TFM® wrote:


To quote Mel Brooks, "Up yours, ******"


While that is from a Mel Brooks movie, the odds are very good that that
line was written by Richard Pryor.

Matthew

--
Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game
You can't win
You can't break even
You can't get out of the game

"Chef Juke" wrote in message
...


The above rant is just my 2 cents worth. You go on and do what you
want.

-Chef Juke
"EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!"
www.chefjuke.com

-- You're a good man Pat.
James A. "Big Jim" Whitten

www.lazyq.com

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:26:54 GMT, "TFM®"
wrote:

To quote Mel Brooks, "Up yours, ******"

Thanks for making my case for me, racist.


No problem, Cumblossom. Lemme know anytime you need help.

TFM®

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:24:13 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:01:07 -0700, Chef Juke
wrote:


I really don't much care about intention. I've had it with ... all the other self-important bozos who think that
they have some sort of God-given right to shove their message down our
throats. ...Quit hollerin' at me

Um, Kevin?

Of the 62 posts in this thread, the original poster made 6 posts,
while you have made over twice as many (13). In comparing those posts
I think it fair to say that any impartial observer would find yours to
be far more agressive, negative and some (including a number of the
A.F.B. regualars who have responded, offensive.

In your messages to both to the original poster and to those who you
disagree with you repeatedly make assumptions about their INTENT
(which you say you don't care about) and use these assumptions to
bolster your arguments against them:
For example:

KEVIN: "You think that your message is so important that you can
ignore prohibitions against spamming, including those in your ISP's
Acceptable Use Policy"

Do you really think that the original poster was both aware of and
intentionally disregarding their ISPs Acceptable Use Policy?


You often resort to name calling ("self-important bozos", "racist",
"ignorant racist" "WebTVe", "You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little
man.", etc.), yet chastise other when they resort to the same.

It also seems that as threads you are involved in get longer, your
statements in them become more pedantic - you start focusing on a
minot point ( that someone did not answer one of your questions)
rather than the overarching point of the thread.

If the whole intent of your posts with this recurring theme (pointing
out to people that they are spammers) is to educate people to the
error of their ways, as indicated in your eigth post in this
particular thread:

"It really is simple: You're spamming. "

...then I have just one question for you.:

Couldn't you find a more constructive way to do it?

You have repeatedly chastised those who take you to task for your
approach and have repeatedly been hypocritical in doing so. You have
ridiculed those you consider "ignorant" rather than attempt to
constructively educate them.

Finally, based on the years of such threads, is seems clear to me that
ultimately, you simply don't care to engage with others in a
reasonable, respectful manner, especially if they have said or
implied something that you disagree with, or if you deem them somehow
'less' than you (ignorant, racist, etc.).

To me, that seems like a truer form of ignorance than unintentionally
breaking one's ISP Acceptable use policy while trying to help people


-Chef Juke
"EVERYbody Eats When They Come To MY House!"
www.chefjuke.com

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:29:16 GMT, "TFM®"
wrote:

But anyway, before I start sounding too sissyfied, you ever been to the deep
piney woods of Georgia?

Ain't nothin' but rednecks and bigfoot living in there.


Roll Tide biatch,
TFM®


You ain't talking bout Bob and Ginger are you! G
Bruce

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:29:16 GMT, "TFM®"
wrote:

But anyway, before I start sounding too sissyfied, you ever been to the
deep
piney woods of Georgia?

Ain't nothin' but rednecks and bigfoot living in there.


Roll Tide biatch,
TFM®


You ain't talking bout Bob and Ginger are you! G
Bruce


Dammit man. That's all that's living *around* them, I should have said.

Standing corrected,
TFM®

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:57:50 -0700, Chef Juke
wrote:

big snip

You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.

That would be Dan Krueger, a sad, pathetic, creepy little man who has
e-mailed my boss repeatedly in an impotent attempt to get me censured
or fired for posting to Usenet. If ever anyone deserved those
appelations, it's Dan Krueger.

As for the rest of your post, I guess that's why newsreaders come with
killfiles. You don't have to read what I post. Nobody does.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:12:59 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson
wrote:

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:57:50 -0700, Chef Juke
wrote:

big snip

You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.

That would be Dan Krueger, a sad, pathetic, creepy little man who has
e-mailed my boss repeatedly in an impotent attempt to get me censured
or fired for posting to Usenet. If ever anyone deserved those
appelations, it's Dan Krueger.

As for the rest of your post, I guess that's why newsreaders come with
killfiles. You don't have to read what I post. Nobody does.


I am just curious. Is your boss your 'father figure' or your 'mother
figure'?

"kilikini" wrote:
wrote in message
...
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On 16 Sep 2005 22:46:42 GMT, wrote:

Are you calling me 'Bubba'? Is that meant as some kind of racial
slur?

DYOFHW.

You know nothing of my true color or colors, you pathetic excuse
for an intellectual and moral giant. "Niggah, ef'n yo is talkin'
tuh me, Ah ain' liss'nin'."

That's actually a quote from C. Himes in Black on Black, 1937.

Keep digging that hole, Bubba.

Yassuh,Marsa. I's diggin'! N' when I gets it deep enuff, I's gonna
stick yo in it wif jes' yo head stickin' out 'n den we's gonna play
bowlin'! Yu'd bes' be reddy ta shake yo moneymaka, honky mofo!

Ten years of living and playing with Black Folk had more value than just
this. My black daughter was laughing like Hell at Kevie and the thread.

Nick, it's funny. Normally I'd have to read what you wrote kind of
slowly to sound it out, but I've been addicted to Alex Haley's book,
Roots, for the past week and your sentences just flew off my monitor.
Did you ever read Roots? It is a wonderful story; extremely well written
- although I've heard that it's not all that factual. I don't know or
care, it's a wonderful read.

Saw the movie (on TV?), never read the book.

I'm planning to kf Kevvie again today. "It was great fun, but it was just
one . . . of those things!"

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
"TFM®" wrote:

To quote Mel Brooks, "Up yours, ******"

Thanks for making my case for me, racist.

Ho hum.

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

Chef Juke wrote:
Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
Chef Juke wrote:

I really don't much care about intention. I've had it with ... all the
other self-important bozos who think that they have some sort of
God-given right to shove their message down our throats. ...Quit
hollerin' at me

Um, Kevin?

Of the 62 posts in this thread, the original poster made 6 posts,
while you have made over twice as many (13). In comparing those posts
I think it fair to say that any impartial observer would find yours to
be far more agressive, negative and some (including a number of the
A.F.B. regualars who have responded, offensive.

In your messages to both to the original poster and to those who you
disagree with you repeatedly make assumptions about their INTENT
(which you say you don't care about) and use these assumptions to
bolster your arguments against them:
For example:

KEVIN: "You think that your message is so important that you can
ignore prohibitions against spamming, including those in your ISP's
Acceptable Use Policy"

Do you really think that the original poster was both aware of and
intentionally disregarding their ISPs Acceptable Use Policy?

You often resort to name calling ("self-important bozos", "racist",
"ignorant racist" "WebTVe", "You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little
man.", etc.), yet chastise other when they resort to the same.

It also seems that as threads you are involved in get longer, your
statements in them become more pedantic - you start focusing on a
minot point ( that someone did not answer one of your questions)
rather than the overarching point of the thread.

If the whole intent of your posts with this recurring theme (pointing
out to people that they are spammers) is to educate people to the
error of their ways, as indicated in your eigth post in this
particular thread:

"It really is simple: You're spamming. "

..then I have just one question for you.:

Couldn't you find a more constructive way to do it?

You have repeatedly chastised those who take you to task for your
approach and have repeatedly been hypocritical in doing so. You have
ridiculed those you consider "ignorant" rather than attempt to
constructively educate them.

Finally, based on the years of such threads, is seems clear to me that
ultimately, you simply don't care to engage with others in a
reasonable, respectful manner, especially if they have said or
implied something that you disagree with, or if you deem them somehow
'less' than you (ignorant, racist, etc.).

To me, that seems like a truer form of ignorance than unintentionally
breaking one's ISP Acceptable use policy while trying to help people

Big Jim said it better, but I'm proud to know you Chef Juke!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
Chef Juke wrote:
big snip
You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.
[crying snipped]
As for the rest of your post, I guess that's why newsreaders come with
killfiles. You don't have to read what I post. Nobody does.

You're finally right about something, Kevvie. One week of toying with you
has reminded me of why I kf'd you last year. So back ya go. Don't bother
replying. You really are gone and I won't see anymore of your
egocentricities.

Behind your sham chivalry, I contend, lurk some nasty tendencies to sadism,
egocentricity, rebellion and neurosis. Hopefully, someday, you will grow
out of your egocentrism, observe other players, gradually begin to
co-operate with others, and finally in conjunction with a group arrive at a
reciprocal agreement embodying definite rules of play.

'Til then, vaya con Dios!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:57:50 -0700, Chef Juke
wrote:

big snip

You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.


That would be Dan Krueger, a sad, pathetic, creepy little man who has
e-mailed my boss repeatedly in an impotent attempt to get me censured
or fired for posting to Usenet. If ever anyone deserved those
appelations, it's Dan Krueger.

As for the rest of your post, I guess that's why newsreaders come with
killfiles. You don't have to read what I post. Nobody does.

Nice diversion, or nice try I guess. Your buddies in ARK didn't believe
it so you finally dropped it there. Why would you think anyone here
would believe it? Go away, Skippy.

wrote


You're finally right about something, Kevvie. One week of toying with you
has reminded me of why I kf'd you last year. So back ya go. Don't bother
replying. You really are gone and I won't see anymore of your
egocentricities.

Behind your sham chivalry, I contend, lurk some nasty tendencies to
sadism,
egocentricity, rebellion and neurosis. Hopefully, someday, you will grow
out of your egocentrism, observe other players, gradually begin to
co-operate with others, and finally in conjunction with a group arrive at
a
reciprocal agreement embodying definite rules of play.

'Til then, vaya con Dios!



Goddamn, Nick! Did you write that or pla.....steal it?

Pretty good, you ol' bastid;.
Gotta go, I feel Cumblossom humpin' my leg again.

Spurting,
TFM®

TFM® wrote:
Goddamn, Nick! Did you write that or pla.....steal it?


I think he got it from Vince Lombardi.eg

--
The High Honorable Reverend
Fosco Gamgee Wooaaa.... hahaa... Whitfurrows
and his 6" stoner


--Weddings performed for a nominal fee.
--Beer or magic shrooms accepted in lieu of cash payment
ROFL!