You are a gentleman and a scholar.

"CS" wrote:

Forever based on past behavior...

Welcome to afb, BTW. . . I see you've already met some of its "luminaries"


"Dr John" wrote in message
.. .
Or read it the way it was written. If you don't like it don't read my
posts. Please read the subject. You have been warned. If you attack
me I will respond. I wonder how long this will last?

Steve Calvin wrote:

Dr John wrote:
Then I won't bother posting again.

bwt: You suck as well

Steve Calvin wrote:


Dr John wrote:

Have some plates made to cover the flames and diffuse the heat. I
have plans available if you are interested.


I know that this has been beat to death, but *please* check out the FAQ
for the group (http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en)

Top posting sux.


Dr. John


Gee, try and read this from the top down, as a "normal" person would
read and see if it makes sense.

Dr. John



Dr. John

You'll find some good info here, but you have to wade through a swamp of
childish banter at times to get to it. If you don't know how to use filters
in your newsreader, you should learn. Then make liberal use of them on
those who spend more time attempting to police your "bad behavior" than
providing anything of substance. You've already identified your first
entries and with a little bit of effort you can read this group and enjoy
its content and not even see the schoolyard kicking and screaming and foot
stomping.


"Dr John" wrote in message
...
You are a gentleman and a scholar.

"CS" wrote:

Forever based on past behavior...

Welcome to afb, BTW. . . I see you've already met some of its "luminaries"


"Dr John" wrote in message
. ..
Or read it the way it was written. If you don't like it don't read my
posts. Please read the subject. You have been warned. If you attack
me I will respond. I wonder how long this will last?

Steve Calvin wrote:

Dr John wrote:
Then I won't bother posting again.

bwt: You suck as well

Steve Calvin wrote:


Dr John wrote:

Have some plates made to cover the flames and diffuse the heat. I
have plans available if you are interested.


I know that this has been beat to death, but *please* check out the
FAQ
for the group (http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en)

Top posting sux.


Dr. John


Gee, try and read this from the top down, as a "normal" person would
read and see if it makes sense.

Dr. John



Dr. John

I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post. The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.

"CS" wrote:

You'll find some good info here, but you have to wade through a swamp of
childish banter at times to get to it. If you don't know how to use filters
in your newsreader, you should learn. Then make liberal use of them on
those who spend more time attempting to police your "bad behavior" than
providing anything of substance. You've already identified your first
entries and with a little bit of effort you can read this group and enjoy
its content and not even see the schoolyard kicking and screaming and foot
stomping.


"Dr John" wrote in message
.. .
You are a gentleman and a scholar.

"CS" wrote:

Forever based on past behavior...

Welcome to afb, BTW. . . I see you've already met some of its "luminaries"


"Dr John" wrote in message
...
Or read it the way it was written. If you don't like it don't read my
posts. Please read the subject. You have been warned. If you attack
me I will respond. I wonder how long this will last?

Steve Calvin wrote:

Dr John wrote:
Then I won't bother posting again.

bwt: You suck as well

Steve Calvin wrote:


Dr John wrote:

Have some plates made to cover the flames and diffuse the heat. I
have plans available if you are interested.


I know that this has been beat to death, but *please* check out the
FAQ
for the group (http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en)

Top posting sux.


Dr. John


Gee, try and read this from the top down, as a "normal" person would
read and see if it makes sense.

Dr. John



Dr. John



Dr. John

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:58:02 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

No, sir it was you who hurled the first insult saying my post sucked,

He said no such thing, as anyone reading above the 6th-grade level can
attest. He said, "Top posting sux." That is a comment on the practice
of top-posting, not a comment on your post. That your post was
top-posted means only that it is an example of a practice he dislikes.

But you knew that already, didn't you?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?

The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?

Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?

The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?

Dr. John

Spin it as you wish, I am simply responding in kind. When you finish
the 6th grade I am sure you will understand too. See, responding in
kind. Gee have you now created two top posting threads?

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:58:02 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

No, sir it was you who hurled the first insult saying my post sucked,

He said no such thing, as anyone reading above the 6th-grade level can
attest. He said, "Top posting sux." That is a comment on the practice
of top-posting, not a comment on your post. That your post was
top-posted means only that it is an example of a practice he dislikes.

But you knew that already, didn't you?

Dr. John

Spin it any way you wish, I was just responding in kind. When you
finish the 6th grade maybe you will understand. See, responding in
kind. Gee, it looks like you have started a second top posting
thread. lol

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:58:02 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

No, sir it was you who hurled the first insult saying my post sucked,

He said no such thing, as anyone reading above the 6th-grade level can
attest. He said, "Top posting sux." That is a comment on the practice
of top-posting, not a comment on your post. That your post was
top-posted means only that it is an example of a practice he dislikes.

But you knew that already, didn't you?

Dr. John

Dr John wrote:

Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:


On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:


I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?


The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO. He is a legendary troller and very proud of that.

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:21:28 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

Then I won't bother posting again.

bwt: You suck as well

Steve Calvin wrote:

Dr John wrote:
Have some plates made to cover the flames and diffuse the heat. I
have plans available if you are interested.


I know that this has been beat to death, but *please* check out the FAQ
for the group (http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en)

Top posting sux.

Dr. John


Given your attitude, it's not surprising you showed yourself to be a
liar.

Steve didn't say that you suck--he said top posting does. Which, in a
group that prefers interspersed/inline replying, it does. You chose
to take offense and hand out insults. Your privilege--but you're
either in, or very near to being in, a lot of killfiles already.


--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:46:56 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

Dr John wrote:

Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:


On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:


I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?


The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


This is Kevin's MO. He is a legendary troller and very proud of that.

And what are you going to do about it, you impotent little coward?
E-mail my boss again, Dank, to complain about me posting to Usenet?

Dan Krueger wrote:

Dr John wrote:

Simply responding to your taunts. You seem to be so intensely
interested in what I have to say.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:


On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:24:53 GMT, Dr John
wrote:


I know what you mean. I have been reading messages here for several
years. Most threads lose all content value by the 3rd or 4th post.

As opposed to the top-posted, content-filled love fest you and CS are
engaged in here?


The
pathetic thing is these guys they think I really care what they say.


Now don't go contradicting yourself by responding, mmm-kay?


Dr. John


This is Kevin's MO.

When did he buy Missouri?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:05:01 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

Spin it as you wish, I am simply responding in kind. When you finish
the 6th grade I am sure you will understand too. See, responding in
kind. Gee have you now created two top posting threads?

Let's see. I clarified. Kevin did. You continue to claim
'responding in kind.' Bye.

plonk
--
-denny-
"Do your thoughts call ahead or do they just arrive at your mouth unannounced?"

"It's come as you are, baby."

-over the hedge

And I clarified. Bye.
I don't plonk

Denny Wheeler wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:05:01 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

Spin it as you wish, I am simply responding in kind. When you finish
the 6th grade I am sure you will understand too. See, responding in
kind. Gee have you now created two top posting threads?

Let's see. I clarified. Kevin did. You continue to claim
'responding in kind.' Bye.

plonk

Dr. John

You are truly amazing. You continue to engage in debate knowing full
well I will reply once again TOP POSTING a message in an attempt to
enlighten you to the folly of your ways. If you say my post sucks, I
take it as an insult. If you simply ask me to refrain from top posting
I will react differently. Add me to your kill file if you wish, but
in the future I will seek out your posts. I find them very
entertaining. Of course if I am in your kill file you won't know what
comments I make about you. Think about it if you dare. lol

Denny Wheeler wrote:

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:21:28 GMT, Dr John
wrote:

Then I won't bother posting again.

bwt: You suck as well

Steve Calvin wrote:

Dr John wrote:
Have some plates made to cover the flames and diffuse the heat. I
have plans available if you are interested.


I know that this has been beat to death, but *please* check out the FAQ
for the group (http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en)

Top posting sux.

Dr. John


Given your attitude, it's not surprising you showed yourself to be a
liar.

Steve didn't say that you suck--he said top posting does. Which, in a
group that prefers interspersed/inline replying, it does. You chose
to take offense and hand out insults. Your privilege--but you're
either in, or very near to being in, a lot of killfiles already.

Dr. John