Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:



On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:



I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS
are
engaged in here?



The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they
say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO.


When did he buy Missouri?

It's an abbreviation for a latin term "mmm-kay"?
But you already knew that.
Pro.

Dank is turning on his only defender and best buddy CAL, his only
intellectual equal. Can total meltdown be far behind?


Tuna Cheese Meltdown with side order of coleslaw and fries.
THANKYOUVERYMUCH.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:22:05 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:46:26 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

cl wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:
This is Kevin's MO.


When did he buy Missouri?

It's an abbreviation for a latin term "mmm-kay"?
But you already knew that.
Pro.

Dank is turning on his only defender and best buddy CAL, his only
intellectual equal. Can total meltdown be far behind?

So dank's willing to stomp on CAL to let us know -- what? That he's
stupid (we already know that)? That he's got no supporters, even the
lurkers (we already know that)? That at posting, he's no Pro (we
already know that, too)? Pathetic and feeble, yes, but no Pro.

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"McGonnell, welcome to Plonksville, population: You" -- Stacia

"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:
Dr John wrote:
Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.

I did. Last week.

Why are you unable to understand that the group that you seem to want to
participate has, as a long standing custom, rules? One of the rules is
that interspersed posting is preferred. Regular participants in this
group frequently try to get top posters to adopt the rules of the group.
The smart ones do. The others end up talking to themselves because no
one else reads their posts.

It's your choice. Do what you want. With the attitude you are displaying
you will find this ng to be very unresponsive.

I only read his posts when SOMEONE ELSE quotes them. ;-))

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

"Cam" wrote:
Matthew L. Martin wrote:
Dr John wrote:
[ . . . ]

Matthew,
You are writing to someone who claims to have been reading this group
for several years but was disappointed to find that his top posting was
unpopular. Pick smaller words. HTH.

LMAO Good one, Cam!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:46:26 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


cl wrote:


Dan Krueger wrote:


Dr John wrote:



Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:




On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:




I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?




The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO.


When did he buy Missouri?

It's an abbreviation for a latin term "mmm-kay"?
But you already knew that.
Pro.


Dank is turning on his only defender and best buddy CAL, his only
intellectual equal. Can total meltdown be far behind?

Notice the crosspost. Now the morons arrive...

Nice job, Kevin. Get back to the "real world" and earn your freakin'
paycheck.

"Cam" wrote in message
ups.com...

Matthew L. Martin wrote:
Dr John wrote:
Who died and left you witless. I am not attempting to control
anything. I simply defend myself from attacks. Have you once seen me
demand that bottom posting be banned? Perhaps you should add me to
your kill file as well. Of course you won't be able to inspire any
more post on my part if you do.


Why are you unable to understand that the group that you seem to want to
participate has, as a long standing custom, rules? One of the rules is
that interspersed posting is preferred. Regular participants in this
group frequently try to get top posters to adopt the rules of the group.
The smart ones do. The others end up talking to themselves because no
one else reads their posts.

Apparently enough of them read these posts to comment endlessly on how
"wrong" they are.

I have to admit, it seems most anything of even a very small amount of
insignificance is enough to generate an endless diatribe by many of the
"regulars" here. When are you people going to learn that your chains are
just being yanked for the fun of it? Man, I wish I could find trout as
eager to take the bait. . .