On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:42:07 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

I guess the answer is "because you say so". Doesn't work for me, big boy.

Where's the lie? You are backpedalling now, pro.

I'm done with you, Dank. You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.
You are to be pitied, if only because you are too cowardly and
immature to take responsibility for your actions.

These are the facts:

1. Over the course of the past few months, my boss has been receiving
e-mail complaining about me posting to Usenet. In telling me about the
e-mails, he said, "You have another stalker."

2. The other day, with no prompting from me, and without recourse to
Google or Usenet, my boss referred to you by name, saying, "What did
you do to **** off this Dan Krueger guy? He still sends me stuff you
post to Usenet."

Those are the facts, Dank, whether you can screw up the courage to
admit to them or not. I don't have to prove anything to you or anyone
looking on; you and I know the facts, and those looking on can draw
their own conclusions.

You and I both know that you e-mailed my boss to try to get me
censured or fired. That your pathetic, creepy attempt failed is merely
more evidence of your impotence. That you continue to deny it is
testimony to your cowardice and immaturity.

Go stalk somebody else, creep. You never were worth my time.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:42:07 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I guess the answer is "because you say so". Doesn't work for me, big boy.

Where's the lie? You are backpedalling now, pro.


I'm done with you, Dank. You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.
You are to be pitied, if only because you are too cowardly and
immature to take responsibility for your actions.

Done? Good (but I doubt it). It's about freakin time, big boy. Pity me
all you want. I never complained to your boss.

These are the facts:

"facts" - funny!

1. Over the course of the past few months, my boss has been receiving
e-mail complaining about me posting to Usenet. In telling me about the
e-mails, he said, "You have another stalker."

"Another"? Guess I missed that one the last 40 times you posted this
garbage. Better check some headers, pro.

2. The other day, with no prompting from me, and without recourse to
Google or Usenet, my boss referred to you by name, saying, "What did
you do to **** off this Dan Krueger guy? He still sends me stuff you
post to Usenet."

"The other day"? You posted this weeks ago. Keep your story straight
if you want to be a model troller.

Those are the facts, Dank, whether you can screw up the courage to
admit to them or not. I don't have to prove anything to you or anyone
looking on; you and I know the facts, and those looking on can draw
their own conclusions.

"Facts" and "I don't have to prove anything". Interesting since you
would be the only one who *could* prove anything. Let's say I emailed
something, anything, to your brother Bubba. How could *I* prove I
didn't send it. More F'd up logic from a moron.

You and I both know that you e-mailed my boss to try to get me
censured or fired. That your pathetic, creepy attempt failed is merely
more evidence of your impotence. That you continue to deny it is
testimony to your cowardice and immaturity.

Blah, blah, blah... Come up with a new one already.

Go stalk somebody else, creep. You never were worth my time.

Really? You spent hours on this. Unless you can type 300 wpm and read
hundreds of Google archives in a few minutes. I know you think you are
better than everyone else but there is reality you know.

In article .net, Dan
Krueger wrote:

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

Those are the facts, Dank, whether you can screw up the courage to
admit to them or not. I don't have to prove anything to you or anyone
looking on; you and I know the facts, and those looking on can draw
their own conclusions.

"Facts" and "I don't have to prove anything". Interesting since you
would be the only one who *could* prove anything. Let's say I emailed
something, anything, to your brother Bubba. How could *I* prove I
didn't send it. More F'd up logic from a moron.

Forget the logic and look at the reality. The burden of proof is on
Wilson and he can't bear it. All he has to do is post one these
nefarious emails. He can elide his boss/friend's identifying
information while leaving your's apparent, offering some sort of proof.


You and I both know that you e-mailed my boss to try to get me
censured or fired. That your pathetic, creepy attempt failed is merely
more evidence of your impotence. That you continue to deny it is
testimony to your cowardice and immaturity.

Blah, blah, blah... Come up with a new one already.

You're wasting your time, Krueger. It seems to me that while Wilson has
no proof of his accusation, he does have a reputation for lying
(trolling if you will) that precedes his silly charge. The best he
might come up with would most likely be just another falsehood.

Go stalk somebody else, creep. You never were worth my time.

Really? You spent hours on this. Unless you can type 300 wpm and read
hundreds of Google archives in a few minutes. I know you think you are
better than everyone else but there is reality you know.

Ah, reality. There you go, Krueger. You've provided an artful defense
to Wilson's slovenly indictment. He is clearly a slow thinker. He made
charges that would be easy to prove if true, and yet he offers no
proof.

Nevertheless, I don't believe he thinks himself better than everyone
else. Quite the opposite, actually. It appears that Mr. Wilson doesn't
like himself very much at all.

Evan
--

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:42:07 GMT, Dan Krueger wrote:

I guess the answer is "because you say so". Doesn't work for me, big
boy.

Where's the lie? You are backpedalling now, pro.

I'm done with you, Dank. You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little man.
You are to be pitied, if only because you are too cowardly and
immature to take responsibility for your actions.

These are the facts:

1. Over the course of the past few months, my boss has been receiving
e-mail complaining about me posting to Usenet. In telling me about the
e-mails, he said, "You have another stalker."

2. The other day, with no prompting from me, and without recourse to
Google or Usenet, my boss referred to you by name, saying, "What did
you do to **** off this Dan Krueger guy? He still sends me stuff you
post to Usenet."

Those are the facts, Dank, whether you can screw up the courage to
admit to them or not. I don't have to prove anything to you or anyone
looking on; you and I know the facts, and those looking on can draw
their own conclusions.

You and I both know that you e-mailed my boss to try to get me
censured or fired. That your pathetic, creepy attempt failed is merely
more evidence of your impotence. That you continue to deny it is
testimony to your cowardice and immaturity.

Go stalk somebody else, creep. You never were worth my time.

Perhaps he was just trying to show them how they have been duped by Dr.
Jekyll and that you're really Mr. Hyde at heart. Have no fear, the poison
in your soul will eventually reveal you to them, even without our help. I
won't bother. I'll just be 'como tabano sobre caballo'!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !

On 14 Sep 2005 02:02:10 GMT, wrote:

Perhaps

slap!

You've crowed dozens of times that you have me killfiled. Turns out
you've been reading each of my posts all along. Why is that?

Have a nice warm cup of Olvaltine, gramps. You need a rest.

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On 14 Sep 2005 02:02:10 GMT, wrote:

Perhaps

slap!

You've crowed dozens of times that you have me killfiled. Turns out
you've been reading each of my posts all along. Why is that?


I tune my wife out sometimes, what is your point?

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:54:21 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On 14 Sep 2005 02:02:10 GMT, wrote:

Perhaps

slap!

You've crowed dozens of times that you have me killfiled. Turns out
you've been reading each of my posts all along. Why is that?


I tune my wife out sometimes, what is your point?

You misspelled "turn."

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:54:21 GMT, cl wrote:



"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

On 14 Sep 2005 02:02:10 GMT, wrote:

Perhaps

slap!

You've crowed dozens of times that you have me killfiled. Turns out
you've been reading each of my posts all along. Why is that?


I tune my wife out sometimes, what is your point?

You misspelled "turn."

I guess that is better than misspeelling "eat."

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
On 14 Sep 2005 02:02:10 GMT, wrote:

Perhaps

slap!

You've crowed dozens of times that you have me killfiled. Turns out
you've been reading each of my posts all along. Why is that?

Have a nice warm cup of Olvaltine, gramps. You need a rest.

Turns out that after I kf'd you, I only read the parts of your posts that
were quoted by others. I just un-kf'd you the other day, because I need a
rest, but your ego probably won't let you accept the truth this time
either.

BTW That's twice you've mentioned Ovaltine. SPAMming, Mr. Hyde? LMAO

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !